If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35...

>If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.

What does this mean?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FaCHBmGWcBc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I think it means the idealism of youthfulness comes into direct conflict with reality in your late 20's, and reality finally wins out.

It means people realize the fucking value of money and don't wanna be taxed to death, and also don't have time to put up with people's bullshit so we should get rid of them. Two things conservatives are all about.

That's why Trump is amazing.

that if you're a liberal you're a faggot

Better to be heartless than brainless.

This is a coping mechanism for dummies that took too long to figure it out. Nothing wrong with being a conservative under 25.

it means liberals are children and conservatives are adults

thats it

Recognition that bipartisanship, generational politics and the touchy feely nature of the left wing is kind of pointless ("you have no brain").

The answer is transcendence from bipartisanship with stronger, non binary politics such as libertarianism, which may be cosmopolitan or nationalistic.

God bless.

Liberté, égalité, fraternité.

Liberté première, brother.

We have always been right.

Keep in mind that when Churchill said that the word "liberal" meant "libertarian".

He is saying that being a libertarian when you're young is fine but when you grow up you realize that libertarianism, with its social permissiveness, is not that great.

The word "liberal" in this context does not mean anti-racist or pro-faggotry.

Citation needed

Libertarianism is a disgustingly retarded ideology (and this is coming from someone who used to be full blown libertard).

We need national socialism or at least national capitalism now.

Read a fucking book

Cite the fucking book.

Fancy ideas that hold no value in reality are usually lost once you get a little older, happened to me as well.

What part? That the word liberal changed in meaning?

I believe that shift is mentioned in Hayek's introduction to the revised version of Road to Serfdom.

Conservative, 19
can confirm heartlessness

So you're saying one man's utterance had a change in meaning due to the political philosophy of an unrelated writer.

actual adulthood goes way past the 18 years old mark. Mentally speaking children keep on growing well past their 18th. White children that is, even some asiatic. Not so much niggers and mexicans. Those guys mature fast, and hit their mental peak at their 13th year, they more or less stay there for the rest of their lives, mentally. They are also the eternal teenagers.

Cool, militant ideologies designed to prey on collectivism. That sounds great dude.

>national capitalism
Sounds better, thank you. Anything socialism is fail.

Times change.

The youth are now attracted to politics that appeal to their morality or rather their egotistical pride of being moral. Libertarianism is now the logical political ideology and it's main opponent, socialism (equipped with censorship), is the ideology of the immature.

I'm using immature loosely here, since it's not easy to understand why libertarianism is logical, especially against the allure of finally making the ""bigots"" shut the fuck up. It really is socialism against libertarianism in 2016, even if it were liberalism against conservatism in 1996. The words have achieved different meanings and libertarian in a sense feels closer to what I'd like to see achieved.

For instance, it's closer to the original idea of a free society: As in, it must be free.

It means whoever came up with this saying is lazy and likes to generalize about people

OK to be fair, it is true that people tend to get more jaded and less idealistic as they age but still

This kind of lazy generalization is fucking retarded and ultimately Facebook-posting-uncle-tier

hardcore right-winger who had no choice but to see the truth because my mom was redpilled due to being privelaged as shit in the fsu. then my cousin came over fifteen years later and told me about zionists. it just has gotten worse

Collectivism is a strength not a weakness. Without collectivism Australia wouldn't have had the white australia policy, the sole reason for our success as a nation.

Socialism is a disastrous failure, yes, free markets do work, but a lot of markets fall prey to Jewish and international globalist vultures. We need to regulate markets to ensure our national self interest even if it means lower economic growth.

The value of money... 11010010110101
>btw I'm 25 get back to you in 10 years

>tfw 24 and converted from liberal-neutral to right-wing extremist over the past year
so close to having a heart

I was a liberal until i got out of highschool; i thought my family were all fools until i found this site. At this point I'm a very traditionalist, conservative, heritage and eugenics based person. As George Lincoln Rockwell said, "National Socialism, fundementaly, is the application of science not only to inanimate objects but to mankind himself.". It is inevitable that if you are an advocate of pursuing truth under the support of science then you will inevitably arrive to the conclusion of national socialism which is essentially tribalism considering culture and eugenics on a larger scale. youtube.com/watch?v=FaCHBmGWcBc

Colectivism has my attention... only problem is no-one wants to work together without a slave driver. I guess thats partly what the obviously staged sociatal meltdown is about... When the government becomes an enemy of the people except for the DUMBASS bluepilled news-at-6 fucktards, we have no choice but to find ways of working together.

underrated post (considering the average trends for Africans and Mestizos)

I must have no heart

The political equivalent to the cock carousal

Collectivism is the death of innovation and creativity, essentially what fuels a free market society. By pandering to it, you incentivise it, leading to stagnant stifling societies.

