Why does Sup Forums hate shad. I think his art is pretty good, and there are much worse artists out their

Why does Sup Forums hate shad. I think his art is pretty good, and there are much worse artists out their

>SHITman

Name one single image where he posted a female without a dick

His only gotten "better" because other artist are helping him out.

i dont like when artists act like fags

Probably because he draws porn of peoples children

The internet hates seeing mediocre artists succeed.

So fucking what, big deal
You forget what site you're on, Reddit?

This is why.

Name artists are shit

>shadman

Dobson

t. Shadman

he really isn't very good. his understanding of anatomy and perspective is very poor. he compensates for it by adding lots and lots of detail, but fundamentally his drawings are flawed.

Dump what you have

Everybody is somebody's child. You're saying there should be no porn.

Hopebiscuit

This is not a negative.
Collaboration is a good thing.

>reddit
>not liking child porn

>Botticelli

...

1. Implied pedophilia. It doesn't matter if it's just a drawing, it pisses people off therefore it's wrong. Simple as that, majority overrules.

2. He does this for fame. Which is one of the sins of humanity. Draw for posterity, not for glory.

3. Sup Forums isn't (1) an single entity, so stop fucking saying this, say "posters of Sup Forums". And (2) isn't just the people of Sup Forums, whether you crossboard or not, other visitors of other boards have mostly people that hate him (namely /ic/) and other newfags that just doesn't know about him.

Regardless, he's just not worthy of attention. It's not even about "there are worst people", what makes him something to be proud in? Why should (You) like him for what he does over his family? If his family hate his guts, you don't have any power over them, and if I was his parent I would be a disappointed one.

Key word: child.
Not someone's adult offspring, someone's pre-adolescent little kid.

You're looking at that picture and thinking there's something pornographic about it?
It's just a boy dressed up like Harley.

What's wrong with you?

top kek

>1. Implied pedophilia. It doesn't matter if it's just a drawing, it pisses people off therefore it's wrong. Simple as that, majority overrules.
So in that logic everything should be banned because someone has to hate everything.

I've always said the same thing about Shad: His art sucks but it gives me a boner so I can't really complain much.

He's got a lot, dude. In a lot of cases, he makes futa and non-futa versions of his art.

>acting like the outline of the balls aren't there

Sure user

What fucking difference does that make? You think dad would appreciate porn being made of his daughter if she were just above the legal age of consent?

Is this bait?

Read.
> majority overrules.
If more than half of the world can agree that "x is shit, delet this", then it must not be something worth keeping around. I don't know the numbers, but there are a Hell of a lot of people saying "he sucks" and actually give a reason why he sucks vs people that act like he's good and give no reason why he is "good". Look at the OP, then see of a negative towards Shad. Then promptly this user get's as an insult, not an argument. Many people don't accept child porn so why is Shad something to be proud of? Majority. Overrules.

This is probably one of his worst drawings to come out in the last few months. Thematically, and artistically.

I was once banned for posting a non-nude Shad picture on here. Make of that what you will.

I don't like him because he's edgy and seems like an unpleasant person. And unlike you, OP, I think his art is pretty shit.

>looking at a child's groin and being upset they have genitals

>Majority. Overrules.
But that logics stupid. Most normies dont know whats good for them. Thats why we have shit like feminism and emoji movie. Kill yourself.

All i'm saying is maybe wait until they're 18 if you don't want to get called a kiddy diddler

On a technical level, yes, there are worse people out there, but his art is unimaginative and boring. His fetish is as follows: take popular character or event; make a boring pin-up; make the same boring pin-up again but with piercings, a dick, and then a boring combination of both. He lives to be controversial just for the sake of being controversial, but it comes off as desperate and sad. Also, it's one thing to do pedo art, it's another to do suggestive drawings of a dude's daughter.

Oh, and OP, if you didn't know, not only is Shadman not Sup Forums related (he barely even draws shit that isn't of real children), he's also hated by nearly all of Sup Forums moderators. So see you in a few days, hope you like that ban hammering.

>If more than half of the world can agree that "x is shit, delet this", then it must not be something worth keeping around.
By that logic, if over half the world agrees that something is good, then it must be worth keeping around.
You now realize that over 1.5 billion people consider a man who fucked a 9 year old to be the most holy man alive, and 4-5 billion people live in countries where the age of consent is 14 or younger.
Therefore, clearly, there's nothing wrong with wanting to fuck children.

He's edgy for attention and it's really obvious.

Too Bad. You make it seem like everyone that look up porn are all underage. New flash, adults look up porn too, it was what was originally suppose to happen. And I'm sure the people that have the opinion of Shadfag being shit is, well, adults. Not every "normie" are kids.

Why would anyone want to fuck children anyhow? It's seems stupid. They aren't fully developed so it'll probably be uncomfortable as fuck.

>Majority. Overrules.
Not in America, fuckboy. That's why we have the Electoral College and Supreme Court.

Okay, addendum.

Name one single image where he posted a female without a dick or one single image where he posted anyone who wasn't underage.

See, you say that...

Off the top of my head, I came up with that one image of Helen Parr getting BLACKED in a bathroom stall. I dunno what that says about me, but there ya go.

Because he wants me to hate him. If I didn't, he'd just have to make something even more fucked up.

...

This is my main reason why i visit these threads

...

Well, there's one problem with that, nearly all of Shadman's audience before the pedoshit was, well, Americans and westernfags ala britbongers. There's a reason why he went pedo, to get the nipnog audience. In the Eastern world, people might love Shadfag outside of his shit rendering skills, but here in the West, were all that "age of consent " traip isn't teenager age, well there's your problem, all of your Western audience is now bitching pedophile instead of doing what you used to do before going to pander to Easterns consents. It shouldn't be surprising the West audience are bitching here.

