$50 million budget

>$50 million budget
>has Tom Hanks
>only makes $2 milllion at the box office
what went wrong?

Meryl Streep

Is it good?

>this is why newspaper reporters are IMPORTANT and you should LISTEN to them
What do you think?

>People paying to watch a movie about the media

Normies aren't as stupid as they let on to be

everyone knows washington post is fake news

Nobody wants to see the media fellate itself

>Limited release
>Releases wide Jan 12

That was hard to figure out

Nobody likes the newspaper people anymore. Theyre faggots.

r u a boy ur r u a girl user?

>We have integrity goyim, pay to listen to why we are right

This

The media can go fuck itself and everyone knows it.

I don't understand.

What is Trump doing right now that's objectively WORSE than the tens of thousands of American soldiers and millions of civilians that were dying in Vietnam?

Not wiping out the goyim.

it was a movie about a fucking newspaper a million years ago

The target audience for this movie are long dead

>Ellsberg was born in Chicago, Illinois on April 7, 1931,[1] the son of Harry and Adele (Charsky) Ellsberg.[2] His parents were Ashkenazi Jews who had converted to Christian Science, and he was raised as a Christian Scientist

The Washington Post is one of the most egregious publishers of fake news.

This movie is literally just propaganda. They're desperately trying to save face and make it look like they once had journalistic integrity.

DUDE HISTORICAL DRAMA LMAO

unless it wins a bunch of awards nobody's gonna see it

It has a very limited release.

It's gonna have a wide release later in the month, might make between 75-100 million

>"As for New York - there is no question but that its overwhelming Semitism has totally removed it from the American stream. Regarding its influence on literary & dramatic expression - it is not so much that the country is flooded directly with Jewish authors, as that Jewish publishers determine just which of our Aryan writers shall achieve print & position. [...] Taste is insidiously moulded along non-Aryan lines - that [...] it is a special, rootless literature which does not represent us."

__________

>"not a paper in New York dares to call its soul its own in dealing with the Jews [...] I do think that something ought to be done to free American expression from the control of any element which seeks to curtail it, distort it, or remodel it in any direction other than its natural course."

And yet critics agree that it's the definitive movie of the year, possibly the best movie of the decade. It's up for six Golden Globes and will likely sweep the Oscars.

Keep being fucking capeshit eating retards, Sup Forums. Never change.

>essentially a 2 hour advertisement for a newspaper
>preachy as fuck
>people under 40 don't give a fuck about tom hanks anymore
>spielberg has been phoning it in for 10 years and everyone knows it

I doubt it’s even gonna break even.

>Reeeeeeeee capeshit

Unironically wanting to decrease non-white immigration. Jews feel safer in multi ethnic societies where they get to keep their identity.

> has Meryl Streep

If you believe that a Spielberg oscar bait flick is actual cinema then I have bad news for you, user. At least some of the capeshitters spam that trash ironically.

>Jewish movie will win Jewish awards
Really?

>The media establishment promotes media-friendly content to the masses.
Shocking

>Widest Release: 36 theaters

retard

THIS. fpbp. She needs to go away.

Which critics? The Post is not even considered a lock for Oscar's Best Picture

Have you sent it?

>And yet critics
Stopped reading here.

Critics literally are the news. Of course they'd support this.

It's not at wide release but even then it's not gonna fare good. Hanks and Streep might save the day

even Ridley's lateste effort that's starring Wahlberg of all people is farring bad at the box office

long story short, if it aint a franchise/capeshit it probably not gonna do business, sometimes the name of people involved saves the day though

These posts always get overlooked because box office shitposting is detached from reality. I'm sorry you have to be surrounded by retards.

>will likely sweep the Oscars.

uhmm no sweetie, thats Call me by your name

(((critics)))

Everyone is a critic in the 21st Century nigga, your job is obsolete

This was a good one, congrats

I don't have to watch a movie to know it's gonna be shit

>it's up for six Golden Globes and will likely sweep the Oscars.
>actually taking award shows seriously in 2018

Won't win because Moonlight just got the "gay community Oscar."

I don't give a fuck about this movie, it's social message, or the archaic newspaper industry it unnecessarily lauds. It's oscar bait bullshit.

Normal everyday Americans HATE the media now.

Look at how the corporate media pushed Clinton and TLJ™. People are on to the fucking bullshit.

Do you suck dick for money or pleasure?

>Normies are on our side-

Most people are retards, no surprise

>People are on to the fucking bullshit
>Most people are retards, no surprise

Hmm.

>ignored by screen actors guild
>ignored by writers guild
>sweep the Oscars
Yeah right. You have no idea how Oscars work.

>‘Stop watching the news” is the savvy advice Morrissey sings on his politically oriented, recently released album. He then explains: “Because the news contrives to frighten you / To make you feel small and alone / To make you feel that your mind isn’t your own.” This provocative assessment of contemporary journalism felt positively restorative after watching the deceitful glorification of “the news” in Steven Spielberg’s The Post. Morrissey’s complaint cuts through to the truth about modern journalism — as Spielberg does not — by exposing how what we consider “the news” has become the illusory practice of a primarily Left-centered, conspiratorial institution that operates to manipulate a susceptible public. In other words, Morrissey knows that journalism has become corrupt, whereas Spielberg’s movie normalizes that corruption. The Post is a fawning account of Washington Post publisher Katharine “Kay” Graham (Meryl Streep) and editor Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks) crying “Me, too” when the New York Times scoops them with the precedent-setting publication of the Pentagon Papers in 1971. Spielberg looks to that turning-point event because the past is the source from which today’s leftist sanctimony — and particularly the media’s maddening “resistance” posture — claims its validity. All of today’s social-justice movements — Black Lives Matter, fourth-wave feminism, the transgender-equality brigades — derive their sentimental impetus from the memories of halcyon protest and counterculture dissent that transformed America.

Nixon didn't start Vietnam you moron

>18% suicide
>9% extramarital affairs

How does an actual gay nigger end up as the voice of Sup Forums

>journos telling us the movie about journos is the MOTY

really gets the gray matter galloping

That's the power of orthodoxal contrarianism.

Apparently 2 scopes of ice cream, feeding koi fish, and shitposting on twitter.

He has a high IQ.

Though /pol itself is a mixture of high IQ Catholics and low IQ Protestants so it's a mixed bag.

The brains behind Sup Forums are Jews, always have been always will be

Point proven

People can agree with some liberal issues while disliking that the corporate media attempts to manipulate them for a narrow political agenda.

It's shocking right, shill?!?

Main reason is the media can now criticise a president after 8 years of race card so they're just going nuts about it.