QUALITY thread
QUALITY thread
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
It's funny that the animators foresaw this problem beforehand, but fixing it would've been too expensive.
If Nick is soo cool, why he wears a geek replica from the "One Ring"?
they could just move the characters a bit??
It's fucking CGI animation, they wouldn't even need to re-animate it
The office the animation team worked in was constantly losing power, and they basically had no money and no time.
Renders times were no joke back in the day
...
What the fuck is with all the Jimmy Neutron on here.
It's a cartoon
This board is about comics and cartoons.
And lots of people in general on here like Steve Oedekirk stuff.
Or at least Kung Pow.
Okay, have a QUALITY cartoon intro
youtube.com
...
I think I noticed this when I was a kid.
This cartoon ruined my Saturday mornings so many times.
>quality emotion
Can't have a QUALITY thread without this gem.
this is fucking disgusting in every way
I warned you about that cliff, bro
...
...
I know Mr. Avery said to go nuts when it comes to cartoons, but I doubt he wanted this.
...
Dies someone have the exploding baby one
...
Smear frames are not QUALITY, btw.
jimy
I watch this every now and again to make myself feel better about my own art
>it was a stretch
that's never not funny.
You'd thinks Disney owned animation studio could scrounge up a single fuck to give
Other than Archie's weird mysteries, Liberty's kids, and Mummies alive, DiC has made no good cartoons. They are the king studio of laziness and hackery in animation.
...
I don't see what's wrong with this one.
Look at the ground more carefully and like where rocko walks, he walks on air.
I dunno, that one seems kind of intentional.
we need more stretch superman.
>plastic man disguised as superman.jpg
Not a cartoon, but still Sup Forums related.
What the fuck is that face.
...
...
I don't think you get what "QUALITY" means
You don't notice the hands on the couch and Marge?
So they're left handed, big whoop.
I didn't notice until you pointed it out
They're still no joke. Computers get more powerful, but our desire for better lighting, shading, and realtime simulation grow just as quickly.
Despite computers being considerably more powerful than they used to be, render times are still tremendous for 3D scenes with good lighting and complex animation.
They probably didn't. This is almost certainly a case of one animator cheating and another unknowingly adjusting the camera angle so it wasn't off-screen anymore. It happens from time to time.
which one wins for QUALITY?
ahem
encore looks very quality
>*sniff sniff*
I used to fucking love this show. I honestly don't know why.
...
IT'S
that's not fair, this entire show is QUALITY
It's a gold mine that hasn't been mined. So much content yet so few people use it.
What's the matter with this one? Scaling? Lack of depth?
I wanted to put my dick in those aunts so badly
There was nothing else on TV for me
All these frames, AND ITS ALL FROM THE SAME SCENE
anyone knows the history behind this scene? like what was going on between the animators and storyboarders to make this ?
fucking lord that horrifying
The guy on the left is a floating torso
Wait this was good? Most everyone I've seen says it was bad
Unless they're a bunch of no taste plebs
>when somebody is smoking pot in the bathroom in jr high
Alright, what the hell am I missing? Because that looks pretty awesome.
>hariyama used earthquake
...
...
What is this?
...
My guess is that they were supposed to be going inside that metal thing, but someone fucked up the order of the cell layers BAD.
On the left is the illustration from the original books. On the right is it extended sideways by a different artist for a DVD bonus feature. It is meant to be set in an engine shed at night (pic related), however the artist has misinterpeted it as being outside the shed in broad daylight, and extended it as such.
It was pretty bad, even if you only watched it for the waifus.