I've just seen this shit

This is the ebst film I have ever seen in my entire life.

Masterfully though-out and executed. Beautifull, haunting, sexy, mind-blowing. Perrformances, script, the visuals, the score. Honestly it's an instant classic, 100%, 10/10, certified fresh meme.

I am convinced that there's no point in ever watching another film because this is the last film you need to see.

This is what you associate with the word "film". As far as film go, there's some irrelevant shit, and the FILM. Blade Runner 2049

Do they show any tits?

yes

The plot was really weak though, if it wasn't for Deakins and Memeneuve it would never have stood for itself.

The plot is strong enough, and it asks some big questions and doesn't fall flat.

Hell, there a dozen scenes in this film that if another movie had it we would be saying you need to see it just for that one scene.

Example

literally the case for everythign villeneuve has done bar incendies

Plot was weak? Was better constructed than the original desu

the three way sex scene
Vegas sequence
the K-luv fight at the end
the opening fight between K and Sapper Morton

As amazing as Wallace and Luv's scenes are, I found the overall motivation of the villains somewhat under developed.

This, the original plot is a mess, but it stunning to look at and has a great soundtrack.

2049 actually has a b+ plot that gets elevated. Did feel like a marathon

Luv was amazing.

wallace was Leto chewing scenery, which in most films is a strong point, but was a weakest link in this film

Is the movie pretty violent?

Like the original, it doesn't have too many violent sequences, but when it does it it masterful and very very violent.

Of course, my wife thought Joi death was the most violent, even if it didn't have one bit of blood.

I loved it. I also feel like the plot calls out for another movie but I could do without it as I fear it would be an action flick.

best sci fi movie of the last 10+ years desu

That whole resistance was just there for a possible sequel and was the weakest part of the film.

There won't be a sequel

>The people who shat out the Emoji Movie won't want to push a sequel to this high acclaimed film which will also probably be a box office success

I hope it is a success, as it a long movie that not everyone going to like and might not have enough explosions for folks.

>There won't be a sequel

Joi was literally what K wanted to see and hear. He was desperate to be something higher, to have soul and a bigger purpose, so she spent their entire life telling him exactly that. That he was special and meant for great things.
In the end, when it turns out that he's a nobody. A red-herring that history won't remember, he at least manages to make a difference by saving Deckard.
The movie took the "Tears in the rain" monologue and made it the entire plot: What if your entire existance was for nothing? What if you have no purpose, no future and everyone you like is either artificial or dead?
K, like Roy, saved Deckard because that way, they both could at least leave someone behind that would remember them.

This is a Blade Runner for the coddled Millenial audience. The unsatisfied men who grew up being told about the limiitless potential they had, being told how special they are. This is about "Joe" learning that he is, literally, an Average Joe. He's not special. All other replicants have the exact same dreams of grandeur as he does. His ego was just so big, he actually believed he was a chosen one.

just got back, it's kino
not perfect, but excellent

yeah and I don't really want it, this film stands on its own as a masterpiece along with the original.

I love how when Joe died the same music started to play as when Roy died.

It probably won't do that well in the box office tbqh.

we all want to believe we're made in His image, when really we're all just disposable, fleeting Bravo Villanoov, seriously
i also like how they acknowledged the deckard as replicant question and said it doesnt matter

YES. thank god he didn't try to answer it

The plot in the original film far worse than in Blade Runner 2049. That being said Blade Runner was originally be about 3 hours long. There was alot of studio interference around Blade Runner. Someone made a fan edit with alot of the scenes that were cut.

A couple of the scenes has Deckard seeing Holden in the Hospital and there is a scene with Gaff and the Police Chief.

Most importantly in the fan edit you get to see Sean Young's Boobies.

It was so nicely teased too

9.5/10

Just got out, too. They don't make kino like this anymore, that's for sure.

I have a prediction that this is going to get high praise from critics (like we are seeing), but bad/mediocre exit rating from audiences.

