Is this THE most POWERFUL moment in television history?

Is this THE most POWERFUL moment in television history?

youtube.com/watch?v=ML3qYHWRIZk

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=m95qHOmoUXs
youtu.be/ypsQO3dFiB8
fraser.stlouisfed.org/scribd/?item_id=457089&filepath=/files/docs/historical/martin/54_01_19330512.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_Adjustment_Act
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Great_Depression
forbes.com/forbes/2010/0830/opinions-amity-shlaes-current-events-great-refresher.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Not opening another shitty youtube link.
Explain it.

Yes. Fuck America, and fuck Drumpf!

No, it's embarrassing to watch.

>this is what radical centrists actually believe

Blah blah blah America is shitty blah blah blah unjustified wars blah blah blah republicans r bad

It definitely is the cringiest.

Fucking stupid. The way they set him up for this "lmao freedum and freedum" "are you saying that...." and all the students being shocked and turned by his "revolutionary" views.
Why didn't he include in his rant that they have to dramatize shit like this for anyone to be interested?

dont be so sensitive americans,what hes saying can be aplied to any western advanced country today.

It's true though.

>"America used to be great"
>forgetting all the racism and slavery

What is this man smoking

>implying great things can't have flaws
America is a bunch of whiny faggots now.

More like:
>This is what 100% indoctrinated Hollywood liberals think Conservatives used to be like
Sorkin is a hyper-liberal cockroach and he literally couldn't write an episode of this shitty show without pushing illegal immigration, anti-natalism, Howard Zinn-tier historical revisionism, that the Koch Brothers pay the media to be critical about unions, lies about voter ID preventing elderly people from voting and so on as pure authentic "Conservative" viewpoints.

And that's just before I stopped watching. There's two more seasons of that garbage floating around.
I haven't watched the West Wing either since the introduction to this rat's work was the Newsroom, I don't doubt that it's more subtle but I do doubt that it has any content worth listening to.

Why do americans get buttblasted by reality?

Why are yuropoor socialists so jealous of us?

America was originally a white nationalist country and there is NOTHING wrong with this.

i don't know why the students are so blown away by his rant, their lefty professors probably say the same shit everyday.

Most of the failures of the country lie solely on democrats.

FDR destroyed this country.

and lbj hammered the final nail.

how often do you read historical nonfiction

America was literally founded through the unjustified whining of the upper class.

No, this is

youtube.com/watch?v=m95qHOmoUXs

Strange how America usually becomes #1 or at least among the top five countries if you just removed all non-whites from the statistics and look at whites as a single group.

Imagine living in Norway, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Finland, Lichtenstein, Japan, Austria... and watching this video.

I don't get this meme.
Why do you think it's fair to remove the worst group from statistics in one country but not any of the others?

I don't have to imagine.
Nor did most people think much of it, only time I heard it mentioned at all was by redditors.
It's a pretty shitty show overall and it relied on news coverage and political viewpoints without much global appeal.

>I support FDR and I enjoy being economically enslaved and poor
kys

>implying slavery or racism is a flaw
Funny how as soon as the blacks are unchained everything goes down hill. Really made me do that thing with my mind.

Because it is the system, natural resources and most important the people that make up a society. Kind of unfair to compare America to other countries when ~30% of your population consists of a population with an average IQ of 80.

because europeans and japs don't have to deal with blacks.

i cringed

>europeans don't have to deal with blacks

Despite being an ok tv show. He is right and most of these thing the american people don't give a shit about.

Without non-whites you'd become a shithole in all the leading fields from banking to technology, good luck relying on middle america after kicking out all the jews, indians, iranians and other sort of asians who manage some of the economically substantial companies right at this very moment

Imagine a swimming competition, where one swimmer represents a nation. All the swimmers are really good, America is maybe the best one. None the less, America has a cement block tied to his leg, this cement block represents the non-white population.
The black population makes up on average 1-3% of the most West-European population while America has a population that is 13% black.

>The black population makes up on average 1-3% of the most West-European population
nice fallacy brother
now look up the age demographics

Most European countries don't have stats on that. If I am not mistaken, France is doing screening for sickle cell anemia on 1/3rd of every newborn(=1/3rd of ever newborn is black) which means France is totally fucked.

This. It's why we MUST import the entirety of the Middle East.

Sorkin is a liberal centrist

Howard Zinn is a leftist

pretty big difference

nice dodge

he shouldn't have said non-whites, he should have said blacks and hispanics. and jews, because they're more trouble than they're worth.

