Protagonist has no-kill rule

>Protagonist has no-kill rule
>It never bites him in the ass

>There's a protagonist

God I fucking hate the faggoty way comics censor words.

>Protagonist has no-kill rule
>It never bites him in the ass

Has that ever actually happened?

>"hero" doesnt use guns
>uses everything else

center that

Better?

Much better

Remember, kill everyone but the Joker.

>Protagonist has no-kill rule

That rule is for pussies.

>characters with the least lethal weapons kill the most
>characters with the most lethal weapons kill the least

>protagonist is surrounded by enemies
>uses THAT technique

>Character has no qualms about killing
>Ends up committing suicide

>Protagonist has a no-kill rule
>Gets backed into a corner where he has absolutely no choice

go away Zack

Why would it?

The fuck I'm reading?

Jason came back from the dead and really wanted to kill the Joker

Batman intervened

...

>Antagonist has a no-kill rule

Now that is something I want to see.

>Antagonist doesn't kill women or children

I want this.
No casualties.
Just control.

kek, source?

Well, I don't kill people either and so far things have been going alright.

The Rogues are usually like that iirc.

oh yeah, I've reasd some of their stuff. I think they're pretty cool.

You aren't a protagonist. You're set dressing at best.

If you're powerful enough you can make it happen.

What is the GoT Stark family?

> Bran doesn't kill Petyr on a duel
> Ned doesn't kill Jaime in picrelated

Holy shit this is retarded

why not hit arm? hand?

>Protagonist has a super secret family member
>This is never brought up again

>Ned doesn't realize Jaime is the Good Guy in picrelated
FTFY

Still, if Ned HAD killed Jaime... his son wouldn't have been crippled. His foster-father wouldn't have been murdered, so he'd have no reason to go to King's Landing. Since he wouldn't be there, he wouldn't uncover the incest conspiracy, so his best friend wouldn't have been boar-gored. With drunken Rob still in charge, most of the kingdom wouldn't have been murdering each other while the ice zombies were amassing. Since there's no civil war, most of his kids and his wife would still be alive...

And he'd have told Jon Snow about his actual heritage.

Feels like Ned really should have killed the guy. I mean, half of the above is only tangentially related to Jaime being alive, but if Ned never went to King's Landing, things would have been very different.

Kefka pushed Jason in such a way where the batarang hit the jugular.

Wait, no. I forgot. Little Finger had his cuckquean murder Jon Arryn... Well, without his son being crippled, Ned might not care enough to go to King's Landing anyway.

>protag has no kill rule
>handily kills tons of nameless goons
>always lets the main baddy go

If Tyrion hadn't killed his mom at birth Jaime would've been married to Elia Martell and Cersei to Oberynn. Avoiding shitloads of later squabbles and leading to a more mellow Tywin.
If Howland Reed hadn't traipsed his frog-eating arse down to the trident Rhaegar wouldn't have noticed Lyanna when she defended Howland's honour under the guise of The Knight of The Laughing Tree.
If Varys didn't manipulate Aerys to crash the Tourney at Harrenhal the lords of Westeros may have crowned Rhaegar on their own and everything could've been great.
Hell, if Robert had just not been a complete shit to Stannis Jon Arryn would've survived and the entire plot of the first book would've been averted.

Ned not killing Jaime by the Iron Throne is hardly a defining moment in the series.

Everyone is the protagonist of their own story, user.

>Protagonist kills a lot
>It never bites him in the ass

a bit to the right please

Let me know if I went too far.

Probably because the people he kills are deas so there's no chance of that happening.

>what are vengeful relatives/friends
>what are innocents caught in the crossfire

>what are vengeful relatives/friends
They die too.
>what are innocents caught in the crossfire
Doesn't happen.