I blame these talentless hacks for popularizing the "prequels are bad" meme. If it wasn't for them maybe George wouldn't have sold Star Wars to the fucking mouse.
I blame these talentless hacks for popularizing the "prequels are bad" meme...
Dominic Rodriguez
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Bentley Rogers
>one shitty reviewer is all it takes to take down lucas
lmao what a fucking hack
Leo Harris
But they were bad?
Two bads don't make a good.
Jordan Bailey
They are bad, but at least they tried to be good. Prequels had a great concept that was terribly executed.
The Disney movies are just unoriginal pieces of shit covered in a good looking wrapper.
Nathaniel Cook
>nuWars is bad so prequels are good
Brainletism is a disease
Parker Murphy
Fun fact, most normal, everyday people have no idea who these people are and don't care about "hating" on the prequels.
Owen Stewart
But the prequels were just as bad as this tripe.
Charles Diaz
The prequels ARE bad though. If the new ones are bad too it doesn't make the prequels good.
Jacob Flores
The prequels are bad, it's just that nu-Star Wars is even worse.
Jason Smith
I blame them for giving the prequels a second wind in the "so bad it's good" sense. People had stopped caring about the prequels until Mike came along
Josiah Garcia
>"prequels are bad" meme
Juan Rogers
The prequels were hated and laughed at since the day they came out. The Plinkett reviews just gave an in depth analysis of why everyone hated them.
Jace Cook
Just because they 'felt like star wars' doesn't make them good.
Nathaniel Jenkins
...
Logan White
This.. and both bad for different reasons.
Zachary Gomez
Lucas wasn't going to make any new movies anyway. He wanted to tell the story of Anakin and he told it. He was done. Maybe he should have just buried it instead of selling it, though.
Liam Rodriguez
It's all come full circle and Sup Forums is now defending the prequels unironically.
Jacob Davis
Prequels did suck
Jonathan Carter
>Maybe he should have just buried it instead of selling it, though.
He should've, but I can't blame him when the mouse was throwing literal billions at him.
Robert King
...
Gabriel Scott
Jay is a marvel-sucking wannabe hipster bellend
Anthony Baker
Reminder that Hollywood fears them
Camden Lewis
I really hope that RLM will rip this movie a new one
Jack Reed
Reminder the prequels made shit ton of money and Georgie Lucas had no idea that people hated the movie because of the viewing number where so high.
Luke Carter
You know this is faked, right?
Adam Jackson
Rian knows well
Elijah Smith
Jaxson Rivera
Reminder that a bunch of people will flip and start defending The Last Jedi as soon as the HitB comes out and Mike goes "I loved it, it fixed everything wrong with Rogue One and is x10 better than the prequels"
Logan Martinez
I haven't seen the movie, but I can tell you right now it's probably not as bad as people make it out to be here.
Jeremiah Cruz
RLM also lied about Lucas. Midchlorians and lightsaber joda were all ideas from kasdan.
Nathaniel Flores
fpbp
Jonathan Perez
That's not what that screencap shows. Kasdan had no involvement in the prequels.
Benjamin Parker
I have no idea why they turned their autistic essay in such a hitjob on Lucas, misrepresenting every fact of the production process.
Jacob Gutierrez
Nigger, just because the new trilogy is worse than the prequels, it doesn't mean the prequels suck any less.
Fucking kill yourself.
Dominic James
Patreon kinos:
Nerd Crew
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Best of the Worst
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Half in the Shit
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Other
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Carter Edwards
That's from the behind the scenes of the OT you fucking retard. That was before Lucas went insane. The prequels and all the shit ideas in it are all him. You're the one misrepresenting facts
Landon Butler
Yes he had you moron.
That's from the transcripts of the prequel story meetings.
RLM presented the whole story like Lucas ego was out of control, when the contrary was the case and his movie got dragged down by brainletts like kasdan having creative input.
Matthew Reed
>That's from the transcripts of the prequel story meetings
No it's not you dumb cunt. It's from Return of the Jedi and you know. Hence why Kasdan and Marquand are there. You're fooling no one
Hudson Martin
Dont think so.
JarJar was loved at. That anakin was a MarySue was laughed at.
The lovescene in ep2 was a "why would you do that george?" moment.
Haydens turn into vader plot was a "how does this happen?" moment with a laugh at his transforming scene.
Everything else was just loved and liked.
Eli Sanchez
Prequels have always been shit though, Even when I was 9 years old the Phantom Menace was unappealing as shit compared to the Original Trilogy.
I liked Star Wars when it was rare space wizards with unexplainable space magic and space cowboys, as soon as I saw too many Jedis and "Sith" they lost their appeal
Jose Evans
The prequels were phenomenal.
