He fucking sucks. He's only good at being a director in the strictest sense. He can direct but he has no understanding of character and story. Why does this fuck have so many fans?
Also I'm so sorry about your daughter man. I would never wish that upon anyone.
Other urls found in this thread:
He has a very good eye for visuals and excels at making simple, self-contained films which are light on narrative but very visually impressive.
This is apart from Dawn of the Dead, which I think sucks and looks like shit but everyone else seems to love it so what do I know.
Hes a fucking manchild retard whose only good movies are of quality because he copied the source material to the bare bones.
>Watchmen is good because it was made by moore
>Same with 300
>makes original movie sucker punch and it is absolute garbage.
I just wish he could have copied a good superman story like birthright the same way with Watchmen and 300. Man of steel would have actually been good if this happened.
>excels at making simple, self-contained films which are light on narrative but very visually impressive.
He excels at being a massive faggot
He's Michael Bay if Bay took Psych 101 and thought he was the shit for it.
Prove it to me in person McDuck
>Same with 300
Forgot to mean same with 300 because it was written by Frank.
This.
Directors don't write the story, where this misconception comes from is a mystery
Anyone see that animated movie he did about the owls, forget what it was called . was it any good?
Wrong.
Some directors write the story(like with Joss Whedon, James, Gunn, Christopher Nolan), some take a complete hands off approach(random studio directors), and some are heavily involved in the process with the writers(Russo brothers with their Captain America films).
Zack tends to fall in the third category.
Zack Snyder genuinely doesn't like "classic" superhero stories, and he's said this publicly. I can't remember the exact quote, but it was something like.
"My friend tried to show me some old Superman comics, and I thought 'nobody is having sex or murdering each other, this isn't doing it for me'."
I don't pretend to now if Snyder is a good director, the only movies from him that I've seen are Man of Steel and BvS, but I don't think he's a good fit for a comic book movie.
*to know
drinking in the morning is bad
>I don't pretend to now if Snyder is a good director, the only movies from him that I've seen are Man of Steel and BvS, but I don't think he's a good fit for a comic book movie.
This. So much this. I mean, the guy has a great eye, I'd buy some photos if he were a photographer, but when he goes with his gut for storytelling, his gut's always wrong. Now if he improved, that'd be better. But he didn't. In fact, he got worse in Batman v. Superman. Now he has to reinvent the entire tone of this universe that he mad an unfortunate mistep when he could have salvaged it.
Sucker Punch is his best movie.
Also people like Snyder because nobody comes close to shooting action sequences and iconic imagery like he does
Yeah, this. He's not fit for writing a story about capefolk. He just isn't.
THIS
H
I
S
ld say Watchmen is his best work. To address OP, the people who like Snyder's films usually do so because he has a great eye for visuals and movies are at the end of the day a visual medium.
He has also gotten better with action scenes as well comparing what he did with Sucker Punch to the Batman Warehouse fight in BVS.
Thing about Snyder is much like George Lucas, he needs to be reigned in by other people in order to do good work. People who will guide him away from his impulses while making a film. When Lucas had this you got the original Trilogy, when he didn't have this you got the prequels.
Frankly i would take Zack Snyder any day of the week over directors like Paul W.S. Anderson, or Olivier Megaton. I honestly don't know how people can call Zack Snyder one of the worst directors when people who shoot scenes like this one:
youtube.com
Are getting work in Hollywood.
He makes simplistic and shallow choices and then commits, which is why his films only work on a surface, ie visual, level, and can look impressive.
There's no meat to it however, which is why discussions of his work fall apart once, for example, everyone agrees that yes, that is a christ allegory.
So it's the equivalent of a comic having good art but horrid writing?
I suppose I can understand that. I think there has got to be some kind of balance though.
I can't appreciate his visuals for 2 reasons. I think his color pallette is lacking. It makes the image look uglier to me, regardless of how it's framed. I also think a good amount of his visuals come at the déterminent of character and story. I can take a badly written story with good visuals, but not when the story has to suffer to set up the visuals.
Most people that I've met the like the movies act like he's a super genius intellectual and the stories are just too deep and smart for the masses.
>He has also gotten better with action scenes as well comparing what he did with Sucker Punch to the Batman Warehouse fight in BVS.
