How do you feel about MCU Stan Lee being a Watcher as oppose to the OAA?

How do you feel about MCU Stan Lee being a Watcher as oppose to the OAA?

I don't care.

>implying they will not make him OAA in Infinity Wars

What's more important to me is that the reveal is funny, whichever it is

What if Stan Lee was playing a Skrull the entire time?

The watcher makes 100x more sense than if he were to be the OAA, the one above all is just the head of the celestials and isn't omniscient like a watcher afaik. Celestials are glorified scientists. I think it's a cool detail and the watchers are a great concept so the fact that they have the balls to utilize something like them is a good thing to me. I hope his head is huge

I think OP meant TOAA as in the actual deity that created everything including the first firmament and etc.

And the Watchers are glorified peeking toms.

Different OAA, user.

There's OAA, head of the Celestials, and there's OAA, Marvel-God.

I assume OP meant the latter (supreme maker of the Marvel Multiverse or whatever his official title is), the former really would be a WTF role.

A celestial would murder a watcher, because watchers can't do dick

Jack is OAA. Now and forever.

Nick Fury murdered a Watcher, they ain't shit.

They would never show that in the MCU though

Read this as "Peking Tom"

This is a really random impertinent thing to say

If it means they got the FF back, great.

>Avengers 4 ends
>No post credits scene
>"For Stan"

...

I'm fine with it, the one above all is canonically Jack Kirby.

However, Stan was shown to be his collaborator.

>implying he will live long enough to be in infinity wars

But TOAA will forever be Jack Kirby.

You know he's filmed lots of cameos for future films right?

Also,
>Stan Lee
>Dying
You new here?

that would make so much more sense, too bad the skrulls are hanging at FOX