What the hell is this?

What the hell is this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oU19mwjHiRs
youtube.com/watch?v=wlfE_IplWAU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

cant you read? It's called The Unstoppablw Wasp you retard

It's cringe but also probably a commissioned cover

A reference to an old rap song .
youtube.com/watch?v=oU19mwjHiRs

It's what the kids call a "big bootay"

A Sketch cover someone paid Cho to draw.

Cho being based by bother delivering fap material and pissing Tumblr off

>OUTRAGE.png

Frank doing his thing.

You pretending to be offended to make a shit thread on Sup Forums even though you actually support it.

How is it possible for just one man to be so goddamn based?

Yeah, he should of just made another samurai jack thread.

isn't she like 14?

Cho trying to stay relevant.

No lie, I'd read the shit out of that.

Your point?

>Why is Willem Dafoe yelling at us?

Why are white chicks so obsessed with no wanting a big butt?

I had a chick talk to me one time and make fun of another girl.

>"God, like she needs to be eating that. Her ass is already huge."
>responded with shrugging and going "Nothing wrong with a huge ass."
>get disgusted look back in return

you;re a paedophile

Might be so but those young girls can really fuck once youteach em how

Hebephile, technically.

to them it just means theyre fat

i know, its strange

I usually experience the opposite problem, people who know I'm an assman think I only care about size when shape and proportionality are more important to an ass than being big.

That's it. Marvel, just hire Cho again. Put him in a comedy book.

There are some 14 year old girls who have big butts user.

Pics or gtfo

That stupid Cashme Ousside girl probably does

You think I walk on the streets taking pics of every girl with a big butt user?

Can confirm.

Then what the fuck are you doing here?

So you're gay.

anyone who didn't recognize the reference is too young to appreciate it anyway

I read comics.

Stay mad fag.

Unless it's a real 14 year old girl, your full of shit.

That, friendo, is pure stupidity. Applying the "thicc" meme to a character who's defining power is SHRINKING.

Please don't.

Nigger the original Wasp was a hot as fuck daddy's girl.

thats not how the law works paedo

Wow I can't wait for this to become a controversy.

yes it is

Wasp's writer is definitely the kind of guy to flip out over sexy depictions of women/teenagers.

And oh hey what do you know

I like Cho's art, but the only dialogue that was funny was "Chest out, Danvers. Not that far out."

>REEEEE

Color me surprised, more delicate snowflake millennials getting chapped about harmless cheesecake.

>Oh no
>The Pinup artist drew pinup art!

Hormones in our meat are turning girls into cows and it is great.

>evolving
Ironically all this sex-negative stuff is actually pretty regressive. It's just a drawing. If Cho says it's Janet then it's probably Janet, because Cho likes Janet.

Can't Slow the Cho.

Looks like Janet to me.

Yeah. They are railing against a liberal status quo by demanding censorship.

Well he handled it better than Robbie.

Gwen and Eddie deserve each other.

>this comes on the radio at work
>turns it up a bit so everyone can hear

>boss walks in

>implying Frank Cho doesn't love comics
he'd probably make a lot more money as a straight commission artist than continuing to work for Marvel

It's about the way different races put on fat

>It's just a drawing.

But user, the implications.

SJWs are the new Victorians. The reasoning behind it is different, but the end result is the same.

>no "outrage" though balloon
obviously just a cho ripoff.

17

It IS possible he isn't aware Nadia isn't Janet.
He just passed through and didn't care to read the new shit but saw there's a new costume.
There's no regression with evolution though.
You just change, so if Cho isn't changing he isn't evolving even if he's not evolving into a prude like the rest of the times.

BASED CHO XDD

>But in real life, that's not titillating or sexy - it's violent and horrible and totally, utterly, deeply wrong.
>what is bdsm

>There's no regression with evolution though.
>You just change, so if Cho isn't changing he isn't evolving even if he's not evolving into a prude like the rest of the times.

Well if we're trying to apply the actual meaning of evolution here then the whole argument goes out the window, because changing behavior through shame and outrage isn't evolution it's just censorship.

Change is change

>against their will

Non-rape bdsm requires consent user.

That page is still ham-fisted preaching but please understand that.

