I will be making more of these, to show how douchey the dialog sounds when a guy says it. Holy Ejaculation!
America Chavez as a male
All urls found in this thread:
Hmmm. I'm not sure if it's any MORE douchey, but I see potential for hilarity here.
Keep going OP
I have faith in you, OP.
what are you doing at Trump university
That's actually a good question seeing how it's scam school.
Go for it
They're all scam schools user. Every fucking one.
I need to see the original page to know how full of shit OP is.
yes more of this mess
Reach for the stars, op.
Ejaculation isn't the male equivalent of menstruation. The closest analogy would be smegma.
We don't talk much about smegma not because there is this massive misandrist conspiracy, but because it falls under a bodily function taboo. Its not sexist, its just gross. The same thing for period blood, thinking that free bleeders is nasty isn't anti-woman, its anti-gross.
It's this opinion that'll lead to being dependent on more foreign scientists.
Op combined two separate pages of America #1. But he really didn't change much.
What this smeg-head said
It was already a 5 star wanted rating.
Yeah. I see it being a train wreck, to a slightly different kind of trainwreck. But we won't really know untill we crash more trains.
You gonna crash more trains to find out?
I'm pretty sure freebleeding was a false flag thing /pol/.
Why yes, I *would* like to upsize my burger combo.
It would help of colleges didn't spend so much time making you memorize the periodic table of gender pronouns.
Post them on tumblr and see what happens
Either way it's equally as obnoxious.
If you want to really make something worthwhile that manages to be both funny and pointing out the flaws of America, I would recommend being careful as to what dialogue you choose to change. A page for page redrawing of America with a male protagonist is good, but if you really want to cement the ridiculous double standards found in America
(There's a joke in there but I'm too lazy to find it), only change the pronouns of Americo. Maybe even make him gay on top of that so there's more of a juxtaposition for when he says shit like "Holy Ejaculation", subverting the expected trope of a dudebro protagonist so that you can better identify and exemplify the baffling linguistics of the source material
I doubt you graduate high school let alone been in a college campus.
What is Prodigy doing at a school in the first place? Last I knew he still had all his absorbed skills and knowledge.
good thing so many refugees are scientists we're already covered!
I'm glad Exposition Lady is there to sing the praises of this nobody character
You should switch the gender of the other character too.
America hasn't really accepted any refugees. It's why Europe is overburden with them, cause America refuses to accept responsibility fornthe mess they made.
They are also very poor people who went to europe over other muslim states.
lol he din go to kollege huuuuuur.
I have MS that I got paid to get, so you'll be flipping those burgers yourself, fatty.
Nice grammer, college-boy.
America is the mess Europe made and never cleaned up.
Nice lie bu no on cares on a maine fishing BBS.
But it's not even an actual university, it's just a quick get rich seminar.
"Holy smegma" sounds funnier but "holy ejaculation" sounds more obnoxious just like "holy menstruation", so I give it a pass.
How dare you say that about Full Sail and DeVry.
Why is college such a boogeyman for american conservatives?
Why would I lie? That seems like such a strange knee-jerk. Is that what you do, user? Anyway, it was a huge waste of time and I'd never wish grad school on anyone- even you.
It's almost as if women and men are different physically and culturally and held to different standards.
You're like the women who try to compare having big boobs to having big balls, or me who try to compare giving birth to getting kicked in the nuts or passing a kidney stone.
Oddly enough both SJWs and anti-SJWs seem to try and ignore this shit only when it's convenient for them. Going "Yeah but if a [my sex] said this thing that [your sex] said you'd scream bloody murder!" undermines both of their core philosophies.
It's like some kind of bizarro version of those cringey "battle of the sexes" games that were popular in the late 90's.
Because anti-intellectualism is a big issue america is dealing with. Half the people who go to college don't even get a practical degree which only perpetuates that attitude. It also leaves us with antivaxxers and flatearthers.
What did you even go for that it would be considered a waste of time? Especially, if you did it for your job.
it's sexism when i don't like it
it's 'just different standards' when I do
America does accept refugees but not only is there a quota, there's also a 2 year vetting process with biometric screening and numerous interviews. Better safe than sorry
attack a vermin nest
don't accept refugee vermin into your home
Makes sense to me.
Just send 1 of these edits with a watermark on it to the Diversity & Comics guy and watch him make at least 1 video about it and 3 about butthurted twitter sjfws.
This is why no one invent you to the block party user
user shows up anyway
This is why no one likes you in general user
How about you not involve that parasitic cocksucker.
The EU could easily have done the same thing.
You do realise that Syrian refugees only make up 10 to 30 percent of the numbers, right?
Also, because it's harder to swim across the Atlantic than the Mediterranean,
just close your borders, most of the cunts pouring in aren't even from a war zone, they just want welfare
30 percent is still a large group of people. It's like saying a third of refugees are Syrians.
it's not a insignificant number.
syria is only a non-majority fraction of the 'refugees'
ignoring they're mostly adult men, really gets the neurons firing
ignoring even further that just because I gas a wasp nest I should take all the ones that survived and put them in my fucking house is a retarded sentiment
This would be better if you didn't change every bit of dialogue breh.
It's almost as if women and men are different physically and culturally
GTFO back to /pol/ you misogynist shitlord
So when are they gonna kill her off?
Either that or fire the fucking womanchildren writing this garbage and make her into a respectable person.
It's not America's fault that the EU is retarded enough to bring in hundreds of thousands of illiterate poor fucks from Africa/Middle east.
ignoring they're mostly adult men
Yeah I tend to ignore things not based in fact.
