Sup Forums has gone crazy for this piece of crap, decent at best

>Sup Forums has gone crazy for this piece of crap, decent at best

Figures...

I guess "good taste" it's not a Sup Forums thing

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Q0CbN8sfihY
youtube.com/watch?v=h35QgVZzesE
youtube.com/watch?v=eOLVm_9UcRw
youtube.com/watch?v=VKpQgEyjNdM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Sup Forums is full of millennials now, reddit, tumblr...

you shouldn't care that much tho.

Whenever I get a package of plain M&Ms, I make it my duty to continue the strength and robustness of the candy as a species. To this end, I hold M&M duels. Taking two candies between my thumb and forefinger, I apply pressure, squeezing them together until one of them cracks and splinters. That is the “loser,” and I eat the inferior one immediately. The winner gets to go another round. I have found that, in general, the brown and red M&Ms are tougher, and the newer blue ones are genetically inferior. I have hypothesized that the blue M&Ms as a race cannot survive long in the intense theater of competition that is the modern candy and snack-food world. Occasionally I will get a mutation, a candy that is misshapen, or pointier, or flatter than the rest. Almost invariably this proves to be a weakness, but on very rare occasions it gives the candy extra strength. In this way, the species continues to adapt to its environment. When I reach the end of the pack, I am left with one M&M, the strongest of the herd. Since it would make no sense to eat this one as well, I pack it neatly in an envelope and send it to M&M Mars, A Division of Mars, Inc., Hackettstown, NJ 17840-1503 U.S.A., along with a 3×5 card reading, “Please use this M&M for breeding purposes.” This week they wrote back to thank me, and sent me a coupon for a free 1/2 pound bag of plain M&Ms. I consider this “grant money.” I have set aside the weekend for a grand tournament. From a field of hundreds, we will discover the True Champion. There can be only one.

Did you watch it?

Why are you this fucking obsessed?

Why is Sup Forums the board that gets the most butthurt about people liking things? All these pseudointellectuals who act like they have ascended tastes yet are scared to talk about what they think is good because they think people will laugh at them.

ah, the classic "it's decent at best, you can sense my superior taste because I take the middle ground" shitty compromise argument

It's alright, nothing too special, not enough Jared leto I'm, and the pacing was all over the place.

I'm in love with Joi tho, not gonna lie... what's point of living if I'll never have Ana De Armas to hold?

it's just people fishing for (you)s
calm down autist

sometimes I wonder if /tv is all paid studio shill bots talking to each other

>KINO
>SCI FI KINO
>BASED DENIS
>BASED DEAKINS
>KINO
>NORMIES WON'T UNDERSTAND
>KINO
>KINO
>PURE KINO
>10/10 CINEMATOGRAPHY
>THAT SCORE
>10/10 SCORE
>MOVIE OF THE YEAR
>KINO
>BRAINLET DETECTED
>MOVIE OF THE DECADE
>KINO
I enjoyed Blade Runner, but there's so much hyperbole around

what the-

That troll culture where people think they "win" by getting people to reply to them is probably the worst thing that's happened to this site in the last few years. If you want to talk about autism, that's a good example of it: a complete misunderstanding of the basics of human interaction.

Then... don't go in the threads?

>Sup Forums has gone crazy for this piece of crap
More like Sup Forums is swarming with shills and viral marketers.

>taste

So if i say i believe it's the best film I've seen in the last five years does that make me a shill? Is it possible for someone on Sup Forums to unironically like something, feel passionate about it, want to discuss it and not be labeled a shill?

Your best move is to ignore posts like that. They don't care about whether people are shills or not, their goal is to shut down discussion by shitposting the thread until people are only responding to them exclusively.

have you done nothing but shit on this movie for the past 24 hours? kys senpai

Link all his threads, I want a laugh.

OP has been busted numerous times now. He's making these threads back-to-back to influence narrative on his side.

Some terrible people really like trying to start a war between Sup Forums and Sup Forums.

True patricians enjoy both.

>good
>bad

There is only "Sup Forums" taste.

This is Sup Forums kino.

Sorry you don't like it, reddit.

...What else is Sup Forums kino?

...

