The amount of coke (high energy coal...

The amount of coke (high energy coal, very scarce near end of war during a war when supply lines are cut and you are losing the war and allies pushing inwards when the holocaust supposedly began and all the killings occurred) required to burn that many bodies is in the hundred millions of tonnes. We have no records of that much coke being delivered. We have all their communications and could listen in and surveilliance planes flying over head and NONE show the amount of coke required for even a fraction of the bodies supposedly burned.

Additionally, the coke furnaces are single body furnaces and at maximum output could run 21 hours a day. 3 hours required to clean the coke buildup of the fins or it would implode basically.

For the amount of bodies they try to claim were burned, a modern crematorium could not burn a fraction of those bodies in that time period. Also, the bodies cannot be vaporized completely in the 2-3 hour time period - bone fragments and whatnot remain still. Modern crematoriums take these and put in a tumbler with giant steel balls that pulverize the remaining fragments and only then do you get teh ashes for your cremated loved one.

Nazis using an inefficient method comparatively were able to do it faster and completely with no bone fragments remaining or need to bury. The ashes also spread to the wind and were never found, supposedly used to fertilize farms on mass and dumped in rivers. No carbon content in sediment is found or show these types of millions of dead bodies in surrounding areas.

There are also no mass graves anywhere. Auschwitz is the largest camp(s) (theres 3 camps to the one Auschwitz, but most only know about Auschwitz 2 from Schindlers List). It has a very high water table and you cannot bury bodies anywhere, let alone milliosn in mass graves due to being surrounded by two rivers and marshland. No mass graves. No ashes. 5 furnaces to burn 1.4 million (originally 4.4 million) people.

Other urls found in this thread:

phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/topf/
hdot.org/debunking-denial/ab7-coke-coal-cremation/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Konrad_Morgen
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Posting a movie poster isn't enough to make your faggy Sup Forumsposting relevant to Sup Forums.

They used the bodies for kindling goy, don’t think about it.

Jesus they’re not even trying anymore.

Your calculations are completely wrong, same with some of your "facts". We know very well (thanks to German documents) how long it take to cremate a body (no one said they were completely cremated, we have memories and pictures depicting members of the Sonderkommando crushing remaining bones with hammers). For example here:

phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/topf/

About he amount of coke necessary to burn the bodies. Here is a good article.
hdot.org/debunking-denial/ab7-coke-coal-cremation/
I think this is the most important thing, almost always ignored by the deniers.

>Alternative fuels and open-air buring pits were also regularly used by the Nazis. These facts make the issue surrounding the amount of coke (coal) irrelevant.
They also tend to forget that very close to Birkenau there was an IG Farben plant which needed much more coal than the camp itself.

>the coke furnaces are single body furnaces
>Nazis using an inefficient method comparatively were able to do it faster and completely with no bone fragments remaining or need to bury.
This is another lie.

>In 1911, a Japanese oven was presented at the International Exhibition of Hygiene in Dresden, Germany which could burn five bodies simultaneously in a period of 2 to 2 1/2 hours. [156]
This alone proves that it was perfectly possible for the Nazis to burn more than one body per 2-3 hours.

>his argument comprises of false claims

Ken. In order for holomath to work, the ovens require 24/7 operation with no downtime and no maintenance and, an hour to burn an entire jewish corpse (do jews burn more efficiently?) and 4-5 bodies per muffle than can’t hold more than a single body with two pushing it unless they’re kids or midgets.

It’s a strawman anyways just like Zyklon-B. The “jewish people” claim that 66% of the gassings occurred at the destroyed treblinka and sobibor which have only like 10 total “survivor” eyewitnesses. That say diesel-powered Russian tank engines were used to gas jews packed in a chamber with carbon monoxide from exhaust fumes. Diesel exhaust has no lethal carbon monoxide though and more than enough oxygen to keep jews alive indefinitely. Introducing no gas at all and allowing them to suffocate from lack of air in minutes would actually be more effective. If you believe in the holocaust you deserve to be gassed yourself (with sarin or something viable for killing

Also, they calculated the residue of zyklon B leftover in the alleged gas chambers, they found taking into account degradation, the original concentrations would not have been sufficient to kill people but only to delouse and kill ticks.