>FDR is bad

I cant even imagine how classcucked you have to be to believe this

Centrists are just leftists that don't wanna call themselves leftist.

Has some good points but like other anons said the setup was way too easy. "Freedom makes murica great"

Isn't that guy supposed to be a political scientist or something

WHEN YOU TRY YOUR BEST

>88720020
More like 2020. TRUMP 2020 TRUMP 2020 TRUMP 2020

>talking fast
>sassy tone
>rapid gesturing
>running off 40 opinions every minute
woah this is so redpilled, I'm gonna share it on fb

>all the test scores he's quoting and he doesn't control for race
Look at this big brain niBBa

>no argument
kill yourself "progressive"

>FDR was a great president that helped the working class
>just forget about him and Hoover economically enslaving americans for 10+ years with massive government intervention in the economy and corruption
He literally paid farmers to burn crops and kill animals when people were starving to death.
He implemented tariffs, raised the income tax rate to like 95%, went on a massive government spending spree which fucked people over even more.
You are so royally brainwashed lmao

You people unironically want to be poor and enslaved.

Why was the economy so fucking shitty during FDR's reign? lol

No, this is

youtu.be/ypsQO3dFiB8

i asked you a straightforward question that you dodged and you accuse me of 'no argument'? lol

>Is this THE most POWERFUL moment in television history?
It is pretty great watching amerilards squirm as they watch it.

1. someone wrote this
2. someone didnt say no dont film this
3. someone watched this
4. someone enjoyed this
5. i exist in a world where these someones exist

why

Fuck off drumpfkin, this is communist board now.

#resist

>i asked you a straightforward question
No, you posted an ad hominem attack.
Refute what I said about FDR, oh wait you can't and are going to continue to butthurtedly reply to me without refuting shit.
Let's watch.

>He literally paid farmers to burn crops and kill animals when people were starving to death
citations needed

ever heard of a little something called "The great depression", which started three years before FDR got into office, largest economic collapse in history, FDR got out of that-

>went on a massive government spending spree
I think the term is Keynesianism

In general he laid the foundation for America becoming the richest and most powerful nation in history

can you cite the books youve read that form the basis of your opinion?

>citations needed
This is so easy.
fraser.stlouisfed.org/scribd/?item_id=457089&filepath=/files/docs/historical/martin/54_01_19330512.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_Adjustment_Act

>ever heard of a little something called "The great depression"
Of course, the thing caused by massive government intervention, it was the most amount of government intervention in american history.

>which started three years before FDR got into office
Because the guy before him, Hoover, had the same economic policies.
FDR was just Hoover on steroids.

>FDR got out of that-
LMAO no he didn't.
He made what was a small recession into a massive depression that lasted the entirety of his term in office.
The depression ended after he got out of office and the government cut most of the new deal regulations and taxes. The year they abolished most of the new deal bullshit, the economy had the most productive year in american history.

>I think the term is Keynesianism
Yes, and it failed for a reason.

>In general he laid the foundation for America becoming the richest and most powerful nation in history
By plunging it into poverty for 10+ years?
No, america got rich because they had the freest markets in the world.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Great_Depression
Decades after this book was written, nobody has been able to refute it(which includes you).

This is hilarious.

are you saying youve read the book or that youve read the wikipedia page

Keynesian economics fucking sucks,it opens us up to the worst capitalism has to offer and gives the state unnecessary amounts of power

Thanks.

>FDR destroyed this country.
Quick rundown, please.

turned me off to ever watching this shitshow

remember West Wing Sorkin? That was actually good

I doubt he’s read either desu

nigga stop, that kind of shit is insufferable, just carry on your argument or shut up

>In general he laid the foundation for America becoming the richest and most powerful nation in history

Germany chimping out and destroying Europe laid the foundation.

Liberals before Trump
>America is terrible and evil
Liberals after Trump
>Um...America was always great sweetie

I own the book and have read most of it. :^)

Gas yourself FDR supporting retard.

REKT

I hate fdr as much as next the Man friendo, im just here to shitpost. Gas yourself on the spot and never reply to me again

you paid money for a book on austrian economics, who's the real idiot here?

>I hate fdr as much as next the Man friendo, im just here to shitpost. Gas yourself on the spot and never reply to me again
ok kid

>who's the real idiot here?
You for not understanding basic economics.
You for supporting central banking and your own economic enslavement.
Enjoy being poor and supporting the people that made you poor, bro.

