How do you fuck up CGI in 2017?

how do you fuck up CGI in 2017?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RlXnBtasZJM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>gif in 2017
How can you fuck this up, OP.

Watching this on my iPad I was really thankful for OP

>iPad
You and OP need to leave.

It looks weird because you're imagining its a human body but its ahead attached to a metal body with a bunch of hydraulic cables

>judging a film based on a 240p camrip

wrong

This.

I blame Disney for this.

Why is there a monkey on screen?

Somehow 1987's Robocop didn't had this problem.
The head tracking is completely atrocious here, it's beyond iron man in civil war and that's saying something. This is the new low bar in head tracking. Congrats DC you finally beat Marvel at something.

phoneposters have evolved

why does this look fine then you nigroid?

Bruh. Look at this dude.

The head isn't supposed to track, its not rigidly connected to the body like Robocop or iron man. There are a couple of loose cables holding the head in a floaty position. Look closely

You can see all the metal parts moving here, while with Iron Man his neck isn't supposed to move like that.

good question

Jesus Christ. Those ashes look soo bad.

Cyborg didn't bother me at all in this. Superman face in the other hand, that was some uncanny valley shit. Just looking at his face was horrifying

Cavill's mustache in MI 6 is epic, there should be an option to turn it back on in the blu-ray so Superman looks like the dad from Invincible

Why would the web get stickier/more able to stick to the ship just because he's holding it..? That's why the other webs broke.

Physically speaking, holding it like that makes absolutely no sense, doesn't help at all. He just makes himself a part of the sharing the web's pull, but the web can contain the pull (since it's not breaking in half, not that it matters in this case anyway). The problem is that it's not sticky enough.If he wanted to help he should've just continued attaching the web at both sides as he did previously.

Wasn't he supposed to be a top student..? This is some pretty basic shit

Watchmen was like less than half the budget and had way better vusuals

nooo wait i retract that... the webs were breaking in half, and the shorter length of the webs would make it less prone to breaking. Good science there, spidy

you don't even need CGI here

>Cyborg
>Practical effects
They'd look even worse, I just wish the face plate was real

you kinda do considering cyborg is all cgi

...

Does cgi even look good anymore? When was the last time you saw a movie and were legitimately impressed with how computer effects were done?

The truth is CGI was never meant to be "good" but convenient.

my girlfriend works at Luma pictures, who only do Marvel movies and not this bullshit DC crap. Luma is far and away the best VFX company, so thats probably a reason.

>175 million budget
>25 just to RDJ

300 million budget

So basically it's supposed to look like shit

>That weird head move...

>25
seems a little low 2bh

***no manlet jokes please***

No practical effects would work, then the CG artists could use that as a base design, look what marvel did with their iron man, Spider-Man, and black panther costumes. They have actual pieces from what they wear and then they mo-cap the costumes and use the base design as reference when they animate over

>A DECENT 40%

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

youtube.com/watch?v=RlXnBtasZJM
youtube.com/watch?v=RlXnBtasZJM
youtube.com/watch?v=RlXnBtasZJM

pixar movies

By juxtaposing it with a living person.

really? they look like any other CG movie now

grow up fags

That's extremely gross. Just reminds you he's been annihilated as a human being.

dude, they only had 500 million budget. they had to cut it somewhere.
be glad it has such great actors

The problem is that his movements are small, jerky, and unrestrained as if he is wearing a mocap suit and not and actual cyborg suit. It's not to say that a magic cyborg suit wouldn't have mobility- but it's hard to suspend disbeleief when it is so clearly layered over a mo cap suit

even though literally everything else about the movie was garbage, the landscapes in the good dinosaur were very impressive

meant for

LOOK AT HIS LIPS!!

>It's a DC movie gets slandered thread because paid Marvel shills can't let public opinion be swayed

You guys are so easily manipulated.

Iron Man was a man in a protective suit, why would his neck move like a cyborg?

NOOT NOOT

I don't know if the weird shoulder movements are there due to writing but they look weird. But the weirdest imo would be his throat moving down from wherever it was up in his neck/head. He wouldn't be able to talk if that were the case and it should move along with his voice. On his back left side something is crawling up which is also not a movement anyone can naturally make. Lastly for all the tiny things that move over his body, all that added detail (too much imo though) his head seems very simple in design and movement, it looks like the head of another robot all together, they don't match in style.

