Reminder that if you don't agree with this you need to FUCK OFF and go back to ******

Reminder that if you don't agree with this you need to FUCK OFF and go back to ******.

is this real?

DIS

He's absolutely correct.

He's not wrong

When did Sup Forums become r/dc_cinematic?

>everting is so dark an gritty
>ids uh metfor ub jezus

based armond

Spotted the redditors

DON MAGE FUN

As you wish pajeet

redditors love snyder. what the fuck are you on about?

>redditor goes on reddit collecting reddit posts to post during his reddit spergouts
sad!

>"you must guide them, Kal-El. You must give them hope"
>*proceeds to destroy the whole fucking city*

truly, what a genius

Snyder is so astonishingly dumb he turned Watchmen, a deconstruction of capeshit, into capeshit. I'll never ever take him seriously. There are first year film students who are more intelligent and subtle than him.

>the brainlet capeshitter chimpout has already started
ZSnyder is a pleb filter

SNIGER USD BIBICAL RFRENCS DRULY DA WORG OV A GENUS.

>this samefag psycho constantly crying about a director

Literally film student tier

He's not wrong. Most other comic directors fail utterly.

Ironman 1 is still the best capeshit film though. Cap. America WS comes close.

you didn't go to film school

He's not wrong, im still waiting on someone to post a valid criticism of bvs/mos

Martha

>Ironman 1 is still the best capeshit film though. Cap. America WS comes close
No wonder you're all plebs, you capeshitters really are pathetic, next you're gonna tell me the winter soldier is a espionage thriller.

brainlet

>Ironman 1 is still the best capeshit film though.
Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man
The Dark Knight
Batman Begins
The Dark Knight Rises

Everyone knows what Snyder was going for with that stupid fucking scene, you pseud. People mock it because the execution is hilariously clumsy.

why

t. brainlet

He sho know de movieses! I guess he be de smartest cartoon man expit in de ho wide worl!

fuck off mark kermode you lefty nigger

What kind of valid criticism can anyone post about a movie that is that lacks narrative and relies way too much on ugly cgi, I couldn't wait for it to end, I do realize that these characters have ardent fans who waited many years to see Superman on the big screen, but trying to make up excuses and look for validation for what is genuinely a bad movie is something that you shouldn't do, at the end of all this discussion, what I want is what I think everybody wants, a good movie, it doesn't matter if it is capeshit or not, I want to be able to watch that movie 15 years from now and enjoy it.

LOOK LOIS IM CONSIDERING THE OPINION OF A NIGGER

Cringe.

wew, you're retard

No he's not.

>that lacks narrative
the narrative was clear as day user...
>relies way too much on ugly cgi
taking into account its a capeshit tentpole, bvs utilised practical effects considerably more than other blockbusters
>I want to be able to watch that movie 15 years from now and enjoy it.
imo bvs/mos fit this criteria and no; I'm not memeing

>Everyone knows he had the right general answers, just give him a hundred on the test!
People like you disgust me.

snyder is /ourguy/

>the narrative was clear as day user...
Really?
I felt like there was no connection between the scenes.
>taking into account its a capeshit tentpole
What does that mean, what are you trying to say with that?
>bvs utilised practical effects considerably more than other blockbusters
Humm, I have the bad habit of calling everything that is digitally added, CGI, and I am wrong, I was talking about the awful chroma key which the movie relies a lot, and the image disaturation that makes the movie look cheap.
>imo bvs/mos fit this criteria and no; I'm not memeing
Well, in my opinion it's a movie that failed on all technical aspects of movie making, there isn't much that can be said about that.

YE

jordan peele is /yourguy/

must be true, a nigger said so

What DC does: Yes, let's take a medium originally designed for children and still uses primarily a childish color scheme and make movies except we'll turn the camera orientation and color scheme into that used by 80's French films and then wonder why mainstream audiences don't connect to the film.

What Marvel does: let's take our comics and turn them into movies making only minor story or plot changes, but otherwise stick with as close of a translation as possible.

Seriously, can anyone tell me why DC movies all have either washed out colors or some other shifty histogram filter on for the whole movie? And why all the characters act so fucking serious? Are those the two qualities that make them "art" and "kino" and so much better than the Marvel movies?

Bump

>was no connection
i dont know why you're pretending to be dumb user because i know you're intelligent enough to follow the plot of bvs

>what are you trying to say with that?
Only that big blockbusters rely heavily on cgi a crime bvs does commit but not to such an extent that its distracting

>makes the movie look cheap.
I'll be happy to take this criticism on board if you can provide some examples user, i thought the grading is what set the movie apart from the rest...

>it's a movie that failed on all technical aspects of movie making,
I cant help but feel this is hyperbole. Care to elaborate

Marvel panders to people who aren't smart
DC panders to people who think they're smart

In a way I think that's somewhat accurate. One thing I like about the Marvel movies is that with everything being political and trying to shoehorn in a SJW message in some form or another, the Marvel movies seem to not try any of that garbage. Mindless entertainment seems to be disappearing unless you watch reality tv.

Is Armond secretely a pajeet

No you. Snyder's hella f*cking epic action completely contradicts the meaning of Watchmen. Either you haven't read it or you're one of those fucking idiots who missed the point and unironically idolizes Rorschach.