Competition necessitates some individualism even if friendly competition means humility. Competition is what drives strength and the pursuit of strength in a free market, leading to everyone becoming stronger as the ideas for strength spread. Regulations create a framework of traps that in turn maximise techniques to defeat the system rather than maximising production, profit and value for society. The more you have the less good you're doing.

It all hinges on one thing; that strength is rewarded, that there's a meritocratic system, that redistributive policies are condemned as antithetical to this useful feedback loop. It also means people cannot be rewarded for loyalty to the state, that would stifle individualism. People also should not be rewarded for their skin colour or gender, as that has nothing to do with strength.

No, I think libertarianism is incompatible with any form of socialism, nationalistic or cosmopolitan/marxist.

It means Winston Churchill was a Zionist cocksucker. The end.

If you don't keep Australia white libertarianism, or anything close to it, will never be any sort of reality. Shitskins don't vote for systems that work.

It means that Churchill liked to spew stupid aphorisms to justify his being a turncoat

You realise there's already a lot of in group preference here. There are a lot of Asian companies working in Australia with only Asian clients, I've seen office suits labeled in Chinese, I doubt they're hiring a white boy. Same with university, lots of lecturers/professors think they're getting away with preferencing and cheating. Hint, you're not, RMIT is getting fucked because of it, but at least RMIT is hiring diversly... And internationally.

I don't mind foreigners, but when they don't follow our rules they need to leave. It's not acceptable for a white company to (even secretly) only hire whites, it's not acceptable for any other company to have any preference on ethnicity, culture or gender.

Yes, this is where government regulations step in because it effects the competitiveness of our society. There must be a fine of some sort for unfair hiring, a fine and your name dragged through the media should be enough.

Until then, maybe a tariff to protect local goods or local people? I wouldn't suggest raising very many tax based policies, I wouldn't mind seeing the lowest tax bracket disappear since I believe you poor slobs spend to much money, so you probably end up paying more sales tax than income tax. Might as well not take the income tax and let you spend it all.

What he's saying is that optimism is the fancy of the young.

It's true. Except if you are a liberal at 25 you'll never have a brain.

No, you simply do not get it. It's not about Asians hiring only Asians. It's about them voting for a worse society. Look at America to see how nonwhites can derail even a well structured society.

It's all over once nonwhites start voting in large numbers for their own interests. Australia must stay WHITE.

Guess I have no heart.

as intelligence and technology foil the sort of environmentally imposed homeostasis that ruled lower life forms before the advent of humanity and the concept of private property;

and as every inch of land worth hunting, gathering, farming or fishing on/from would quickly be snatched up by a handful of wealthy people/families if all land, everywhere, were made available for general sale;

... how can it be said that humans have the right to live if it is impossible for them to eke out an existence without violating the property rights of another?

...and if people do not have the right to live, how can they have the right to own property?

taxation and the welfare state are the price we pay for the privilege of property ownership and the concomitant elimination of the commons

this is why I'm a fiscal "liberal". imo the right to live is a requisite for the right to own property

means I'm was a fucking prodigy

Westernized Asians believe the same sort of things all Australians do, they'll vote according to the demos, especially since they're so strictly average intelligence (not many idiots there).

You're making out as if non white Australians are the worst thing ever, if we're all competing equally (which we're currently not) then are you somehow intimidated by them? What interests do Asians have that Europeans do not? We are both equally self interested.

Yes the only problem is that contemporary companies, especially in Melbourne, have preferences of race and gender for who they're hiring. Considering the relatively high youth unemployment and the tendency for most of this inequality being in junior or "training" positions, I'd argue that this is the most pressing issue facing our economy.

If you're arguing for anything else, like your own racial supremacy, you're a tool.

Np I haven't had a heart for a long time.

Race creates culture. Asians will never understand anything but money.

White people can empathise with their fellow man and create truly great cultures. Simply look at the difference between Australia and China to see this in action.

this, feel good tbqhwyfmlm

I think it means you saw that in a thread yesterday and now you want to make a thread about it so you can get sweet sweet replies
sage

It means that you can forgive yourself for being an ignorant liberal douche even if it took you 2 to 3 decades to grow out of it