Quasi-Abrahamic Occult Horror Film Suggestions

Requirements:
>Has to at least have a Rotten Tomatoes score of 66%
>Can't be any of The Exorcists, The Conjuring, Annabel, Paranormal Activity or any of the other formula following shitflicks of the 2010s
>Preferably horror films that are from 2000-present day, but if not at least aged well

Perfect example: A Dark Song or The Void.

GO! GO! GO!

Other urls found in this thread:

rottentomatoes.com/m/the_devils_candy
rottentomatoes.com/m/left_bank_2008/
change.org/p/the-world-fantasy-award-make-octavia-butler-the-wfa-statue-instead-of-lovecraft
rottentomatoes.com/m/faults/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Martyrs

I really liked The Devil's Candy
rottentomatoes.com/m/the_devils_candy

Conjuring is better than 90% of the films you're going to get suggested :)

>perfect example: The void

kek

Holy fuck, never mind. It's at 53% critics. 68% audience tho.

it looks lovecraftian and kafkaesque

The House of the Devil

The Sacrament
>63% tho

Maybe, but it's so fucking boring, typical, and lacks any sort of character development/resolution.

Left Bank
rottentomatoes.com/m/left_bank_2008/

one of my fav horror movies. I watch it closer to October 31st.

I know, but the whole haunted house thing...*sigh*

Lovecraftian-tier films with alternate dimensions and forbidden knowledge are cool too.

Couldn't finish it. Thumbs down.

Good enough.

This is the truth why we will never have a movie based on Lovecraft


Lovecraft was a white loser writer who wrote for low-quality magazines.

Nothing he wrote can be compared to works by modern authors.

The only fans of this mediocre are edgy and lonely semi-illiterate boys and racist right-wingers.

> He was a beta that in the whole life only managed to have sex with a woman, for pity.

> He was an affected racist, his hatred of minorities was a shame even at that time

> He was totally devoid of talent,skill and experience, his works were limited to a few pages without a deep narrative and really complex characters, all of them imitations of himself, an incapable, boring and pathetic white male

> It was too anglo, all his work is based on the limited spectrum of the life of an anglo-saxon man.

> Even though he was only focused on this limited racist expectation of an Anglo-Saxon, he was unable to create characters with whom we can identify with ourselves. Even if you are a descendant of Anglo-Saxons, you cannot identify with his racist and poorly educated characters.

> His scientific knowledge was pathetic even for works from the early 20th century. There would be great difficulty in adapting his lack of knowledge to intelligent content for modern audiences.

> Lack of economic and political knowledge. He flirts several times with eugenic and socialist conduct. Had he lived long enough, he would probably be an admirer of Hitler. This lack of knowledge in these issues makes their work become even more outdated and less complex.

> Total lack of subtexts. He probably did not even know what that word means. He also had an extraordinarily poor vocabulary.

Cheers. Making a lineup to watch right when when the clock strikes 12 on October 30th and the early morning hours of Halloween begin.

In summary, Lovecraft is a lame """"""""""artist"""""""""", his work is incapable of captivating people endowed with education, imagination and taste.


Hollywood understands this and seeks to stay away from the pitiful quality and racism that the name Lovecraft is eternally bound.


Here is an example of the """"""""legacy"""""""" of Lovecraft


change.org/p/the-world-fantasy-award-make-octavia-butler-the-wfa-statue-instead-of-lovecraft

>at least have a Rotten Tomatoes score of 66%

Psht, what to kiddies know about horror pre-1980?

The Legend of Hell House (1973)
Children Shouldn't Play With Dead Things (1973)
Magic (1978)

Never said I liked his shit. Matter of fact I've never read a single Lovecraft book. I just like the idea of infinite universes fulla powerful cosmic beings that we can't even begin to wrap our human minds round. I'd prolly be a fan if the God-like beings in his works were more humanoid instead of amorphous, pulsating masses of tentacles and mouths like if a tentacle monster had a miscarriage. I like to stick to my humanoid, quasi-Abrahamic/Silent Hill monstrosity entities of evil.

Did they age well? The Exorcist's a classic, but ain't scary. I'm tryna scare myself into a catatonic state.

Was Lovecraft's racism so bad it seeped into his books? If it did I imagined it was subtle, but the way you make it sound you'd think he dedicated whole chapters to "Race, I.Q. And The Jewish Question" or some such Sup Forumspaganda.

...

Marvel fan boi detect

Watching it now. Just watched some fat, bald guy take an axe to an old lady. Hope the film tones down the metal a bit though. It's giving me From Dusk Till Dawn slasher vibes, cool, but not atmospheric.

the void

sucks, forgot to finish my comment

Anything remotely to do with caped crusaders is fucking gay.

>Cultists
>Occult rituals
>Portals to ungodly realms outside of time and space

It's got everything I look for in a horror film.

>this is a post by someone who is wholly unfamiliar with the works of Lovecraft and only knows what they have been told on Sup Forums

...

>had an extraordinarily poor vocabulary
kek

Does this really have a RT score above 66? It's like the worst fucking movie ever.

This is some pretty good pasta.

rottentomatoes.com/m/faults/

Devil's Advocate
Frailty
Constantine

>lovecraftian
>kafkaesque
>unironically using meme words

>Constantine
Seen it.
>Other two films
Thanks, m8.

dunno about Abrahamic but I sure liked Kill List

>Comedy
>Drama

You even trying, bro?