Enjoy having back and knee troubles at 40 and a poor life Bob
Lol, look forward to years of debt because you fell for the college scam pretentious fucktard. Should have gone to trade school
donald trump university
Scalia university is RIGHT THERE moron
Either way, you're left with 90 to 70 percent of non-Syrians that no one knows where they came from or what they're doing there, but will take in regardless, no questions asked.
Give money or whatever but let them far away, taking 1 refugee is more expensive than saving the life of a dozen people in their own countries by sending suplies to their country so it don't make sense anyway.
The biggest issue isn't even that. The problem is how they did it without any fucking vetting process. I guess germans don't care because it's looking like merkel for another term.
This is like the second or third time I've seen someone bitch about DaC faggot, out of nowhere today. I'm going to assume it's all you, letting your autistic grudge over some youtube fag get to you.
Get a hold of your life and stop shitting up Sup Forums with your autistic grudges.
I lost it at Trump University
Considering the source material, "Zapata university" would make for a better analogy.
They couldn't vet as well as they could because America refuses to take in refugees which leads to surplus that burdens everyone else.
oh no we fucked Syria so lets take a bunch of welfare queens from nigeria and pakistan!
This will not help syrians.
Germans are fined over criticizing immigration policies on social media. They've been beaten down by their government.
Fuck off. It was europe's choice to be retarded. It had options.
Why? It's not funny at all, none of this is.
They have nobody else. Schulz is a stereotype of a socialist pig.
You are a racist, Mr. Common Man if you do not want refugees and migrants
give every MEP a limo with bulletproof windows and specially trained driver since Brussels ain't safe anymore.
Here's hoping FDP will make enough.
not enjoying someone making Marvel writers mad and is someone that loves the 90s making him a fake comic book guy isnt hilarious.
Idk what you guys consider entertaiment anymore.
They could but choose to not, even if murica took refugees they would still not vet
It's funny in the tragic sense that Marvel peddles garbage like it, and said garbage gets nominations for "serious" awards.
It's not when you criticize immigration, it's for illegal hate speech. That fact that you don't clarify the difference is so suspect, you're obviously trying push an specific narrative here.
I bet you've got a hot source to decry that fact, Ahmed.
Yeah but the joke that it's trump university os not funny, it's cringey.
A nebulous as fuck term. Literally anything can be hate speech. Even this post.
Wtf are you talking about
We accept, on average, about 85000 refugees a year.
For a country not connected by land to the areas being fled, that's pretty high.
Man, i'm surprised twitter hasn't pulled out just because it's harder to spend money monitoring hate speech than it would be to deal with germans.
You don't have a source either though.
llegal hate speech
I keep forgetting America's one of the only places on the planet with a rational stance on free speech, it's fun.
go to school
not a billionaire after graduating
Every image I've seen of the huddled masses are like 90-100% doods and there sure ain't any muslim women and eight year old crime sprees being reported
passing a kidney stone
Women who have had birth and passed a stone, often rate the two very simlarly in pain
Germany has like 2million immigrants. i guess our process of being safe over sorry is the wrong approach. and we should have to deal with terrorist cells every day.
Stating you don't agree with getting refugees in a polite manner CAN be considered hate speech due to racism/xenophobia
It's not when you criticize immigration, it's for illegal hate speech
Let's pretend that calling for an immigration ban is not labeled as racism by the left, and racism is of course "hate speech"
That fact that you don't clarify the difference is so suspect, you're obviously trying push an specific narrative here.
Oh, it's another dumblr deflecting criticism of lefty politics by implying implications.
a surplus that burdens everyone else
is 'wait your fucking turn' that hard to translate into sandnigger speech and post on the border?
are lines haram?
You guys always try to pull this shit, the idea that everything gets labelled as racist so that means nothing can be racist but I think that's bullshit.
another thread where people argue about politics, immigration, and eventually other bullshit
And no, I don't think you're raiding or whatever, I just think you should discuss it there instead.
You guys always try to pull this shit
the idea that everything gets labelled as racist so that means nothing can be racist
Meanwhile, liberals do the exact opposite so that means EVERYTHING can be racist.
Why are you defending trump university? Do you think it's an actual university or something and that liberal elites are just shitting on it cause drumpf?
they're literally delusional and uninformed, user
let them drown on their own saliva
There's definitely things that are 'racist', but let's even set aside how fucking retarded jailing people for literal thought crime is.
What defines 'hate speech'? What legal code says, (explicitly, set in stone, unchanged without whatever law-making body's consent), 'hate speech is this, this and this'? Where do you draw the line if not arbitrarily and at the whim of whoever's enforcing the law at this point in time?
liberal elites are just shitting on it cause drumpf?
but that's exactly what's happening, it's like wanting Burger King to get the rope for claiming they make the best burgers
No it's like wanting them to get removed for claiming a steaming shit was a burger. there is nothing good about trump university.
I think that's bullshit, I think you guys said liberals call everything racist in an attempt to delegitimize the word so that nobody can call you guys out.
a steaming shit was a burger
implying that isn't also an accurate descriptor of BK
Making nebulous claims about your business still isn't a crime unless you're doing bogus studies or some shit.
Not even a liberalfag but trump university is fucked dude, you should probably read about it, i hate cucks as much as anyone.
libs have gotten to the point where they've managed to go above and beyond 'unintentional but still existent >implied waycism' to making "muh dog whistle" the new hotness which is literally just "this thing is ~secretly racist~ because I say it is"
They're doing hell of a lot more to ruin the word than alt right death squads.
If that's true then why did Trump settle?
