Is this the least hyped Marvel movie ever?
Reminder that Guardians 2 is three weeks away
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
screenrant.com
twitter.com
>3 weeks
Really?
Feels like the marketing has been subdued.
I'm hyped. I think that Spider-Retards are getting overhyped for Spider-man's sucking Tony's dick instead though.
But yeah, I'm pumped for GOTG 2
Hold on let me get the pasta
The thing that kills that movie for me is that they added that fat Hawaiian kid for Peter to telegraph his thoughts to instead of having to direct it in a creative way so we didn't need Peter to literally say "I'm tired of him treating me like a kid!"
b-buh muh witty banter
We aren't allowed to be excited for Marvel Movies or acknowledge they were great after they come out, because if the MCU produces any less than a Stanley Kubrick art house masterpiece its shit whereas the DCEU can make turd after turd but we're all expected to be unconditionally hyped for every new film that comes out.
If a new Marvel Movie isn't an “Avengers tier” pop culture defining revolution then they claim it was a dud, that "People aren't even talking about it", that "I don't even know anyone who cares Marvel movies anymore", that "the bubble has burst." Chastising it with increasingly brazen parroted criticisms that dubiously never go into any more specifics or detail than what can be gleamed from the trailers.
All those box office bucks and records broken don't matter either, because making more money isn’t proof of quality (“muh bayformers”), but when it comes to DC, "hey look at all the money BVS and SS made despite everyone claiming they were shit!"
And all the pop culture adoration for the MCU with everyone on social media, TV and the streets singing its praises doesn't count because popularity isn’t proof of quality (“muh ad populum”), but, by god, you better believe there’s a sales chart waiting to be posted at a moment’s notice detailing Halloween Costume, Hot Topic and Toy sales should anyone doubt the DCEU’s popularity.
As for those critic reviews and movie aggregate sites, don’t bother bringing them up because “Disney bribes everyone with Mouse Money” and Rotten Tomatoes (despite being owned by Warner Bros) is clear proof of this, but at least we can still count on the Oscars (with judges who don't even watch most the movies awarded) to recognize true greatness.
And should you ever wear one of these trolls down into admitting or even implying the MCU is better than the DCEU that doesn’t mean jack squat because DC still has better Batman cartoons, better Batman comics, better Batman video games and better Batman Lego sets than Marvel.
Fucking Aussies.
There hasn't been anything new and the Thor trailer just dropped, so there's nothing worth to be hyped about. For me it's the movie I'm looking forward the most this year.
You don't need to spend a fortune advertising a movie that's already going to make a fortune.
Based user is Right. Keep fighting the good fight user. Dropping Truth Bombs all day.
How soon til post credits spill?
Marvel knows how to market this shit.
Every film there's people that go, "WHERE'S THE HYPE?????" and then they're proven wrong and the movie gets gangbusters of money.
>ecause if the MCU produces any less than a Stanley Kubrick art house masterpiece its shit
This is where the pasta falls apart.
Wanting good movies=/=wanting 2OO1 A Space Odyssey.
>Is this the least hyped Marvel movie ever?
Every single time I've seen the trailer in front of a movie the past few months the audience loses their shit over it. Laughing, clapping, even one time some sperg was quoting along with it.
>inb4 nice lie faggot
I wish I was. Every time it happens it's like I fell into one of those Sup Forums pastas about theatre experiences. And this is in Australia of all places, where no one ever makes a noise watching a movie.
Not really. CW was a good movie and people still bash it pretty hard.
>all this autistic salt
>implying everyone who complains about them is a DCfag as well
I knew DCfags from Sup Forums had autism but I didn't expect Marvelfags to be this mad when defending their flavor-of-the-month Disney products in face of criticism.
>CW was a good movie
Parts of it. The airport fight was most certainly not good, if only for the ludicrous tonal shift.
And why was Ant-Man there?
I haven't seen Ant-Man in a while, but when I watched CW I remembered something from the ANt Man movie- I think he wasn't being Ant-Man because of his daughter or something?
>waah why are you guys so mean
>just let me enjoy my kiddie flicks in peace
>e-everyone and the critics love them you guys are just a bunch of haters
And now you're proving my point.
It certainly was an hyperbole, but people will shit or heavily diminish any Marvel movie unless it comes out perfect.
>And now you're proving my point.
What?
I can't have a criticsm about an important chunk of the movie?
Fuck off, retard.
