*rewrites history to make Gawker seem like the good guy and victim blames Hogan*

*rewrites history to make Gawker seem like the good guy and victim blames Hogan*

nothin' personal, kiddo

>trials of the free press
>gawker
lmao. people like this should be culled

this will be shown in schools

I think Gawker was wrong. I think Hogan was right. IDK how I feel about a billionair using his money to destroy a media source. Also nothing really happen Gawker still exist just in a different form.

and he still came off as the good guy

What pieces of shit make an anti-hulk hogan docu? Not real americans. Fuck Gawker.

It was such a lame clip to lose so much money over.

As much shit as they gave him, he seemed like the good guy hitting back te only way he knew how. As long as courts are expensive I thi nk it is reasonable that a person can pay anothers court costs.

Gawker was never real journalism though, it was always just a glorified tabloid that people shouldn't be getting all of their news from anyway.

Not gonna watch this, did they include the part where the Gawker guy said they'd publish child porn if it was newsworthy?

yes, but everyone was shown to be irrational for thinking it was in bad taste.

I can't believe that nasty republican Peter Thiel made him say something so obnoxious and tone-deaf while under oath

A video tape of Hulk Hogan thrusting and farting into a woman is not news. It is not anything any one needs to see and when Gawker ignored a court order to take that shit down they got what they deserved for it.

Gawker also outed Timothy Geithner's (Obama's treasury security) brother as a homosexual. They just pissed off a lot of powerful people and those people hit back.

I miss celeb sex tapes

When does this documentary cover that a Gawker witness said a celebrity sex tape is only not newsworthy when the celebrity is younger than five years old?

They actually did cover it. They even pointed out how it was the turning point when the trial jury really started hating Gawker

Are solo vids not enough?

>socialists
>doing historical revisionism
SHOCKED

>million dollar company gets away with breaking laws and fighting lawsuits because of the large amount of money they have
>billion dollar citizen uses money to have a fair fight decided by a court in a legal way

What's the problem here? It's the story of good guys triumphing over the bad guys.

The whole thing was ideological. Gawker were retards but the people against Gawker weren't heroes, it was personal vendettas and ideological opposition.

They are journalism liked it or not. You dont protect journalist only when its convenient. Look behind it man, Hogan was just a pawn for Thiel who hated Gawker.