Boudica was the wife of a Celtic Iceni king from around in the year of our lord 60/61. After noble Roman forces made sure of showing these savages who was in control of Britannia, Boudica conspired with her traitorous neighbors and they made the fatal mistake of voting her as war queen.
The campaigns started with the sacking of each Roman stronghold city in the southern regions of Britannia. The savages massacred roughly 80,000 Roman immigrants and nobles, cutting off the breasts of Roman Noblewomen, feeding it to them before impaling them through their rectums on long sticks. Truly barbaric.
A true Roman hero, Gaius Suetonius Paulinus, made a stand against the savages while trying to save the civilized people of Rome. He led a massively outnumbered army against Boudica.
Under Boudicas' leadership, she marched her army against Paulinus. Dio stated Boudica's forces to be numbered nearly a quarter million, 230,000, but armed combatant numbers were probably half or less of that number.
Paulinus had 10,000 men.
Under the wisdom of our brave Paulinus, he formed his legions into a wedge formation and charged the horde of savages. Paulinus' forces had the gods on their side, and they fought bravely, cutting down the savages as they came. He then routed the savages, who turned to run like cowards. Paulinus then cut down every single person they ran into as they charged the retreating cowards.
Boudica lost 80,000, her entire fighting army plus many civilian casualties.
Paulinus lost 400 men.
Boudica killed herself 3 days later by poison.
Paulinus drank wine and broke bread with his generals.
> Roman forces forced their way onto another groups land and set up "strongholds" > this is somehow noble > implying the romans werent doing much more messed up shit than impaling women all the time to many people > britains are bad guys for fighting back
hmmm this reminds me of someone, you wouldn't happen to be a kike would you?
Christopher Stewart
Yes the Italians were bringing civilization and culture to the filthy rabble.
John Robinson
You do know the Romans carried out genocides all over Europe, don't you?
Gavin Hall
Her?
Aaron Cox
literally how america was founded kys
Nathaniel Carter
>You do know the Romans carried out genocides all over Europe, don't you?
>Yes the Italians were bringing civilization and culture to the filthy rabble.
Michael Phillips
>people who fought against each other since the start of time learn to live under the pax romana >roads and aqueduct are built
truly a genocide
Adrian Cruz
But dozens of cities in spain, france, and italy used aqueducts for thousands of years after the empire's fall.
Jackson Miller
>hair tied up I could forgive the flat-chestedness but that is in complete contradiction to historical sources
Logan Myers
had a hearty chuckle, thank you based pasta bro
no hard feelings about the colonization
long live the empire
Luke Cox
>The savages massacred roughly 80,000 Roman immigrants and nobles, cutting off the breasts of Roman Noblewomen, feeding it to them before impaling them through their rectums on long sticks.
If only we were allowed to do this is modern day Britain...
Robert Price
The Romans cheated her dead husband out of a pact which would share power of his tribal lands with Rome and the Iceni.
They then raped her daughters and had her publicly whipped dishonouring the entire tribe. The other British tribes had suffered similar indignities at the hands of the Romans. So they rose up? It seems perfectly understandable to me. As for the savageries, it was a savage time.
Remember it wasn't just dishonoring and breaking deals made with the local people, the Romans had been wiping out the British people's entire religious class and spiritual system.
Paulinus was on a mission in Angelsey to wipe out the last refuge of Druids who were promoting rebellion against the Romans.
It was inevitable that the British tribes would unite against the common foe and it was unfortunate for the Roman civilians who the Roman army just left vulnerable without fortifications.
Robert Bailey
But when we give blankets to natives after landing on the shore we are somehow the bad guys?
Chase Morgan
If your dog has rabbies or has attacked other on multiple ocassaion because it's a wild wolf , then killing it may not be a bad idea.
Thats how you seperate the strong from the weak , those that adapt vs those that are shit.
Romans allowed anybody to join them in return after 25 years of service they would get the benefits of any Roman citizen plus land.
Those that refused , those that try to fight back againts them got wiped , so yeah thats life "The weak should fear the strong"
Sadly multiculturalism , degeneracy and corruption destoryed the Roman empire.
