Bad news: Your comment didn't make it. But these did:
>Okay like geez. I know that Ruth did a lot of shitty things but… I also feel like Rachel is being an asshole right now. She had a point before that Ruth did some shitty things but this is just going too far with it in my opinion. Not to mention the way she condescends to Harold is just ew.
>[I think the in-book doodle should be Toe-Dad at the Women’s Rights March, wearing a pink knitted pussycat cap]
>While I can understand the sentiment, I think that Rachel’s kind of going over the line here. If Ruth’s being kept on, then that’s something to yell at management for.
>No Mike to vote for. I’m sad that I can’t vote for that sociopathic interdimensional asshole
>Part of me wants to say “HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT ABOUT RUTH, YOU HEARTLESS DEMON,” and then I realize they call her Ruthless for a reason. I wish I knew enough about Rachel to explain why she, in particular, is most hostile to Public!Ruth, but I think she’s just blunt and strongly opinionated, no matter how much less terrible Ruth is.
>oh god Howard’s not far from my age, guess I better start watching HBO.
>Ruth, no.
>Your heart is in the right place on this issue, for once.
>But a floor meeting is NOT A GOOD WAY TO DO THIS.
>Sit down one-on-one. Hear out everyone individually. Listen to all their concerns.
>Do NOT set up a situation where peer pressure, group think, and mob mentality can rear their ugly heads and more hesitant voices can get drowned out by the sharper ones.
>In Dumbing of Age, bad decisions are more active agents in their own right through some sort of fusion of animism and platonic idealism. People don’t make bad decisions… bad decisions make themselves. Ontologically.
>Y’know, if she’s that mad about Ruth, you’d think she’d have complained to the RM.
Among other comments, of course. The comments section is surprisingly split between hating and supporting Rachel.