I said never reply to me again. No wonder you never finished that book you fucking illiterate.

Its rare to see people get that btfo on here

*replies*

Since no one remembers this show and it was by all accounts an all around failure. I'd say the answer is no.

>have read most of it. :^)

...

>this is what radical centrists actually believe
>radical centrist

Fucking lel

>this is what indoctrinated millenial hip young Democrats actually believe

Because they can only keep on trucking as long as they have a false sense of superiority.

>>He literally paid farmers to burn crops and kill animals when people were starving to death
Seems there was a program to deal with the overproduction of some agricultural goods. Farmers were paid to not plant stuff, some corn was apparently used as fuel becuase it was so cheap, not because a law said so but because there was a vast overproduction that this program tried to deal with.
This apparently lead to a 50% increase in income generated by farms from 1932 to 1935.
Seems like a pretty good program. FDR ofc also instituted the minimum wage, social security etc

Seems like you have mixed up the cause and effect of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, no sweat.

>(The great depression) the thing caused by massive government intervention
Calvin Coolidge was president up until 1929 when the crash happened, he was a small government conservative who was very pro business

Herbert Hoover, did the opposite of Keynesianism and raised tarriffs and taxes during his precidency as he believed it vital to keep the deficit low. He was also pro business in general.

"Hoover became a conservative spokesman in opposition to the domestic and foreign policies of the New Deal."

Hoover and FDR don't seem to be the same to me lol.

So you are wrong about the great Depression being caused by "massive government intervention" since the economy collapsed under right winger, small government guy, kept falling for four years under a different pro business guy.


You said FDR and Hoover are the same which I also showed to be false. You dont seem to have much credibility


>No, america got rich because they had the freest markets in the world.

No markets are completely "free", this statement is completely mired in ideology and has no basis in reality. Since the neo-liberal "free market" reforms of Reagan, Bush and Clinton America's median real income has stagnated, quite impressive.

>Without non-whites you'd become a shithole

AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

This is what shitskins tell themselves.
We were the leaders before the Left started importing you for cheap labor and promoting you to prove how "diverse" their company is. We'd do just as fine without you.

Non-whites need America. Not the other way around.
You entitled cucks best remember that.

>it opens us up to the worst capitalism has to offer
how so?

white American PISA scores place us in the top 10 globally, without controlling for race everything he said is true though.

really makes one ponder

>Seems there was a program to deal with the overproduction of some agricultural goods.
There's no such thing as overproduction, it's a keynesian myth.
Production is a good thing.
This policy was fucking stupid and sociopathic, no wonder it failed miserably.

>This apparently lead to a 50% increase in income generated by farms from 1932 to 1935.
No fucking shit.
It means everyone else got less food to eat and had to work harder.

>Seems like a pretty good program.
TOP KEK
Are you actually defending this shit?
Are you honestly that stupid?

>FDR ofc also instituted the minimum wage, social security etc
Yes, both terrible things for the economy.
SS is bankrupt and the minimum wage causes unemployment.

>Calvin Coolidge was president up until 1929 when the crash happened
What? LOL
Hoover was president for 8 months before the 1929 crash.
>he was a small government conservative who was very pro business
Coolidge supported the federal reserve, which printed money and pumped it into the stock market, fueling the bubble.

>Herbert Hoover, did the opposite of Keynesianism
No he wasn't.
He and FDR had the same economic policies.

>and raised tarriffs and taxes during his precidency
No shit, these "progressive" things contributed to the depression.
>He was also pro business in general.
No he wasn't if he was raising taxes on them and heavily intervening in the economy.

>"Hoover became a conservative spokesman in opposition to the domestic and foreign policies of the New Deal."
So politicians always do as they say? lol

>Hoover and FDR don't seem to be the same to me lol.
Because of your public school education forcefed lies to you.
If his policies were very similar to FDR, why would you care what he said?
Look at what he did, not what he said.

he's not wrong though

>So you are wrong about the great Depression being caused by "massive government intervention" since the economy collapsed under right winger, small government guy
The economy collapsed under a government interventionist, fueled by almost a decade of central bank stimulus by another interventionist president(Coolidge).

>You said FDR and Hoover are the same which I also showed to be false.
You didn't show shit, I already debunked it.
Hoover dramatically increased government spending too.

>No markets are completely "free", this statement is completely mired in ideology and has no basis in reality.
I never once said or implied this.
Only that USA had the freest markets in the world, which is objectively true.

