Am I the only one that's going to see Logan just for X-23?

Am I the only one that's going to see Logan just for X-23?

No fuck you degenerate sickfuck pedophile

...

Its a drawing user.
Not a child. Did you know people fuck midgets and aren't arrest or killed for it?
Maybe you should go on a crusade.

no

I normally don't mind loli but when it's of an actual child that's just a step too far.

>but when it's of an actual child
But its not.

You and the whole of Sup Forums.

>Did you know people fuck midgets and aren't arrest
Unsurprising that you can't grammer good/

I can't believe our Lord and.savoir shadman backed down from drawing porn of keemcucks niece. The two he did were pretty hot

>Its a drawing user.Not a child
It's a drawing on the shape of a child, and that's the particular reason you like it.

>midgets
they are Very different from a child.

...

>It's a drawing on the shape of a child
I've never seen a child shaped like that.
You must see some fucked up deformed kids.
Where do you live? Fucking Russia?

>they are Very different from a child.
Not different enough by your standards.

Kill yourself pedo fuck.
>inb4 she's not real guys!!!!
It's in the likeness of a real person. Don't use the loli excuse.

Why is Sup Forums full of SJWs?

Is this Keem's daughter?

This whole sight is full of SJWs.

Cunt from Logan.

Buts it's a drawing.

Yes the image looks like a kid, but all the thought police need to fuck off.

>Why is Sup Forums full of SJWs?
Listen you retard, the excuse "it's just a drawing" work when it's, you know, actually "just a drawing".
This is not just a drawing, it's based on actual living underage girl, and you fapping to an image based on an actual living underage girl, why is it so difficult to understand normal people would find something like that disturbing?

This is not a tumbleresque "oh, you can't fap to this character, she's fifteen in-universe, that sick and wrong". Those charactrs don't actually exists. This hoever is based on an actual person. Shadman didn't read a comic and decided "I want to do porn of X-23", he saw a trailer and decided "I want to do porn of Dafne Keen, age 12".

It's not even thought police, it's just sick to abuse a real child's image. There's so much non real life based loli porn for you to fap to sicko

>I've never seen a child shaped like that
the figure is literally based on a child

>Not different enough by your standards
it's clearly different in face and body. It's like trying to compare a hobbit with a human child.

I'm going to donate to him out of spite for this thread now.

Oh fuck this is based off a real kid? Nevermind, that's too far.

Fuck off to tumblr.

>the figure is literally based on a child
There are adults with figures like that.

>It's like trying to compare a hobbit with a human child
Hobbits aren't real, user.
Just like that drawing isn't real.

That's literally playing into Shadman's hand. giving him free money just because he is edgy as fuck.

Who is this real person you're talking about?

You know, I actually respect you. You actually acknowledged that there is a line not to be crossed. Thanks m8

So If I draw gore art of you I'm commiting murder right?
Kill yourself American.

Watch your fucking mouth, faggot.
I've been calling these fucks out since the thread started and I'm American.
We aren't all fucking fat retards, alot are but not all.

But murder is something different. Plus I'm an adult so my image is open to various forms of parody whether I like it or not. Obviously fapping go cp isn't molestation, but it's still violating the image of a child. Children deserve more privacy and safety

>Shad sucks
>His art sucks

Look at his Discord he has over 10K people. He clearly doesn't suck

Not that user but if it was drawn in a more anime style I'd not have even bothered to look twice. But with shadman's style it just feels wrong to glance at.

And now I'm wondering why. Is it because I'm used to the constant lolita posted on this japanese moving pictures website, so by now I'm unfazed by it? Or is it because a more 'symbolic' drawing style like anime dehumanises the characters so my brain doesn't process it as something wrong as OP's pic?
Or am I just a massive hypocrite?

>but it's still violating the image of a child.
And this isn't an image of a child.
Its a drawing. A drawing that someone could literally write (character depicted is 18) and you would be able to say shit about it.
You wouldn't even be offended if it were a fucking stick figure but they could just as easily write (character depicted is 3). Would you throw a shit fit then?