WTF, time to boycott AMC

WTF, time to boycott AMC

Other urls found in this thread:

judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-clinton-emails-uncovered-reveal-additional-mishandling-classified-information/
wnd.com/2017/09/more-hillary-emails-revealed-additional-pay-to-play-evidence/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Trying to be optimistic: Maybe it's not a political attack, but instead they are trying to avoid any politics what-so-ever, because of how polarized the country is right now

>phoneposter

Who censored that person's name?

That's really dumb. If they wanted to avoid politics, they would've avoided politics.

Nah. Cutting him out is political.
they don't want to make him look like he might be one of the good guys in the film.

donald trump is a shitlord and a mobbed-up real estate sleaze. watching you retards slurp up his "man of the people" bullshit would be real hilarious if he hadn't managed to get himself elected.

And yet he still isn't as corrupt as most politicians in the Republican and Democratic parties. That ought to tell you something.

But Donald Trump is the quintessential american: A loud, wealthy pleb.

Movies are edited for time when aired on tv. Right wing snowflakes need to calm the fuck down.

>And yet he still isn't as corrupt as most politicians in the Republican and Democratic parties
after this latest tax bill I'm shocked you can believe that. trump represents the most corrupt politics this country has seen in decades.

What's so bad about his tax bill?

80% of the money goes to the elite.

>actually doing this

Insanity.

This have the opposite effect.

>Cutting him out is political.
exactly.

>le land of the free

>watching any movie on tv with ads every 5mins

You mean more people get to keep money they earned.

It's absolutely amazing that to the Left having the government steal LESS money is somehow evil.

That's a very vague and dumb statement. John Oliver and Colbert really need to stop with their grade schooler explanation of policies because that's what then gets parroted as facts by their audiences.

You're an idiot.

Wasn't Obama polarizing and yet they shoved it down people's throats because "this is real,deal with it!"

just mad he got rich before getting into office so money doesn't have the power to make him sell his own country out like a nigger """""president""""

>everyone suddenly cares about wealth inequality again now that trump is president

strange that, as usual, inequality increases most rapidly under 'liberal' politicians

>OP is a phoneposter who searched #censorship on instagram and thought it would be a good idea to post the results here
could op BE any more of a faggot?

Trump's entire campaign was literally a money laundering scheme for his crooked, failing Atlantic City casinos. Now that he's elected he might as well do what he can to make money on his existing ventures. That's not to say other politicians are any better, but don't kid yourself about Trump.

Captial gains tax is robbery

what?!?! private companies can do whatever they want? GET THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVED

It's 100% political

>inequality increases most rapidly under 'liberal' politicians
[citation needed]
>money doesn't have the power to make him sell his own country out
so why is he doing it anyway?
You're an idiot.

>You're an idiot.
Explain to me why income tax isn't 50% of your paycheck but making money daytrading should take 50% of your gains

it's astonishing in this day and age there are people who defend censorship. progress my ass, you're no better than 1930s panickers

You should educate yourself on the absolute state of the DNC and the Clinton crime syndicate, ahem I mean foundation. Try wikileaks. Trump is an incompetent schoolyard thug compared to them.

ah yes.. trickle down economics, the contributing factor to the massive inequality we currently have, was the liberals right
and continuing to cut taxes for the wealthy is the liberals while trump is in office
hol up
you have pay taxes on money youve earned? imagine my shock.

Oh and if you've gobbled up the Wikileaks = Russian propaganda narrative, you can always read Hitchens prize winning indictment of the Clinton crime syndicate.

see
I'm fine with paying taxes on it, but paying 50% is ridiculous

>BUT HILLARY
not an argument

Very little of consequence about the Clintons has come out of wikileaks. This anti-clinton bullshit is literally republican propaganda distracting the public from outrageously corrupt republican administrations (bush and reagan) that committed serious war crimes. But no, Halliburton was clearly a drop in the bucket. Please continue to enlighten us about the evils of Hillary Clinton's real estate deals, you complete fucking tool.

The technical term your looking for is whataboutism. When addressing the assertion that Trump is the most corrupt politician of all time demonstrating that that is incorrect isn't whataboutism, it's empirical evidence the assertion is false. You should work on your reading comprehension.

So you clearly haven't read any of them but you still think you're in a position to comment. Figures.

Don't be so hard on him user, Share blue only pays him like 2$ an hour

Strange how all the ultra rich elite was supporting Hillary and is always voting for the democrat politicians, isn't it? Almost like things aren't as simple as John Oliver told you they were.

Trump's tax bill also cuts taxes for the middle class by the way.