Apart from that Batman fight, every other fight on the movie was shit.
>Most people that I've met the like the movies act like he's a super genius intellectual and the stories are just too deep and smart for the masses.
The hilarious is that those movies have the philosophy of something on the same tier as Naruto or Death Note.
>He has also gotten better with action scenes as well comparing what he did with Sucker Punch to the Batman Warehouse fight in BVS.
Total opposite for me, honestly. The action in Dawn of Justice was a massive letdown for me and a huge step down from Man of Steel.
I love the guy to death but it took me several rewatches just to gain appreciation for the Doomsday battle.
I just hope he kicked back into high gear for Justice League because so far it's Man of Steel, Sucker Punch and 300 that have his best action scenes. Possibly Wonder Woman.
>Sucker Punch is his best movie.
Like, original film? Is that a compliment or...cause that movie is just fucking trash
Reminder that he fought to have the Wonder Woman realized. He fought the WB executives, put his own money and reputation on it, picked the actress and director, helped produced, helped writing it. Fought for the movie to be released ahead of Justice League.
But hey, Snyder hate DC characters, hate classic heroes and so on.
You're wrong. The Christ allegories are a minimal aspect of MoS and BvS themes.
No one can even agree what the themes are.
Yes, people can. Only some who clearly didn't understood easy things that don't, but i doubt those people payed much attention to the movie anyway.
So you know you just NTS'ed right?
Maybe the bar is really that low for Snyder.
He is fantastic and you are a retard. Not muh faggots and comfyfags are usually Numales or manchildren
>"Nobody understood BvS" meme
You are a fucking idiot, zack loves comics thing is he got into euro comics and heavy metal, so capeshit was tame as fuck, he got into capes after reading watchmen
You have to be 18 to post here son.
He has more daughters, though.
He understands comics as a visual medium, better than most other directors, but he DOESN'T understand comics as a storytelling medium, and he DOESN'T understand how pivotal good characters are to both conveying that story and making people actually give a shit. He's absolutely shallow as fuck.
When he looks at Superman, he thinks people think Superman is cool because he can fly fast and punch harder than the human mind can comprehend - basically, he thinks everyone likes Superman for the same reasons HE likes Superman, and he won't even entertain the thought that it might be something different. What Superman stands for as a character, what Superman BELIEVES as a person, are either lost on Snyder or just irrelevant to him.
Like mentioned, Snyder isn't interested if people aren't having sex and/or murdering each other, so instead of looking at a subject that isn't about either of those, he tries to twist it so it is, and we got Man of Steel/BvS out of it.
The dude knows his aesthetics, but he's absolutely a shit fit for the DC world, especially up against Marvel's friendly, accessible movies.
>When he looks at Superman, he thinks people think Superman is cool because he can fly fast and punch harder than the human mind can comprehend - basically, he thinks everyone likes Superman for the same reasons HE likes Superman, and he won't even entertain the thought that it might be something different. What Superman stands for as a character, what Superman BELIEVES as a person, are either lost on Snyder or just irrelevant to him.
How can people watch MoS and BvS and believe that?
Seriously, i get not liking the movies for the tone, the destruction porn, the bad acting, the way it handled some things, but saying shit like that makes no sense.
>obnoxious slo-mo
>cringeworthy posturing that ruins any serious moment
>muted tones and colors that look absolutely unnatural and unappealing
I have no idea why anyone thinks he's some genius of visual storytelling
What?
The problem is that every one i talked about the movie that didn't understood the themes also were left confused by simple scenes that happened in the movie. Like way Lois went searching for Superman or where she knew he was.
His involvement with Wonder Woman was limited to a co-producing and co-writing credit; he didn't have his hands on anything else, and what he DID have his hands on, other people were involved to dilute his influence.
Probably why it's the best DC movie so far.
He doesn't hate classic heroes, he just doesn't understand what made them classics in the first place.
Can't blame the guy for taking a job that WB gave him. But I think we can blame him for being incredibly ignorant in taking criticism for his portrayal of Superman. He keeps doubling down on his adaptation, even though it's clearly not a very well received portrayal or one that makes much sense.
He is our generation's Guy Ritchie. All style, no substance and quickly forgotten.