What did The Walt Disney Company's Marvel Entertainment's Marvel Comics mean by this?

What did The Walt Disney Company's Marvel Entertainment's Marvel Comics mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/08/david-ayer-marvel
desuarchive.org/co/search/text/"age of ultron"/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Perfect sense.

"We want to reach a new low! And make sure the writer doesn't get hired by DC, ever!"

Doesn't Warner Brothers company DC comics have a Black Panther and a Deadpool in there comics right now

Probably to make a joke or trigger butthurt people like you.

It has already done its job it seems, considering you made this thread.

Literally the new Howard the Duck

>joke
Yeah, like when Marvel says that DC is crashing the comic industry with $2.99 comics...

Yeah, but we aren't talking about that.

Exactly, It's a joke at the expense of a shitty fucking company

>getting butthurt over a 6 month old issue
hehe haha hoho

>Joe Kelly has gone full Waid

Here's the MIDF.

Then why make the thread?

Yes, but Deathstroke existed much before DP, and that Black Panther character is an intelligent joke. That panel, on the other hand, is American Housewife tier.

user, no. This is a joke about a movie that most people think is crap. At best, you can say he's beating a dead horse.
Waid, on the other hand shits on DC more than any writer at Marvel, with the possible exception of Spencer. Waid went on a twitter rampage when he heard the first Wally West trades were canceled, and didn't even bother saying a token "oops, my bad" when it turned out that it was going to go to sale, and indeed it did.

Seriously, don't say things you can't take back, user. He didn't go anywhere NEAR full Waid.

>a movie that most people think is crap
Good intern. Go on.
>He didn't go anywhere NEAR full Waid.
Oh, he did. Going back to Marvel was just the beginning.

Are DC fans the most thin skinned fans in existence?

Forgot to say: Twitter bots aren't people. Not until IAs become something as common as air, anyway.

No, those would be marvelfags. They need to hate on DC or their life won't make any sense.

he's talking about red tool aka wade wilkins a deadpan parody in harley quinn that was created around the time of the first trailer for deadpool..

Then why this thread?

Because people ignored it last time OP made it.

>Good intern. Go on.
Oh, fuck off. Don't deny that BvS is a widely disliked movie, it just makes you seem like a mindless drone.
It's a shit joke from a bad comic, but acting like the only people who could possibly dislike BvS are shills makes you look like an idiot.

Oh, nice. But do they insult Marvel or Disney with that parody?

Good intern. Go on.
>a bad comic
See? Kelly is dead. Gone full Waid.
>the only people who could possibly dislike BvS are shills
Or Twitter bots.

The Deadpool character I was talking about is in Harley Quinn

There's nothing wrong with making fun of shitty movies.

If this upsets you you're just a butthurt fanboy.

>There's nothing wrong with making fun of shitty movies.
And yet you get so angry when someone laughs at the MCU...

Jesus, triggered much?

>pointing out that you're crying over mean old Marvel bullying poor innocent DC
>somehow WE'RE the shills

You do realize the irony, right?

That isn't happening in this thread though.

The only one who seems to be butthurt is you.

>somehow WE'RE the shills
Well, yes. Modern Marvel only has shills, not fans.

What's the difference, user? Seriously, what is the difference?

I think the failures of the DCEU and DC You broke them.

Even now that they've got rebirth they just can't let go and are tushy tortured that DC isn't universally praised

Marvel fans hate modern Marvel because it's shit.
Marvel shills defend modern Marvel, no matter how shit.

No samefagging, user. It makes you look butthurt.

Actually, it's a GOOD one. It's pretty clever to mock DC by using their clone characters. Also marvel versions are useless anyway. At least they can do something as a joke.

>not once in my life have I gone to the movies dressed up as Spiderman

Why am I living such a shit life?

>And yet you get so angry when someone laughs at the MCU
That's a funny thing that never happens, or at least happens far more rare than threads like this

You are thinking of Redtool or Deathstroke and Red Lion. And the issue isn't Hyperion and Nighthawk- the issue is the Disney mandated criticism of the enemy company.

I think it's hilarious. I haven't been a fan of Marvel for a long time now, but the astronomical butt hurt of the DC drones is something truly amazing to witness.

In fact, and I'm the one accusing Kelly of going full Waid, it works both ways. Those two characters are bad copies of Supes and Bats; what DP says can be applied to any MCU movie, and what Spidey says can be easily applied to CW2.
That attack on Karen Berger is a bit sad, though.

Suuure.

>I haven't been a fan of Marvel for a long time now
Well, Marvel shills are all casuals, so...