Why would you remove the only really good part of that shitty movie? Home Alone 2 is a rehash of one without any of the classic scenes.

The only good notable additions to it are Tim Curry and the Trump cameo.

maybe they were cutting for time and just thought Trump didn't add a single thing to the story?
>whoa whoa whoa we have to secure a future for white childr--

ok, yep you're right, you're a victim again. how does this keep happening...?

please enlighten us, oh wise one, to any earth shattering revelations I clearly missed.
by your rhetoric any taxation is robbery. newsflash: governments have the right to tax their citizens. we regulate our economy so rich assholes don't hoard wealth and take over the whole game. get over it.

While I agree with the implication that JO is a partisan hack, the "elites" don't support any one party, they have long bought both.

Right? Who the fuck would shill here for anything less than 300 rubles an hour.

>the "elites" don't support any one party
Except they overwhelmingly do.

Exactly. But in the 2016 election, they were clearly backing the democratic party because Trump was not part of the GOP that they had bought.

>by your rhetoric any taxation is robbery.
I was speaking hyperbolically, user. I do think 50% capital gains tax is way too high, though

I'm going to need proof.

>but paying 50% is ridiculous
yea that would be ridiculous considering thats nearly double what it actually is

>Strange how all the ultra rich elite was supporting Hillary and is always voting for the democrat politicians, isn't it? Almost like things aren't as simple as John Oliver told you they were.
liberal = BAD because Hillary!

>Trump's tax bill also cuts taxes for the middle class by the way.
Cutting taxes for the wealthy and the middle class? Woah. I wonder if that will do anything to the debt, maybe we should ask the CBO, or did Republicans flip flop on caring about this issue too?

Hillary is still paying Russians? Guess all that Uranium 1 money won't run out anytime soon.

>Hitchens prize
you understand that was established posthumously and has nothing to do with him right? and that it's clearly a political tool?

Oh, NOW liberals care about national debt? After 8 years of Obama, the president who raised the national debt more than all previous presidents combined?

the endless, vast sea of butthurt

fuck its so odd that between 07 to 09 the national debt was climbing at it was entirely obamas fault.
and then it almost inexplicably dropped from '11 to '16

fuck dude thats weird.

Hillary? Pretty sure the exchange was done through Atlantic City.

Sure I'll give you the highlights:
- evidence for collusion with the media resulted in DNC personnel changes
- evidence for rigging of DNC primaries in Clinton's favor
- evidence for mishandling of classified information on multiple occasions and cover up through DOJ and FBI loyalists
- evidence of fabricating the Russiagate scandal to divert attention from the actual content when the DNC was fully aware the files were downloaded locally
- evidence of decades of pay to play corruption scheme and funneling donations from the who is who of the world's dictators and tyrants through the Clinton foundation as facilitation payments for policies like Uranium deal, Lybia and Saudi UN resolution
- decades of anti-feminist, anti working class and anti-homosexual politics while claiming the exact opposite (read Hitchens he presents irrefutable evidence, dating back to BC's beginnings in Arkansas)
- systematic silencing, blackmailing and threatening of rape victims of BC (read Hitchens he presents irrefutable evidence)

Like I said, do the required reading then come back and comment.

>yea that would be ridiculous considering thats nearly double what it actually is
My mistake, it's 40% for short term gains in the high bracket. It should be closer to 10% in my opinion

yeah but where's your argument? the only real measure of the right level of tax is the one that stops the retarded accumulation of wealth we're seeing, balanced with a healthy stimulation of the economy. If it's 50%, so be it. Comparing it to a cut of your income tax when it only applies to people who are already quite financially comfortable is disingenous.

holy kek what retards I always wait for that scene so I can see drumpfy a cute

Look at campaign donations and facilitation payments over the last 10 years and point out the elites that only support candidates from one political party. I'll wait.

Absolutely correct. That was the first time in recent history were that occurred. They have since exerted enough pressure to manage him more or less but initially it was a rupture style outcome.

everyone apart from mel gibson and colin farrel.

dude get your head out of the gutter, your country is run by a cabal of rapey jews

who cares since home alone was one of the most shamless cash-ins of all time.

literally, and I do mean literally, a remake of the first movie. right down to being saved last minute by some eccentric old loner

Why should I not be allowed to make a ton of money for making smart investments?

