Is it really THAT bad?

Is it really THAT bad?

Is it worth my time watching?

Mummy thread.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hCm2PX5Iz00
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I really liked it in the same way I loved Jupiter Ascending and liked Transformers 5.
It's basically a Roland Emmerich movie.

The hateboner comes from people thinking its a reboot of the original Mummy trilogy, which is plain wrong. Even so, by a stand alone pov, the movie is like your average american money grab, like Transformers. A 6/10 at best, but something you can watch out of curiosity. It had references to the original Mummy trilogy, the one and only nice touch.

>Is it really THAT bad?
No. It's dull and uninspired but It's worth a watch. Sofia Nutella and The Cruiser almost make it fun.

Depends on what your time worth tell me whar is your job position and salary and il quantity it

Boutella is ugly so no

>Boutella is ugly
Uhmm no sweety

Full time student.

Part time pizza delivery driver. £7.50 an hour. I work Fridays, Saturday's and Sundays.

Worth watching for
>mummyfu. Design and process of her regeneration is top-notch.
>new take on the story. Remakes/reboots usually are repetitive. This one isn't, not related to previous trilogy. New characters and locations.
>great blend of special effects and CGI. Movie feels very realistic. Solid grounds in our world, mummy powers are only supernatural things.
>action. Tom Cruise delivers what he does the best. Stunts and running.
>very cool portrayal of Dr Jekyll/Hyde...
cons
>...whose character was unnecessary to movie
>cringe humour and dialogues
>out of place characters, especially lead female.
7/10 for me. It's one of these movies, where initially panned may become cult-classic in future

It's one of my favorite background movies. Same with The Faculty

>It had references to the original Mummy trilogy, the one and only nice touch.
>original Mummy trilogy
2017 movie plot is closer to """"original"""" mummy, than whole Brendan trilogy
Director and creators stated many, many times the movie is more rooted in original, Karloff one. Even before actual movie, they played short promo with 30s monsters. Whole movie starts with quote straight from 1932 one.
youtube.com/watch?v=hCm2PX5Iz00
If You got DVD/BR release, they included small info-advert inside, reminding Universal Monsters movies from 30s.

I thought that video was laughable.
>montage of classic monsters
>EPIC MUSIC FUCK YEAH GET HYPED FOR THE DARK UNIVERSE

You only proved their point.
She is not attractive.

screw movie, wasn't that bad but not great either
just post moar mummyfu

its boring, poorly written and pretentious the way it spends so much time jacking of its own "universe" instead of trying to be an actual movie.

>Is it really THAT bad?
yes
>Is it worth my time watching?
yes

She's gorgeous. Clean the semen off of your eyes.

checking Mummy threads since months. Never seen this picture. Good job user.

No prob

Sofia is tiny (5'4 165 cm) but how tiny these chongs have to be?!?

lol

japs maybe, this seems to be from Japan release
china had the same day as worldwide, japs had to wait month

MUMMY?

it is only worth it for russell, and he isn't even used that well.

sweetie posting is back!!!!

>just post moar mummyfu
this guy gets it

Would've been a decent flick if it took itself seriously, but one million millennial fags would've screamed, MUH FRASER QUIP MUMMY and it would've done even worse than it did.

Mummy-fu is wasted.

>ugliest pretty girl ever born

Isn't this that ugly chick with the sword legs from kingsman?

giv mummy gf

giv mummy setepai

More like other way around.
Prettiest ugly woman.
But to be honest she's in no means ugly. It's something I would call unusual beaty, not for common standards. Symmetrical face, beautiful eyes, fit and athletic body, without muscle overload. It's only her chin that makes you feel uncomfortable with.
Would choose her over any BBW or bimbo.

she was photo model too

...

...

...

...

...

...

someone continue pls