Go spam your Drax gifs.
>I think he wasn't being Ant-Man because of his daughter or something?
They never implied he was going to stop being Ant-Man.
And yeah, the fact that he was almost literally trucked in from off-screen to join the fight was sketchy from a writing perspective, but what they did with him was so satisfying that I was willing to go along with it.
Would you prefer if they pulled a Fant4stic and sold pancakes
>says that when the airport scene is regarded as one the best parts of the movie
I swear there were bells that went off in my head.
OH yeah, wouldn't he go back to jail or something if he tried to be Ant Man again, as per the Cop boyfriend?
>Guardians is 3 weeks away with nobody hyped for it
>Marvel decide to release the new Spider-Man trailer AND the new Thor trailer to steal hype away
Good one.
>Stanley Kubrick art house masterpiece
>Stanley Kubrick
>Art house
>Masterpiece
Reddit is thataway -->
Damn, you're just shilling your pasta's narrative. That's fine. I don't know why I except discussion on a discussion website.
>OH yeah, wouldn't he go back to jail or something if he tried to be Ant Man again, as per the Cop boyfriend?
I don't think so, I think he just made peace with Bobby Cannavalle and that was the end of it.
But it's been a while since I rewatched Ant-Man, I could be mis-remembering.
I'm not even the one who posted the pasta, but shitting in the airport scene is just dumb considering it was a pretty well done fight fanservice.
>CW was a good movie
It wasn't the worst but it certainly wasn't good. It's a very dissapointing follow-up to Winter Soldier.
The airport fight that everyone memes about is just a symptom of the movie's general lackluster quality and tone.
>if the MCU produces any less than a Stanley Kubrick art house masterpiece its shit
>being this dense
No one expects a "Stanley Kubrick art house masterpiece" out of your soulless junk food superhero movies.
That's not the problem and you know it. Stop whining as if DCfags were oppressing you or something.
This has little to do with the stupid company wars you chose to believe in.
Heh. Marvel is finished.
>but shitting in the airport scene is just dumb
Even your precious RLM didn't like that scene tho.
And now you're just pointing boogeymen out of nowhere. I don't even know what RLM stands for.
> but shitting in the airport scene is just dumb considering it was a pretty well done fight fanservice
Not him, but the argument that it's essentially a glorified aside that doesn't really fit with the rest of the film's narrative isn't without merit. You could pretty much cut that entire sequence out of the film from a script-writing standpoint.
I like that sequence but I'm not pretending it's perfect.
>Even your precious RLM didn't like that scene tho.
RLM didn't like the entire movie.
>And yeah, the fact that he was almost literally trucked in from off-screen to join the fight was sketchy from a writing perspective, but what they did with him was so satisfying that I was willing to go along with it.
He was originally going to be on Stark's side. But that was before Antman was even released. Then the Rossos were told that Antman would not likely work for a Stark, so he switched sides.
That then caused the issue of Tony being outnumbered, which was solved by the involvement of both Black Panther and Spiderman. Otherwise it wasn't going to be a fair fight.
>Damn, you're just shilling your pasta's narrative
you mean the TRUTH?!
ftfy*
see
Stop feigning oppression, it's embarrassing.
I literally couldn't care less about this movie
As someone who really enjoyed the first movie, I'm not excited for this one.
Part of why Guardians was so great and unique was because of the freedom given to it since it wasn't expected to be a hit. The movie had nothing to lose and they didn't have to try too hard in making it part of a crappy extended universe. But since it became a huge hit, it's going to go down the same route as all unexpectedly popular movies do when they get sequels.
>movie made by big studio given smaller budget because they think no one will care about it
>director is given freedom to do as he pleases as a result
>it becomes a huge hit surprisingly
>sequel is produced
>larger budget and greater expectations
>studio gives the director less free reign and meddle with the picture since more money is being invested and they want profit
>while bigger and arguably more impressive than the first, it's missing the charm and style and ends up being a forced, shallow, and vapid experience
This always fucking happens. It always has happened, and will continue to happen.
>HEY BABY GROOT IS BACK AND ISN'T HE THE CUTEST ?
>HEY GUYS LET'S HAVE HOOKED ON A FEELING COME BACK! I'M SURE THAT'S WHY ALL THE KIDS WENT TO SEE THE FIRST ONE!"
>HEY BABY GROOT IS BACK AND ISN'T HE THE CUTEST ?