*since home alone 2 is

what the fuck, my brain is fried

cringe

I think you misunderstood my statement because of negligent punctuation. It should have read: Hitchens' prize winning indictment

so nothing of note apart from some partisan hackery and a trumped-up scandal. I'll believe you give a shit about classified information when you call for Colin Powell's imprisonment. Do you even know who Valerie Plame is, you narrow-minded moron?
and by the way, Hitchens was an opportunistic asshole who started out as a marxist and then ended up gleefully cheerleading for the Iraq war. I value his opinions almost as much as yours.

reddit

because it's not good for society. Why should society enable you to buy luxury cars when it can't even afford housing for the poor?

ah yes the old leftist are artist but lets censor things that will offend the soy boys. It's the jew trick that started ww2.

Less corporate tax cuts equals more tax revenue. It's a net gain and basic economics. The better businesses do, the more jobs are created. Plus the middle class is also getting cuts. There is literally nothing wrong with Trump's policy.

my bad

No evidence of anything of the kind, he has denied any salary or backhand deals.

Oh well if he says so.

>It's the Economy, stupid!
you parrots never learn. supply side economics is an elite scam promoted by partisan think tanks and hack economists. the ultimate goal is the same as it ever was: take all the money and power for themselves. and you're the asshole who's voting for them.

Burden of proof is on you bucko. If you are claiming that Trump is siphoning money into his casinos then prove it.

people should go, watch movie, and demand refunds afterwards for the donald not being in it

Sure let me just dig up his tax returns.

is this way.

So your response is whataboutism, ad hominem and misdirection. I'm not a fan of Hitchen's political stance myself, but that's irrelevant to this case.

The original assertion was that Trump is the most corrupt politician ever, I have provided the highlights of the Clinton crime syndicate to counter that and you have provided nothing that would even constitute an argument let alone evidence to back up the assertion. You're talking about other republicans tat aren't even part of the argument.
You'll forgive me if I remain unconvinced.

>DUDE ALL THE COORPORATIONS ARE EVIL
>DUUUDE IT'S THE ZOG!
>NO BLOOD FOR OIL!

If I'm doing better under the deal and the elites are doing better? Then who's losing? The nigs?

Why is it my problem that people can't afford houses? I shouldn't be penalized so harshly for the sake of others

I have countered what you said, if you bothered to read. The Clintons have done some shit but it's penny ante compared to the Republicans. Not only that, but the Benghazi stuff and the classified information are clearly non-scandals. Colluding with a network anchor is inappropriate and the DNC ought to be reformed but next to what Roger Ailes has been doing with Fox News for the last twenty years it's a joke. Republicans have been concocting scandals about the Clintons for 25 years because they've managed to accomplish significant progressive reforms, and the best they've found are some sex scandals and some FBI bullshit that doesn't have legs.
>Clinton crime syndicate
bullshit

you exist and enjoy the protection of the government by the grace of a social contract. if that social contract is abolished, the poor will enter your home, murder you, and take all you have.

>babby mad we don’t worship his spoiled golden boy

you guys are worse than liberals.

More whataboutism and baseless assertions, how utterly unsurprising. Like I said multiple times do the required reading. Talking to you is a waste of time.

judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-clinton-emails-uncovered-reveal-additional-mishandling-classified-information/

wnd.com/2017/09/more-hillary-emails-revealed-additional-pay-to-play-evidence/

say whataboutism again, idiot. Whataboutism matters if you've only got two alternatives. I my choice is between a crook and a bigger crook, I'll vote for the crook all day, and you'll be whining that I made the wrong choice.

I can afford private protection. It's ok

enjoy having your films doctored or banned for problematic political content.

and by the way, jerkoff, I voted for Sanders. But only a complete ass-for-brains would have picked Trump in the general

Jesus fucking christ. I'm assuming this is AMC the channel and not the theater chain? This isn't an issue of censorship this was probably cut for time decades ago when they were putting the tv edit together. I'm willing to bet when the director put together the tv edit it was the first thing he cut considering they didn't want the scene in the movie it was just one of trump's demands for letting them film at his hotel.

here comes the centrist

>voting for Clinton over Trump
wew lad

So could Louis XVI

>deleting a scene because the fucking president of the US is in it

Why are amerifats on the left still trying to pretend trump is a outsider of the far right? He's the most powerful man in the world allegedly

I don't understand why you're jumping to that extreme, though. I'm not saying I think capital gains should be abolished. I'm saying I think taking 40% is way too high. You say "Why should you be allowed to make lots of money" but I'm asking you why I shouldn't be allowed to do that? I'll still give 10-20% to the government to pay for whatever, but 40% is overreaching

I already explained this. I don't care how much it is as long as it correctly manages the economy. There is a balance to be struck between providing incentive to investors and preventing the excessive accumulation of wealth. The current thinking is that a 40% top rate is appropriate. I see no compelling reason to disagree, particularly in light of current elite excesses.

>edited
is that sjw's latest favorite word?