For once shad draws something good

for once shad draws something good

...

Not Sup Forums.

since when have threads about an artist not Sup Forums related?

...

...

not at all

how

...

shad isnt good

i was talking about the picture in the op

he has eased up on the shading so thats nice. gonna be hard for flip the meme though.

...

that's not how tits work
that's not how perspective works
that's not how shading works, she's floating over the couch

yeah, it isnt good

it`s almost like it`s a cartoon drawing

explain how

>implying that invalidates anatomy

if you expect proper anatomy from cartoon art then all of it sucks

What's with his obsession with eyeliner in his art with every girl he draws?

It's the same as all of his other pictures, not sure what makes you think this one is good all of a sudden?

i at least expect it when the artist is clearly trying to do so

Ed has no chin. Timmy Turner's head is the size of his body. Kim possible's tits make a perfect right angle.

Artists are not required to have perfect anatomy.

Delete that slut. It's heresy.

yeah why is that piece of shit wasting his time drawing shitty backgrounds if people only look at that big ass anyway

It's alright, and we already know he's capable of alright. He seems to do it best from behind.

these are actual cartoons, not porn that is meant to represent a human being.

And besides, those cartoons still knew how perspective worked and never forgot to draw the fucking right arm

There's a difference between willingly altering anatomy for the sake of stylization and not knowing it in the first place. It's basic art training to practice accurate anatomy before deciding to fuck with it. Shad's mistakes are clearly those of an amateur who has not perfected his understanding of anatomy. I can still fap to his stuff though

>Drawing lewds of Ivanka
So the Obama sisters are up next?

Leave, Pan.

Of them getting fucked by horses or KKK?

I never really got the obsessive need to bash Shad. I mean, he's not a fantastic artist, but he's not terrible by any stretch of the imagination. And if you guys hate him so much, why don't you just ignore him or not look or close your browser and take a walk? Why feel the need to share your hateful opinion?

>no right arm
Cannot unsee.

What about horses being ridden by the KKK?

Yeah nah the anatomy is all fucked up it's freaking me out a little

like cartoons don't have to have good anatomy but in this case I'd say it detracts because the main purpose is shit to jerk off too

Why does it look like all of his girls are covered in some sort of grime or sewage waste that i'd get sick from if i touched them?

>why don't you just ignore him or not look or close your browser and take a walk? Why feel the need to share your hateful opinion?
Might influenced other people's mind.

No.

>Why feel the need to share your hateful opinion?
wheredoyouthinkyouare.jpg

but nah, I don't hate the guy, but his art is often pretty off, and I think that the filthy subject matter is off-putting to some people

though he's honestly better than most porn artists out there lel

>shad
>"artist"

Not that guy and I don't think the picture is very good either but you're being a dickhead

Well, let's see it then!

...

Disgusting.

> why feel the need to bash?

Because despite being a very mediocre artist Shad has enough pull to run a site with multiple guest artists, most of whom are better artists than him.

he misspelled "autist"

Wrong.

That's stylized anatomy, what shad is doing is still slightly stylized but it's meant to represent the human form that you'd see in real life. It's not good.

What's wrong with that one?

People who can't draw always want to be critics.

Is shad here?

>that fucking profile view face
lol

I was about to ask "where's the dick" then I went to check his site, and of course, there's the dick.

Surprised there wasn't a loli version.

...

Kys shill

>durr you need to know how to do it to criticize it
You do know that half of Sup Forums is criticizing someone's animation/drawings, right?

>no one knows what's its like
>to be a shadman
> to be a bad man
>behind mascara eyes

Posting shads """art""" should warrant an instant ban.

Its good to know I don't have to get THAT much better at art to be able to make money

This!

I did not realize I wanted this.

Her arm is too short.
Part of the background seems to be a photo of trump's manhattan penthouse.
Her jaw seems weird.

>not Melania

I'm guessing that he wanted to draw someone that trump was actually having sex with.

don't forget that fucking ear
there's more wrong than right in this picture
maybe he's a bit better than a complete amateur but that's it

You know this "if it taste like shit, it's shit" metaphor is something everyone likes to use to scapegoat around "opinions" and shit, but this is retarded. Your body (although can very slightly) can naturally detect things it does not like and etc, like for example your taste buds. There may be certain foods that may taste off to some, others not. But something that IS what it is IS what it is. If you eat shit? It's bad. It taste bad. Even if there IS someone that like the taste of shit, it's not something that naturally acceptable. You usually have some problem that caused you to like the taste of shit, this is the same thing for what creates a "fetish" for some people.

