Tarantino's Manson film gets 100 mil budget

>variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-1202617387/
Will it be Kino?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=G5Niy7pM6bQ
youtube.com/watch?v=HaWtWAvUb-4
youtu.be/0a-E4Q9CHSk
culturebox.francetvinfo.fr/cinema/evenements/quentin-tarantino-revivez-toute-sa-masterclass-a-lumiere-2016-247419
youtube.com/watch?v=C0Do-DDAi-c
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Normally I dislike his "films" but I have hopes for this one

I hope we get to see some of Manson singing, he was a really great artist

youtube.com/watch?v=G5Niy7pM6bQ

He looks fucking creepy now.

looking forward to this

Reminder that Charles Manson is 5ft 2. They will never EVER learn

Is he gonna play Manson himself? He looks fucking creepy enough to do it now.

Didn't he say its not specifically about Manson and just about the year 1969

>Manson will be played by Leonardo DiCaprio instead of Walton Goggins

I haven't been this disappointed since Robin Williams died.

Tom Cruise or Brad Pitt being tapped for Manson.

Why do you need 100mill for a moive about Manson? I thought QT was famous for being an "independent" director.

It's the same budget as Django (people like Leo take 20mil per movie, Lawrence takes 15, and QT also wants Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise + period piece means big budget) and it's not actually about Manson; he's being vague about it but it's probably gonna be a more ambitious period piece about 1969 Los Angeles, Hollywood violence, hippie culture, etc. with a large cast, culminating with Tate's murder in a similar way that Basterds ended with Hitler's death, and Manson as a minor backdrop figure.

>5'2"
>complete loser burnout
>still manages to party with famous musicians and get his own harem of women who will even murder for him
/ourguy/

ok I see what Dennis liked now

speaking of Dennis, he'd make a good subject for a biopic. Not one made by Tarantino though

is it the power of charisma and utter insane confidence? was he a manipulative psychopath adept at finding/controlling vulnerable people, despite his average intelligence? I guess what I'm saying is literally how did he do it?

he'll get the preacher from red state to play Manson he will walk in last 10 minutes give a nice speech and that's it also Christoph will be there doing something

JLaw isnt in it, right? She's BO poison outside of franchises

>that picture
None of those people are great actors, except for Denzel maybe, and none of them are even great movie stars, except maybe RDJ, who's still overrated. Man modern Hollywood blows, are the Weinstein types with shit taste in women responsible for this malaise? That doesn't explain the men...

he died a few months back

he has a new hairstyle now. this is his most recent look:

oh look a tarantino movie where people say nigger 3,873 times. groundbreaking...

it will feature the same boring actors as always and will lecture us how evil the white male is

Leo does have BO draw though and Denzel has it too. Being a movie star is really about being a brand and managing that brand.

Its not hard to start a cult, user. They are everywhere but you werent recruited because you arent attractive enough

I predict that it'll be very Inglorious Basterds-esque, It'll revolve around the manson family but also a black panthers group. Manson was all about the race war, i can just see a huge gun fight happening between the two groups as Helter Skelter plays in the background. Knowig Tarantino i''m 100% there will be a black resistance group involved.

>Tarantino makes cameo
>Calls someone a "nigga" and sucks their toes

Manson was on the upper end/slightly above average IQ according to FBI profiler John Douglas. Also, if you look at the history of the groupies involved you'll see they were fucked up from the beginning and pretty stupid, so it didn't require spectacular effort to manipulate them. When confronted with mildly intelligent people Manson puts on the crazy act because he knows he can't bullshit them deep down. Sad desu

Mormon girls at Temple Square in SLC were flirty but that's standard I think. That entire religion was just an elaborate scheme to get lots of quality pussy anyway. Maybe most are. I'm not actually unattractive, the real sticking points are that I'm too proud to join the cult of someone else and live like a hermit by preference when I'm not travelling

>if you look at the history of the groupies involved you'll see they were fucked up from the beginning and pretty stupid

literally all he did was supply them with drugs and they'd do anything for him, they were stupid hippy addicts.

man, Leo's the worst meme too. he hasn't even been cute for 20 years now

Its pretty hard to imagine being locked up in a prison since the fucking 60s

>Hi, I'm Chucky! I'm your manlet til the end!

It's pretty scary knowing how easily normies can be convinced to do crazy shit. Makes me really appreciate all the subtle bits of western culture that make the whole thing tick, and how vulnerable they are

>Be notorious mass murderer
>Get played by one of the biggest Hollywood A-listers

Welp, time to start my career as a serial killer.

>Leo DiCaprio
What a fucking miscast.
Also, Son of Sam movie when? It was already a bit if a slasher flick with the blackouts, the curfew and the heatwave.

>Will it be Kino?
no

Looks better

>Also, Son of Sam movie when?

