What's wrong with diversity?

What's wrong with diversity?

It's usually hamfisted and poorly done.

Nothings wrong with.
What's wrong is bad writing and characterization.
Kenan Kong's a character
Riri Williams is a marketing tool

Nothing if its done right

it's not actually diverse

having a mandatory number of token characters and scenes is in itself an act of uniformity.

Is this the board you're looking for?
>>Sup Forums

*Nothing's wrong with it

The fact that the character is "diverse" is their only character trait

>Tfw your race has literally become a meme used to trigger anonymous people
Honestly, the people posting this kind of crap might be genuinely more pathetic than Sup Forums, even worse is that they think they aren't.

Source on this?
I bet it's hot

It's bad when you push out other well deserving characters for colored people.

Piper Perri.

So hot.

Caln down Sup Forumsack. It's just an image.

It's only bad if the character's only trait is that they are their skin color or religion, and nothing else.
People will always complain about black, asian, and brown characters in media, even if they're well designed and written. Usually because they're edge-ridden, legitimate Sup Forumstards.

It's bullshit

There can't ever just be a black guy. They won't let them get away with that. Any character appears and they're not white = "forced diversity". There's just no way to do it that would be acceptable. Therefore, it doesn't matter if someone says diversity is bad, because the complaints were inevitable anyhow.

This looks like a woman who's about to have her womb filled with diversity.

Nothing wrong inherently. Simon Baz and Jessica Cruz are great.

Marvel's path to diversity is the problem, it's extremely obnoxious.

Nothing, the problem is the belief that diversity in and of itself is a strength or a virtue.

Diversity is a predicted, but not necessarily mandatory byproduct of personal liberty, an actual virtue people should champion. The idea is, that if you treat everyone equally and remove unjust barriers in people's way, then eventually things will inevitably converge to mirror the demographic model that the world is made up of. For instance, if you removed all barriers preventing say, gay people from being able to write comic books, then the proportion of comic writers who are gay would correlate to the proportion of the population who is gay (and less perfectly but roughly, the same amount of characters too). So, you should of course remove those unjust societal barriers.

What this doesn't account for however, is personal choice and individual agency. That initial assumption in the above paragraph isn't necessarily true. Just because there are no institutional or prejudicial barriers in the way prohibiting certain groups of people, does not mean that every discipline will inevitably mimic the demographic trends of the entire population. For example, women now hold the majority of enrollment positions in universities and higher education, it's roughly 60%. But despite that, the majority of STEM students are still male. That isn't because of societal barriers prohibiting women, the disproportion exists despite things being equal (most likely because pre-natal testosterone makes boys more interested in things and materials while women are more interested in other people).

If you're rigidly crafting diversity that matches the larger population, and you're doing so forcibly, you are putting the cart before the horse. You are infringing on people's personal choices and agency over their actions in order to arbitrarily create a world that adheres to a phenomenon that was merely predicted to be a POSSIBLE result of giving people personal liberty and free choice. It's backwards.

why do they allow her in porn when she is quite clearly a child

Ufuckingwotm8?
She looks like she's in her late 30s, look at those eyes.

tl;dr

>tfw you have the body of a child but the skin of a grandmother

Nothing really. It's when people use it as a gimmick in place of a story or character attributes that it fails. And when this is done repeatedly for the sake of marketing or some kind of PR campaign it makes the entire concept seem cheap and shallow.

Sup Forums has ruined me so fucking hard that whenever I see a pic of a blonde in an all white room with a shitty white balance I assume this is someone's cuck porn that OP is jerking it to.

And I thought semen was supposed to be good for your skin.

Well many annoying fags call it "hamfisted" no matter how it's done.

there's nothing wrong with diversity
but nowadays it means "put moar brown people/women into the story"
I prefer diversity of character

It's usually mishandeled
Best "diversity" I seen was Hey Arnold! Which covered race, gender, age, social standing, and possibly even sexuality.
The more I think of it, the 90's had more diversity than today, at least in cartoons.

>mfw this bitch is already a mother
can someone give my the sauce of my image?

I want creators from a culture creating cultural works of their culture. I'm not really interested in what coastal jewish white guys think it's like to be an inner city black woman. But that's what we get. Over and over and over.