He's getting ripped off all over the place woth zero gratitude. But of course his copycats fail completely every time.

Yes, Snyder was the very first person to do those shots. They hadn't ever been done before in the history of cinema.

Sorry your Russo hacks embarrassed themselves utterly with that airport scene MCUck.

This is bait, right? You don't seriously think those simplistic shots were invented by Snyder, right?

>Sorry your Russo hacks embarrassed themselves utterly with that airport scene MCUck

>muh capeshit wars
Not an argument.

I don't think so, he doesn't like Villeneuve.

>grey sterile CGI airport with CGI dudes pasted in to quip
Is this what Marvel Pajeets shill 24/7?

...

I know this is bait, but I still feel the need to point out Captain America: Civil War and Batman v Superman were in production at the same time. The two shots aren't even that similar.

>but otherwise stick with as close of a translation as possible.
This is false, and thank God it is, because marvel comics are fucking awful.

Civil War was reshot like a month before release. By then most of BvS was already revealed in trailers.

pretending to dislike Watchmen Movie doesn't make you alan moore

Not an argument.

Is this the power of Marvel Pajeet samefagging?

>samefagging
It seems you don't know what that term means.
>Marvel Pajeet
Ahh, more of the "muh capeshit wars" bullshit. Marvel's shitiness doesn't negate the fact that Snyder is a hack, you brainlet.

...

SNYDAH IS GUD BECUZ MARBEL IZ BAD

Kek, no you absolute moron, he did the same moore did using the thropes of capeshit movies and action movies, Watchmen as a movie deosnt escape the same clkished the comics cant escape. It's the same you dumb casual.

Explains why civil war looks so dull

Snyder is a hack. His "subtle" messages are thrown in your face. He should be a trailer maker, not a director.

no one has ever put up a valid defense besides "no you're wrong i'm right" or "you're just too stupid to understand it" or "lol redditor kys." you're all fucking imbeciles that give credit to directors for coming up with interesting ideas and then completely butchering them in front of you, i have no doubt in my mind that the drooling retards who like the dc movies are the same people who clamor for george lucas to come back to star wars. yes, snyder had interesting ideas but the execution fucking sucked so why are you giving him credit and treating him like an actual artist for ruining something that had the potential to be good?

Absolutely wrong. The stupidity of you Snyder fanboys never ceases to amaze me. The removal of the giant squid is enough to prove he didn't understand Watchmen but instead of ending my post here I'll briefly mention other aspects of the film that show he's a moron:
>Our heroes are supposed to be worn-out losers but all of the action is pure badassery that glorifies them.
>Ozymandias is a one-dimensional mustache-twirler.
>The sex scene is completely meaningless.

Sup Forums has always been pro-Snyder ;)

>dc vs marvel
so this is Sup Forums's version of Sup Forums's console shitposting threads?

>Watchmen: 7/10
>300: 9/10
>Man of Steel: 7/10
>Batman v Superman: 5/10

He's right

Unlike Burton, Snyder’s sensibility derives from comic books and graphic novels yet his visual extravagance also contains the palpably erotic core of comic book fantasy. Snyder immediately invests the Superman story with this tactile realism, a feel for ancient legend: Opening scenes on the dying planet Krypton recall the stylization of 300 but with a slightly futuristic edge that never lapses into conventional superhero movie fantasy. (Snyder got that out of his system with Watchmen.) The arch otherworldliness of Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and his wife Lara Lor-Van (Ayelet Zurer) sending their newborn infant into outer space to survive Krypton’s destruction and preserve their heritage from the tyrannical threat of General Zod (Michael Shannon) also evokes a kind of classicism. It doesn’t play like sci-fi and when the story shifts to planet Earth where the alien boy Kal-El is raised as Clark Kent, Snyder effectively creates a contrasting, charged-up realism.

In Man of Steel, Snyder’s ingenuity–his realistic panache–prevents the Superman story from mainly appealing to either adolescent whimsy or adult camp. He makes a radical break from past Superman movies and the entire recent movement of comic-book/graphic-novel-based films. That genre, where commercialism overwhelms imagination and hack directors (Jon Favreau, Shane Black, Tim Story) are undifferentiated from minor auteurs (Sam Raimi, Bryan Singer, J.J. Abrams) and distinguished directors (Irvin Kershner, Richard Lester), has accustomed audiences to a type of artificiality and silliness. They accept cliché narratives, routine violence and a basic lack of seriousness as standard. Man of Steel is marvelous, serious fun which changes all that.

Nooo maek fun of snak shnyger. He is baesd becawse he liek duh bibble an jeesus cwist! Dat men dey gud an gino. I-It's jost wheaties fauwt justice league wuz bayud. WHEAT IS POOOP

It has been done many times. You just don't agree with them, and therefore not valid to you.

>cinema
>artistry
Movies aren't art. They are just there to feed an actors ego, make a director feel like people give a shit about their powertrip fueled faggotry and give an audience a fantasy to jack their minds off to while they wait for their inevitable death.

he's kinda right

only other movie was V for Vandetta

yeah, only plebs like his films