Liberals call everything racist because they see giants were there are only windmills and view all things only in terms of relationships of power. That's how the term "microagression" came into existence.
no need for self-hatred user
Because we're a bunch of fucking contrarians and since being educated got popular (and, in a more realistic perspective, bloated the system beyond its ability to help and sucked in a lot of people who might have benefited from a more technical education like a vocational school) so now people have to crow about how it's not cool anymore.
Because when something doesn't work properly our only recourse is to throw it the fuck out, apparently.
why did Trump settle
Do you think trials work like Ace Attorney where everybody just shows up for a couple days and it's done
he thinks dog whistles are the new hotness
You have to be 18+ to use this site.
our only recourse is to throw it the fuck out, apparently
Salting the earth of major universities and starting over WOULD be a net gain though
OP speaking -- I didn't know there was a real Trump University. wtf? o_O
there are people defending academic fraud as a legit institution of learning.
That's it. Its peak shitposting for me.
At least in the circles I witness. "Thing is (blank) because I said it is" is nothing new but it's definitely come into prevalence more as of late.
We dont need no smartypants fancy dancy booky learnin round these parts
OwO What's this?
Sykes-Picot Agreement was a thing
ITS ALL AMERICA'S FAULT!
I honestly hope a white genocide does happen in Western Europe. You fuckers are quick to blame us for your own bullshit.
yes, all that technical education, critical thinking and specialized research facilities and staff are a net drain on Freedom.
Honestly we need to adopt a system that provides education up until highschool freshmen year than people choose if they want to continue, go to vocational school, or go into college. Education really needs to be restructured and teachers need livable pay.
He said he wouldn't three times than did each time because he new he would lose. It was 25 million in settlements. If the though he would win he would not do that.
Saying that I don't know shit doesn't distract fron the question.
why did trump settle?
overturning Stable Middle eastern despots for Freedom has nothing to do with the US.
'major universities are a bloated scam, smaller local institutions and vocational study are more useful'
HURR YOU MUST BE SOME RETARD THAT THINKS ALL LEARNING IS TURNING THE FROGS GAY
How many paint chips do you consume on a daily basic
Draw one where she punches wonder woman in the face then claims she hasn't been truly oppressed because she is white
Or maybe one where she beats up a bunch of people then claims Shiara law is the perfect way to live!
We wouldn't even need those shitty despots had fucking Wilson had his way and let the colonized shit holes to be given nations based on ethnic boundaries.
Except they literally do
muh internalized racism
muh rape culture
muh male gaze
muh safe spaces
It's not my fault you're an ignorant piece of shit who never realize that appealing to racist is a republican strategy.
yeah, the universities that attract the best and brightest around the world to the US and help it keep it's edge are a scam.
Because throwing money at the problem is infinitely easier than getting into a court grappling match amidst a presidential campaign.
If any of the claims would have stuck libbie media would still be ranting and raving about it.
settling a court case means you're guilty
go to an university
all they do is make you take a course for consent and ask you to be mindful of your fellow students feelings.
"What the holy menstruation" is the most awkward phrasing of anything ever.
Say that shit out loud.
Major universities are mostly responsible for a lot research and funding in america.
appealing to racists is a republican strategy
why don't they just get less supporters
Can't imagine why dems aren't a majority anymore.
People are inherently suspicious of spending half a million dollars to make their kids dumber and fatter.
yes, they can do that for free anyway.
go to an university
Because outside of STEM, Medicine, and maybe Business, college has become a propaganda machine for the left in America.
And if you step out of line, even slightly, even accidentally, they will tear you to shreds.
actually, the things you saw aren't real but the things I saw are.
SJWs piss everyone off
They multiply the more people complain about them, getting more extreme to piss people off more
Alt-Righters piss everyone off
They multiply the more people complain about them, getting more extreme to piss people off more
Maybe the solution is for us to stop doing shit purely to piss each other off, it only validates the other side.
... But nah, let's just keep stewing in our anger. Worked great the last twenty years.
You're not a retard cause you didn't go to college, you're a retard cause you think every college is a liberal brainwashing center.
You're really missing the point.
can't wait for the kettle to boil over.
I went to an american university. I didn't see any of the rape culture or safe space bullshit. I suppose it had to do with my major and the uni I went to but it wasn't a leftist brainwashing center.
Actually more people vote consistently for democrats but REDLINE has gerrymand the shit out of america.
but the US ain't a democracy.
Its a Republic
Fair point. A lot of the cash also goes into steaming bullshit. The fat needs to be trimmed which is the major thing.
Which of course will never happen because again, shit sells.
Quite possibly literally Im sure some university has gotten d0sh for a scatology course.
Outside of STEM and Medicine, Universities are a scam. You're are better off learning a trade than wasting thousands of dollars and 4 years on a liberal arts degree.
outside of everything the modern world is built on, universities are a scam, you should join my welding school instead.
'smaller local instutitions and vocational study are more useful'
you think every college
Reading is fundamental.
I was making a joke about how an university wouldn't be correct. That's all.
listen and believe goy
gerrymandering is suddenly something republicans do
What bizarro universe did I step into
sorry. I had a good time learning there, especially because I came from a culture where learning is not supposed to be fun.
Americans really diss on some of the best things they have.
Are you actually fucking serious here?
liberal arts are vital to the modern world
le happy merchant face.
Everyone does it but they're doing it to honestly illegal levels,gerrymandering is something that needs to be removed but won't.
Cause americans are greedy selfish shits.
STEM isn't vital to the modern world
you can learn advanced mathematics, engineering and science at your local trade school.
