Have competition

>have competition
>buy them
>buy everything

Can they fuck off already?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=gcbBRkPBgB0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

shut up you communist, go live in north korea if you hate capatalism so much

>hates disney
>actively helps promotes Disney by keeping discussion alive
fuck off shill

Unrestrained capitalism eventually ends up in monopoly, this is just as totalitarian as communism.

t. commie

You want to live under corporate rule? Imagine having only one source for all commercial items, you must be a troll or a retard.

Thats communism though

It's their God-given right to do so, fucking pinko.

I’m genuinely worried about the Disney monopoly though.

I mean if there is no one to stop them, what’s to stop them from just owning everything? It’s only an upside for them.

Just look at their market share now compared with 15 years ago. How are we to stop the juggernaut ?

They're still smaller than Comcast you commie/warner
Even apple could buy them if they wanted

I learned how bad this was when WWF bought WCW. Without rivals your product has no need to keep getting better. Competition breeds innovation.

But that's wrong, other people are still allowed to create independent and low budgeted projects and you still have the power to support them and not the big corporation.
Everything Disney is buying was already souless bad idea corporate dumpsters, it's not like any artistic endeavor will be suffering from it.

Just watch foreign media man.

Lol Comcast and Apple have no play in Hollywood.

That’s like saying Ford could buy out Disney. Well yeah no shit.

Disney bought the internet?

Capitalism needs competition, that's kind of the whole point.

We will never get something like BvS from a Disney monopoly.

Haha ok, enjoy being such a fucking cuck.

>Yes you can subjugate me wonderful sociopathic businessman!

comcast is part of warner

>be tripfag
>be retarded

every time.

In unrestrained capitalism, eventually an entity will gain sufficient power to control the market completely. Its the same as the anarchy paradox, the second an entity gains power its no longer anarchy.

I don't see why not. Are you arguing it's too violent for Disney? Because they are always pushing that envelope.

Eventually Disney will be so big they'll own brothels in Neo Tokyo; it's just a matter of subsidiaries within subsidiaries so no one knows those prosty bucks ultimately go to the Mouse.

>already produce 7/10 of the highest grossing movies every year
>buying what little competition they have
what could go wrong?

>Disney will never be this comfy again

youtube.com/watch?v=gcbBRkPBgB0

No, in unrestrained capitalism no one can control a market 100%. They can own so much and expand so much they control 99% of it but as long as anyone is creating businesses, competition never dies out totally.

Walt Disney was a power hungry anti-Semitic dictator.

He’d love the state of Disney now.

>hello I am an idiot

If one entity controls the economy, how does a third party enter the economy?

Disney movies are designed for you to turn your brain off, not think.

The "unrestrained" capitalism you speak of can only occur in a stateless society, which is absolutely utopic and will never ever happen.

"controlling the economy" is not the same as laissez-faire capitalism

I could explain why but I think you're just a baiting retard

Nice non-sequitur, faggot.

Control of the market/economy is the inevitability in discussion here, friend.

What thoughts has BvS provoked in you?

Well, when the government kicks in, they sure will

citizens united 2010, friend. The government is nothing but a hand-puppet and corporate bootlicker

Bow down consumers

Comcast owns Universal you fucking muppet

It's a ludicrous idea since Disney isn't even the biggest company on the planet, not in employees or revenue or total assets or anything. Literally the only reason it matters so much to you is because you're a Sup Forums resident.

Maybe read reason.com for 6 months to get a better idea of how markets work.

idc I just want Marvel to have everything that is rightfully theirs.

I don't think you even understand what you are saying.
The United States will never abolish the state, Disney will never be able to abuse other content producers with only leverage. The end.

>freedom to spend money on political advocacy = end of the world
This is what liberals actually believe

They didn't buy Netflix

>It's ok if Disney owns every major cable network, movie studio and website because someone can make flip book cartoons of their own original characters and sell them at a flea market and make minimum wage :)

>end of the world
Nah, just the end of all checks and balances on the power and influence of the rich over government.

Protip: lobbyists are much more a threat to "checks and balances" and have much more influence of government (being in direct contact with congress) than individuals pooling their money together.

>Disney
>Google
>Amazon

these 3 stand alone at the end. who wins?

Google because they're the first to develop Strong AI.

It'll be more like Apple vs Google vs Amazon lad

Nope. iPhone X and the notch is the beginning of the end. Apple will be irrelevant by 2030.

