Why the fuck does Sup Forums like this flick?

Why the fuck does Sup Forums like this flick?

>BUT DUDE LONG TAKES ARE FOR PATRICIANS
You can have long quiet scenes that are both good and bad. Just because its long doesnt automatically make it good fucking hell.

>DUDE THOSE SCENES MAKE US APPRECIATE TECHNOLOGY AND SHIT
A competent director would have directed those scenes in a way that doesn't put a hyperactive 5 year old to sleep. It's just shitty film making, no excuse.

>IT JUST DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH LASER GUNS AND SJW PANDERING FOR YOU LIKING
Fuck off. Before Sunrise was litterally just two people walking around a city, talking and it wasn't boring for a second. You know why? BECAUSE IT HAD A COMPETENT DIRECTOR!

>DUDE BUT THE AENDING WAS PRETTY LSD TRIPPIN LMAO
So it's confirmed the drugs have destroyed your brains. 2001 fans are literally DUDE WEED LMAO tier

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941741
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941468
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941564
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941844
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Why do people like things?

>linklater
>competent director

inb4 a wild pack of boobs rage over this b8 and this is the top thread, again

People are going to just call you a pleb, but you're absolutely right

Sup Forums Likes to think they're intellectuals.

When this movie was released people didn't even had seen a colored pictured of earth from orbit yet.
To explain why it should be valued would be an exercise of futility if you don't know it by now.

OP is a filthy pleb.
Shame on you.

im glad my original posts have been formed into this pasta

You must be too autistic to watch anything other than capeshit

Case in point.

>You can have long quiet scenes that are both good and bad
Yep and the long quiet scenes in 2001 were good.

>It's just shitty film making
Factually incorrect.

>IT JUST DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH LASER GUNS AND SJW PANDERING FOR YOU LIKING
Never heard anyone say this in defense of 2001.

>2001 fans are literally DUDE WEED LMAO tier
Some are, sure. Not all of us though.

>replying to age old pasta

>hey guys I made that by the way! Please Give me attention!

>looking for upvotes on Sup Forums
kill yourself

work on your baits, sage over and out

Its just litty popcorn fun, turn your brain off.

Like a lesson on sentence structure would be wasted on you?

Almost like english isn't my language.

/thread

thanks :^)

OP here, you didn't do shit. I originally made this pasta on the 16th of July by combining these posts together.

archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941741
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941468
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941564
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/84940925/#84941844

These were clearly made by different people. Stop being such a lying faggot.

i said 'posts' plural and 'formed' so yes some of those posts were mine

Prove it

wew

Gotta love 2001 the film and thread about it.

/2001/ thread when

>/2001/ thread when
OP here, this IS /2001/.
I'm trying to use reverse psychology to start a thread about it.

>Why do people like things?

Awful taste. People shouldn't like things; everything is terrible.

I liked the movie except for the lsd trip segment.

It hasn't aged well desu

2001:A Space Odyssey is quite simply the worst thing to happen to cinema ever. Its forced profundity has caused millions of people all over the world to force themselves to like what is quite simply nothing more than an exercise in style.

Kubrick has no idea what he is doing here. His film jumps around with little to no sense of unity. The great film makers of the world create a series of events that contain clarity of information, something Kubrick couldn't bet his life on.

What is the purpose of what is going on here? Is there any coherent message? I have heard suggestions that it is Kubrick's message about the future of humanity, but what future is that? Does Kubrick even know?

This is Transformers for the art house crowd. Pure style over substance. Nobody actually likes this film, they just like to be seen liking it.

I'm not a big fan of 2001 but implying that Linklater is a better director than Kubrick isn't even bait, that's just a plain hook. And I like Linklater.

Hey man congrats :)

this is more pasta yeah, written by a pleb. garbage diction of a writer who hasn’t read anything, repeating words unnecessarily, no soul, vocabulary reads like a rant from a corporate executive or journo hack. do people fail to see that their creations are warped, defficient and ugly? I couldn’t imagine thinking that anything like what’s written there was intelligent. I know its pasta but here’s a response; you’re an unjustifiably credulous fraud, the movie has extremely coherent themes bordering on mundane, the final sequence is so cut and dry and obvious that having to explain it to anyone over the age of 9 is a slight against their humanity and sapience. moongazer to starchild, animals afraid of monoliths, humans inside cosmic space zoos. nothing esoteric here really. besides the secret moon base

Hey man congrats :)

Aaaaaaaaaautism

>quite simply nothing more than an exercise in style

And what a beautiful style it is.

> that's just a plain hook

It's diving into the water to catch a fish with your teeth

>Linklater is a better director than Kubrick isn't even bait
It's a fact

...

Lel

Spot on OP. Not a single fucking quip in the entire thing. Wayyyyyy to serious.