You mean like the movie "Summer of Sam"?

youtube.com/watch?v=HaWtWAvUb-4

... not to say intelligence is some kind of antidote to being convinced/convincing yourself to do crazy shit, in fact it's often the source of the crazy shit in the first place, the ideas that are really insidious. my point was just something about how fallible the human animal is

Oh.

Complete waste if true.

Tarantino wasn't bad enough to ruin Django, but he was the weakest link.

This would be a total waste.

Also apparently this is going to be his first Internet Era film where the script won't be released prior to filming. That sucks.

Tarantino nemisis Spike Lee already made one and it was breddy good, but it came out in '99 and got swamped by a zillion other great films.

youtu.be/0a-E4Q9CHSk

>not Jared Leto

looks much better, why did he even have that long hair?

should have gone with shia

if you're over 50, cut your damn hair

took advantage of hippies with fucked up childhoods. no lie, look up some of the women in the group especially the ones who did the murders.

...

Hmmmm. Something about that tie looks a little odd.

we all know this is going to be another movie where he slaps some script together where everyone says nigger every 5 mins

So are they going to show Polanski killing her?

He looks like Assange with the beard

>implying getting everyone saying nigger all the time isn't a net positive
Not even a Tarantino fan but I'd like it if we stopped tiptoeing around words and deferring to blacks when they sperg out about it

I'm curious about this film but from a commercial aspect I don't see it being a film that needs a $100 million budget or making a significant return on investment.

>leather tie
Amerimutt fashion everyone

usually thats a good sign for a director

Sandra Bullock is that expensive? Who the fuck hires her? The last movie I saw her in was Gravity and this was for at least 4 years.

>Sony
Holy fuck maybe Sony will turn a profit for once in the quarter this releases

...

Hopefully, he'll still hold the bottom line on the final cut

In Django Unchained, Schulz was the only likeable character and Django was an Asshole who didn't care and just wanted his wife back.

its a belt fastened into a tie

it's leather

wew not bad at all, never heard any of his music before. he's got that cat stevens thing going on

It doesn’t say that anywhere though

Bros, why did singing as a common skill have to die out?

Jews hate beauty and art.

The Charlie Manson story is so uninteresting to me. It's about a psycho chad who got 3 toasties to kill a genuine QT3.14

Who wants to see this???

>tfw you'll NEVER fall for mason's shit

>Who wants to see this???
There has been a lot of press that the script focuses on Charles Manson and the murder spree he orchestrated, but I’m told that is akin to calling Inglourious Basterds a movie about Adolf Hitler, when the Nazi leader was only in a scene or two. He said of his next project “It’s not Charles Manson, it’s 1969.”

During a masterclass in 2016 focused on cinema of the year 1970, he said he’s been researching that year for four years and how it marked a turning point for American and international cinema. “Am I going to write a book? Maybe. Is it going to be a six-part podcast? Maybe. A feature documentary? Maybe. I’m figuring it out,” he said, calling it a “work in progress”. He curated a group of 14 films from 1970 which he’s been presenting throughout the week. Arthur Hiller’s Love Story to Dario Argento’s The Bird With The Crystal Plumage; Claude Chabrol’s The Butcher; Billy Wilder’s The Private Life Of Sherlock Holmes; Bob Rafelson’s Five Easy Pieces; Jack Nicholson’s Drive, He Said; Russ Meyer’s Beyond The Valley Of The Dolls; and Robert Altman’s MASH.

Link to masterclass: culturebox.francetvinfo.fr/cinema/evenements/quentin-tarantino-revivez-toute-sa-masterclass-a-lumiere-2016-247419

Asked why he has chosen to focus on 1970, Tarantino cited the 2009 book by Mark Harris, Pictures Of A Revolution: Five Movies And The Birth Of The New Hollywood. The book chronicles the “real emergence of the New Hollywood,” Tarantino explained, and noted that “By the end of 1967, new Hollywood had won, only they didn’t know it yet. And Old Hollywood was over by 67 even though they didn’t know it yet.” Now researching that year, he said, “the more I started going to the library and looking up newspaper articles of what it was like, I realized New Hollywood had won the revolution but whether it would survive wasn’t clear. Cinema had changed so drastically that Hollywood had alienated the family audience.”

“Oddly enough, it was the films on the lower end of the Top 30 or 40, which, while they weren’t as good, in a weird way were more interesting to me… I’m always going to come at it from a critical or cinephile perspective but I wanted to put that in the minor and make it more as a historian or a sociologist.”

As part of his research, Tarantino says he’s been watching prints, DVDs, old videos and cable as well as reading reviews from the day. Patterns have emerged during the research. “There were a lot of promises made of possibilities of a new cinema. It was almost like, could Hollywood handle this kind of freedom? Could the public handle it? The freedom seemed limitless. Directors could adapt any book, could shoot anything. There were no restrictions and that was maybe untenable.” “If you ask me, the promise was fulfilled,” he continued. But there were casualties. That included the possibility that a new “genuine black cinema” would emerge. He cited Hal Ashby’s The Landlord, along with Ossie Davis’ directorial debut Cotton Comes To Harlem and Melvin Van Peebles’ Watermelon Man. He also pointed to films such as Paul Bogart’s Halls Of Anger and Brian De Palma’s Hi, Mom! which were making an impact. But “Blaxploitation” ended up taking the place of this promise, said Tarantino. Despite being a fan of that genre, he said, “Now I see Blaxploitation did derail a real rising voice.”

