BOOOOOORING

BOOOOOORING

No wonder this movie failed

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=79edWNu7NO0
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

"Boring" is not a valid argument, it only says what your mood was while watching the film.
Same as saying "it was fun", that does not indicate anything about the actual quality of the film whatsoever.

To me BR2049 was an 8/10 but I respect your opinion a lot more than the plebs who talk about how good it was visually.

They eat this pretentious "lets make every shot symmetrical even when it doesn't serve the emotional notes of the movie LOL" horseshit up like it's bullcum. The CGI (and/or lack thereof) was good though which makes it better than 99.9% of movies released this year.

Watched it yesterday in the last movie theatre in LA showing this piece of shit yes, it was completely boring and pointless just like the original.

Would you says its "an almost 3 hour long R rated visually focused slow burning neo-noir sci fi film with zero quips that deals with the human condition™" my shill friend?

I love how everybody who hates this movie sounds like a bratty 8 year old girl every time they speak. Really makes you think

Notice how every single person who praises the movie never actually says anything about the movie itself? It's always:
>it's kino
>based x
>
>muh feels
>women don't get it
>roastie
>i like da pictures
>how many times u seen it Sup Forumsros
It's all the fucking same

That's because you're a waste of life loser who gets all his social interaction from an image board.

I'll tell you why I liked it.

Overarching plot of K finding out his past and coming to terms with it, layered over two almost seperate conflicts, first between police woman who doesn't want the world to end over new technology and the wallace corporation doing the unethical to further their power, and then a conflict between the revolution replicants and the wallace corporation. This all worked really well. I also appreciated Ryan Goslings acting, as he over the course of the movie becomes more and more human. Great pacing too, you always have something to think about and you're never annoyed or distracted by clutter or bored from nothing happening.

People are more shallow IRL about the reason they like/dislike movies. You're a waste of life loser who insults random people on a film board.

You're boring
Fucker

I loved this movie. Can't wait to watch it on DVD.

>DVD

I guess I meant BlueRay

Boredom is a symptom of low attention span, low attention span is a symptom of infantilism, infantilism is a symptom of bad genes, bad genes are a symptom of delayed evolution.

Where can I find this in HD online?

An user posted a couple webM's with Chinese subtitles of it . Figured he'd found an HD link. Here's a screen cap of one i found.

Apart from the fact that the trailers failed to show anything relatable to the fans of the original?

That was just for promotional material

Joi a cute

Notice how every single person who shits on the movie never actually says anything about the movie itself?
>Its boring
>Its Reddit
>Villeneuve Pasta
>But the original!
>You're a pleb if you like It!
>The only reason you like it is because AI girls
>Here's the RT scores of other movies. This proves Blade Runner is bad!
It's all the fucking same

I enjoyed most of it, mostly K/Joe's story, but as soon as deckard enters the picture and becomes the main focus the story got less interesting.
K should have said fuck being used and killed both the revolutionaries and the corporation.

This is a common problem with Sup Forums.
>People who hold x opinion are fucking retards
>Only examples I have of such people are from Sup Forums.
There's your problem.

That's because you're a waste of life loser who gets all his social interaction from an image board.

It had some ok moments.

They should have discarded the human-skinjob baby shit though. Just a lame excuse to make Harrison Fords character relevant for this movie. They should have made this its own story, without the baggage of the original. Maybe just mention Decker as an aside, don't force this jesus like plot device. Apparently the skin jobs can't reproduce, really? It shouldn't be that hard to make happen considering we can grow humans in a lab right now if we were allowed too. Such a dumb plot decision.

This movie had lots of problems but being "boring" wasn't one of them. It had kino moments but overall it was ruined by brainlet action Hollywood blockbuster tropes like the shitty Replicant revolution scene.
You must be to a turbo brainlet if your problem with this dumbed down kino is that it was "boring".

>K should have said fuck being used and killed both the revolutionaries and the corporation.
That's exactly what K did, except without the 80s action film conclusion of killing everyone. He went against the corp's desire to capture Deckard and the revolutionaries desire to kill him, instead choosing his own goal to reunite father and daughter.

Er, what?
The revolutionaries wanted him to save Deckard, because they didn't want him interrogated for information, knowing that he'll be likely sacrificing himself in the process.
He literally did exactly what they asked.

>Gosling

No wonder it's shit

LONDON
O
N
D
O
N

Yes, I concur!

Very boring film indeed, and I simply could not understand what was happening most of the time!

Pic related is me.

>The revolutionaries wanted him to save Deckard
What movie did you watch? They tasked K with killing Deckard.
>In order to ensure that Deckard does not lead Wallace to Rachael's daughter or to the replicant freedom movement, Freysa orders K to terminate Deckard. Meanwhile, Deckard is brought before Wallace, who offers him a clone of Rachael as a reward for revealing what he knows. When Deckard refuses to cooperate, Wallace orders Luv to escort him off-world to be tortured for information.

She literally tells K to kill Deckard.

Are you sure? Because based on your post and neo-ideals picture related is you

he wanted K to kill deckard, YOU COMPLETE FUCKING RETARD

Shit, I must have alzheimers or something.

