That was just shared by CartoonBrew

That was just shared by CartoonBrew
vimeo.com/197093965

Never thought I'd be saying this, but that's too much boob jiggle.

>too much boob jiggle.

Like I said, it's not a criticism I usually make, but it's a bit absurd here.

highly anticipated saying this, but i believe you prefer men

That's CRAZY TALK!
There is no such thing as TOO MUCH boob jiggle

The only time you could get away with saying this is for that bullet scene in highschool of the dead.

>boob jiggle

>too much

Heresy.

Conversely, the second clip with the girl running through the woods has not nearly enough boob jiggle.

I'd say it's not enough too much.

Cant wait for the inevitable porn of this

>only lasted 18 seconds out of the whole clip

I feel swindled.

I thought it was going to be 2 minutes of her dancing and her tits bouncing everywhere because of the first post crying about it.

This. I'm sad.

18 seconds of joy i will take to my grave

>18 seconds
>Boob Jiggle
>want more

at least it was 18 seconds of your lives that didn't actually go to waste for once.

Never thought I'd be saying this, but half of Sup Forums are virgins who have never seen boobs jiggle IRL.

WebM done.

>Reduced Resolution to just relevant portion of animation.
>Cut beginning of ball bouncing.
>Cut Mid section swipe.

I'm actually realy impressed on how fluid it is.

I'm surprised that's on someone's animation reel. Given all the crybabies that will freak out about objectification.

I remember an animation class I had where I lost points just because I used a bikini girl in my walk cycle.

>too much boob jiggle

Look at this faggot

Thanks for the webm, senpai.

Some people are able to take criticism without thinking there is some global conspiracy against them.

Also
>>>Italian

That's a great business card for their email, hope they get a chance to see it in this format!

agreed

The instructor literally wrote next to the grade, "poor choice of subject matter."

that's part of the lesson, user: Know Your Audience.
College marks you on giving correct answers, not on your mastery of the craft. You gotta learn how to read your teachers, just as you gotta learn how to read your employers and clients. (it sucks, I know, I'm sorry)

it's to showcase their animation/hardwork.

>too much boob jiggle
I bet you also think ten inches is too much dick you giant pussy faggot

Made some cheesecake shots from the webm If anyone else wants.

looping gifs would be better. the colors in the animation are very solid so it's already optimized for gifs

So's your FACE!

...

>t. someone who havent met art school people

Some user made the webm, I'm making some jpegs, someone else can make gifs

My brand of mental disorder doesn't like fapping to gifs and webms, so I make images.

That's all from my part. the other poses just don't inspire me as much.

Yout teacher sounds like a faggot.

It was a she.

It was my first year at art school and I assumed there weren't hangups about that sort of thing.

do'h

>Why is there so much boob jiggle?

Your teacher sounds like a fat piece of shit.

Well I'm sure somehow it was your fault
What was it actually about?

Porn when?

God's work, user.

this is cartoons man, sure in real life it would take some sad long tits that reach her knees while standing and only keep their shape because of the clothing, for bouncelike that to happen, but if the artist ecided thats how the phisics work on that specific world the it's ok,

>attractive, jiggly-boobed white woman in a swimsuit
The artist isn't getting a job anywhere.

france

COMMENCE THE JIGGLIN'!

Just a walk cycle. Had to animate a character walking.

She didn't have enough boob to jiggle.

...

Except for Adventure time and that bear movie that came out last year. Neither of which you'd call minor jobs

This so much wrote a paper disagreeing with my teacher liberal views
She took 20 points of the paper

It's not like there's nipples or anything over-sexualized. Like, sex appeal is always gonna be there cause it's tits, but it's not really the point of the bit. Fievel goes West had massive wobbly titties, and I don't have more examples but I know I've seen them. Sometimes boobs is boobs.

try studying an not-shit subject

That's actually a pretty lively animation.

I don't think that's the objection; this boob jiggle is hyper-kinetic. Real boobs jiggle plenty but every motion of red-leotard girl sends her tits flying. It's odd and distracting but also not very sexy.

Some restraint would really increase the sex-appeal, if that's what it's going for.

And that was it? Was she simply nude or was there more? What did you do?

Did you mean "20 points off the paper"? Try proof-reading as well as spell-checking next time.

Nevermind reread.
should've went for nude.

Why did he give them such long thighs and short shins? I wonder what they would look like with more proportional legs.

Because Chris likes thighs.