Reminder that a Disney funded sitcom had characters talking about how bad BvS was while standing in front of a row of Disney posters.

>Marvel Rebirth happens
>all the writers are Outhousers or CBR employees
>they write anti-DC pamphlets instead of superhero stories
Calling it now.

Well, thing is - DC universe is superior and connected world of greatest and iconic characters while marlel is sjw garbage. And yeat their cinematic universes are both shit.

user, not everyone is a casual because they don't think everything DC does is perfect. You've got the better books, why must you be such a faggot every time someone makes a joke about Snyder's movies? Fuck, Suicide Squad came out, and they're STILL making fun of Dawn of Justice, and usually people stop making fun of the last movie when a new one comes out (sort of like how you don't see people making threads to shit on Avengers 2 anymore).

>greatest and iconic characters

Oops, forgot the fact that the movie rights to DP and Spidey aren't owned by Marvel Studios.

>not everyone is a casual because they don't think everything DC does is perfect
Can you prove it? Furthermore, can you also explain ?
>you don't see people making threads to shit on Avengers 2 anymore
I'm sure the Archive thinks otherwise.

>Marvel has their attack dogs talking about how DC is killing the industry and shilling on every form of media 24/7
>"lol its just le bantz bro!"

>One DC creator says "Fuck Marvel"
vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/08/david-ayer-marvel
>Marvel Zombies go on the attack and force him to apologize

I mean I guess its not surprising since Marvel's writers are all just bitter DC rejects like Waid or Shooter, but isn't it a little odd how only Marvel ever stoops as low as filling their books with hate for their opposing company?

Dance off bro!

And what do you care? Do you work at DC? You seem way to personally invested in a pissing contest between comic book companies.

>You seem way to personally invested in a pissing contest between comic book companies.
So are you. Your point?

>I'm sure the Archive thinks otherwise.
I checked the archive, there isn't an OP bitching about that movie in particular. Maybe there's a post whining about that in particular, but I can't be bothered looking through every thread posted on Sup Forums in the last three days. If you are so sure, YOU can post the threads.

This delusion is comical.

It's funny that YOU are the type of people who declare other shills, while you act like a dog to an specific company, thi ks that everyone who disagree with you is part of a agenda, and cry over any kind of criticism.

If anything, you are the shill.

Why are all you Ratfuckers so phenomenally anally anguished all the time?

I hope DC isn't that piety. Even Marvel lets the writers makes fun of itself all the time. It's a charm they have had sense the 70s.

We explained the joke, and you started bitching about how mean Marvel is.

How am I? I'm just laughing at how butt blasted you DC fan boys get at every little thing.

>usually people stop making fun of the last movie when a new one comes out
wut

>collects attacks on DC
>considers himself morally superior
Your autism is comical.

Try that again in english

They did this joke already with Falcon back

>the day BKV prophetised the descent of Marvel into SJW'ism
So this is why he left for Image.

>How am I?
By angrily responding with buzzwords, unpaid employee.

That was english, you fucking mongtard. At best, he spelled "petty" wrong.

That's pretty good.

desuarchive.org/co/search/text/"age of ultron"/

You are LITERALLY calling everyone shills. That is the definition of responding with buzzwords.

Point stands that the two make fun of each other and themselves all the time. You have to be very callow to think the big two are that immature with each other.

>DC

It's Warner Bros mate, there is a difference that fanatic shills don't notice.

Anger? Buzzwords? Point out where I have done so.

I don't know, seeing how Marvel is dominating the movie industry and DC is still catching up.

I guess that they wanted to do a fun jab at them but this comes off as a petty insult.

>DC isn't WB
If you say so.

Reread the thread. If you can read, that is

>I guess that they wanted to do a fun jab at them but this comes off as a petty insult.
That's exactly what's happening, and what we're talking about. But the MIDF, you know...

Welp, time to ht the gym like a good DCfag. Thanks for the tears, mousefriends.

>DCEU fanboys are so butthurt about the fact none likes their shitty movie that they need to make a thread about a joke in 6 months old comic and pretend there is a DC bias when Lego Batman is a critical success
This would be funny, if it wasn't so pathetic... but what the heck, I'll laugh anyway

@90187367
DC has different people in charge, and people who are better at dealing with the characters than the movie studio.

Man, it's just OP baiting.

All the thread is a desperate cry for "you"s.

>>the day BKV prophetised the descent of Marvel into SJW'ism
>something Marvel has done since the fucking 70s
How fucking underage and/or retarded are you? where do you think they joke the joke for that comic strip? She this comic where they add a pile of diversity to their big selling book? This is what they do today. Same shit different day kiddo.

