OK the story wasn't THAT profound on paper and it was maybe 10 minutes too long, but the visuals and music were monumental, there wasn't single scene that didn't feel like I wasn't witnessing a bona fide cinematic event.
Why are brainlets fucking obsessed with plots? Did they have to write a paper on it? Are some people just less conscious? What the fuck is wrong with the general viewing public? Is this the Age of the Pleb?
Other urls found in this thread:
icgmagazine.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>but the visuals and music were monumental
Are you fucking tone def and blind? The visuals were complete shit. Color correction and shitty sepia tone scenery was completely bland, and the soundtrack couldn't hold Vangelis cum rag.
They’re used to spoon fed plots that give an easy understanding of who’s good and who’s evil and levity via quips.
In a world of capeshit, one man stands alone against the normies. And that man is Denis Villeneuve
Movies are just entertainment to normies. And only stories can be entertaining.
>T. Contarian
Either that or you literally don't have any taste.
Christ I actually felt second-hand embarrassment reading this
Post your top 10 films of all time and top 10 albums of all time
>that rainy dystopian cyberpunk city scape
>Egyptian-inspired tyrell aesthetic
>Luv's water room
>a garbage dump so big its got its own population of maurading junkyard warbands
>retrofuture casino with the holo jukebox
>uninspired visuals
Fucking pleb
To accept Villeneuve as a quality director is to garb yourself in a coat of hot pockets and video games and then writh around on the ground in a supermarket while screaching and slapping yourself on the sides of your head.
He is cheeto dust. Nothing more.
>one replicant had a kid thirty years ago
>this means immesiate global war
>kill two people in a police station two different times
>walk right out no big deal
>wallaces goons kidnap deckard
>beats goslings ass
>leaves him alive
i was still waiting for the movie to start when it ended. the only good moments were call backs to the older competently made movie
fuck off cinemasins
This.
holy shit this
literally scratching my head in the theater, was this a first draft script?
you can go all day
>we want deckard to willingly cooperate
>execute new rachel right in front of him
Literally anything he post you'll say is shit in an attempt to sound superior, god is Sup Forums filled with fucking 12 year olds?
t. paid shill
>replicants can reproduce and therefore have a soul. Can no longer be used as slave labor
>Hand of the one of the most if not THE most powerful person on the planet, with vast resources, intelligence, and stength. Even if they could prove it was her I doubt anything would come of it.
>idk probably thought he'd die out there or something.
They only executed Racheal after it was clear he wouldn't cooperate with them. Did you even watch the movie?
>world is destroyed and people live in hallways
>people give a shit whether androids have souls or not
The bitch was a cunt, she killed his waifu and knew he was suffering for that.
How stupid can you be not to get that?
>Jews hate this movie
it was pure edginess to execute her right there instead of taking her away. shows how villenueve lacks all subtlety
>didn't understand the offworld references throughout the first and second movie.
Normies have attention spans of ants. Just wait for transformers kiddo.
They mean to torture him, they are taking him to 'extract some information' right after that.
It was meant to fuck with deckard you simpleton
Also it shows that Earth is really backwater, Wallace is just visiting Earth, and his corporation HQ isn't even on it.
It says Earth's HQ not Wallace HQ
You're a dumbass.
can someone explain the matching dna scene? is there going to be a sequel that explains the significance of it?
ad homs because the shills are losing control of the narrative
the visuals were out of this world
not an argument
It looked worse than the original no idea how they did that
It shows the world has changed but society hasn't
They faked the DNA of one of the kid by switching it with the other.
This film is void of everything that made the original a good film. The first film and the book Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?, are often considered some of the best philisophical works of the past 100 years.
Blade Runner 2049 had no point from beginning to end. In the original. you could find 10 different major philisophical points the film had, about the relationship between god and man, mortality, what makes a person real, what does it mean to truly live.. and there are many more.
This film doesnt have any point... at all. The original had like 10 philisophical points you could write books on. This film does not have a single one. Not one. Its sort of mind blowing that they can get away with it.... I feel offended that they can just slap the Blade Runner name on it and have it have nothing to do with the heart of the original.... like if theyd made a new Star Wars film where they didnt mention or have the force. The whole heart and reason for existing is just not there.
>He still doesn't understand
so are there two kids or not? did they just do it to cover their tracks? there are no database controls to flag duplicates like in every database since 1985?
Flat digital cinematography and emptier "sleeker" sets.
...
It hardly had any digital cinematography you pretentious pig
Deakins shoots all digital now and wanks it off any chance he can.
it was shot on digital
Was that your face while trying to follow the film?
Jesus you're retarded
>Blade Runner 2049 was shot almost entirely without green screen
icgmagazine.com
>what is film
>what is digital
Are you a fucking moron?
You clearly don't understand what's being talked about so why interject?
>thinking digital means use of green screen and CGI, and not the type of device used to record the fucking movie
Why does this movie even have a villain? There is no villain the first one. This one adds two cartoon retarded autists as villains one of both genders for who knows why.
>There is no villain the first one
88641867
Man's longing for spirit is the spirit itself
Systems of control can only thrive in the absence of the miraculous/spiritual
Identity is fluid and (literally) repliceable, but it is one man's conviction in the soundness of his mental state, of "what's real", that can be the light in the darkness
A society enslaved to the feminine will be redeemed by a woman
There's 5, there's as much in these films as you bring to them, you're a pleb
>xD i pointed out a typo
...
This board is being shilled so hard for this piece of shit movie.
It's box office numbers keep going down from predictions.
You shills will be gone within a week and then everyone will know what a horrible movie this was
you should see it before doing your contrarian schitck
It honestly isn't that shit and is more enjoyable than it has any right to be. It's no sci-fi masterpiece by any means but in the sea of shit that Hollywood keeps churning out, it was nice to watch a movie that felt like it had some care and thought put into it.