Think of it like this, if we start lobotomizing gorillas because reasons, did they evolve to have half a brain?

Change != Evolution

>this is actually coming true
youtube.com/watch?v=wlfE_IplWAU

I know it requires consent, but rape fantasies are common in BDSM, aren't they? That's what I've seen from porn. That's why you have the set safe words, so that people can scream no and stop and all that but with them knowing you don't actually want them to stop.

No because that's not actually a physical evolutionary change on part of the Gorillas whereas self censorship is still social evolution

>porn
>an accurate depiction of real-life sexuality
pick one

>That's what I've seen from porn
Protip: the real world is not a porn website.

That's cool and all, but then we're back to the point that we're talking about social issues and not real evolution, meaning there is in fact such thing as regression and this SJW shit is about as regressive as it gets.

So are rape fantasies not a thing in the "domination" part of BDSM? Am I wrong about the usage of safe words? Enlighten me, anons.

Nah, just use your Internet abilities and get a escort who will explain it to you. Just make sure mom doesn't see her going into her basement, OK?

CHANGE! YOU GOT CHANGE? C'MON HELP A GUY OUT!

rape fantasies do exist, and can be a part of BDSM.
but they're a small subset.

and safe words are safe words, if you get uncomfortable you use it, regardless of fetish involved.

It explicitly says in the panel that he's drawing women having things done to them "against their will" not engaging in bdsm activities in which they pretend it's happening against their will.

Again, not agreeing with Mr. Mouthpiece about fictitious rape/assault being morally wrong because it somehow makes it happen in the real world, but here you are arguing that real life non-consensual sexual abuse is comparable to consensual bdsm activities.

Nono, rape fantasies are very, very common.
But the catch is that it all builds on mutual trust and prior agreement with BDSM.
It's roleplay with safe words and rules.
Which makes rape fantasies a bit hard to act out because, well, it's hard to build up an illusion of threat in an absolutely safe environment.
The idea of getting swept away by a forceful-overwhelming stranger is alluring, but in reality it just does not happen.
Unless you actually get raped which isn't sexy and alluring at all.
No matter what talentless hack writers imagine.

Rape fantasies are so prevalent in romance fiction that it's an ordeal to find one that doesn't have it. Women like the idea of a guy they want to have sex with removing the choice from them.

i'm homeless and find this offensive please delete this and check your privilege

>fiction
>an accurate description of real-life sexuality
pick
one

Then what's the problem? Besides you being a pathetic prude, that is.

>>Which makes rape fantasies a bit hard to act out because, well, it's hard to build up an illusion of threat in an absolutely safe environment.

Drugs help

Remember, it's cannon that Eddy can instantly spot lesbians thanks to how hot he is.

What happened to people being able to differentiate between reality and fiction?

...

SJWs are generally somewhere on the autistic spectrum and have trouble differentiating the two, so they assume that's how everyone is.

Is all of this book a big dumb meta-wank "fiction is reality" preachfest like this page

A lot of it is just moralizing browbeating towards others that you eventually end up tricking yourself into believing.

No user, I'm saying that people find rape fantasies hot in real life too, and some even enjoy acting them out. It's not against their will, but they can enjoy the illusion that it isn't.

Don't put words in my mouth.

There's a demand for it, and some of them will admit that yes that's what they want.

The author tries to maintain a neutral stance on things, but its pretty obvious how they feel about everything.

>i'm homeless and find this offensive please delete this and check your privilege

It's time for you to get a job.

Most babies are born based. The fact that people other than them exist is something they have to learn.

Wait, "is". They can enjoy the illusion that it is against their will. My bad.

romance fiction is probably the absolute worst place to get a primer on human sexuality

Nothing, but a lot of ess-jay-dubbya arguments revolve around pretending that it's impossible and that even if you're aware it doesn't protect you from being influenced.

I'm not putting words in your mouth, but you are misunderstanding what you are arguing against. By quoting that particular line, you are arguing against that author's stance that "in real life, that's not titillating or sexy - it's violent and horrible and totally, utterly, deeply wrong". You're arguing that fantasies are fine, and you are correct. But that is not what the author was talking about. He was equating fiction to real life situations of assault and rape. He's wrong, but not for the reasons you're putting out there.