Dude looks like Casper tier CGI

>The problem is that his movements are small, jerky, and unrestrained as if he is wearing a mocap suit and not and actual cyborg suit. It's not to say that a magic cyborg suit wouldn't have mobility
No the problem is you're wrong. Look at all those sliding points of articulation. It's so satisfying watching Cyborg move, you guys think he's supposed to be restricted in plate-mail or something when that's not what his suit is.

It's less Iron Man and more Transformers

If it appears like it's not deliberate, then it's bad design. If they wanted his head to slide around like it's not connected to his body, they should have made it obvious that his head isn't connected to his body.

OH NO NO NO NO
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

Surely it is slander and not a tonal mess with poor effects despite its ridiculous budget.

Why are there no TS up on Pirate Bay?

I haven't seen Justice League yet, but this is the exact same thing that happened around BvS. Then when I saw that it was one of the best Superhero movies I've ever seen.
There's definitely paid shills all over Sup Forums and this type of thread fits their MO perfectly. If Sup Forums had IDs it'd be way more obvious

>It's so satisfying watching Cyborg move
t. whedon

It honestly didn't look this bad in the cinema

Can you ask your girlfriend to insert a single frame of her titties in the next movie, preferably around the 14:58 mark? Thanks asking for a friend

There's plenty of shemale porn my dude.

This right here. Overall though, it's really bad design. Out of all the Cyborg looks, they make the worst one possible.

thought that was from the video game

I think mobileposters is the catchall term for these people.

UMA

Outsourcing it to chinks wigwams and cheap fucks. Basically just giving any project to a pack of wogs just to save a little money. Faggots.

The best movies dont use CGI on actors
>Dr. Pavel, im CIA

his head is coming off

Cyborg still has a spinal column. So this move just broke his neck.

At least the geometry isn't intersecting. Good work, lads.

This.

the absolute state of capeshit

The cyborg suit is moving on its own to target Superman, right? So why is it aiming 90° away from him in this scene?

So they retconned the part in BvS where they show us how he's created? Because he most definitely had his head attached to an upper-body there, rather than being a disembodied head.

That's how cyborgs actually move.

>Save money
>300million budget
Really activated my almonds

>That's extremely gross. Just reminds you he's been annihilated as a human being
That's the point!

>let's have terrifying body-horror shit going on to one character in the movie filled with characters so that we can't actually focus on his existential plight
>just animate him in a way that makes it look like we fucked up with the CGI instead

Genius

First cyborg I've seen that incorporates frictionless surface technology, really cutting edge stuff
>He can't admit it looks terrible

...

I think it's more of a bandwagon effect than shills. If anything the more desperate side (DC), will shill more than the side that is winning (Marvel).

Is there any leaks of green lantern yet?
I wanna know if he looks worse than the porn parody.

...

this is not cgi

Why the fuck does he look so utterly DYEL?

Is that Red Son Superman?

why is the glow from his eye so fucking exaggerated??

youtube.com/watch?v=RlXnBtasZJM

Because it's Spider-Man as a teen? If there's any hero who should always look DYEL it's Spider-Man, because of his proportionate strength power.

Unironically Rogue One.

>implying this doesn't look a thousand times cooler

so what was the game plan here, exactly? take everyone hostage and then... what? blow up? from a bomb on a timer? why not just blow yourselves up immediately? why give someone the opportunity to stop the bomb? oh right they needed this action setpiece for a trailer

It was the idea to blow everyone up, 20 seconds timer, but Wonder Woman saved everyone.
It was a shit scene btw.

why the fuck do the eye spots on the mask shrink?

They're lenses that change shape based on his own facial movements, so that he can actually express himself and scare muggers, just like in the comics.

>jesus on the cross

This looks like it was made with one of those smartphone apps that give you funny faces and shit.

I'm not sure I understand what's going on with WW's throw move here... bad CGI?

Basically a weak undernourished woman pretending to throw a stuntman on a cable. It's really nothing more nor less.