Is this the future of filmmaking?
I'd rather have this than a bad live action green screen compositing job. At least this way nothing in the scene would look out of place.
They're probably already using that face morph technology to blend takes together so we're already partway there
Case in point: Lucas combining two Anakin takes at least in 2005
Very subtle, but noticeable.
Even outsourced, sloppily made CGI is still fucking expensive.
>have an actor act with dots on their face
>replace the face with a digitized version of the same face just so they can save money on scenery
>wonder why the expressions look fake
>being this clueless
>2018
GPU-based rendering is taking costs down dramatically compared to traditional CPU-based rendering.
youtube.com
A bald assertion isn't an argument. I've already refuted your representation based arguments. Give me something else.
not an argument
Neat, is it commercially viable already?
Yes. Many studios are already using GPU-based renderers like Octane and Redshift.
youtube.com
Pretty sure most CGI expenses are not associated with the price of software required to render the frame. Hundreds of artists have to be paid to make this shit otherwise you get superman
Your confidence is drastically delusional, and disproportionate. A clear indication of someone lacking self control with neither an accurate sense of self awareness. Someone prone to imitate others, and depend on others to feel gratification no matter how dishonest, or false.
This is the future of filmmaking.
Not an argument
Longer renders cost more than shorter renders. GPUs can render frames much faster and more efficiently than CPUs.
Wow, never noticed it
You have to look for it in the hair
400 fucking times since yesterday
So? What are you talking about? Rendering isn't exactly the bottleneck in CGI, it's something you do in the very end. Speeding it up is nice and all, but all the work up to that point still has to be done at exactly the same speed