I still have no idea why so many people are mad about Baby Groot. Apparently you're not allowed to have cute characters in movies anymore because that makes them marketable?
>inb4 IT'S OBVIOUSLY MADE FOR MAKING TOYS
He was literally set up at the end of last film, this is not a surprise. Also who gives a shit as long as it works in the context of the film itself?
If ya go to any theater I've seen they've got giant standies for it where you sit on a couch and get a pic with the whole cast.
>Apparently you're not allowed to have cute characters in movies anymore because that makes them marketable?
>if you hate this then you MUST hate all of these other things
You know that's not how it goes.
But if you still want a reply, it's the marketing. It's because of shit like this
>alright team, we have ourselves a solid poster, how can we fuck up a bit?
>lets put Baby Groot screaming in the bottom left, the children will love that!
Baby Groot was a cute and fun gag that, just like everything else in the first movie, is going to be forced down our throats and repeated in the 2nd movie until it stops being funny, just to attract children to see le cute high pitched smashy smashy plant.
>Marvel being so confident over CW and Doctor Strange that they lift the review embargo months in advance for high RT score bragging
>absolutely nothing on this
What is going on?
oh shit that's lit
I didn't even realize that this is three weeks away.
Maybe MCU is getting really confident and don't care about promoting their movies anymore.
>tfw best girl is hardly in any of the marketing
I'm worried about muh bald blue cutey.
>best girl
>not Mantis
You'll get to enjoy your blue condom girl in IW.
Hypest for me. Taking my girlfriend opening night, my nephews the following day, and my mother and siblings the following Saturday.
Hooked on a Feeling isn't back though. It was in the first teaser, that's it. An everybody who's involved in this movie has bent over backwards making it clear that they aren't just retreading old ground.
Nice strawman you've constructed though.
Sitting in the theater waitin for my boy king king and this stupid fuckin trailer starts. Aw for fuck sake. Don't push the button, I am groot, hur hur dur... pop corn munching, paper cups emptying, hur hur hur. Stupid title shot, volume 2, like your mixtape, you remember your mix tapes don't you co? You have sexual feelings for her! She said your secrets! Do me! Hur hur dur dis movie is so cool I sure hope it's in 3D like last time please punch me in the fucking skull some more I like movies that require my skull being concussed in order to enjoy it
What's it like, living with autism?
I'm excited for it. I hope the women characters are allowed to be just as goofy as the men this time.
I might be excited for it if the trailers had even one good joke. It just looks exhausting. It's running the first movie's shtick right into the ground.
>Is this the least hyped Marvel movie ever?
Yes. This is finally the first MCU failure.
Judging by the trailers it seems Mantis is definitely going to be.
I do wonder if Disney is anticipating middling reviews on this one and that's why they hyped up that "Best Test Audience Reactions Ever!" story in the Hollywood Reporter.
Should have had Peter saying it while jerking off.
Hulk and The Thors were failures.
Ant-Man
P O S T T H E P A S T A
It's going to be hilarious when this shit flops. Once again confirming why the man-children who still read comic books are barely more than marginalized caricatures of themselves. But instead of admitting you've become the most beta of betas, you'll complain for years how "good it was" and how "tasteless" the general public is in desperate attempts to try and divert away the soul crushing realization that you've wasted your lives on mind-numbing drivel originally designed to entertain teenage boys.
I'm pretty excited
Guardians 1 was my favorite Phase 2 Movie.
If this is in any way like the first one then this may be my favorite Phase 3 movie.
That's what's curious. We should have had or be getting reviews of GotG2 around about now.
The problem with releasing reviews early is when a less stellar movie comes along, karma hits.
They had reviews out months ahead of release for Doctor Strange? I don't remember this. Anyway there's still plenty of time before reviews are conventionally released. I don't think it's a bad omen yet.
Wasn't saying that. I think with Civil War it was about three weeks, with Strange it was closer, two weeks, I think.
Is the movie even done yet? I think I read they just finalized some VFX shots the other day.Possible no one even saw it yet.
On the other hand, CW reviews came out Apr 13 one year ago.
>Feels like the marketing has been subdued.
Clearly you don't live in New York
>when
You do realize this movie flopping is impossible right? It doesn't even have any competition.
>ben grimm
>bacon
Fuck they couldn't even get Denny's cross promotion right.
