ITT brainlet criticisms

ITT brainlet criticisms
>it had pacing issues
>the atmosphere was lacking
>the characters aren't relatable

Valerian city of a thousand pointless scenes

>the characters aren't relatable
The first 2 are valid, but this one. It's not an argument

Depends on the story you're telling. You can set out to make your characters relatable and fail.

>it sucks because i have to read subtitles

>it was historically inaccurate

>the story was too convoluted

>hey deed yoo sea phat jaun mooby
>ye i dudnt lick eet bcooz id hab sun hibbun agender daat ackshuwallyy isnt dare

>too many characters introduced early on in the film. hard to keep track of them all

End of Evangelion
Braveheart
Logan Lucky
Star Wars
IT

If I wanted to read I wouldn't be watching a movie

...

>tone-deaf

>IT
>too many characters

What's more stupid is people who think movies don't have political agendas
So you are incredibly stupid

>DROPPED posting

> not esoteric enough; if retards on this board can understand it it's clearly below my patrician tastes

>it has Marvel humor

They don't make movies about no gf ever NEETs. When will it be my turn to relate to a character. Even if they did make a movie the NEET would get his waifu instead of his actual fate The Bullet.

>REEE woman is powerful in movie. feminist propaganda REEEEEEEEE

Forgot pic.

It takes literally no effort to read sentences on a screen if you are over the age of 8.

t. Dunkirk fanboy

Fuck that, that's not relaxing at all, I have to stare at the screen and read every single sentence fast enough in time, I can't even blink or look away from the screen for a second
That's bullshit
I want to relax

...

>dunkurk sound reel gud

>the plot made no sense

>it had shitty writing

The people who say this never even list an example of what constitutes as good/bad writing.

Valid criticism if the movie was trying to present itself as being historically accurate.

>movie has one good black character
>waaaaah this is forced diversity pushed by the jooooz