Sup Forums BTFO! Science proves it!
ITT: Times that Sup Forums got absolutely BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
Adrian Flores
Jaxon Lee
"No!"
Jaxon Cooper
>Sewerage wasn't invented in the wizarding world until the late 1900s, so before this marvel was commonplace, witches and wizards would relieve themselves anywhere they stood and simply magic away the waste matter.
Literally designated shitting street culture...
Josiah Stewart
more like dullest humans
Jeremiah Morgan
It's hardly worth bring scientists into it to understand that Harry Potter fans are better humans for enduring the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Dominic Perry
fuck trump and fuck wh*te people
Jason Myers
Based Potterheads confirmed based
Charles Cox
basef
Jordan Hill
I think that might be the most liberal sentence I've ever read
Lucas Campbell
To be fair up until the 18th century most regular people would do the same.
Nathaniel Lee
archive.4plebs.org
Sup Forums blown out by based mentally ill happa potter drone!
Lucas Johnson
>It's hardly worth bring scientists into it to understand that Harry Potter fans are better humans for enduring the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises.
Lel, not bad
Lucas Martin
Russian Tomatoes shills everywhere killing themselves right now, turns out the "soyboys" were right all along huh?
Ian Ramirez
>The research, entitled The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice, conducted three studies to test whether extended contact through reading the best-selling books "improves attitudes toward stigmatized groups (immigrants, homosexuals, refugees)".
Jason Gutierrez
if potter fans are so superior how could the writer is a piece of shit
Jaxon Bailey
Yes, sounds like a totally objective and peer reviewed paper.
Xavier Campbell
SOCIAL SCIENCE IS NOT SCIENCE
Blake Diaz
Yes, yes, very nice progressive movie Star Wars fans... HOWEVER
William Peterson
>SOCIAL SCIENCE IS NOT SCIENCE
topkek, what a rural retard
it is the future of science, just because you don't like it doesn't mean that it isn't scientifically true - it is actually your prejudice and racism that is unenlightened and unscientific
Christopher Hernandez
>according to science
Please make this phrase illegal.
Samuel Ramirez
THIS POLITICAL FIGURE'S SIMILARITIES TO HARRY POTTER VILLAIN WILL SHOCK YOU!