When did same sex kisses (even accidental) go from "funny" to the stuff of controversy?

When did same sex kisses (even accidental) go from "funny" to the stuff of controversy?

Because it use to be a form of humor/comedy.

Now it's used by degenerate to enforce degenerated behavior and brainwash kids.

/thread

but why

Remember how Bugs Bunny kissed Elmer Fudd on the lips all the time but then he suddenly had to put himself in drag before kissing?

When SJWs started getting involved. So, sometime in the last 2 years.

>brainwash kids
To do what? Be more accepting of differing romantic ideologies?

About the same time that disliking homo stuff started meaning you're really a homo

It's not that things like that are brainwashing kids, it's that people don't subject to that kind of humor anymore like they did in the Loony Tunes days.

With the constant controversy about diversity, pandering to gay people/lesbians and the way society is today, it's no surprise.

I still don't get this scene.

The princess was looking at Buttercup for a few good seconds, which seemed like enough time to see that she was a little girl and not a prince. How did she still make this mistake?

My problem is people getting more and more sexual with childrens shows. All these "deep" romantic relationships(that are handled poorly anyways) are basically an excuse for the artists to throw in some tongue for pandering to the adults who ship them in message boards.

Im not defending limiting content in cartoons as a medium, but there was a time even a heterosexual hand holding was a nono but now it seems like people want to write really bad love stories to a target audioof children who are still in the kissing os gross phase

Cartoons were a lot more sexual back then.

because the animators/writers are shit tier

Fpbp

Depends, the 80s was basically a toy campany add and you never had romantic relations between character aside from the mc's parents.

60s and 70s definitely didnt have it, nor did the 20-40s aside from minnie mouse like characters.

This is more of a 90s and especially 2000s thing, on the scale im talking about. Do you think cartoon network would have been ok with the open mouth kiss like woth finn and flane princess if it were an older show? Romantic relationships were handled much more carefully and certainly werent as common like the ones are now.

Its become a lot more perverse and not played for laughs like it traditionally was. They are supposed to be ground breaking moments for our characters and their relationships with eachother that imply change to the status qou if they are "official" now a days but as i said the target audience of these shows makes it awkward as fuck and sloppy

And to be clear, we are talking strictly about animation aimed towards children. I wont deny adults were a bigger target at one point thus adult animation more common but im talking about SU AT ect kind of shows

Maybe she was still delirious.

>To do what? Be more accepting of differing romantic ideologies?
Yes and it's awful.

What about animation meant for both kids and adults?

I agree with that, and can say the same thing for any type of medium like comics. That is why they have low sales now because it's not what people want to see all the time. pandering =/= good content

Yes, but the sexual content wasn't pander to the mainstream audience for boost recognition. You can easily tell because the media never (or rarely) cared about things like that back in the day. Anyone could make almost anything without expecting some kind of backlash, or any other thing people heavily care about today in cartoons, At least in the US.

FUCKING LIBERALS MAN

Sup Forums infected Sup Forums.

When did this website turn into a bunch of puritans?

Literally the only good thing about this nuPPG is the porn

Apparently it's only funny if guys do it, like in Gumball.

2 girls kissing was never a joke material, the trope is only done by two men.

>when did black people in theater go from "funny" to the stuff of controversy
How not only historically but philosophically ignorant do you have to be to not know that treating something as a joke is the highest/lowest from of social ostracization? When it is an unspeaken social mores that "everyone" shares, then it's funny to subvert it. When it's a sociopolitical issue that traditionalists and younger generations disagree on, then it's a controversy.

>/thread-ing your own post

The second that the general public turned on Bush and it was no longer cool to be conservative.

if any kind of kissing could brainwash kids why the fuck to gay kids happen even if they come from a conservative nuclear family setting?

if anything, its just "normalizing" that specific kind of kissing, for good or bad.

The only thing that pisses me off about that is the people making it can't even fucking animate the Powerpuff girls right

:^)
/thread

>When it's a sociopolitical issue that traditionalists and younger generations disagree on, then it's a controversy.
I think the real question here is, why did younger generations come to have a different opinion on these issues? Are they simply being contrarian?

This. Alright everybody go home! Thread over.

Homosexuality is considered an ideology now?

Yes, the reason entire generations decides to think differently all at once is to be contrarian against a generation that has next to no social interaction with them.

What about it? If its target is still children adult jokes should be a subtle nod, adult content should be the plots or focus for humour. If you want to make something adults appreciate with heavier themes and sexuality then actually make an animation geared towards them

Shouldn't*

Someone's got blue balls

>haha you must hate it because you dont get laid not because you dont appreciate awful love stories xD