Anyone who says different is in ironically a Disney shill.
Chase Phillips
>The prequels were phenomenal
Lucas Perez
Name a good prequel that isn’t rogue one
Luis Reed
The Phantom Menace was not actually THAT bad. Sure, kid Anakin sucked, but did he really suck more than adult emo Anakin?
Joseph Howard
Revenge of the Sith is good but only for memes
Joseph Myers
bullshit, watch this clip from Clerks 2.
youtube.com
notice how Randal doesn't even try to defend the prequels? This movie came out 6 years before the first plinkett review. The common consensus at the time was that these movies were shit.
Grayson Clark
Revenge of the sith
Christopher Walker
This is true only because the subsequent movies suck so much more that the whole is bad. If TPM was the only bad one of the bunch it would be a fluke. It at least had less green screen
Lucas Murphy
They are bad. It is no meme. George is a hack. And he is 100% responsible for HIS decision to sell out even though it was against his stated principles.
RLM is popular because they just stated what people already thought in an entertaining package. I doubt they actually changed many minds.
/thread.
Xavier Ramirez
holy shit thanks my man
Carson Morgan
Why would he? Hayden was bad. So thats the only critic?
Jaxon Peterson
youtube.com
This sketch aired in 1999 and pretty mercilessly pokes fun at Lucas for being lazy, out of touch, and way too focused on shoehorning terrible characters like Jar Jar into the prequels. If TPM was loved at the time and people still respected George, this sketch wouldn't make any sense.
I was ten when TPM came out and even my friends and I (who were all obsessed with it) thought it was bad compared to the OT.
Anthony Cook
>So thats the only critic?
Probably the most famous examples of other media hating on the prequels are from Spaced and The Simpsons.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Those all aired while the prequels were still being released.
Cooper Peterson
BTFO
Nolan Bennett
I didn't need RLM to fucking FALL ASLEEP during episode 2.
shit sucked, deal with it
Mason White
mike stoklasa is to disneys star wars as zoe quinn is to the trump presidency prove me wrong faggots pro tip you cant calle corso
Kevin James
will sasso was so good
Cameron Roberts
dude people have rekt these movies since i was a kid
Jordan Thomas
Yeah, that's a real good counterpoint.
Bentley Foster
>wow a british show no one watched until years later hated star wars
the simpsons jokes about everything so ehh
Ian Davis
This is actual autism
Nicholas Morgan
Who is to the what and what for the who now?
Owen Martinez
based as fuck
also I'm screencapping this thread and will shove it back at you retards when Mike, Jay, and Rich hate this flick
Leo Perez
And Mad gave OT parodies too. So by your logic OT was laughed back than too.
What i see here is just critic that he relied on toys and JarJar. Still doesnt make it laughing stock.
And simpsons were made 5 or 2 years later. Its about JarJar and the cgi that made it "suck". But never on the films or the story. It was criticised, but never laughed at.
Benjamin Jackson
I was talking about a bad prequel online back when Clinton was cigar fucking a chubby teen in the Oval Office.
Aiden Lewis
RLM actually just rode the wave of "contrarianism and nitpicking makes you smart" that rose from internet culture around 2007 and onwards.
Blake Parker
it was star wars was always trash
Jose Fisher
Not really. Just realistic. Others are just reeeeing. And im not that narrow minded. It was criticised, and it had it flaws. But these flaws dont maske it that bad as many want to believe.
Grayson Hernandez
They won't, they're "big e-celebs" now.
Thomas Watson
DELET
Jason Powell
What does that even mean?
Daniel Hernandez
False equivalence. Star Wars have always been parodied but the prequels have been parodied specifically for being shitty disappointments
Michael Lopez
>I blame these talentless hacks for popularizing the "prequels are bad" meme.
This is some amazing revisionism, but I understand why millennials don't want to let go of their childhood nostalgia.
Logan Ross
Indeed it was always corny and cheesy. I rememeber how many laughed at luke for being a crybaby. How he could singlehandly destroy deathstars, marketable ewoks and things, but that are critic or flaws that are there, but can outweighted by other good things. For me Ep1 is the less of the new trilogy, but still better as Ep7 if you take effort and story into that quotation.
Adrian Edwards
>And simpsons were made 5 or 2 years later. Its about JarJar and the cgi that made it "suck". But never on the films or the story.
Did you not watch the one where they tell Lucas to knock it off with the politics bullshit and get back to swashbuckling and character interactions?
Jaxson Sanders
>painfully obvious green screen
>frame cluttered with tons of meaningless shit
Really made me ponder
Jaxson Evans
Nice point, stupid.