Same goes for erotic cinema. “There was the promise that eroticism in cinema would be taken out of the raincoat crowd and would achieve mainstream success and play in nice theaters, particularly for couples. We had some wonderful artists at that time like Russ Meyer and Ken Russell. That worked for a little while but ultimately a lot of them went back to porno and sexploitation.”

HE COME TO ME WITH MONEY IN HIS HAND

like I said, not a Tarantino fan. But that's not a problem I have with his work.

lol 100mil

they clearly don't have any faith

what the fuck. this movie has been on my watchlist for a while, but jesus, this looks bad.

after listening to this, it makes sense why he was so charismatic and was able to convince people to join his cult

Sharon was just one of many killings. Also, Manson was one of the main reasons why the hippie movement died out. And his killing was one of the first in a number of many serial killings that took place in the 70s.

>when you're so obsessed with companywars bullshit you start to think every movie is a summer blockbuster action flick

t. Thomas Pynchon

RDJ can pull a great performance with the right script.Same with Sandra and denzel. Its these tend to be wasted on average movies
He legit looks like Jessie venture without a vag for a neck

100 is what he asked and a pretty big budget for auteur-driven R-rated filmmaking, Basterds was a period epic and cost 80, H8 less than 50.

>Those who’ve read it said the script has heart and a strong commercial appeal, and if there is a film of Tarantino’s it can be best compared to, it would be Pulp Fiction, which also was set in Los Angeles.

If he manages to get the three biggest stars in Hollywood together and give the normies something on par with Pulp Fiction, it's an amazing deal for Sony.

And Schulz was a guy who didn't give a fuck about Django and used him to turn a profit via bounty hunting. Not to mention he was stubborn and got himself killed.

"Oh, you're wife has a German name and speaks German? I'm totally invested now, lets go save her"

"bu-, but, but he gave Django some money for his work. And Django was completely ruthless"

>trying to compare a guy who makes easy money killing trash with a guy whos been tortured

Tarantino is such an overt film maker, yet his movies still fly way over you idiots

I got worried from the initial description, but now I'm much less worried

thanks, faggot

Christ. Tarantino really is a fucking autist

What will Tarantino's LSD trip scene be like?

If he's doing an homage to the psychedelic thriller genre he needs to have a visually represented acid trip.

She ain't dead. She played Don's wife on Mad Men.

Would Cruise be in a movie that will definitely reference 60s era cults?


Since he's in one?

what's the prob bob

You know damn well California Dreaming is going to be in the soundtrack.

I am sorta excited though, and I don't think I've every been excited for a Tarantino movie.

Don't forget this one
youtube.com/watch?v=C0Do-DDAi-c

>implying she doesn't turn down a ton of roles

*ever

And I take it back. I did get excited for Kill Bill.

This could be really good, or it could be The Devil's Rejects. Not that Devil's Rejects was bad, but if it's not focused on Manson so much as the 60's it's not what I'd be hoping for.

Many things make it interesting. First, they had a famous victim. Then, they thought they were kickstarting a massive change in the world. It wasn't typical serial killer shit. Thirdly, and I think why it makes an interesting movie, is the backdrop of the hippie movement. It's such a stark contrast to the manson murders.

>I realized New Hollywood had won the revolution but whether it would survive wasn’t clear
It didn't, thanks to this autist

couldn't be bothered to get a haircut.

That is so moronic, blaming an entire industrial shift on a single artist, you can't see the forest from the trees. The myth that he single-handedly sinked UA is grossly exaggerated. It was unavoidable, the audiences themselves were to blame and were already switching from thoughtful adults to children wanting to be mindlessly entertained, the cancer that's in plain sight today. They all suffered the same downfall as Cimino in the late 70s early 80s: Friedkin, Coppola, Scorsese... HG is such a beautiful piece of cinema and the critics should have cherished and defended it but they all shilled against it as well, playing the studio game, favoring business over art. If it had come out five years earlier, it would have gotten the Oscar, but by 1980, it's like the entire country had went full pleb overnight.

>Charles Manson wanted to start a race war
How many cuck scenes will be in it?

Really pleb? It's just going to be, mark my words, "WHITE MALES ARE MURDEROUS NAZI CULT LEADERS," that will be his big poetic metaphor, won't look at ANY of the intrigue of the Laurel Canyon scum (and the secret military base tucked inside of it). Manson was framed.

Classic

Money laundering.

>is it the power of charisma
No, it’s the power of heroin and LSD

>HG is such a beautiful piece of cinema
It really is