Be honest, you miss it don't you

Be honest, you miss it don't you.

What the hell is this?

The fuck is that?

A little bit. It reminds me of when Sup Forums was more fun to go on.

Is it over? When did it end exactly?

better than cucumberquest

The fuck?

ask your subreddit about "Moon Over June"

This shit end around 2013, and it is a roller coaster ride of cringe and laughs. Also the website doesn't work anymore. I checked.

I miss the days when I could just dump these without being banned and we would suffer together. Sup Forums has become so uptight about the rules in the later years. Can't even share terrible lesbo webcomics anymore.

What the hell happene?
I'm honestly curious.

It used to
Be this, Fuckley and that dude with the Fedora/Glasses wearing blue bear thing going on.

I say this a lot, or something like it, about a lot of things, but
this comic would be hot as balls if it was just drawn pretty instead of ugly. their shitty personalities lead to all kinds of sexy shenanigans, and I like how they dont tiptoe around stuff like fisting and squirting. They get literally and figuratively elbow-deep in their depiction of sex. if it wasnt for the art, this would be hot.

I don't know, maybe the author had enough of the criticism and delete the whole thing.

god I love ugly girls with a sense of humor

Everyone can bitch about the goofy expressions and say it's ugly and whatever, but I love it. It's different, and I appreciate that. It still gets the ooint across, exaggerates it, you know, because it's a fucking cartoon, and yeah it's ugly, but in a "honestly humans and their emotions are kind of ugly" kind of way. Whether the creator meant that or not, I have no idea. This my first time hearing about this apparently infamous webcomic.

I know most of you on here and just people in general don't really have the capacity to appreciate it (and I honestly don't mean that in a condescending way) but as someone who's been through art school and seen the community, everything like the bottom part of pic related gets boring. I bet the person who made this pic felt so rad, but honestly, their style of drawing faces and emotions is boring and annoyingly familiar, I've seen this style a trillion times over, in webcomic and other forms of media. It's not new or exciting.

I appreciate this art style because it's it's own thing, and iwns up to being unpleasant to the eye in a way that (typically, just from what I've seen looking through Google results for a few minutes) isn't uncomfortable from an actual design aspect. Just a different, fun way to illustrate emotions that doesn't look like every other fucking thing in the internet

yeah I get the feeling the idea is to try to frankly depict the grossness of humanity.. but i also assume that artist thinks that IS sexy

I completely understand and despise your viewpoint. Ugliness for the sake of variety is like stupidity for the sake of nonconformism. It's being unnecessarily contrary. but you still have points.

Yeah but even if you can appreciate the art for whatever idiotic reason it doesn't make the storytelling any better.

well, not as a story, but.. for porn? kinda yeah actually. just slice of life where the life is perverted as hell
obviously no matter what i would have gotten buttmad when they adopted kids, but..

>(and I honestly don't mean that in a condescending way)

Well guess what, fag. And in the very slim chance that you're not trolling, the artstyle is shit because the facial features look like they're stapled on like a fucking Mr. Potato Head doll. And that's just a fucking starter.

Breaking the rules is one thing, but breaking them without any sense of style, skill or cohesion is another.

that's one of the few criticisms you can make against this style that isn't valid. the features wrap around in threedimensional space quite nicely.
it's just the faces warp and twist like rubber

>but i also assume that artist thinks that IS sexy
No idea. I don't think it's sexy

Fair point, although I don't think the artist was trying to make it unattractive. No idea though. I think it's just their style and I appreciate it for what it is

I love how any time someone disagrees with a held opinion on this sight, there's always at least one guy who's like
>I know ur trolling, BUT
And it's art, by necessity there are no rules. It's subjective. I agree that you have to have a competent grasp on proportion, spacing, mental imagery, etc. in this particular medium, but if the illustrator steps out if these bounds in a way that isn't jarring to the viewer, then I see no problem. One if my biggest issues with getting into illustration is that so many artists in the field immediately invalidate your art if it doesn't manage to fit into a predetermined line of rules. If the style of the work allows for it, then step out if the lines. Obviously if you're going for a more realistic take, then this isnt the way to go, but otherwise, like I said earlier, as long as it's not jarring, then I see no issue.

And don't confuse ugliness, intentional or otherwise, with jarring.

So I remember reading a comic the author did about herself which has implied MoJ was a big joke she did. Is there a reason people thought it was serious?

even if she did say that, it's not a huge leap to think it was only to save face