Robert Ramirez
Mainly for the toys. Back than OT was mocked at being very cheesy and having logical flaws and soap opera turns, which in your logic indicates that they are bad movies too.
Isaiah Baker
That’s not true, I was a teenager with the internet when they came out and he was well aware of the backlash after episode 1
Robert Gonzalez
...
Benjamin Cook
Lol they did what? They criticise heay use of CGI, which in fact is just an art form, and being more plot driven.
But than he says going back to copy cheesy stories which both accept. Says many things on the writers what they think about starwars and makes more like a nab at fans than at prequels. That it always was that way. Thats not really laughing at StarWars.
Hudson Richardson
>the prequels are ba-
Juan Fisher
The one thing the RLM videos hammered home is that green sceen acting is atrocious.
Half the prequels are just people walking through CGI hallways and talking.
The movies are BORING and then the action scenes are too cluttered to really be entertaining.
There's a way to show a lot of people fighting on a screen and still allow the audience to focus on individual soldiers. The opening of Saving Private Ryan comes to mind. You get big sweeping shots of dozens of soldiers running, dying, the view from the gunners nests mowing them down, but then there's also small scenes of medics treating wounded, soldiers cowering behind giant caltrops, etc. It allows you to focus briefly on nameless soldiers and feel like you're there in the action.
That's something that the prequels 100% failed to do. It all felt like a video game. Every single action scene had the choreography of a bad video game. You never feel like you're there in the action. There's a CACOPHONY of visual noise attacking your brain and you can't focus on ANY of it, so you just tune out.
Dylan Torres
Know where you are.
Angel Williams
>which in your logic indicates that they are bad movies too
The fuck are you talking about? I never said a movie being parodied proved it was a bad movie. The OT has been parodied but it's also universally recognized as great trilogy of movies. The prequels on the other hand has not only been parodied, but shat on since the beginning. But you seem to insist that they were beloved movies until the plinkett reviews despite being proven wrong constantly in this thread, you retarded revisionist cunt
Nathaniel Perry
They were beloved movies. Or how do you think After that it went big even with normies? It spawned animated series and several games? Jango, clonetroopers and several jedis had fan following? Even the imperator got more fans. It was not with Plinkett were the tide turned, just with all the too much merchandise it got a stain.
Anthony Howard
After phantom menace they really didn't. Pod racing, going through the planet core, and the theed power station (even though what the actual fuck does tuscany in space fucking need with all that power?) FEELS like star wars, it's a fantasy adventure movie set in space. Attack of the clones is sorely lacking in fantasy OR adventure, and revenge of the sith has Sheev and memes and sheevmemes. But that's fucking it.
And it's not to say star wars must be a rehash of the OT, because the EU and clone wars proved that people dig the universe, and are interested in hearing other space fantasy adventure movies set in space, set in star wars. It's a big universe, with plenty of tales to be told, but it just keeps coming back to the entire galaxy hinging on what is basically one extended family being fucking retarded absolutely all the fucking time for no better reason than things need to happen.
Jace White
>Man takes a shit on stage
>"Wow that sucked, fuck you"
>Another man comes on stage and starts jacking off onto pictures of his 90 year old mom
>"I'm so sorry mister shitting man, please come back I should've never been mean to you"
I don't know why autistic people think that a successor being shit redeems its predecessor, its such a bizarre line of thinking.
Ethan Wright
So you admit you like them because you're an underage who grew up on shitty licensed tripe that milked children and autists while everyone else moved on to Harry Potter? Thanks for actually being honest rather than attempting to revise pop culture history to make you feel less embarrassed over your sad childhood.
Jaxson Turner
>implying Lucas saw, or was effected by, Plinkett’s reviews in any way
Samuel Hall
They really have valid points. Cant agree on the fights, they were good but they tried too much "what technical is possible"
And that its boring, it has similar action pace as OT and even a more feel like old time swashbuckle films
Camden Mitchell
they just amplified the nerd rage and created new memes.
The People vs George Lucas was already a thing.
Justin Allen
Lol, so you dont have any arguments to prove me wrong?
And I was sadly too young too go into the cinema, i only got the afterwaves of the OT. I even got back than the Luke in Stormtrooper outfit from the OT toy line. Im just saying how it was back than, but maybe i never was that autistic nerdy or in that group to see OT through nostalgia glasses.
Michael Roberts
...
Carter Cook
Nah, the problem is that some are just nostalgic autistic that say "its different than the predecessor, but i want the same story over and over again". And because they grew up with the first one, everything should be like that and every fault is ok. Thats why ep7 is so liked by them, because its just a new hope remastered.
Jaxon Scott
Honestly when I was a kid I loved the prequels, and even today all of my young cousins enjoy them as well.