... citizens united 2010 was the ruling that ended all lobbying limits you fucking idiot

more like

>buy everything
>lobby to extend copyright protections to 1000 years

pure evil.

You're a dumb fag that doesn't know the difference between lobbying and political advocacy.

At this point it looks like you're intentionally attempting to muddle facts.

The government is going to block any deals between their owners.

I pondered the effects of Superman's existence.

None. Comcast and AT&T are the gatekeepers to almost every form of relevant media. Telecoms are the real threats to society and people want to let them grow into huge monstrosities that will make pre-breakup Bell look like a minnow.

If we already have precedence on the bad effects of big telecoms, why are people letting them get so big?

>At this point it looks like you're intentionally attempting to muddle facts.
Let me spell it out for you:

Because of Citizens United there is no limit on the amount of money you can spend on videos critical of Shillary or Drumpf or whoever you don't like. You still can't give them money, all you can do is spend money on advocacy.

This is not what lobbyists do. Lobbyists are working directly with Congress as representatives of special interests. They too are forbidden from giving money directly to elected officials, but their physical proximity to Congress means they have a lot more sway than anyone other non-elected official in policy making.

Yes fellow citizen there is nothing to worry about.

There is plenty to worry about but Citizens United vs. FEC is not one of those things

Its literally legalized bribery your retarded if you think this is ok.

>removing caps on corporate influence isn't something to worry about

I am also happy to have full capacity for free speech a citizen.

As a citizen I am quite happy that I can bring the full brunt of my influence to bear on matters important to me.

No, it's spending money on speech which is protected by the 1st Amendment.

Before the ruling states had unconstitutional rules limited speech around elections.

I swear liberals are beyond help. You're totally off-base on this and Net Neutrality.

i hate these literal fascists

The "unconstitutional" rules that were in place affected only those with millions to spend. Also a earlier ruling had legally defined corporations as citizens. The entire point of citizens united is to remove limitations on corporate power.

>being this much of a cuck for rich assoles who dont even give a fuck about you
conservatards are the most pathetic creatures on this planet.

Relax Bugs. You'll get your time in the sun. Oh wait you already did. KEK.

This

Sup Forums sucking trump's cock every day is proof, he's cut from the exact same cloth as shillary

Not to mention a {{puppet}}

NWO

I need to go back to church.

Disney while Walt was living is true kino.

thank god

Americans 'free' market lol

I don't think pretending they don't exist changes copyright law

More like feudalism

how is it any different from having a dictator?

Free market rules!
Except when it comes to intellectual property, then based Disney should be able to protect themselves from evil pirates

The virgin competitive film distributor vs The Chad Mouse

ib u dun lik it go to norb gorbea

StarWars/Marvel expanded megaverse when?

Google, they are developing advanced AI and forcing us to train it through captcha.

>be walt disney
>hate jews
>create what becomes the most jewish company in existence

Maybe when ww3 starts, then they are really fucked.
>Have a Merry Nuclear Winter

They still can make a non glitchy or laggy OS after 10 years

disney kikes will dumb down film until literally just 2 hours of people shitting POV style onto the viewer is what's considered kino whereas a literal blank screen with one of the avengers members occasionally appearing to say a quip is considered low-brow entertainment

>is considered low-brow entertainment

if you think "making a sterilzed joke that's non-offensive to anyone in a smug face" is anything but lowbrow humor you should delete yourself.

why would you make this post and reply to me with this post, what do you think you are doing

>television and movie audiences are in slow decline/complete collapse
>old-paradigm company consolidates sinking ships into one sinking ship

look up Standard Oil to understand why your fears are retarded.

How about explaining your point and how it's relevant to modern entertainment.

>Buying brazzers in 2025.

Screencap this

>>lobby to extend copyright protections to 1000 years
>pure evil.

Do socialists actually believe that wanting to keep what is rightfully yours is "evil"?

>>have competition
>>buy them
>>buy everything
>Can they fuck off already?

fuck off kike

Apple is fucked without Jobs.

I wasn't aware Walt was still alive so he could extend the rights to keep Mickeyg

As long as there are antitrust laws they wont buy shit. Politicians are more expensive than critics

capitalism is the idea anyone can set up their own shop on the end of the street and start selling what they wish, not a monopoly with poor value (although that may be the American interpretation)

>all the disney shills ITT arguing against monopoly laws
I mean I wouldn't be so concerned if Disney did anything other than shit movies for children

Walt created the Disney company, and the company owns Mickey.

the mouse will rule all

>t. mouse jews