But for art? Humans aren't naturally able to detect "what makes art good or bad?". We don't need such a trait, because art isn't something detrimental to our survival. But when it comes to the point of art, why it's even a thing? It's a trait of creativity. Exploration. To draw is to imagine what can be thought of and made a reality, what can be explored to be realized. By nature of this, only artist can truly be critiques to artists. We are the only people that understand the practices to get to a end result of an image, that normies cannot grasp. As an artist, only we can see why Shadman's drawings lack good knowledge. Good intent. Good creativity. He's blatantly not in the right direction in his art career and thanks to all that's happened to him, he'll never truly be a good artist.

Do you think if you had "your style" of science scientists would accept your way of doing things? No. Absolutely not. And do you REALLY think normies can justifiably critique this scientist's way of doing science just because they think it's "ok"? There are ways to do things, the way into doing things with proper knowledge and understanding.

I never knew you could samefag art so much.

How about horses who are members of the KKK?

>>>KKK Horses
Genius!

I bet you thought you would come off as very deep and intelligent when you were typing this. I am rather happy to inform you that your tl;dr makes you appear like a pretentious ass who probably has other shallow opinions when it comes to haute couture.

That's an ear???

Can you post it?

Science is based on objectivity, art is based on subjectivity.

...

So you're just jealous of someone more successful than you?

>not loli Ivanka

I'm surprised, honestly.

>shadman
not Sup Forums
that anatomy is godawful
all his girls look the same, I wouldn't have known it was Ivanka if it weren't for the filename

can we PLEASE stop discussing shadman. it's bad enough he hinted he's in the overwatch Facebook group I'm in

No, I just typed what I thought about of the subject at hand. And if you looked through this thread's comments, all the posts here are of the same quality that are on /ic/, where, imo, this thread should ACTUALLY be on btw.

>For Once
Naw, Sup Forums doesn't like him because they get triggered easily, /ourguy/ is actually pretty good.

>being in a facebook group
>for overwatch
You deserve it.

>overwatch Facebook group I'm in
>overwatch Facebook group
>overwatch
>Facebook group

He isn't though. Fapable as hell but he's not very good.

overwatch is actually not that bad. but the point still stands, I'd I had more clues, we could trace shadman's identity

Filthy fucking casual.

>>/out/ with your facebook browsing ass

how the fuck does someone put so much time effort and passion into something only for
the result to be complete shit?

>captcha: STOP

I hope this cutie shows up again.
She's marriage material

I like Shadman. Lewd and trashy western 2D is nice, and I guess he likes doing it as well.

>REEEE PEOPLE CANNOT DISCUSS THEIR FAVORITE COMICS LIKE JOHHNY THE HOMICIDAL MANIAC HERE

...

Oh lord.

What is wrong with the lower part of her dress?

The manner of how it encases the body makes it look like body-sized condom than anything.

Also:
>Cartoony detail lines accompanied by semi-realistic shading

What's the use?

Hey guys, what's going on in this thread?

she has so many fucking sharp objects, you sure you wanna dick her down

Herrsy.

>I hope this cutie shows up again.

...you haven't seen the original image, have you?

Since they don't depict Sup Forums characters.

Guys, what if he was the one who commissioned Shad?

I cant help but feel Shad could be very good if he ever took some gooddamn classes

>Fapable as hell

Unnecessary glossiness, with bad colour selection rounding off the total damage, isn't exactly inviting for my dick.

One step above Palcomix, but that is like beating a retarded person in spelling bee.

The ability to tell just how garbage Shadman is has more to do with your perception of anatomy and linework than anything else.

That's why people sperg about this shit. People who know what the fuck a drawing SHOULD look like know he's a hack, while people who don't know get fooled by the illusions.

Shadman has improved overall over the years, but his sense of anatomy is still fucking bad. The proportions on his characters rarely make any sense. His lolis are too long and gangly while his grown women are too stumpy and awkward.

He also has a very poor sense of perspective and forms, so his shit flattens out a lot.

On top of all this, he went through a period of literally slathering his drawings in shitty scribbled text and memes. He was cramming as many details in drawings as he could to mask just how terrible his figures were. This is the art people had the most exposure to before he started doing loli and political shit.

Now he's done a couple color tutorials so his shading, coloring, and rendering is a lot better. But his perspective is still shit so his drawings still flatten out, they just look slightly more colorful while they do it. On top of that, his "polish a turd" philosophy also works to mask his garbo linework and 80's anime tier anatomy.


Also. Pig noses.

I'm fucking jealous how successful he Shad is.

ironically he was in art college, but got expelled