>Entire soundtrack is heavy, oppresive and chaotic
>After K finds resolution and accepts the futility of his own life, it reverts back to Vangelis' style

Kino

I'm honestly shocked at how good it was.

Thought this too. Really hoping the studio releases a crisp gatefold vinyl for this score.

the vangelis over the waterfall after that transition was peak kino

Yeah, I can see people thinking it too long and not enough action

>those creepy little mini drones that follow Based Creepy Wallace
>their spooky SFX
[>spoiler]When he brings in Rachel[/spoiler]
Wew

Man, I feel sorry for all the dumb normies who'll watch a trailer or two and go into this thinking they'll see some TFA style quip filled nostalgia fest.

Good job spoiling

her eyes were green

Why are plebs so easily impressed? Is it because you're completely underexposed to real cinema?

didn't even realize Zimmer was involved until after watching it

A lot

Was surprised the movie had the balls to do what it did, which really highlights GitS's testicular inadequacies for me.

Didn't really like the score.

Obvious sequel bait. Also, in a movie with so many morally gray characters, why is the big bad so cacklingly evil?

Joi was HOT AS FUCK

9/10

Any webm of the scene where the dog walks to the window and there are flying cars in the distance on the yellow sky? Shit was seriously aesthetic.

what didn't you like about the score? I thought it was a brilliant tribute to Vangelis

Yes, good sir, you're very impressive indeed. I to no longer enjoy contemporary Hollywood filmmaking but browse this board trying in vain to educate the unwashed masses.

9/10

Undeniably kino. Kept the tone of the original while standing on its own as its own work. I don't think it quite reachs the heights of the original but still fantastic

This, masterfully handled

The movie really does have brass balls

Why do you lack cinemaIQ? Did you just get into it after watching John Wick and Mad Max FR?

Nailed it

Yes, yes mm indeed, i enjoy the back and forth or shall i say the repartee. Continue, please.

Did it feel kind of anti climactic to anyone else

I thought it was a very good movie overall, but the climax of the movie is on the water in pitch black it was kind of odd

Overall i'd give it 8/10

I agree with you about the score, it was shit and the movie was most of the part silence, it's probable that after that old guy stopped working they only redid some of the music and discarded a lot of things

It was really generic and simplistic in a no good way, I guess you could get some new artists out there that could've made better shit


The only thing I disliked about the movie besides the score was the lack of a good city, everything was grey and the neon things were punctual, it's like someone said "We need a girl dancing in this city, ok let's put one here, the last can be peugeot and sony sings"

planning a Sup Forums meet up this saturday night to go see it somewhere in manhattan, will post more info tomorrow night.

You want the real answer?

I'm a synth sucking pleb and was hoping for more memorable tunes I could hum. Also anytime I hear a boathorn early in a movie's score it sours me on the rest of it.

Only replicant titties

>Did it feel kind of anti climactic to anyone else
Sorta, yeah. I liked it a lot but shifting focus to a father and daughter reunion was a little unexpected

>The first 4 notes of Blade Runner Blues playing in the beach scene
>Tears in Rain playing in the end

Fuck me what a movie.

>that pesudo-threesome
K I N O
I
N
O

Josh?

Wallace gets no comeuppance. He doesn't even get a final scene. He's just sitting at home like "Oh, I guess my plans didn't work out. Back to my doing whatever it is I usually do."

Yea parts of the story kind of felt clunky it didn't always mesh well 100%

At the end I was kind of like "hmm alright cool" I liked the beginning more I think and the world building aspect

>shifting focus to a father and daughter reunion was a little unexpected

I thought it was supposed to make us question: Was it a happy ending? As in, K's entire life was for nothing, the woman he loved the most was a artificial beiing created to just tell him whatever he wanted to hear, he has no friends, no home and he's dying alone. But Deckard is with his daughter. So was it worth it?