I mean, learning a trade is pretty important. Lot better than medieval feminist poc trans literature study.
it's suddenly an epidemic when repubs do it
they will of course bend the knee because half the party is still convinced they're supposed to show any moral fiber
Glad you agree user. Most of the problems people complain about in regards to universities in America come from the Liberal Arts departments.
You didn't go to a frat then. Frats and prisions are the only places in america that have an environment that fosters rape.
Outside of STEM, most college is trash
WHAT SO YOU'RE SAYING STEM IS TRASH?
/read/ nigga, /read/
Its a lot better to be an actual engineer and to design the shit that trade school blokes fix.
Lot better than learning how to go lefty loosey righty tighty
You seem to ignore that a large proportion of them are Iraqis and Afghanis.
You do realize that a part of your stem degree has you study things like philosophy and stuff so that you can actually function like a well rounded being?
And pretending that universities would we useless without STEM is facetious because ultimately that is where people go to study that shit.
But you can only get respectable STEM degrees at those "scam" universities.
You literal uncultured swine.
Rape rape, or Woman has sex and regrets it later rape?
these blokes will also defend western culture without actually experiencing how it evolved throughout the ages.
study things like philosophy and stuff so that you can actually function like a well rounded being
*so that we can bloat your requirements
Liberal Arts =/= STEM
Liberal Arts Departments have become nothing but sources of propaganda. Federal funding for liberal arts scholarships should be cut. Federal funding for any school offering scholarships should be withdrawn. That'll do wonders in correcting the problems in academia.
both. One of my friends at a frat got molested by this chick that was crazy into him.
Roofies, you stupid fucker.
You guys do know that math and physical science falls under liberal arts right?
I have no argument so I'll personally attack him
Have you ever been in any of the classes you're complaining about?
That's actually between 3 and 60 times France's number depending what source you want to believe. But don't tell /pol/ or tumblr that.
learning about other things outside of your comfort zone is bad, m'kay
Studying the entire course of western philosophy right until the enlightenment isn't brainwashing desu.
What's next? The Holy Bowl Movement? The Holy Vomiting? The Holy Pissing Contest?
Twitter has literally never made a profit.
he doesn't know what it takes to get a STEM degree
Enjoy fixing those A/C units.
They are too stupid to know that you used to get an MA in mathematics a long time ago.
Or that the most pioneering scientists were also classically trained philosophers.
What's even the point of lying?
You do realize that a part of your stem degree has you study things like philosophy and stuff so that you can be charged for those classes and books.
Cut funding by 20% and let the collages decide what to keep running.
Then they should leave germany before they get sued for 53 million euros because they don't have the ability to catch hatespeech in time.
clearly they should keep english.
I could do that on my own )and have to an extent).
If you genuinely think non-vocation related education needed for a vocation is anything but happy mercantilism, I've got a lovely bridge you might be interested in.
I have and I do, and have never had to use anything from Western Civ in my job.
teaching you how to critically examine viewpoints is now a waste of resources
and where have you tested those ideas? where have you debated them among similarly prepared peers and come to a better understanding?
So what cropped porn is this?
As it becomes easier and easier to get a college degree they look even dumber for not having one so they lash out
So ... we're not discussing the comic anymore at all, are we? ::sigh::
Where we ever?
teaching you how to critically examine viewpoints
he thinks this is what actually occurs
Unless you're actually persuing that shit (which is also extremely rare at least in my area) they're almost exclusively railroading you into gimme classes for d0sh
This is the same on every level from State U to local.
implying you can ever have an apolitical discussion on the internet ever again
Keep dreaming. Nothing is free from politics anymore. /pol/ won. They did it.
Logic falls under liberal arts.
actually I learned to critically examine viewpoints by not discussing ideas with anyone else
He's here arguing on Sup Forums, user, I think his ability to critically examine viewpoints speaks for itself.
I went to university to get a degree and get shitfaced at frat parties.
Come on man. Professors worth their salt actually challenge you to debate your ideas with them and your peers to better express yourself.
Tbhl, America threads are mostly filled with anons bashing the comic anyways.
A mix betweeen the old American anti-intellectualism (reading is for faggots) and the market demand for cheap labor force and technicians so college degrees are useless except for the elite, who happen to run both the democrat and the republican party.
Oh like that's supposed to make it better
Unlike Yugoslavia which was Wilson's idea and went completely to shit.
How about we all set aside our differences and mock Gabby Rivera instead?
muh head is not an echo chamber.
people with different opinons than mine are an echo chamber.
Well, there was also the (very slim) chance that it'd lead to him impeached. Plus, you have to remember with Trump is that when he's accused of something, 999999999 times out of a billion there's a cartoonishly large amount of evidence that he's guilty
The fact of the matter is if we could make our public school system suck less we wouldn't need college so much in the first place.
But that'd require putting more money into education and fuck taxes man
Is this written by a grill? Because no grill talks like this, or human. This looks like someone desperately trying to write a young, hip, lady.
Also, republicans don't believe on welfare except for the corporations and Wall Street so the workers's children not only can't get education but they're being conviced that they don't need education and they're rooting for a system that essentially make education into a luxury only accesible to the rich instead of a human right, like in the old days when America was great. Basically it's a return to feudalism but with CEOs instead of feudal lords
I encourage you, OP!
Ok, but what does this have to do academia?
The idea of a unified Slavic country in the Balkans had been around for decades before Yugoslavia became a thing my friend.
That's picking the low-hanging fruit, isn't it?
To be fair, it's not like OP delivered any more than his one pic. Besides, if it keeps the rest of Sup Forums /pol/-free, I'd say it's a price worth paying
Yes, America is the bastion of freedom of expression.
