Kelly does it again!

Kelly does it again!

Trump is going to win 2020

>it's a Kelly literally inserts himself into the comic episode

My favorite. I'm only sad he didn't make himself buff this time

>wife outside

>USA Atlas

>Liberty at the foot of a free man
Kelly speaks to sole of every patriot.

i love this road trip series. the best ones are always the ones with kelly himself in them, and this is no different.

I think that's the daughter in law.

>the daughter in law is waiting outside

Anyone here ever been to hooters? Is it really that uncomfortable for female patrons?

I think that user incorrectly identified Kelly's son as the default character, instead of recognizing that the elder male is the true superior subject of any situation.

>I finally realized Benevolent Patriarch is Kelly

It's not. The food is quite good too.

I've never been to one, if I wanted to eat a bad, overpriced food surrounded by bimbo's I'd just eat at the strip club

Hold up pal their wings are fucking delicious

The Daughter in law being outside makes it perfect. Or maybe its the crying liberty under the table

>uncomfortable
You mean envious of women who aren't total hambeasts like them

The kids seem happy.

I don't think strip clubs generally serve food.

Why wouldn't they be? They are finally getting a taste of real America

The son seems down. How can he be unhappy eating a delicious hamburger? And it's a FREE hamburger too!

What do you eat with your drinks then?

Breastlets must wait outside.

The kids love it. Grandpa is happy. Only the parents hate fun and attractive people.

kids don't give a fuck about what they're eating as long as there are french fries.

Some of them are worth going to for the buffet alone.

The one by me had great french fries. Some sort of seasoning salt, and they were cheap. No cover to get in. So I'd stop by there, get a large serving of fries for a few bucks and look at naked chicks for awhile.

the statue of liberty kills me every fucking time

>user pretends he's never been to strip club
It's okay user we are all Sup Forumsmrades here you don't have to hide your degeneracy

>Is it really that uncomfortable for female patrons?
Not really. Most women who've described Hooters to me tend to fucking love the wings so it's something for everyone.

Strip club food is unhygienic as fuck.

This is the 11th straight comic with it, all in his "all american summer" series. Where have you been you unpatriotic sicko?

...

Why does he calls his son grateful but he didn't draw him that way?

>Democrats
>value freedom and equality
Freedom and equality are diametrically opposed goals

i cant belive you read the wall of sperg

that doesn't make any sense unless you're only defining freedom as the freedom to oppress others

...

>not realizing that having the government enforce equality violates the freedom of others to be above the rest
Holy shit is Sup Forumsmblr real

The waitresses literally just wear clothing you'd see at a beach house or something. It's not like they literally start stripping in front of you.

Why'd you have to go dragging politics into a perfectly civil political cartoon discussion?

Trump isn't on the ticket for 2020.
ELECT PENCE TO BUILD THAT ELECTRIC FENCE

Yeah, this isn't that revealing.

This is the only board where you'll unironically be called sexist or racist. Avoid political discussion here. It's cancer.

thanks for confirming the first post, I guess

If you don't unironically agree with at least half of Kelly's strips you are objectively wrong headed.

Oh, yeah, I know what the uniform looks like. It's the company policies and possibly customer base I'm concerned with. There are stores now that I've begun to avoid because their service policies are too aggressive. I'm curious what it would be like to be in a restaurant where the policy is apparently to actively flirt with patrons.

Lady, try this in Pol/...Co/ is for cartoons not politics

It's like a normal restaurant but the waitresses smile more and write their name on a napkin and put a heart around it.
The men are mostly there to watch sports

No, Hooters is a great family restaurant. At one point in their history the uniforms were much more revealing but they realized there was more money in families because the food is REALLY FREAKING GOOD.

It's not Raisins.

I think this one falls a little flat.

>the food is REALLY FREAKING GOOD.
why go on the internet and tell lies? Are you a Hooter's franchise owner?

Well what about the government pushing for equal opportunity as opposed to forcing equal outcomes?