>falling for pasta
>thinking that marvel hype steals hype away from marvel
You should leave to reddit as well.
en.wikipedia.org
>week of
fucking nothing
>1 week before
fucking nothing
>2 weeks before
fucking nothing
>3 weeks before
Fast 8
>1 week after
Shitty King Arthur
>2 weeks after
Alien
It opens right as Fast 8's legs will be running out, and it'll own that weekend with literally no competition. King Arthur isn't likely to take anything from it, so it has two whole weeks to itself until Alien comes out.
Guaranteed box office gold.
>JUST turn off your brain bro!
Meanwhile Wonder Woman:
>opens a week after Pirates 5
>2 weeks after alien
>same week as Captain Underpants
>the mummy opens the next week
>Cars 3 opens 2 weeks later
Wonder Woman is going to get swallowed
If it's bad, I'll just go back and watch the first movie again.
If it's good, I'll go back and watch the first movie again just so I can watch the sequel again.
Now that is some tonedeaf shit right there.
How bad is the cgi in this movie going to look in 8k?
screenrant.com
>For the sequel, it seems that James Gunn and his production team might try to outdo themselves when it comes to expanding the cosmic world of Guardians of the Galaxy. It’s not going to be an easy undertaking, but it appears Marvel and Gunn now have the tools to make Vol. 2 look really, really sharp.
>Digital camera company RED announced that they will partner up with Marvel Studio for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, which will be the first movie to use RED’s new WEAPON 8K camera during production. From the press release from RED:
>“We are all hugely excited to be shooting the next Guardians of the Galaxy on the new WEAPON 8K. This is my third collaboration with RED, having previously shot with the RED EPIC® on Prometheus and the EPIC DRAGON on Tarzan,” says Nik Korda, Executive Producer. “The large sensor size and super high resolution offered by the new WEAPON 8K, combined with its lightweight and compact size open up a whole range of new creative possibilities.”
>While a majority of modern movie theaters can only digitally project at 4K, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 will shoot at a higher resolution of 8K, which could make images sharper and more vibrant. The high resolution sensors on RED’s WEAPON 8K can capture more color information for clearer and more crisp images than 4K. In addition, the cameras can also be outfitted with 35mm lenses. No Film School has a good breakdown of the benefits of shooting with 8K cameras and sensors here.
>Wonder Woman is going to get swallowed
Chill out there vore man.
I worked on the special effects on this and thor 3 if you like the first one you're going to like this one it's like two hundred times better
It not that bad and if you thinks so than im sorry we worked so hard on it
trust me the movie is hilarious every Drax and Star-Lord interactions are the funniest part of the movie trust me man
My man i meant
It's not a great shot right there, but I haven't seen the rest of the movie.
What happened to his right arm? Did they mess up while filming and didn't get a good shot of his arm lowering down? Was it quickly made for the trailer? Why couldn't cgi be made for his arm coming down to look normal? It's like less than one second of movement.
maybe I'm not seeing it ... what's the problem with that shot?
They already know people are going to see it, there'll be a slew of TV spots that week though.
Nigger, they outright said it was pasta. Have you not been here for any MCU movie since the first GotG?
Or is it something to do with youtube's compression and/or how the shot's framed?
In the video it looks 'choppy'.
Christ, at least the Smoky Bacon Flavour Pringles that Tescos advertised for Ramadan don't contain any actual pork products.
Tell me about Thanos.
Civil War managed to fit all those characters and not be bad. It was a good movie but really a step down from Cap 2. I don't care if Serpent Society "wasn't really the sequel" it would've been much better than the Avengers 2.5 movie it turned out to be.
Posters are all over the city for me.
They will likely go harder on the advertising 2 weeks prior and even more the week before.
what do you want to know
Imo civil war was more a cap movie than the an avengers movie
>OH yeah, wouldn't he go back to jail or something if he tried to be Ant Man again, as per the Cop boyfriend?
No. The ending of the movie completely vindicated him in his family's eyes and the cop even erased the evidence of him escaping from jail.
Why does he wear the glove?
He shows up in the last five min of thor i was actually animated him today it was pretty cool doing he smile
It was more of an Iron Man movie than a Cap movie.
I'd say Black Panther is the third main character of the movie,after Cap and Tony. He doesn't seem like a last minute addition the way Spider-Man does.
Only if you're a retard. The whole movie was about Cap trying to save Bucky from the government.
this autism
No one cared who he was till he put on the infinty gaunlet