Oh yeah, that is a good one.

could be legitimately attractive if he had some facial hair desu

This movie, holy fucking shit
>2:45 of BWWWWAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>the slowest, most plodding cinematography since The Thin Red Line
>dat endless scenery porn of the same shit
>looooooooooooong dialogue because of incessant pausing and staring by the main character
>no seriously, the main character does nothing but stare THE ENTIRE MOVIE. He's a PERFECT metaphor for the modern male.
>still don't understand why the movie was supposed to be good. Movie has no actual point.
Yah, a real 10/10. If you liked Broken Arrow.

You dont have to love something to deconstruct it.

You cannot deny that the movie had elements worthy of decontructing.

what board doesn't get angry at people liking things?

Every movie has elements worthy of deconstructing. I could deconstruct a Michael Bay movie.

"I like that thing."
"I don't like that thing, and I am the better human being."

Do you see how pointless and stupid this is?

deconstruction is derrida, not foucault, you fucking pleb

/c/, usually. Only exception is the crossboarders who raid it every so often for the "winterball."

Why don't sensible posts like this get made more often?

Why is it only Blade Runner that draws out the sensible people?

They're both pomo so it doesnt matter

You’ve summed up every message board ever since the beginning of the internet. Porn and arguing over trivial shit are pretty much the reason the internet even caught on in the first place.

>le millenial insult

You're a funny person.

So is this a meta thread
Cause hiro said we can have only one

I seem to remember a time when people used to actually talk about stuff instead of saying HAHAHAHA PLEB SHIT TASTE *BREATHES IN* cuck cuck MAGA SHILLS

Sup Forums became the de facto blue board for shitposting a few years back after Sup Forums mods started cracking down. That’s probably when you first started to notice the shift on Sup Forums.

I am surprised to hear the phrase "Sup Forums mods started cracking down" because that board is a piece of shit right now.

Man I haven't seen this pasta in ages.

As bad as Sup Forums was and is, Sup Forums is currently by far the worst of the popular boards. The dedication that shitposters have here is almost impressive.

Are people like OP intellectually insecure? Or just bored and resentful of the fact that others are actually into something?

Just trolling. Blade Runner 2049 is the current flavor of the month here so expect lots of threads like this.

>Figures...
>I guess "good taste" it's not a Sup Forums thing

Maybe you should stick to this type of shit...
youtube.com/watch?v=Q0CbN8sfihY

and leave us "tasteless" cunts alone. We get it, your personal taste are objectively fantastic. While our taste are subjective at best and mediocre.

no one on this board watches kino

Very true.

Sup Forums will never be a good board for film discussion. Sup Forums in general will always have a primarily young male demographic. The average age here is probably about 19 which is why Sup Forums almost exclusively talks about blockbusters and “nerd culture” stuff.

>The average age here is probably about 19 which is why Sup Forums almost exclusively talks about blockbusters and “nerd culture” stuff.

So what film would you rather talk about?
Any examples in particular ? Go ahead, what was your favorite film of the year ?

>19

hah!

Honestly It was probably my favorite movie from this year. It got plenty of discussion here although most of it was shitposting about sewer gangbangs as expected. My point was that Sup Forums will never really be a good place to discuss television and film but the ridiculous shitposting here can be fun in small doses.

On average. But yeah, there are definitely a lot of high school kids that post here.

oh well

>complains about blockbusters
>your favorite film was a blockbuster
*scratches head*

I got your kino... right here!

I wasn’t complaining. I was just explaining why Sup Forums only discusses mainstream stuff.

>From the director of Prisoners
The most IMDB sensibility film made so far. Anybody who thinks that Prisoners is above mediocre is juvenile about the medium and entirely emblematic of the video game crossposter fueled downfall of this board.
Villeneuve is one of the biggest trashmasters working today, hack's hack. This is hot pocket: the movie. Cheeto dust: the flick.

IMDB "FILM BUFF" pleb fodder. If you like this film then you are an enemy of the medium.
>MUH BASED JAKE
>MUH BASED DEAKINS
>MUH DARK THRILLER
>MUH RELIGIOUS SYMBOLISM
All the memes are there, it's shit and this movie will be shit

>>still don't understand why the movie was supposed to be good
don't worry, the new Thor comes out soon, that'll suit you better

yikes!