Because ever since the economy imploded early this century, going to college is no longer a guarantee that you will have a worthwhile job. And there's always "entrepeneurship"; why go to college if you can sit on your computer cooking up that one app that will make you rich in two days?
In other words, the economy is dead and there's no sign it will ever recover, so people just threw the towel.
America was the greatest when europe was is ruins from two world wars. As much as americans like to pretend, they are part of the global economy.
How many layers, bro?
I bet the US government is actually investing in education and skill development then?
As had the idea of a unified Arab state, which was the British plan until the French demanded a share of former Ottoman territories.
Regardless, the Middle East was well maintained until the post-war era where the United States main foreign policy became dismantling the British and French empires, even to the extent that they allowed Communists to fill the vacuum, and then trying to challenge them.
In spite of what /pol/ may say, writing skills aren't determined by the gender. It's written by a girl but she happens to be a hack. Her former work was literally writing porn. The Marvel environment doesn't help
In ruins, not is.
Welcome to politics.
You get farther in life with bribes and threats than with logic. Logic is a dead language.
You mean Photoshop layers? I don't even know. "Americo" was drawn on paper and scanned in
Ew furry porn is disgusting.
but it doesn't help you grow as a person. What happened to self improvement?
Even if they were, it would all fall on deaf ears.
its scaly porn.
there's no culture of "safe-spaces" in college
there's no overwhelming majority of a single ideology in current academia
there's been no speakers who go against said ideology who've been screamed out of speaking engagements in colleges across the country
there's no echo-chamber in the modern university
To admit you want to improve yourself you must first admit you need improvement.
this bitch has a job at a major publication
if it keeps the rest of Sup Forums /pol/-free
Ok, but it doesn't. At all.
Why is improving yourself by interacting with the world seen as a joke?
Self-improvement is a sucker's game. It's being that one guy who always refused drinking at parties or smoking pot and then one day wonders why no one wants to hang out with him anymore. That's why monks and ascetics had to retreat from society.
self improvement means NoFunAllowed.
What if I drank enough to have a fun time, but not enough that I puked on someone?
The last time they did it was the 1950s and we were trying to beat the Russians at science so we pumped money into the education system. Then by the late 60s when there was a massive increase in educated young people suddenly they all didn't want to go to some shithole country and die.
there's no overwhelming majority of a single ideology in current academia
There really isn't.
Leftism isn't a political ideology. American leftism is moderate right by the rest of the first world's standards.
And USA can be more competitive with a better education, what mean more innovation and progress, except that would mean a tiny reduction of the budget that could be spent on weapons and shit. Who knows, maybe it's for the better. An educated population could realize the MCU is shit and could start making uncomfortable questions about Washington lobbys
Americo needs to be a gay hipster bear.
Just cause you want to suck Milo's dick doesn't mean he should talk on college campuses
start making uncomfortable questions about Washington lobbys
Like "what criminal syndicate is paying to convince congress to legalize silencers and make it easier for people to buy assault rifles?"
Then you'd get: "Why do you need to drink to have fun, user? Huh? Why? Why can't you improve yourself and quit drinking?"
My point is, self-improvement is a snipe hunt; and now that it's become an industry, even more so. Behind every precept, there is some other theory, and behind it another one, ad infinitum. It is mired with contradictions and half-measures; fitness culture suffers from the same problem.
My response would be that I like drinking or smoking pot with my friends because it is a social activity we do together. The self improvement part is a reminder to myself not to become addicted to it and if necessary take a break from the drinking.
Also, self improvement should be an intensely personal issue kinda like meditation. Discussing philosophy to understand other people's points of view better also helps me understand myself better.
The beautiful thing about self improvement is that you have full control over how it happens. If someone else is making you do it then it's not self improvement.
That said, you engage with other people to gain new perspectives. Even when talking with people you don't agree with, if you can both do so without being immense assholes to each other, you can come away having at least come to understand that position a little better, even if it's only to clarify your own stance. This shouldn't be used just to entrench yourself, you have to actually be willing to see where the other person's coming from to actually get anything from it or you're just locking yourself into your own little echo chamber.
You don't HAVE to agree with other people. But at least TRYING to understand them can still benefit you, even if you come away unconvinced.
It's honestly adorable you think that.
There really isn't
muh "assault" rifles
...wait a minute, that gay blowjob
the bear next to it
On a governing body level? Without question. What random faggots do privately is their own thing.
It is what I experienced.
inb4 a single court case of florida being retarded two decades ago nullifies the first amendment
Did you just make that? It's way better than the OP
Sure would suck of the majority of 'refugees' aren't actually syrian
This shouldn't be used just to entrench yourself
Then what is the point of finding out the target's blind spots?
I bet you've got a hot source to decry that fact, Ahmed.
muh safe space
Smegma isn't a bodily function, it's just poor hygiene. Even women can get smegma.
muh pedophile apologist
Foreign scientists who study at American universities. Unless you think the Chinese actually have good scientists.
What's the point of self-improving if that won't land you a job and you remain a peon?
Get a clue. People want stable jobs, not hot air. Self improvement is a dumb meme diffused by people that don't have to worry about money in the first place.
I don't watch Roman Polanski films friendo.
go to a seminar advertised as a seminar
wtf it was a seminar and not a school
It was still a scam though you stupid fuck.
It's more like I don't understand why you would want an attention seeking literal limpwristed faggot to get paid money to talk to kids.
'cause the kids invited him.
This was a good Idea OP.
Post another one. I vote for this.
But then we'd all love him?
It looks even worse for the safe-space brigade if they chimped out because the University itself invited him.