She tells him to kill Deckard you mong. He refuses and goes on his own path

...

The fact that it is Kino is self evident to anyone who has seen it.

I keep hearing motorcycles revving up and I immediately think of this movie. Am I going crazy?

The sound design in the movie was incredible. Anyone else notice in some scenes they re-used the cyclic fan/ventilation-system noise from the original? You can hear it best in Deckard's apartment scenes.
youtube.com/watch?v=79edWNu7NO0

...

i feel bad for anyone whose iq is too low to enjoy the kino that is BR2049

was it really boring ? i went to watch this movie with a patient of a psychiatric hospital i volunteer in. and he kept saying it was boring untill we got out (15 min after the movie started) but i did not get why he felt it was boring

You walked out after 15 minutes? The first scene of the movie has a huge fight with Dave Bautista, why would he think it's boring?

It sometimes felt like it was dragging on the first viewing, but it felt excellently paced on the second viewing

that's what i don't get it. i feel he said it was boring just because of his mental illness (maybe he was scared or something). i'll go watch it next weekend since there is no HD torrent yet

I was skeptical of the long length but I ended up actually wishing for more. Every scene was engaging. Even in when not much is happening story-wise the visuals and sound design keep you interested.

I doubt you'll be able to find a theater playing it next weekend

why is that ?

because the movie flopped and WB is pulling the plug

the original blade runner movie is also dull as paint drying.

i doubt my movie theatre would remove blade runner. it barely had any movies playing other than some local stuff

The original poster is homosexual.

I liked it.

Maybe you should have watched Geostorm instead.

>brainlet action Hollywood blockbuster tropes like the shitty Replicant revolution scene
That was subversion of a trope though. You never saw the revolution and he basically told them to fuck off.

You know what, let's change this thread up a bit

>"lets make every shot symmetrical even when it doesn't serve the emotional notes of the movie LOL"

You have no idea what you're talking about, this wasn't a Wes Anderson movie...Very few shots were symmetrical.

>tfw you're the best

...

MEDIOCRE HACK DIRECTS SEQUEL TO CLASSIC FILM NO ONE BUT RAGING FEDORAS IN THE 15-30 YO DEMOGRAPHIC WANTED

No wonder this movie failed

you're a good joe

Watched it for the second time today. Loved it by how did K manage to find where Love was transporting Deckard?

LAPD radar. it's literally shown on screen

It's really lame. The praise is very vague. It's obvious the fan boys are in their first 6-12 months of "being into movies."

>beautiful cinematography
>compelling story
>etc.

High-school tier level "analysis"

When I watched it, I figured he used his contacts and ability as a blade runner to track the car, but then realized that makes no sense as he was on the run and set for termination. My guess is the revolution had some way to find it and gave him the "car ID" or whatever jargon you want to use for tracking.

Wait, it was? How did he still have access to the PD after they determined he needed to be retired? And wasn't his cop car destroyed?

appealing to credentialism is a sign of being an irony faggot, fuck off

he parked his cop car on the outskirts. it shows the resistance camp next to it, and they drive it to their HQ in the next scene

>How did he still have access to the PD after they determined he needed to be retired?
They never took his car.Either they forgot because suspending a replicant wasn't standard procedure, or the boss let him have it so she can keep an eye on him because she felt responsible he was about to get put down

>And wasn't his cop car destroyed?
No, Deckards car was destroyed. His was parked somewhere in Vegas.

Love the film but this is bugging the shit outta me.

>but then realized that makes no sense as he was on the run and set for termination

He was never on the run from the police.He was just suspended. The boss told him he will need to pass the next baseline test otherwise she wouldn't be able to help him anymore

What the fuck are you talking about, symmetry isn't even remotely over-used in it.

I liked the cinematography but if you're gonna call something out as over-used "make morons praise the CGI" it's the faux-minimalism stuff.

Best example of it being used for absolute hackery is interstellar. ie hey, here's a shot of the spaceship. except that the spaceship is miniscule and in the right hand corner, and the rest of the screen is black space.

It's a shortcut to making morons praise your visuals because the last 20 years have seen increasing amounts of directors playing "let's shove as much shit into every single frame as we can". So if you cut down everything to like, a bunch of single-colour space, a bunch of retards will notice that it looks different to the norm and striking, and sperg out over the film on reddit.

Having said all that, Deakins is great and the film was still 8/10 visually and 9/10 overall IMO. Minimalism isn't necessarily bad at all. it's just a bit of a cheat for getting the reddit crew on board. (this is also the reason behind the absolute plague of "minimalist" movie posters - that and the fact that they take about 10 minutes to make in illustrator)

Denial/delusion. Just like S5 BrBa. The fanboys claim the critics leave vague criticisms, when in actuality, every BrBa thread, and every BR2049 thread, has had articulate criticism, that naturally, is met with insults, memes, and legitimately vague criticism, as the butthurt fanboys' emotions get hurt and they aren't smart enough to counter real criticisms.

Thanks for the corrections.

Thought as much, BOOOOORING

this is top tier meaningless post. well done

Just came back from seeing it, so whats the deal with the horse memory, was he the cloned baby or he got the memory because lolchaos

I was under the impression the baby was never cloned, they just messed with the records to confuse things.

jesus. why do you people bother going to see movies.