The holocaust is such a bullshit story, all you need is someone with a few braincells to put 2 and 2 together to realise it all comes apart. Of course they don't want you even DISCUSSING it, that's why any discussion regarding the matter sends you to prison.

Who are "they"? Deniers without any proper education? You know that much lower concentration is needed to kill humans than to kill lice? So your first point is completely wrong.

>That say diesel-powered Russian tank engines were used to gas jews packed in a chamber with carbon monoxide from exhaust fumes. Diesel exhaust has no lethal carbon monoxide though and more than enough oxygen to keep jews alive indefinitely.
People who actually knew what happened at Treblinka and Sobibor (German engineers) testified it wasn't a diesel engine, but a benzine engine. For example here:

>We unloaded the motor. It was a heavy Russian benzine engine, at least 200 horsepower. We installed the engine on a concrete foundation and set up the connection between the exhaust and the tube.
Erich Fuchs in 1963

Or this, from book by Peter Witte, a German historian:
>In this case even three former Gasmeister (“Gasmasters” / Erich Bauer, Erich Fuchs, and Franz Hödl), who must have really have known the facts, since they all killed with the same motor, confirmed in court that it was definitely a petrol motor. Bauer and Fuchs, having been professional motor mechanics, simply quarrelled during the trial about whether it was a Renault motor or a heavy Russian tank motor (probably a tank motor or a tractor motor) having at least 200 PS. They also disputed whether the method of ignition was a starter or an impact magnet, which diesel motors obviously do not have, being self-igniting...

And more:
>Now let's see what other evidence we have, to establish the types of engines used in gas vans. Roberto supplies us with the following information: Zalman Levinbuck testified about the petrol engine ("The people are poisoned during the drive by gases and exhaust fumes that are created by the combustion of gasoline in the motor.", Kogon/Langbein/Rückerl et al., Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas, p. 91); Friedrich Jeckeln "mentioned too high gasoline consumption" as one of the problems with gas vans (Christian Gerlach, Kalkulierte Morde, p. 767); Chelmno gas van driver Walter Burmeister testified about "Renault trucks with Otto engines" (i.e. petrol motors; Kogon et al.); SS-Oberscharfuehrer Walter Piller who served in Chelmno mentioned "gases that had been created by the gasoline motor" (Kogon et al., p. 138).

>confessions obtained under torture are more valid that physical evidence

Kek. How many times did your (((relatives))) survive the gas chamber, Shlomo?

Yfw stating this publically will get you a long jail term in most european countries

Hmmm i wonder why that is

Oy vey, what are you suggesting goy? That my ancestors weren’t sent to the bear and eagle cages?

Why would they need to crush the bones to ash when they had electronic disintegration chambers? Are you denying these chambers exist you disgusting anti-Semite!?

The Holocaust happened. Get over it soyboy.

>Leftieloons are literally so bad at memeing they have to copy alt-right lingo verbatim now

End yourself my man

The Haavara Transfer Agreement BLOWS UP the whole holocaust narrative. It was a deal between the Nazis and the Zionists to help emigrate german jews to Palestine/Israel.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

THE HOLOCAUST NEVER HAPPENED!

Want another piece of evidence??

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Konrad_Morgen

This is a Waffen SS judge. He executed a camp commandant for killing two jewish prisoners……….

Let me repeat that; A NAZI SS JUDGE EXECUTED A CAMP COMMANDANT FOR KILLING TWO JEWISH PRISONERS!

He was so fucking thorough that he interviewed other prisoners, PERSONALLY!

Why would an SS judge be executing commandants, when they are supposedly gassing / rolling / electrifying 666 million of them!?!?

On these two points alone the narrative crumbles. And we haven't even gotten to the number problem of killing 3287 people a day in gas chambers, let alone the fuel needed to cremate them all.

They couldn't even produce 1 body for the Nuremberg Trials!

These are lies, the Holocaust is a lie.

They used water and electric currents to burn 100s at a time. Very little cleanup

The Havaara agreement was between GERMAN JEWS and British controlled Palestine. The deal was null and void once the war broke out, and was never made available to foreign jews that fell under nazi occupation (such as the 3.3 million Polish Jews).

