Talk about why this movie sucks

talk about why this movie sucks

Because Wenders made basically the same movie a decade before that with Alice in the Cities and that had cunny

I can't, I love it.

it's boring and the ending makes no sense

It didn't.

Wtf how does the ending make no sense?

it has a catchy name for imdbcore redditors
>teehee, it's called LE PARIS COMMA TEXAS, ISN'T THAT CUTE?

it doesn't

There's nothing wrong with that. A semicolon, on the other hand - well.

What did Wim mean by this?

It clearly means to show that this is as important for Travis as it is for her own benefit. He's making amends not only with her, but also himself. Otherwise the viewer might think he's just being selfless.

What did Wim mean by this?

>He's making amends not only with her, but also himself.
Ah interesting thanks

Anyway, what is some other Kinski-kino?

whoa
hashtag deep

Don't try and change the subject.

#deep

It's a minor digression.

Is an auteur not allowed to expand on their previous work?

How was this an expansion? Unless you mean to more lucrative audiences.

At least the mother here wasn't a professional whore

I don't know, I haven't yet seen Alice in The Cities. I was just responding to the statement that it "sucks" because an earlier work happens to be similar.

Oh, well I haven't seen it either. I was just assuming this movie couldn't expand its way out of a paper bag.