>Anyone that doesn't like garbage is a contrarian
B2R
Already watched a bootleg version. It's horrible
Though I will add on that the story starts to nose dive quite a bit in the second half.
>god is Sup Forums filled with fucking 12 year olds
clearly
since it believes br2049 is a good movie
imagine being this much of a redditor
if anything it proves how bought rotten tomatoes has become. no way in hell audience score is that high. the normies boo'd when the credits rolled
Nobody walked out or booed at my theater.
Even a little kid sat through the whole thing.
>>Blade Runner 2049 was shot almost entirely without green screen
and it STILL looked like shit
HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
But it's another example that tools dont matter, it's the skillset of the person that uses them that matters
If directed by one of the worst ever, aka Villepleb, a film will always look bad and be bad, whether it uses practical or cgi
>Jesus is born
>suddenly tons of holy wars
>powerful assassin working for most powerful man in the city
>cant edit/manipulate cameras inside a police station
I'll give you that last one, but it happens in almost every movie.
>>one replicant had a kid thirty years ago
>>this means immesiate global war
watch blackout 2020
>>kill two people in a police station two different times
>>walk right out no big deal
>implying wallace corp. can get away with it also watch vid related youtube.com
>>wallaces goons kidnap deckard
>>beats goslings ass
>>leaves him alive
K literally bled to death after that just like in Drive
>There was an effort made by Alcon to get younger crowds on board and caught up with the pic’s lore with an elaborate timeline presentation at Comic-Con (later shared on Facebook), as well as three custom-made YouTube shorts starring Jared Leto and Dave Bautista that explain the events leading up to Blade Runner 2049. Such great lengths aren’t paying off.
They are openly admiting they are paying people to viral this trash.
Does anyone else have issues with relating to K's character?
Obviously the film is a character piece in that we follow K with what hes doing, and other events, like the revolution etc. are just happening around him, but with him being a replicant I found it hard to really connect with him as a character, especially after finding out he wasn't really Deckard's son and was just another replicant.
Just me?
I felt the fights lacked tension because K is not human and nearly unkillable.
there was a theme between man and flesh, man and his relationship with the touch of others
no one wants to watch for visuals on here m8. we have seen way too much stuff be be impressed by visuals.
>doesn't watch a visual medium for primarily the visuals
holy SHIT this board
I felt that was kind of the point, hence why his relationship with the VR girl takes on another tone after the reveal that he isn't actually deckards son. He really is just another replicant and the closest he got to real love was an elaborate computer program that someone stepped on.
Take the time to help everyone out and go fuck a rake.
Thats a very good point, I didn't really look at it that way.
I was still hoping for an extra twist with K, just something to give me more of an investment in his character
>You shills
These aren't shills they're pleb crossposters that don't watch more than a handful of actual film a year
>will be gone within a week
They won't leave though
it's october and they spoopy skeleton!!!! movies for halloween and then Jusice League and Thor 3 is coming out AND then SW8
>good visuals make a good movie
the absolute state of Sup Forums
No, good visuals make a good visual experience and since the plot was serviceable and dialogue pretty sharp for a sci-fi I can't complain now can I you drooling reddit mong
>good visuals + avg plot = good movie
the ABSOLUTE state of Sup Forums in 2017 holy shit
It was kind of like the ordinary, hard-done-by man begins to fall into a fantasy that his life might actually be extraordinary, but then has it completely taken away from him.
It wouldn't have fitted with the overall feeling of despair and a undesirable future if he was a miracle.
Not only that but every refn flick since drive has done a better job at it too
this.
>just like in Drive
w-what? No, he didn't die in drive, what're you talking about. He drove away.
T. Reddit
The replicants will care though, and they're all that human colonization is built upon. It'd be like telling that they're more than expendable trash to service humans since they carry the power to bring life out into the world too.
Don't be retarded on purpose user.
Great visuals + average plot = good movie
Autism speaks
the whole movie was predicated upon new replicants being physically incapable of disobedience. what they care about is irrelevant
So why did K have the memories of Deckard's actual daughter? In fact how was she even in that shithole where she hid the toy if she had some immunity problems and had to live in a bubble?
the absolute state of Sup Forums is thinking this movie had good visuals at all
this was one of the drabbest, blandest and ugliest looking movies i've ever seen
even when they basically copied the fury road setting in those scenes where cuckling finally meets harrison ford it still looked ugly
How do you explain K then? He lied and disobeyed orders... I think that the police are now able to monitor how far a replicant veers from his programming, which is what those "cells, interlinked" scenes were, but that's the best they can do in terms of the robot's obedience or not.
can't wait for blade runner 3: War of the Replicants
directed by michael fucking bay
It only manifested when she was ten... I'm having trouble believing you've seen this movie.
Also, she manufactures memories for Wallace, which they then implant into their Nexus 8s... Some happen to be hers but fuck it, she ain't paid enough for that shit.
Get out.
>purchase ticket to go see blade runner
>walk into mlp movie instead
Oh so K just happened to get her memories, he wasn't actually some plant whose entire purpose was to find Deckard and all this shit?
I think this movie felt very honest unlike his previous efforts. This was true kino.
I share your enthusiasm OP. The thought of this guy making Dune is very exciting.
>dystopian cityscape is ugly
Holy shit the brainlets just keep coming
I don't know why the predictions are low. I live in Netherlands and BL2049 sessions are mostly filled with people. This is for IMAX 3D.
I don't think you know the meaning of the word 'viral'.
It's ambiguous I think. But she does believe that her parents are her own, so who's to say. Could be that she seeded various memories of herself for replicants to carry so they'd maybe stumble on her parents for her.
Villeneuve isn't the kind of director who's going to give you a plain answer.