The Camp commandant you claim was killed for killing Jewish prisoners never occurred. I hope others will notice how you never supplied the camp the camp commandants name or what camp it was, because it easy to claim things without having to supply names, places, etc. The only commandant that was tried under this SS-judge was for stealing the loot from the camp (as citied in the wikipedia article you posted).

The Camp statistician at Auschwitz claimed that that their crematoria could burn 4756 bodies per day (JUST AT THAT CAMP ALONE)...which in ideal situations would burn 1.7 million bodies per year (which is well within the historically accepted number that 1.1million-1.3 million were killed and burned within 2 1/2 years of camp operations)

Speaking of Nuremberg trials, do you find it odd that not a single one of the defendants denied that the crimes had occurred? Every single one of them used the defense that they were just following orders. They knew they were going to hang for these crimes, don't you think one of them would have denied such crimes if they never happened?

>soyboy
The soy bean was known as the "Nazi Bean" during world war II due to the German reliance on it as a source of protein. The nazi bean was so wide spread it made made up a majority of hitler's vegetarian diet.

>People still believe the holohoax

It's funny, because testimonials won't mean shit once everyone who lived during that era dies. We will just look at evidence (which proves this shit didn't happen) and more and more people will start waking up (which is already happening).

>Once there are fewer witnesses, it will be easier for us stormtards to bullshit people!
What a guy.

dont need graves when your turn them into ashes
checkmate nazi scum

They buried alot of the bodies too you fucking moron

>JEWISH PRISONERS!
They weren't jews, you lying cunt and they were killed because they "knew too much" mainly that the commandant had syphilis. One of the two was even given the title of Righteous Among the Nations by Israel, a title only given to non-jews

What's more likely, that a revanchist populist regime which openly espoused social darwinism and hatred of jews actually tried to murder millions of them once it had the opportunity to do so, or that a vast conspiracy requiring the cooperation of both the US and the USSR successfully made it seem like such a genocide had happened, even to the point that random middle class Jews are convinced they lost relatives to it?
The former would be the 203948436...th time there's been a genocide in human history, the latter would be the only known example in all history of a hoax involving so many people succeeding.

>Who are "they"? Deniers without any proper education?

>your evidence is invalid because you don't believe in the 60000000000 gobrillionowitzberg

>You know that much lower concentration is needed to kill humans than to kill lice? So your first point is completely wrong.

lmao so everyone who gets sprayed with lice spray dies? fucking kill yourself shlomo, lying like this so obviously.

>Their crematoria could burn 4756 bodies per day

HMMM

NOTHING SUSPICIOUS ABOUT THAT ABSURD NUMBER AT ALL.

>don't you think one of them would have denied such crimes

No because they more than likely threatened to kill their families and everyone they know. Also, they we're treated like fucking shit before the trials and had their balls stepped on. If they denied anything they would be tortured.
Funny how all these "witnesses" keep giving inconsistent accounts of what happened. Like the holocaust roller coaster, or masturbation machines, or baby launchers.

>Like the holocaust roller coaster, or masturbation machines, or baby launchers.
Given how many people went through the Nazi camps, it's not surprising that a few are bullshit artists or crazies who misremember things. The majority of accounts are consistent with each other and independently known fact.

wasn't the first guy who confessed tortured?

>bullshit artists or crazies who misremember things
>misremember things
>it was real in my mind

fuck off kike, here's your (you)

hdot.org/debunking-denial/ab7-coke-coal-cremation/
>Regarding the use of coke, Henryk Tauber, a member of one of the cremation Sonderkommando in Auschwitz-Birkenau, testified, “…we used the coke only to light the fire of the furnace initially, for fatty bodies burned of their own accord thanks to the combustion of the body fat. On occasion, when coke was in short supply, we would put some straw and wood in the ash bins under the muffles, and once the fat of the body began to burn the other bodies would catch light themselves.”[5] According to Tauber’s testimony, there was no direct correspondence between the amount of coke use and the number of corpses that could be burned. Once the fires were started, it did not take as much coke to burn more bodies.
And before you say "why did they have body fat?" ... keep in mind that the people who were gassed were usually gassed straight off the train. It was the people who were kept around to work and not gassed who became emaciated.

Nice argument stormtard