To be fair I've only been to the one in the tourism sector of Chicago, so that's probably one of the better ones.

You know how franchises are, some are good some are bad.

I'm not that guy but I will defend their wings and curly fries with my life

This. There are two Carl's Jrs in my general area, and one always has watery ketchup and the other one has perfectly good ketchup

>liberty not in a hooters uniform
boo

That statement is objectively wrong

Lady Liberty is not a HARLOT, you sicko!

When it's 90 degrees outside and 120 in the kitchen you will be damn grateful for those uniforms.

Not him, but does the govt need to do much to do that? Isn't a legal guarantee against non-work-related discrimination all that'd really require?

You literally can't have both. Even with the "your rights end where another's begin" caveat. Granting a person the freedom to pursue success and be rewarded for it will create an inequality of income resulting in an unequal quality of life and disproportional political power in the hands of people who own more wealth than others and finally ending with the wealthier people having all of the actual power. The only equality a government can provide without encroaching on freedom is the equality in the eyes of the law, but even that is fragile because the reality is that wealthy people can afford better lawyers and bribes. Other "equalities", such as equal opportunities are even more of a joke.

But that is the best we can do at the moment, because if you try to enforce functioning equality, you will end up with reduced freedom that will result in an even worse environment with an even worse distribution of wealth and power, as we can see in the "socialist" dictatorships across the world. Because real equality doesn't work outside of communist utopia fantasies and any efforts to achieve it end in authoritarianism, the very thing a lot of those SJW retards think they are working against.

The best we can do is socialize certain things such as healthcare, infrastructure and education, let capitalism handle the rest, maintain the highest level of transparency possible and MAYBE we'll arrive at some semblance of a meritocracy one day.

Equal opportunity is a myth. People born with Down syndrome do not have equal opportunity in academia to others. People with autism do not have equal social opportunity to others. Men do not have equal opportunity to birth children to women, nor do women have equal opportunity to become a heavylifter to men. Blacks do not have equal opportunity to whites in any way. This is all due to natural factors.

I went once and it was weird as fuck to me because I went with this family in my church that's super religious. Lots of people go to one in Cincinnati because it's on the river and pretty cool though, so it's not weird

that doesnt make any sense unless you consider people with higer iq, work ethic, interest and opportunitys having more money than everyone else opression

Exactly. The most we can do is sanction as much freedom, personal agency and individuality as possible (keeping in mind that absolute freedom is impossible, as giving people absolute freedom will simply result in those with the most power taking freedom away from others) while ensuring that every is roughly equal not in terms of either opportunity or outcome, but in regard to equal treatment by the governing rules. Which is largely taken care of by capitalism because capitalism is a primarily darwinist system where what doesn't work ceases to continue, and it turns out irrational and counter intuitive decision making like say, hiring a white employee when a black one is more qualified, is harmful to business.

What we should aim for is a general attempt to respect people's autonomity, and part of that is allowing people to fail.

Yeah right up until some dumbfuck new kitchen staff that can't handle the fryolator flips a bucket of boiling hot oil onto all that exposed skin.

Would clothing really help in that situation? It's going to soak in and burn the fabric into your flesh.

...

there will never be equal opportunity unless you get rid of money
and getting rid of money will be opressive
you cant have a society thats not opressive, any society will naturally tip in favor of the smartest people around
If you want to revert that and make the people at the bottom the ones ruling first of all you wont have the people at the bottom ruling but a new corrupt political elite
you will cause complete stagnation as progress isnt good for a socialist state
and another society who didnt follow your example will end up conquering you

SJW's don't want real Equality, which is Equality of opportunity.

They want Equality of Outcome, which is marxist as fuck.

Wait staff should be nowhere NEAR the actual cooking area at any time for that exact reason. Kitchens tend to be laid out so there's a large partition with a counter between prep and pickup.