>Since the neo-liberal "free market" reforms of Reagan,
LOL
What neoliberal reforms?
We have fiat currency and central banking dominated economies.
How is this neo or liberal whatsoever?

>real income has stagnated, quite impressive.
Yep, the same neo-keynesian policies you support have destroyed real incomes, congratulations.

yes he is.

>3 minute america hate video for american liberals and foreigners to wank off to

kek

please explain

>social security and minimum wage are both terrible things for the economy
hmm
>Coolidge supported the federal reserve, which printed money and pumped it into the stock market, fueling the bubble
really? forbes.com/forbes/2010/0830/opinions-amity-shlaes-current-events-great-refresher.html
"Another area Coolidge and Mellon greatly affected was monetary policy. Coolidge believed, accurately, that inflation was the twin of taxes and that it, too, was expropriation. In an inflationary environment those who hold the dollars find they can buy less. The Coolidge Treasury and the young Fed pursued a monetary policy that yielded deflation"
But their grandest feat involved tax rates. Coolidge and Mellon tightened and pulled multiple times, eventually getting the top rate down to 25%, a level that hasn’t been seen since. Mellon argued that lower rates could actually bring in greater revenues because they removed disincentives to work. Government, he said, should operate like a railroad, charging a price for freight that “the traffic will bear.”

"Coolidge’s commitment to low taxes came from his concept of property rights. He viewed heavy taxation as the legalization of expropriation. “I want taxes to be less, that the people may have more,” he once said. In fact, Coolidge disapproved of any government intervention that eroded the bond of the contract."

Your view of history seems a bit biased and, dare I say it, ideological. What kind of economic policy is right according to you? BTC based economy? lol

>He and FDR had the same economic policies.

The republican Herbert Hoover explicitly raised tariffs to keep the debt as low as possible. Doing that during a depression is called "monetarism", which is the opposite of the "keynesianism" practiced by FDR.

america sucks but it's not "capitalism" or the "free market" which caused these problems

liberals are so fucking brainwashed it's unreal

>America is a fucking shithole you guys
t. commie :-)

>Yep, the same neo-keynesian policies you support have destroyed real incomes, congratulations.
So according to you Reagan and FDR was the same? Gotta love this Austrian autism
>Only that USA had the freest markets in the world, which is objectively true.

According to what metric other than your ideological statements is this true? How does America have such a free market even though the fiat jews keep doing the wrong thing?

>hmm
Well at least you admit you have no argument and lost.

>really? forbes.com/forbes/2010/0830/opinions-amity-shlaes-current-events-great-refresher.html
LEL
Again, another example of a polician saying one thing yet doing another.
He didn't even attempt to reign in monetary policy.
Either way, the federal reserve fueled the stock market bubble and it inevitably collapsed.
Hoover and then FDR implemented a massive level of government interventions which plunged the economy into a deep depression that lasted 10+ years.
We didn't get out of the depression until we cut most of the new deal regulations and taxes after WW2.

>Your view of history seems a bit biased and, dare I say it, ideological.
My view of history is based on what actually happened.
You're the keynesian that believes whatever the government tells him.

>dare I say it
Are you literally a redditor?

>The republican Herbert Hoover explicitly raised tariffs to keep the debt as low as possible.
No shit, and FDR raised tariffs even MORE.
All of these things point in favor to my theory that government intervention at the time caused the depression.

>Doing that during a depression is called "monetarism", which is the opposite of the "keynesianism" practiced by FDR.
Keynesianism and monetarism are both monetary policies.
Tariffs are different.
Also both monetarism and keynesianism are the same type of government interventionist bullshit that contributed to the depression.
FDR was just as bad as Hoover.

That's what made it great.

>So according to you Reagan and FDR was the same?
On monetary policy they are quite similar. Except for interest rate levels of course, but who cares it's all central banking bullshit.

>Gotta love this Austrian autism
Gotta love when statist cuck bootlickers have literally no argument.
When USA had a system of real free banking during the 1870s to 1890s, America had massive economic growth rates year after year with prices falling as wages rose.
inb4 muh long depression myth

>How does America have such a free market even though the fiat jews keep doing the wrong thing?
I was talking about before the fed, idiot.
The post war boom happened because americans had the most free markets on earth(and central bank interest rates were much higher than today).
inb4 you pull that muh 50s high taxes on the rich myth pic related