Many pretentious pseudo-intellectual garbage in that list...I've seen many. Don't feel smarter because of it. But i hate people who'll pretend to fucking worship these films out of pure intellectual snobbery.
"Oh look ! this film is genius and you'll never understand it! and i'm one of the rare few who has seen it!"... What ? You like "Blade runner 2049" ? "From that hack Villeneuve ?"...LOL "i don't want popular shit because it's beneath me you see"...

Admitedly, Soy Cuba had fucking stunning cinematography and single take shots...amazing stuff for sure.
youtube.com/watch?v=h35QgVZzesE
youtube.com/watch?v=eOLVm_9UcRw

>yikes
youtube.com/watch?v=VKpQgEyjNdM

Oh god! FUCK La Haine!...That anti-cop , anti-french anti-white, pseudo-intellectual kike propaganda!...No sane French person worships this garbage.

>the ridiculous shitposting here can be fun in small doses

it's pretty much why I come to this board. just look at threads like and . so fucking stupid but I get a laugh out of it.

it's not aboput taste, it's about Bane
>Gosling wearing jacket similar to Bane
>Crashing aircraft with no survivors to get an old guy out of it
>was supposed to cover and protect a girl
>to make replicant (fire) rise

It’s called viral marketing. I can’t beleive people paid money for PR firms to shill on this trash of a place.
>quick we need the approval of Sup Forums
One day, instead of the “Official Selection of Cannes” between olive branches, movies will be advertised with “Officially Sup Forums Kino.”

You're not serious, right? You said you "can't believe" it because you literally don't believe it.

What's the matter did all the terrible misogyny and white cis maleness upset you?

Quick Sup Forums I'm going to see this now, what food should I get for it?

>being Australian

>posting an outdated list

>it has no english words in the title
>it must be intellectual!

>la chinoise
>eva
you ruined it

₹2.5 have been deposited into your account by Marvel^(R)

>early Ozu
>City Girl instead of Faust or Sunrise
>Vertov's enthusiasm

Not a very good list to be honest. Nouvelle Vague is great though.

What's your favorite movie OP?

Why?

Don't tell me BR2049 is YOUR favorite movie

>Trump

Oh, i get it

Nice deflecting

In all seriousness, was the movie actually misogynist? I heard it has a giant woman which sounds pretty feminist to me.

>was the movie actually misogynist
No.
First of all, let's not forget that Villeneuve made a movie about the Montreal Massacre of 1989. A movie against misogyny.
People are most likely calling it sexist for the fact that important character Joi (shown as a female) exists for pleasuring others.

That movie looks fucking awesome, no joke.

I fell in love with K's character. I find him fascinating, and he's better than film Deckard by a long shot.

>shown as a female
This is an unusual word choice. Am I right in assuming that the character is some sort of non-gendered entity that can take on different forms?

there's nothing in the film that suggest this. like, maybe there are male models of this AI but they don't get shown at all - all the world building is pretty much shown from a male pov.

also blade runner (cyberpunk) is dystopian in nature. So shouldn't women be treated like shit, being raped and beaten, being reduced to merely a sex object? Otherwise what's the point?

What the fuck? You're going to be slightly disappointed by Neuromancer.

Sup Forums has too much waifu posting and degenerate closeted fags

You realize that Sup Forums is literally filled with waifuposting and degeneracy, right? Glass houses and all that.

>deckard and rachel are now the most important people in the universe and the parents of replicant jesus just because they were in the previous movie
lmao

HAHAHAHAHA

Joi is a hologram. And this hologram appears as a female. Hope that clears it up for you.

>tfw can't find anyone to go with

Aye

For modern day insane budget hard sci fi it was fucking phenomenal.

> decent at best
I see is already growing on you.
In a week you will defend it.

Honestly I'm already starting to change my mind after this thread. I'm sorry for all the trouble I put y'all through.

Just go alone. I wish I did.

Are you the guy who just created that thread about his girlfriend not getting the movie?

literally yes.

>the absolut state of Sup Forums
wew lad