Just came back from watching it. Can confirm: it's kino.
Loving Vincent
>SIX YEARS HAND-PAINTED
Just came back from watching it. Can confirm: it's kino.
Loving Vincent
>SIX YEARS HAND-PAINTED
Other urls found in this thread:
>cutting your own ear off for some dumb roastie
Imagine being this cucked.
Gib wide release pls
>>SIX YEARS HAND-PAINTED
except it was rotoscoped
I don't have to
No it's not, it's only used as reference.
youtube.com
I've been waiting for this film for years.
Tell me, user,
1) Was it short? I've heard that the runtime is just 79 min
2) How was the story?
3) Is it like a feature film or a documentary?
Looks interesting but also gimmicky as hell, don't know how I feel about it
everything I've read says the story is very standard but the visuals beautiful, so basically it's pure kino since as any true patrician knows
>visuals > plot
plot is for plebs
Plot is for plebs but here’s the thing: Character drives a story. Well-defined characters and good visuals make plot almost irrelevant.
See: The Big Lebowski.
He literally hung out with prostitues but was afraid to let hem touch him
Except it’s hand painted
It’s still long and painful, doesn’t matter if it’s rotoscopy
It's 90 minutes or so.
Plot is the son of the postman who brings Vincent's letters to his brother ends up investigating how van Gogh died, so you see various characters who met him in his last days recollecting how he lived, slowly building up his figure. I thought it was really nice. Definitely worth watching. Oh and it was in 4:3 I think.
a film can be rotoscoped and handpainted at the same time
they didn't fucking use computers to do it back in the 40s
that's an odd ratio to use theses days
It depends how heavy involved the plot is. If it's literally a generic Oscar biopic but with beautiful visual it's really isn't going to be all that amazing in the end, whereas a still, esoteric and somber piece without much happening would be kino.
every frame is a literal painting
what theater?
Wait shit did this actually finally come out?
I'd watch this as a fan of animation alone, I don't even need a fucking plot
Who fucking cares
What's Sup Forums's beef with rotoscoping? I get when it's poorly used like in the idolm@ster movie but it's a fuckton of work and has to look good, and someone still has to decide the shot composition and shit. There's noting lazy about how it's made and nothing poor about the result unless they fuck it up.
It's like y'all never seen the 40s Superman shorts.
>six years a vincent
Nice, another film with a single gimmick.
Why not just look at his paintings instead?
LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF PAINTERS
Did animation kill your parents?
>literally a cartoon with paint filters
>filters
They're literally all individual paintings
God I hope it has good sound design
66,960 FRAMES OF PAINTINGS
This. The plot is the least important thing in a movie.
All facets of a medium have virtues. So while a movie can be good because it's aesthetics are good despite it's mediocre plot, it can also be good because it's plot is good despite it's mediocre aesthetics. The best work comes when every element involved is executed with detail and passion.