It's not America's fault that Europe's childless empress Angela Merkel is retarded enough to try and adopt hundreds of thousands of illiterate poor fucks from Africa/Middle east.
But the college didn't invite him. The Berkeley College Republicans is not legally affiliated with the actual college.
Just realized America isn't brown, but sunburned white.
Of course, the US of A is the only country which trains good scientists...
becoming a better person is for fags. all I need is more money.
you can too both
okay, so a group of students invited him.
And then the college using their freedom as a private organization wouldn't allow him to use their facilities.
More like BPD was forced to cancer his event when the SJWs chimped out.
But that didn't happen either.
She's literally a white Nyuorican. Why is she calling herself brown?
If the college receives federal or state funding, which it does, it should comply by constitutional standards.
But that didn't happen either.
Yeah. Editing comics is a useful hobby.
This. Hillary would make a decent center-right Republican
Changing the dialogue
C'mon user, it's a dumb comic already, don't make yourself dumber by suggesting that it's a one to one copy with dudes in and then shoving in a hyperbolic right-wing caricature of twitter autists.
I swear to Christ everyone is getting upset over the dumbest shit these days.
Forced to cancer his event
I'd say his involvement made that redundant, user.
t. user getting upset over the dumbest thing
Yes, faggots are indeed a cancer on society. Some manner of solution should be found for this problem.
The college has absolutely zero obligation to let Milo speak.
That would be the opposite of America, eh?
Then all federal funding to UC Berkeley should be cut.
damn you kinda right desu
i should detach from this shit before
what did God put us here for
what sort of purpose is this
Okay, that's fair, but I want consistency.
If I get a group of people together to strongarm the university from allowing a feminist speaker on campus then I'd like the same response from people like you.
But I know that won't happen.
The event was canceled before that
Then I guess you can't complain about all the "marxists" that get to talk at colleges. Its free speech after all.
I have no words to describe how this panel is ugly ...
All State funding too.
If said person were talking about the inferiority of other genders and races I would be willing to support them being barred regardless of gender or group. It's just hateful mob-riling bullshit.
If said person were talking about the inferiority of other genders and races I would be willing to support them being barred regardless of gender or group.
You mean like all the people who do nothing but spew hate at men and white people?
Y'know, the faculty?
why aren't these pro-tolerance people tolerant to people spouting intolerance, HMMM?
Why? Not lettig a paid speaker give a speech is not a violation of freedom of speech.
The college should let the man speak, (if they already invited him), but students should protest if they dislike his views, while not blocking others from viewing if they so wish
Protests shouldn't be about stopping things immediately, it's more democratic signalling than anything else when used effectively
Again - they're perfectly fine with people spouting intolerance if they're aimed at the right targets.
People who condemn Milo will then go on Twitter tirades about killing cops and silencing white men just for being white.
If they're acting like that, yeah. Feel free to name some actual examples so I can agree with you.
This doesn't have to be a 1 vs 1 thing, user. I can agree with you if I want to, if you actually make a good point. And the point I agree with is that if someone is speaking a lot of hateful nonsense just to incite anger and bigotry, regardless of its target, they shouldn't be allowed to speak at a private institution if said institution wants to bar them from speaking.
A privately-owned organization shouldn't have to be forced to let some asshole come speak in their facilities. That's stupid. If he wants free speech, he needs to do it in a public setting, because that's what the first amendment actually covers.
The event was canceled before that
Then I guess you can't complain about all the "marxists" that get to talk at colleges. Its free speech after all.
When was the last time a conservative group caused thousands of dollars worth of property damage and forced campus police to shut down a leftist's event?
Do you have any evidence of this?
A conservative student group on campus invited him and raised the funding necessary to have him there. It was shut down over concerns of violence from the protestors, which turned out to be sadly very valid.
Just like how all girls cut you off from getting laid. :^)
Can you actually prove that it is?
A privately-owned organization shouldn't have to be forced to let some asshole come speak in their facilities.
I don't think UC Berkely is privately owned...
And people who support Milo will go on to say gas the kikes and kill all blacks.
See, I can make sweeping generalizations too.
There is no benefit in letting Milo speak, he's not there to engage in a discussion he's there to say fuck liberals.
They Antifa guy who was assaulted that kid with bike lock was a professor.
Not in this economy, you cannot.
if they already invited him
They didn't. A separate group invited him, the school was going to let him use their facilities, students complained that he was a faggot and they canceled his appearance
and raised the funding necessary to have him there.
They didn't raise any funds.
Maybe you're right, I'll admit I'm not sure. That being said, I don't think it quite qualifies as a public forum either, especially if his speech constituted an event. Rules might be different for organized events from someone just being there and talking about stuff.
Your mistake is assuming is that I have to tolerate the intolerant which is contradictory as fuck. If I tolerate intolerance then I'm engaging in intolerance myself.
there needs to be some benefit to allow someone to speak
And who gets to decide what this "benefit" will be?
See, I can make sweeping generalizations too.
You generalization seems to imply that everyone with a gripe against Milo is righteous. They're not. Many are just as bad as him, but they get a pass because they go after acceptable targets. That's all I'm saying.
That's a claim, I asked for evidence.
My implication is that both sides have cartoonishly stupid assholes who also happen to be the ones that come to mind when everyone considers them. If you count yourself as a supporter of Milo and you're NOT a racist, then that's very good! You might be a reasonable human. You should then understand that those generalizations don't apply across the board, and my point is that again this applies both ways.
Hey shut the fuck up about Milo unless you want to edit him into the comic.
A student group invited him.