The bigger, and more important, problem here is he's NOT an Eastern. All that shit you posted would only matter if he was from Asianland or something, where he could get away with it. But since he's statebound, he shouldn't think he can get out of trouble going this far for attention. That's the problem, he's dancing on thin ice, and instead of just staying shit with edgy art, being shit and being a pedo is twice as bad and worst as a human to be.

Holy shit, I totally missed that bulge.

Did she get a frozen cumshot from frozone? Like that scene with the frozen bullet/spit, but with cum? That would actually be kinda funny.

you wanna explain to me what you're doing here?

>Argue about the whole world
>"W-Well, actually, I just meant the west."
Funfact, there are western countries where the AoC is 14.
AoC in Mexico is 13 IIRC, and in most of the US it's 16.
In fact, 14-16 is the most common age range for consent in the west.

he has plenty of pinups of girls without dicks

Every day we drift further from God.

>wehavethisthreadeveryday.png

Also, in most of the west, we have this thing called freedom of expression, so if he wants to draw little kids getting gangbanged by giant dicks, he's within his rights to do so, because it's just a drawing.
If you think people should be punished for drawing something, then you're free to hang out with some of those childfucking Muslims in the middle east.

I'm convinced he does what he does not because drawing underage boys in girl clothes gets his rocks off, but because it gets a rise out of people who immediately see red and try to chew his head off whenever he posts something that could be even slightly construed as pedophilic.

I like the sketch it's based on more.

His art is disgusting. It's the typical gross anime art but it's not completely anime, it just looks off. It's the epitome of polished turd and he's very amateur.
I don't fap to drawings but if I did I wouldn't get a boner from that shit.
Incase it's an example of actual artist that just so happens to do pron, but isn't defined by it.
Shad has nothing going on besides being the guy that does smut.

MAN'S
BUTT

He doesn't cater to my fetish so I'm kinda just eh

>shadman

How do you even know for sure that is a child? It could easily intended to be a midget. Do you people have a problem with little people getting representation in lewd drawings?

It's based on pic related.
Very clearly supposed to be that kid.
That said, the fact that we live in a society where people freak out about Shad drawing that picture more than they do about Liev dressing his son up like this to begin with makes me want to go on a killing spree.

Adult lucy

Most likely bait but it's based off of liev schreibers kid dressed as Harley Quinn

Not gonna lie this is good

Odds on that kid being pimped out to Liev's Hollywood buddies?

Looking at the shit he posts online, it's pretty much guaranteed at this point.
Pedowood is ballsy as fuck, can't even blame them, no one's ever gonna do shit about it, so they may as well rub it in your face, especially when people get more outraged by drawings.

...

>little people can't dress up as Harley Quinn
Don't be sizeist, assholes

I you're referring to the bulge in the OP, I'd like to point out that the pic depicts Liev Schreiber's son.

The real reason Sup Forums hates Shadman is so that when the FBI finally gets around to arresting him they can pretend they weren't all equally pedos and defend themselves from getting caught in the inevitably sting operation.

He goes for the dumbest cliches to get attention.

>FBI
>Going after people for drawings
Unless Shad goes out and rapes some kid, he'll be fine.
Also, does he even live in the US?

Pretty decent faptier material :3

>2. He does this for fame. Which is one of the sins of humanity. Draw for posterity, not for glory.

Where the fuck do you think you are? Nearly every artist in Sup Forums media, be they a penciller, a storyboarder, or anything in between, draws for three reasons, in this order:

1: To get paid. A possibility you ignored in your point.

2: To hit it big, to make a name for themselves, so that they can do (1) more effectively. Is there anything wrong with that goal, unlikely though it may be?

3: To make an impact, or because they enjoy it, or because they love comics and/or cartoons. Sure, everyone would love to be the next Stan Lee or Steve Ditko or hell even the next Rob Liefeld, but times have changed. If you wotk for the big two, you have basically no chance of owning an IP of your creation. Work for the smaller outlets? You get to own your characters, but sales will probably suck. As for the Cartoons, most artists there are just names in the credits. Rare is the one who will ever make an impact, create their own pilot, let alone their own show. The McCrackens and the Timms of the world are very much the exception. People KNOW this.

I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with trying to make an impact, I'm just saying that it is largely futile.

So what is wrong with an independent artist playing up a character to get a few more clicks, a few more merchandise sales, and get some money in his wallet?

Donald would.

He didn't MAKE his son dress like that, he LET him. A ton of kids experiment with cross-dressing, he'll probably grow out of it.

I don't give a shit. If he never picked up drawing, he would've probably become some kind of combination of a pedophile and the Unabomber.

Hooooo boy, are you in for a ride.

yes. used to live in canada, but is currently in california
and technically drawn porn is illegal, but we've yet to get a precedent on the sentencing because it's either been in addition to real CP in legal charges or the defendant went on a plea deal, but it'd make me laugh if shad got deported over all the shit he draws

...

I need more
>Shadman
pictures.

...

>Why does Sup Forums hate shad
hes a pedophile

I may like loli but I don't like sexual drawings of real kids, that's what I have against shad. if he kept it fictional I wouldn't care

And in case you're wondering, these are both boys.

You shouldn't hate people for having mental illnesses.

How do we know the son isn't gay and idolizes Harley?

...

And lastly, my favorite of course.

Point is, this is never going to stop, they can do pretty much whatever they want and people will defend them because they need to defend their transtrenderism so they can feel special.
I'd say it horrifies me, but at this point it's par for the course.

>Why does Sup Forums hate shad

Because he is a pedophile who probably uses actual child porn as reference material for his loli works.

>probably

That's suspicious

High. Hollywood has a high pedo rate.