It does help a little. Fry oil is about 350* F. It won't burn your clothes but it'll melt the skin right off of you, like instantly. I have a nasty scar on my hand from a ONE DROP.

Depending on the AMOUNT of oil, it might end up melting your skin into your clothes which will suck but clothes will shield you enough from stray drops and small splashes.

If it's an ice bucket challenge style drenching, it'll only help minimally but not prevent damage from occurring, true. But if it's a splatter or a flick of droplets, then yes, having your skin covered with clothing will seriously prevent some scarring.

You can't predict the unpredictable and you also can't expect workers to wear hazmat suits, but you gotta take practicality into consideration when determining your uniform. Which is why I can at least appreciate that those Hooters girls don't have exposed midrifts and seem to be wearing socks and closed toed shoes.

you realize that nobody forces them to work there and working in a bikini caffee is actually an advantage for those women like strip bars are since they get to make a ton of money from tips
plus if anything happens to them they can sue
also if you want to look for all the really dangerous jobs look at male work fatality, oh right, you dont care do you?

No
He doesn't

OSHA actually requires the footwear, and it has to be non-slip if they're going to spend any time in the kitchen. Especially around fryers, the floor tends to be a goddamn skating rink and no amount of mopping will make it safe, I've tried.

I posted it to show that Hooters outfits aren't all that revealing.

If girls wanna serve coffee in bikinis, go ahead.

They also wear leggings. It's only the cleavage area and arms that are exposed.

ok, sorry i jumped to conclussions
im juggling cleaning, making dinner and posting

>If girls wanna serve coffee in bikinis, go ahead.

I hope their insurance coverage is okay with that.

Girls certainly have a lot of ways of making money easier than men if they want to use their bodies to do so. The only people that pay to see sexy men are other men.

Oh, okay. I'd thought their legs looked darker and shinier than their arms but I wasn't sure.

you have never seen those 40 year old women obsessed with boy bands have you?
it gives a new meaning to thet term pedophilia scare

>Avoid political discussion here
Every day I wish people would take your advice and yet here we are.

>only board
On Sup Forums you can be called a racist for criticizing one of their precious rappers. I'm surprised I don't hear "Sup Forumsmblr" being thrown around more often

>boy bands
Even in Worst Korea, that's some minuscule fraction of the male population.

Let's say you would want to open something like this but with guys. You would need not only very good looking men, like 8+ (the girls in the pic are only 6/10), but you would also need them to be buff.

Why did he label their boobs?

>tfw went to Hooters once and the waitress hit on my GF

W-will I make it bros?

no one is advocating for equality of outcome, only equality of opportunity.

face it. if you're born into a rich family you're set for life unless you fuck up catastrophically, if you're born into a poor one your chance of getting out is one in a thousand.

maybe we could change that if we made healthcare and education a right rather than a privilege.

Nah, you're in the cuckshed the moment that happens. No way any girl will pick you over a hot chick with a nice rack. I would say you're totally fucked, but we both know that's not the case.

>Going to hooters and not even getting the wings
Ha ha, what biting satire.

nobody said men can profit from their bodys the exact same way women do
they still can tho
a good looking man can be a yoga instructor or a bartender and get tons of tips or a personal trainer
women are just as thirsty as men but they dont like to be open about it in the same way

...

>Fuckers started Sup Forums discussion in a Kelly thread again
TAKE IT TO FUCKING Sup Forums! I don't give a shit which way you lean, who you support or don't, just take it to fucking Sup Forums.

The waitress is literally holding their giant platter of wings right over Kelly's head.

I assumed those were for someone else, as he's already finished his plate, but you're right, he can probably eat both a burger and a plate of wings.
I'm sorry I doubted Kelly.

I just don't want to look like a lesbian

>Lady Liberty eating on the floor
It would have been fine if she was just down there, but eating on the floor id degrading. Kelly DOESN'T do it again. >:^(

It's hard to satirize things when reality is more cartoonish than political cartoons.

I love that he to italicize and underline double-d to get the point across.