WTF did I just watch??

>pic related

Why did Sarah Gadon's character sleep with Adam even though she knew he wasn't her husband?

...

>hmm yes, very lynchian

D R O P P E D
R
O
P
P
E
D

Explain it then, good sir.

Spoiler that shit, faggot.

>lynchian
Strikes me more like lovecraftian with a bit of kubricky

I think Thor Ragnarock may suit you better.

More importantly, she doesn’t blink when she looks at Adam.

Because all women are whores, didnt you watch the film?

>spoiler a film that came out 5 years ago

This movie is like Mullholand Dr. in a sense that there's a logical explanation but the film misleads you and you can easily think supernatural things are happening or you can misinterpret it differently.

If you really like the movie you can watch it again and see if you can figure it out, or just watch an explanation on youtube

This and especially if you're a huge fan of BR2049

Watch it again and pay close attention to the torn out photograph

For those who didn't like the movie like me, apparently the events depicted in non-chronological order. The weakest Villnev film imo.

>apparently the events depicted in non-chronological order
I don't think that's the explanation to the movie.

It's better than Arrival and BR you cheeto dust covered pleb.

Bet you like Francois Ozon movies.

>they're more mainstream so they're worse
Uhm, no. Blade Runner was the peak of the mans film-making career so far.

READ THE BOOK

MUCH BETTER THAN ANY SHIT FLICK WITH GYLENHALL

BECAUSE SHE IS PROJECTING HER HUSBAND ON HIM

PIC UNRELATED

Was the book supernatural? Were they twins?
Because the movie leaves some obvious clues thatIt's all in his head , double personality

Blade Runner 2049 was a 4 hour long video game cutscene.

You promised me you wouldn't go there.

...

I can understand not liking 2049 but this is not an appropriate criticism. Is unrelated to what 2049 is and is not.

OT: is Enemy told in an anachronic order?

>is Enemy told in an anachronic order?
no