Plus a centralized government couldn't administratively control all of the land. If they would have embraced federative concepts along side those of the original republic that made them stronk.
Yet they build roads and put down the fundation of European growth.
Charles Gomez
Are you Welsh? They didn't never colonised or ruled over the Anglo Master Race. We were still free on the continent when this all happened.
Nicholas Flores
>The Romans cheated her dead husband out of a pact which would share power of his tribal lands with Rome and the Iceni. >They then raped her daughters and had her publicly whipped dishonouring the entire tribe.
Yeah, they showed those savages who's boss.
Noah Foster
conquest isn't noble? so you're a faggot, right?
Luke Brown
>>>>>>>>>
Cameron Johnson
the romans completely trashed the barbarians, this wasnt bouddica;s fault
many battles had similar figures
OP knows not history
Angel Jenkins
And when they got to Dalraida (Scotland), the big bad romans shat their pants, built a wall and ran away
Xavier Lopez
...
Chase Wood
>killing migrants is somehow wrong I'm sure the dune coons of today are just bringing their "civilisation" too.
Benjamin Torres
Well at least the Jews are treating white American savages just as poorly.
White Americans are going extinct and their replacements are slaves. >60%
Joseph Foster
And then the Picts got overrun by Gaels from Ireland and Anglos from the continent, leaving no trace other than a few slave girls rape babies.
Cameron White
Roman war and battle accounts are absolutely hillarious. They were not even trying to be sensible and objective, but always went full retard mode.
Lincoln Parker
These "savages" impaled the invadors to scare them. The noble, civilized Romans let animals rape women to death for entertainment. I am acctually starting to hate civilization more and more...
Ethan Russell
>many battles had similar figures
Those casualty figures were based on rumor, Tacitus wasn't even on the battlefield, he only claimed what he was hearing from the centurions, and even he recognised the rampant exaggeration. 400 dead romans isn't too unrealistic if you consider that they funnelled the britons into a few dozen metre wide gap, which is where the rout started. it was only as the britons attempted to retreat that they sustained many casualties, which wouldn't have been more than 10,000.
Also consider that Tacitus counts women, children and pack animals as battle casualties.
Luis Green
>After noble Roman forces made sure of showing these savages who was in control
yeah, by raping her two children in front of her..how civilized.
Kayden Martinez
Just because diverse groups manage to not try and kill eachother for a few decades while they occupy the same living space doesn't mean that things were sunshine and rainbows. We don't call America not eating itself some pax americana or some shit.
Parker Kelly
nigga celts already had roads before romans in what is today ireland
Camden Garcia
Its one of the most badass stories ever.
Paulinus actually sent for another garrison still in Britain which had another 5,000 men or so, but he refused to leave his encampment.
After Paulinus victory he killed himself and his legion was degraded.
Adrian Walker
Heres ho based the Romans were.
After the Jews revolted (first time) they made access to Jerusalem by the jews only allowed through one gate. On that gate they had a "graven image" (statue in this case) something which was against Jewish law.
>Of a pig.
Ryder Sanchez
Didn't she rebel against Rome after Rome kidnap her daughter's or something like that?
Jaxson Adams
>Carthage >Gauls >Germans >Jews >Gladiators >defeat a legion >"haha! Rome btfo! You mad?" >Roman logistics just keep on keeping on >Raises more legions >Roma Victor >crucifixions for everyone >"muh genocide. What have the romans done for us? Fuck roads!"
>Boudica >see above
Angel Robinson
So basically Rome was real life's Mordor. Gotcha.
Connor Cruz
Her army just ran straight into their formation, and because there was so many in her army they were so jammed up against the Romans they couldn't communicate or escape. So the Romans just ate at them slowly but surely. What a fuck up.
As a Celt I can honestly say we're not designed to lead empires or even have our own independent countries of any significance. We are tag alongs.
We are too good hearted to do the dirty ruthless shit ice cold Anglos and greaseball Roman bastards are good at.
Grayson Hill
>shit all over barbarians to the point where they revolt >400 years later barbarian armies are overrunning rome >be extremely butthurt by that