It truely was amazing

no but he can come if he wants

Blade Runner is WB not Sony

not that user but i liked that, ultimately. not another, 'lets go get the big boss once and for all!' story. he's still creeping around making evil plans

That's the thing. The Replicant underground leader tells K something along the lines "to die for a greater purpose is the most human thing any of our kind can do" and she means it in the context of killing Deckard to protect the underground.

But K instead spends his life on reuniting a father and daughter. The most human choice.

To me it seemed like he really was content, it seemed more like the movie was saying that despite the fact that he was no one, the love of his life died and might not have had an ounce of reality to her in the first place, he "betrayed" the resistance, but he did something beyond himself by helping another person, and that was fulfilling to him. He died in the service of a good cause, even if it was a small one, and that was worth something.

>The entire movie was the sidequest of some dumb replicant with delusions of grandeur

Ballsy as fuck. I especially loved the stuff about the "Replicant revolution" near the ending. hinting that while K was running around pretending to be a chosen one alongside hiis VR waifu, there was actually important stuff happening behind the scenes, that we never even get to see

Which environment did you like better? I enjoyed the tight claustrophobic cityscape of the original

Autists who love drive will love this movie

>Blade Runner is WB not Sony

...did you not see the gigantic SONY label as the movie started

I agree, there's a lot that goes with it, hinges on it, surrounds it, etc. But just, sort of aesthetically, formally, it shifting the focus from K to Deckard's resolution which again makes sense but felt sort of jarring upon first viewing. And maybe that the daughter was revealed a little to bluntly/early with that

>I want to go see this with a girl but I'm here and lonely.

I thought it was just going to look loke Joi and be a thing people did, but it was more like a backass juryrigged hacked she read about on a forum, I loved that.

I'm listening to the score now and I still enjoy it. but I'm also a Zimmer pleb and adore his work, he and LOTR are the reason I love soundtracks

agreed

???? Unless you're not American then it's possible

Can someone explain to me the the motive of the villains?

>blade runners and LAPD
terminate the old replicants
>replicants
hide from the police
>tyrell corp
be assholes?

Why they didn't kill Joe in the Casino? They killed everybody that knew anything and let him survive why? And how they couldn't access the waifu through wifi? They are in 2049 and need an antenna?

come see it with us on saturday!

Warner Bros owns the rights, sony just paid millions and millions for the overseas rights

Someone explain what the resistance wanted from K

I just go back from the theater at holy shit. This is an 11/10. Haunting and a smack in the face that will humble you as a man. Not a movie for girls, they wouldn't understand. Serious question though, real Joi when?

I liked LOTR soundtrack, but this one in Bladerunner was such a letdown, maybe because I was waiting something closer to the original that is a masterpiece, I bet Daft Punk could make a better score

The atmosphere was great in this but the original is really on its own level

I got comfy Bioshock vibes when he was fucking around w/ the old Sinatra tunes

It's not Tyrell anymore, it's Wallace, and he lays out his motives for you. To create a self-producing workforce slave race.

big if true

Did anyone else notice how those drones had the same shape and made the same sound as a xenomorph?
It was kind of weird and a little off putting but it made Wallace seem even stranger

>What if your entire existance was for nothing? What if you have no purpose, no future and everyone you like is either artificial or dead?

then you'd have real life... or the plot of pretty much any other movie?

this movie was stupid.

Kill Deckard so Wallace couldn't extract the location of the girl from him.

Obviously he could have just rescued Deckard, but whatever.

Wallace corp (formerly tyrell's) wanted slave labor

To be a decoy and to kill Decker

Wanted him to kill Deckard to deny Wallace information.

K instead decides to save Deckard and to reunite him with his daughter.

This is nothing special and pales in comparison to the masterpiece that is the original. It's kino compared to the shit Hollywood puts out today, but nothing substantial in the long run.

Wallace wants to produce a self-reproducing slave race.

Some replicants want to do their thing, others want to do what they are programed to do.

LAPD sends out blade runners to take care of runaway replicants as they are a danger to society

Wow, spot on.

I agree with you, the best part is the Joi song that alerts girls that you are a degenerate