I don't tolerate intolerance
every opinion I disagree with is intolerance
You should try the original.
14% of Berkeley's funds come from the public. It is a private organization.
A student group invited him.
30 students should speak for the 40,000 total students
students should speak for the 40,000 total students
So you're saying... fuck minorities?
Well then they wouldn't mind if that 14% is withdrawn then.
Kek. That should become a thing. It'd trigger so many people.
I'm saying that group of 30 people is not the student body.
Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying
Good thing you don't get to make that decision huh.
nobody in the US says "go to university"
here you say "I am going to a university"
or "i'm going to college"
i know in a lot of the world, that's how you say it, but in the US you would sound like a robot
of course, i've never read the book this is mocking so if that's how it was originally then nevermind, i'll shut up
So they don't get to invite people they want to hear? Their opinion doesn't matter if the rest of the student population deems it so?
Why don't we apply that same logic to the population at large. I'm sure LGBTQRSTUV fags won't mind that logic being applied to, let's say marriage laws.
America is actually invests in education at a higher rate than many developed countries, even at a per capita basis. But just like their investment in health care, the results have been abysmal. It just demonstrates that diminishing returns does happen. And it really doesn't matter how much a country invests in education if the degree they majored in (which is mostly non-STEMM) isn't economically viable or guarantees actual employment.
If the majority of the population doesn't want their tuition money going towards it then their opinion doesn't matter. Since they are a separate organization they could have paid to rent a hall off campus to do it.
I'm sure LGBTQRSTUV fags won't mind that logic being applied to, let's say marriage laws.
False equivalency, Berkeley is a private institution and can use its facilities as it wants, the government cannot discriminate based on sexuality
Just like the 100% girls don't mind laughing at your small penis.
Wasn't Milo the one that got molested as a kid?
No, he said that it wasn't molestation because all gay men are sexual predators and he was preying on the older man.
Do you have some exact quotations on that?
too real man ;_;
You can listen to the interview where he talks about how it's not molestation here
and him arguing with Joe Rogan about it where he admits to attending parties with young boys as entertainment
Berkeley is a private institution
UC Berkeley is a public university senpai
If you really want to piss off Gabby Rivera, just draw America getting pounded by a white guy and loving it.
Only 14% of its funding is public fampai. That's less than some private universities
Or just give her her old girlfriend back.
Holy shit you are literally afraid of different opinions. If your ideas are so superior you should be able to easily argue your point against them instead of shouting them down like a mongoloid.
Fighting for tolerance of intolerant ideas is asinine
Die cis scum.
No, it's called Freedom of Speech.
Good thing that private organizations don't have to give platforms for that
the cis scum
Don't have to bake cakes for gay couples either.
It impinges on their civil rights.
Yeah you do, a bakery is a public business, the complete opposite of a private organisation.
It's a public college, this is also discrimination based on views. It protects people from this bullshit whether you agree or not and I say this as someone who doesn't like milo at all and as a democrat. If you feel the need to use violence to silence people than fuck off.
Private organizations don't have to recognize civil rights, only the government.
They do when the law says that you can't discriminate based on sexual orientation.
A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.
You're an idiot.
It's a public college
Only 14% public. And no one used violence to silenced him, it was canceled before the "riot".
Only the government can't discriminate based on sexual orientation.
See how dumb it sounds in any other context?
Only the government can't discriminate based on sexual orientation
How did you come to that conclusion?
A private business doesn't have to serve certain people if they don't want to.
Just like a private college doesn't have to give a platform to certain people if they don't want to.
What part of that has to do with intolerant speech? Do you honestly not know the difference between "I hate Jews" and "All Jews should be murdered?"
It could be 1% public funding it's still a public institution. Also, no, it was canceled BECAUSE of the riot you idiot. One that broke windows and ruined the hall.
It's true that sexual orientation is not a protected class under federal laws but it varies from state to state and even then that doesn't mean you can discriminate against gays.
Private organizations can't also go against the civil rights act which mean no discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation or race.
that doesn't mean you can discriminate against gays.
They're just not serving them. They're not obligated. They can go to other bakeries.
No, you can refuse service to anyone as long as that refusal isn't based on race, creed, sexual orientation, etc.
So they can't go against the civil right act, but denying constitutional rights is just fine? Interesting priorities.
You're a close minded tool. If your perspective is so superior you should be able to argue it against right wing speakers instead of being afraid of their words.
The civil rights act says nothing about sexual orientation.
Nice try, but it's actually an extremely vital defense mechanism against bacteria. It's unhealthy not to have a good protective layer of it.
Based on their sexual orientation.
It would be the same thing if a darkie didn't wanna serve honkies in his barbershop if they are white.
If his barbershop was appointment only and they barged in demanding a haircut he would boot them out.
But Milo's appearance wasn't a debate???
The first amendment is for citizens to have freedom of speech that the government cannot muzzle. it has nothing to do with non governmental bodies.
Just like the right to bear arms might not apply within private property.
I wonder now what if a bakery refusing to make gay wedding cakes is owned and managed by a muslim that says it's against his religion.
Americans say "I'll write you" instead of "I'll write to you".
I love when people try to do this and act like liberal organization don't fight for all religious freedom.
You know somebody actually didbthis and guess what?
Most muslim bakeries took the job
In fact there's a higher percentage of Muslim americans who support gay marriage then there are evangelical Christians.
wtf? they do that?
There's an order of operations for who matters more and muslims >gay people. If it was a muslim person they would have protested gay people.
Yeah, just like the ACLU would never fight for the rights of Christians.
The ACLU is a completely unique entity completely dissimilar to the left or right.