Not really, it was more like an underdeveloped plot point that shows how the people working on the movie had different ideas of what it should be.
Wallace and his scenes were terrible too, he felt like a cartoony villain from the dumb action movies. My theory is that the movie had a shitty script but an amazing director.

>unlike me, the genius who has never misheard or misunderstood anything in a movie

The real replicant child - Dr. Ana Stelline - was never manufactured. She was a "natural" birth. She got a job creating memories for replicants, but she was illegally using bits if her own memories and putting them into other replicants - it's suggested the horse one is used a lot by the hooker replicant picking up and recognizing the figurine. K just happened to be a replicant cop with the resources to track down and confirm the memory and just happened to come across Bautista's character which started the "quest."

So not chaos as much as coincidence paired with "chumming the water" by Dr. Stelline.

Is the memory place in LA? It's snowing there in both scenes.

Also why did the resistance put in the fake dna record? Without the duplicate standing out, the trail ends there.

>he felt like a cartoony villain from the dumb action movies
it feels like half of his scenes are missing. besides he's a tragic villain - he wanted to be more superior than Tyrell but he lacked genius therefore he was just a simple farmer who spoke in pretentious symbolism and allegories while not improving replicants in any bit.

I thought she picked up the horse because it was real wood, never got the sense she also had the memory.

>and recognizing the figurine
she says "it's from a tree"

so the bit of having no inmune system was manufacturad for her working on the shit plan, but how they managed a slave kid to become a dr anyway without rising any alarms?

>Without the duplicate standing out, the trail ends there.

It wasn't "the resistance", only one person did all of this the woman with one eye. And you don't actually know, because she did this before all the data was lost in the blackout. Maybe more stuff lead to her but she got rid of all the clues in the orphanage. If Ana didn't use real memories unknowingly it would be impossible to find her.

> but how they managed a slave kid to become a dr anyway without rising any alarms?
...she wasn't a slave she was in an orphanage. She was adopted that much is obvious and her parents wanted to take her off-world that means they weren't poor

fuck u riri

Wallace is an awesome character, there is so much room for expansion with him. I love how he can plug those chips into his neck to interface with different machines and control them with his mind while seeing through their cameras (in place of his regular eyesight). Who knows what kinds of other machines he can control with those other chips? Maybe he has his own personal combat mech or something

Maybe, there is also the scene where the revolution leader says "we all thought we were the child" or something like that, but she never says they all had the horse memory.

I just find it too coincidental that K had just the right memory and just the right encounter to set it all off. It makes more sense in my mind that Stelline re-used the horse memory a lot.

I know what she said. Why would she even look at it to determine that? Who would ever suspect some crappy child's toy was made from an incredible valuable and scarce resource? I don't see the point of the scene other than to show other replicants recognizing the figure - there is an entire other plot scene where we determine the horse is real wood.

>but how they managed a slave kid to become a dr anyway without rising any alarms?
If her entire backstory is made up (no rich adopted family) then it isn't explained other than "the revolutionaries hacked the records and set up her current situation."

because she's never seen a tree before. This is the first time she's experienced real wood

>"we all thought we were the child"
She says "we all wish we were her". Doesn't imply what the other thing implies

> I don't see the point of the scene other than to show other replicants recognizing the figure
Because you aren't looking.
>Marriete obsession with threes - Shows she dreams of a better more colorful world than the one she's stuck with
>Her looking around the house for possible clues - her doing what she was asked to do
>Joi noticing her and chasing her away - Shows joi is a bit jelaous, shows replicants see A.I as lower life form than them

Bones show child was born.
Tree has date (possible date of birth?).
Possible DOB leads to checking DNA birth records for that month/year.
Records must be checked manually.
Only thing that stands out are two records that are DNA duplicates save for gender.
Fake male record leads to the real orphanage.
Trail ends at real orphanage.

I guess without the horse memory the trail ends at the orphange, but why end it at the real orphanage? Why not 1, don't put in a duplicate file that stands out. And 2, not have file lead to the real orphanage, have it lead to a fake address or somewhere else.

How would she know it's real wood if she's never experienced real wood before? Fake wood would be all over the place, just like the fake animals in the first one.

I hear your argument and think it could go either way. In my mind, it makes more sense for the memory to be re-used.

I disagree. It's still implying they all had REASON to wish they were the child, that they all had her real memories inside them.

Fair enough.

>Buddhism 101
>no noir in the pretty boy
>refurbished original ala Star Wars
>thinking meiosis is essentially human

This was a shallow CGIed rerelease of the original for little boys. Although I will admit, the aesthetic was.

>How would she know it's real wood if she's never experienced real wood before? Fake wood would be all over the place, just like the fake animals in the first one.
and yet Deckard could recognize the fake animals

This

...

>I disagree. It's still implying they all had REASON to wish they were the child, that they all had her real memories inside them.

But you disagree because you're misinterpreting what was said.
We all wish it was her, never implies what you say it implies. It implies they all wish to be special, to have a soul, to have a mother, etc