ITT: Simpsons jokes you don't understand.
ITT: Simpsons jokes you don't understand
Gay people imagine everyone who doesn't support 100% any homosexual opinion are secretly gay
is the joke that australians dont wear pants?
Are you hiding something homoboy?
It's kind of true, though. Those who are vehemently opposed to homosexuality, and very vocal about it, are usually like that because they are trying to repress or hide their own homosexuality.
I don't get it.
I still don't get this couch gag
[citation needed]
gays are 1 % of the population. Way more than 1% don't like gaydom
>I've heard that guy's scared of dogs
>Must mean he's secretly a dog
Idiot. It's not true, you've bought into propaganda.
that's a fucking lie and you know it
you hang around gay people, you see how they raise their adopted children and how they turn out, you see how promiscuous they are, you read about bugchasing...
and suddenly, you're a homophobe
don't fall for the stereotype television is showing down your throat
Faggot.
Somebody has sometime to hide.
>don't fall for the stereotype television is showing down your throat
>instead fall for this stereotype Sup Forums is showing down your throat
what did he mean by this
>Anyone who hates on racists is secretly racist
This is how you sound like. Not that this would be wrong then.
i dun geddit
Moral is not really high at the plant, contradictary to what Mr. Burns just said.
reminder, the person who posts sneed is an underaged /asp/ and Sup Forums spammer from india
His name was Not Important.
...
>Chucks feed and seed
????
>call someone a faggot
Surprise surprise now I'm a fudge packing faggot as well.
>taking anonymous posts this seriously
hi it’s me the real president trump
they grew up to be the super mario brothers.
There's this one joke where Homer drives to a store with the name 'Sneed's Feed & Seed' and underneath that it says 'Formerly Chuck's'. Can someone explain the punchline to me?
except they usually are
>WHITE PEOPLE ARE ALL EVIL RACISTS!
>but that's racist
>NAH BABY IM BLACK SO ITS OKAY
you're doing a terrible job mr president
it’s the though. I’m a huge bigot and secretly really a black man.
...
This thread is gay and doesn't have enough Sneed.
t. freud
fucking amazing source mate
We need less white inbreds in America like you. Kys
yes, its funny because it doesn't rhyme
jajajajjaja
Yes.
Australians can't afford pants
What have been feeding that Zebra?
He is Nuclear Dude
if you hate homophobes, maybe you're a homophobe yourself, sweetie ;)
don't go on Sup Forums, try harder
I am for the acceptance of homosexuals and have nothing against homosexual parenting BUT, I 'd take a moment before trusting anything from major scientific publications regarding ANY topic. Those same publications could have published an article like "Homosexuality: understanding the symptoms" in the 60s.
I hate gnats and I'm secretly a gnat, I admit it
>it's okay when muslims do it
reeeeeeeeeeeee
brainlet
if you doubt anything "scientific" just check the source and researchers
>brainlet
not at all
do you doubt they could have published this?
where did I say that? you can't read too?
SO if I read that back in the 60s, this hypothetical article, and checked the sources, how would I refute them?
Jfc
>moving goalposts
I don't know. I assume by having lots of friends, being influential and not caring much about your moral reputation and job.
>there’s dna in the sign
I'm not moving the goalposts, why did it seem that I did? I have changed the subject however, yes, I am talking about the limits of the scientific method and whether one can trust science to explain everything in life and/or human affairs.
Your first post was about trusting scientific research, the second about refuting a scientific article, and now you're talking about the limits of science.
Either decide what the fuck you're talking about or shitpost by yourself.
It's cum from back when it used to be Chuck's.
Wtf I am a [the unstoppable pass of time and imminent death] now!
>Your first post was about trusting scientific research, the second about refuting a scientific article, and now you're talking about the limits of science.
everything you mentioned is related to each other. I don't understand why you 're angry at me.
...
The sign is clearly made of wood. You think wood doesn't have DNA?
The fact that they're related doesn't mean they're the same thing. I refuted your first point with facts and answered the second one with the knowledge I have on the matter. The third point I can't answer because I'm not God.
Since this is clearly over the best I can do is recommend praying, studying, or what I expect you to do, asking /sci/.
Powers of 10 eames
SNEEEEEEEEEEEEED
>We showed prudes homosexual pornography, and they were affected by it!
>THIS PROVES THAT PRUDES ARE HOMOS!!!
They didn't bother to see how they were affected by heterosexual pornography, in contrast to people that accept homosexuals, because that would blow the shit out of the study.
DNA=soul
think about it
>The fact that they're related doesn't mean they're the same thing.
they are one topic, yes
>I refuted your first point with facts
my point is one and is made through all 3 posts, what were the facts you used to refute my point? That I should check the sources? In that case I answered to you in my second post. Science is related to human experience and how this experience is evaluated and interpreted.
They usually are.
FUCK
I hate niggers therefore I am.
Yes,yes very good thread HOWEVER
What a coincidence because that study actually happened
psychologytoday.com
en.wikipedia.org
wtf i'm a muslim now
gotta give the jew faggots some credit, this stupid underhanded debate tactic of theirs has truly infected western society to the core
dude chill it's ok to like dicks sometimes you dont gotta be a stick in the mud
>this is what faggot marxists actually believe
Feed and seed
>alt right
Opinion respectfully discarded
>respectfully
that's not necessary
CELLS
Try harder next time
Pence is hella gay, bro. Just fucking look at him.
nice comeback, closet case
>I only respect the opinions of everyone who already agrees with me
>check mate, bigots.
?
ya, I dont know why that upsets you that I dont love you. What are you, gay?
Vice emperor Mike "LGBBQ" Pence will be in charge of mass electro-conversion of the mentally ill when the day of the rope arrives.
the want to pretend that mass murderers are lone wolf weirdos. it fools the general public because there is no need to explain crazy.weird.
maybe they just find homosexuals disgusting based on their study of thinks like CDC data regarding their lifestyle and preponderance of disease
NELSON RULES!
the only one who got it
Can someone explain?
Favourite Simpsons episode?
Go
E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt)
Unions are run by the mafia.
'Eating seeds is a pass-time activity' user.
Lemon of Troy
union bosses are all mob types
The joke is they had incredibly repressed childhoods. The Simpsons has suggested homosexuality is due to nurture (not nature) before.
The dog barking the crime thing.
This was the gayest reply ever.
That's not true. There are actually two options.
As you mentioned, being a closeted homosexual is one. But being religiously repressed is the second option.
Nothing is wrong with being a homosexual, unless you're a cherry-picking bible basher.
Great episode, love how they just ruin Flanders New motor home
I've got a joke for you
Matt Groening's net worth is ~500 million