Again. Point out where I said something in anger or used "buzzwords".

>Reread the thread
I have and all I see are
muh Marvel shills
muh rat fuckers
muh unpaid interns

>implying

People only liked Lego Batman because Disney and Marlel changed people's perception of super heroes and made they think that super heroes movies can only be meme comedies quipfests.


Now if you execute me, I have to hit the gym, I have to keepyou DChad body.

>Waid, on the other hand shits on DC more than any writer at Marvel
Was he that upset over Superman snapping a neck? Is the man still broken from that after all this time?

Every time I remember video with Jimmy Felon where they making parody of BvS scene and Will Arrnet shows up and saying something like "we're still relevant" about Lego Batman. And nowdays Lego Batman is much more praised than BvS. What a fucking strange timeline we live in.

Stop taking OP seriously, it's bait.

OP is just sad that Snydefags shut posters aren't even end tolerated on Sup Forums anymore.

>Lego Batman is much more praised than BvS

Well, Batman vs Superman is shit, so....

That's a weird way of saying "because Lego Batman is good".

>OP is just sad that Snydefags shut posters aren't even end tolerated on Sup Forums anymore.

Seriously? Wow, good on them.

I think he's upset that he didn't get to write Superman.

>prophetised
user he was called Black Panther to capitalize on the same group that was very controversial for it's time. Marvel has always been very far left liberal, it's just the new stuff isn't what you grew up with so it seems more threatening. I find it strange we are freaking out over these changes when they had a woman of color beat a average white man for team leadership of a big selling book decades before SJW even were a thing. Hell DC was pulling the white guilt card in the late 70s.

>Disney mandated criticism of the enemy company
Or, now hear me out here because this is a little crazy, it's just a jab at a critically panned and near universally despised movie.

Well, that's what I'm talking about. Lego Batman is best superhero movie of last few years while BvS is one of the worst. Dafuq

>user he was called Black Panther to capitalize on the same group that was very controversial for it's time.

I thought it was a coincidence?

Where has DC gone on the attack against Marvel?

Yes, snyder dick sucking has been low there, and most people mock them. This is why the shitposting increased on Sup Forums - people still fall for DCEUfag bait.

Yup they report and hide where they got tired of the shit. Which honestly it's a bad sign for the property when people don't even care to engage the topic anymore. That kind of apathy is going to lead to some low sales in the box office.

Wasn't the character created a month before the group?

Joe Kelly didn't even write this issue. It was a fill-in.

It was, user is full of shit. In fact, there was a brief period of time where the character's name was changed to distance him from the group of the same name.

Not involved in this conversation, but the new X-Men were different. The team was inclusive, yes, but it was to play up the international aspect of the new team. It served a purpose in both the story and the group dynamic, it wasn't simply to meet a quota.

honestly it's a bit of a mystery because while the Black Panther Party was officially created October 15 1966 (3 months after the marvel hero) the term was used by the party long before that when they were more or less just rioters and protestors. Interestingly enough BPs original name was Coal Tiger but Stan changed it close to publication. With the lack of internet back then we won't ever have the full story if it was just a huge coincidence or if Stan knew what he was doing and it went horribly wrong. I myself lean that they were aware of the group and wanted to support the idea back in it's infancy because again, the term Black Panther was know a good year before they were an official group and was the 60s equivalent of the "Black Lives matter" before they became a nationalist and socialist organization. Talking about this just reminds me how nothing is new under the sun.

Source?

To be fair, Coal Tiger is an awful name.
Hell, it wouldn't shock me if Stan heard the name "Black Panther" somewhere, and just took it for the character without doing any research. It sounds like something he would do.

>play up the international aspect
That was still a huge controversy back in the 60s and 70s, the country still wasn't a fan of foreigners on their lands, more so with post WW2 and the Cold War.
>It served a purpose in both the story and the group dynamic
strongly disagree there because the story was the original all white team was kidnap short of the leader and they needed the new all diversity team to go in and save the white folk.
>it wasn't simply to meet a quota.
It was very meet a quota. Stan Lee admits a lot of what he and others were pushing in 70s Marvel was diversity and "wanted our comics to be the first black superhero, the first Asian super hero" also they did these big changes with one of there best selling books. This is honestly no different from now. You are just more aware of the politics being injected in the media today because it's what you are growing up around.

>people are getting butthurt about a topical book that makes fun of everything.
Why?

>diversity book
One Native American (who promptly dies) and one African. Wow, so diverse.

Imagine if DC takes a jab at Marvel