I like thighs too, but I like them wide due to squats. Having the femur that long looks weird.

Yeah, that's fair. I'm not an animator, though I imagine jiggly boobs are a blast to animate. Movement and trajectory and gravity, plus, duh, boobs.

Good reel, swanky music. Thanks.

What's the little black band she's got around her left arm?

you could show this sort of thing in a baby's cartoon for fucks sake

it's nipples that are forboden

you havent seen too much boob jiggle if thats too much for you

We got ourselves a boob expert over here. Your complaint is really fucking petty and stupid.

has this animator ever seen boobs before?

have you ever watched french animation before?

Sorry, Alvise.

The jiggle-factor kinda depends how tight and high cut the suit is in the chest area.

>white woman

It's a racially ambiguous pink woman with thick eyebrows.

>if that's what it's going for
I feel like he's going for the boob jiggle as bait, not necessarily a sexy bait, but a fun one.
boys will watch the short because tits
gay boys/girls will watch the show because they laugh at how ridiculously those tits bounced
Actually informed people may watch it for any of those reason + animation looks good.
The guy's also good with dem facial expression, the way she looks at the ball after making it bounce it's pretty damn well animated

The real accomplishment here is the animator managed to give this girl cute mannerisms while also giving her massive hips and supernatural tits.

Usually cartoons are drawn that way to make up for terrible animation.

HNNNNNNNNNNG

Femurs are the longest bones in your body

>AT
is dead

>that bear movie
The fact you can't even remember the name speaks by itself.

No, you don't understand, hyper sexualization is fine so long as you make her quirky.

>someone out there thinks this is a thoughtful and relevant response
I am now imagining a mile long femur on an otherwise normal sized human being.

why is hypersexualization inherently not fine on it's own?

Objectification. That's why being quirky is the solution. An object can't be quirky and fun and nervous and quirky.

Your opinions are bad and bring bad things into the world.

>Objectification.

you mean people can't express their sexuality without doing it for someone else? or that they have to supress their true selves to keep an image you'd aprove of?

how selfish of you.

As an animator, its more fun to exaggerate these types of things. Of course, I'm not a very good animator, so I'm pretty shit at exaggeration but I really enjoy seeing it applied when people know how to do it.

I mean curvacious titty monsters that don't obey physics in pointlessly revealing clothes for the sole purpose of giving 14 year olds boners. Just make her quicky. Everyone wins.

this
lewd aside, it's well animated.

>pointlessly revealing clothes
>purpose of giving 14 year olds boners
>pointlessly
I'm not following the logic here.

>tfw no big titty gf

>but also not very sexy

It isn't. Only people with ulterior motives are against it. Personal dislike, jealousy, fear.

Objectification isn't a real thing unless you're a wizard literally turning someone into an object. The whole concept is retarded. Are you an evil person for treating a clerk as simply a means to legally attain ownership of items and not bothering to learn his dreams, motivation and life story?

Dude still got paid and has something for his resume.

>making sexy things because you like sexy things is wrong now

No friend you are wrong. Sexy is good and only needs to be sexy.

user plz.
As if there aren't already countless actually talented, passionate animators out in the field with a burning love for bouncy titties wasting their youth behind a copy of toonboom churning out flat, lifeless shit for Teletoon or some other godforsaken cartoon hell.

He'll find work. It will be as dull and forgettable as the workshop scenes from the demo reel. It'll utilize none of this skill. The machine will grind on.

>It isn't. Only people with ulterior motives are against it. Personal dislike, jealousy, fear.
There are good reasons to be against hypersexualization but I don't see the problem in this case. Especially because it's not hypersexualization just for hypersexualization's sake - e.g., it was well drawn and animated, she has a cute personality, etc.

As with many things, the more prevalent, the bigger the problem. Arguably a society that becomes more and more hypersexualized is not overall a good thing for that society. Yes maybe "fear" plays a role in thinking this but fear, in moderation, is a very good thing (people have smoke detectors because they fear there might some day be a fire - and as a result many lives are saved per year)

ok but how is it actually bad

explain it

Has anyone?

Yes.

You sound young and either unable or unwilling to understand the past that led us to this point. You can argue that objectification isn't a problem anymore to argue it has never existed is ignorant.

>pointlessly revealing
>specifically to titillate
You couldn't even sermonize for one sentence without contradicting yourself, you dumb faggot. And who are you to decide what's a good purpose and what's not? As long as you're fine with it it's OK and if you don't it's objectification, did I get your number?