Except when it comes to that War on Christmas, right?
non american here. Can someone explain thise meme to me?
And yet the Orlando shooting wasn't carried out by a white christian.
Oh, so NOW the ACLU is considered neutral...
ACLU is liberal though.
I wouldn't cut him off from laying me ;)
muslims cannot be american citizens.
Just recently the ACLU defended Ann Coulter and Milo Yiannopoulos on the grounds of free speech violation, they aren't a partisan group
There's this idea that saying "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas" is erasing the holiday or something
White Christians applauded the Orlando Pulse nightclub shootings.
Liberals in America are autistically anti-Christian and do whatever they can to erase it from public.
Or the 100% men who call you fat?
I'm liberal. It believes in free speech in a way that's antiquated at this point because the fucking millennials act like fucking triggered violent assholes. For some reason, you think I'm republican because I don't like muslims. No I don't like muslims because I'm gay and most of them are fucking scum.
You know how in the US you're supposed to say Happy Hollidays instead of Merry Christmas because the latter might offend non-Christians? Well, that attitude doesn't exist in a vacuum.
But they are liberal.
Cuckservative media pretending there's a war on christians in murrika so the right wing waste their time talking about it and ignores that their libertarians politicians are big industry shills.
Just like the "lefty" media (actually neoliberal as fuck) uses gay and nigger issues to keep the "left" occupied while obama gives their country to the jewish bankers a little more.
who do I trust?
The American conservatives have decried the ACLU for years as being a liberal institution for fighting to stop tax payer money funding Christian holiday festivities. They also defend Muslims who have to wear head coverings for religious reasons and Jews that have to have the Sabbath off.
They also defend Christians religious rights too.
There was a time where being liberal didn't have negative connotations.
it always did.
You just see it more often on facebook now.
And it's the liberals' own fault that happened.
They also defend male genital mutilation on behalf of Jews and Muslims. See, they're all for religious freedom!
cutting your foreskin is an american tradition.
Yeah, thanks for agreeing with my point
Civil rights are liberal?
Defending constitutional freedoms is apparently these days.
if you call that a girl
Also an African one.
In fact there's a higher percentage of Muslim americans who support gay marriage then there are evangelical Christians.
You have to be naive to think Muslims would openly admit their personal views in a poll or surveys. I should know, I have friends and family who are Muslims, and what they advocate in public is completely different to what they personally believe. The number of anti-homosexual and anti-Semitic attacks in my country are disproportionately high for Muslims, no matter how much the media tells the country that the culprits are straight, male, Christian/secularists.
This is despite the fact that the news indicate claims Muslims are on pair or even more tolerant of Jews/homosexuals than the average Westerner. I mean, is it really hard for you people to understand that a group of a different culture that believes it's acceptable to stone homosexuals might be more dangerous than the group that believes homosexual acts are a sin, but won't advocate the death penalty for those guilty of it?
In my country
Unless your country is america I don't think this applies?
I mean like, motherfucker they come here to get AWAY from you.
They don't call the "African Americans" over there?
That's pretty insensitive, you know.
Religion is a race
Your bait's pretty confusing fampai.
Muslims are still disproportionately responsible for crimes against homosexuals and Jews regardless. Actions speak louder than words, and claiming more Muslims support gay marriage doesn't negate the fact that they still have a higher number of crazy fundamentalists that don't have a problem starting a Orlando nightclub shooting-level massacre. I would rather have a majority of Christians disagreeing with me over same-sex marriage than a portion of Muslims willing to resort to violence to enforce their views.
Implying there aren't violent, crazy bastards in the evangelical christian ranks
That means their propaganda is working. You've been rused user.
Ignore poll results, this anecdotal evidence carries more weight
Well, for one, there is no Christian version of ISIS burning people alive in cages or beheading homosexuals.
ISIS are muslims
Burning people alive is explicitly forbidden.
Ever heard of a country called Uganda?
The Orlando nightclub shooting incident was the deadliest mass shooting in United States history. There's literally no recorded incident of a Christian, Jew, or atheistic homophobe that can match that level of gun violence against the LGBT community. Kind of like how there's no Christian or secular terrorist attack on par with 9/11. Muslims just seem to be better at committing terrorism for whatever reason.
Pretty sure we called them nazis.
ISIS aren't muslims
Well, they are certainly not Zoroastrians or Taoists.
Fuck your dubtrips. You actually managed to make me giggle.
But no for real, they're as close to being muslims as the Jonestown cultists were to being christians.
Can you explain how?
"Gee why is Sup Forums shit now?"
But user, there's been more people killed in non-Muslim terrorist attacks in the US if you conveniently begin counting in the year 2002 and end counting in the year 2015!
Because for example, you can claim to be a Christian all you want, but the second you start knowlingly breaking commandments and harming/persecuting others, you've committed a crime against God.
For clarity, the Jonestown cultists committed mass suicide, and they also assassinated a Congressman.
I mean, fuck if I've ever read the Quran, but if burning people alive is expressly forbidden that's a pretty good example.
we say both of those actually
i have no idea why
What if it's encouraged, so long as the people being burned are the right kind of people?
Encouraged by who? The violent fuckos you've surrounded yourself with, or the holy book you claim to follow?
/b/ lied to you. Go wash your dick.
Then how come they want to force bakeries to make gay wedding cakes but aren't helping the kid who wanted a Trump birthday cake and a shop refused to bake it? Not that I think anyone should have to do either but it shows the ACLU is a biased left wing organization.
I mean, Christians have at least one commmandment that says "Don't kill people, moron." and Moses himself broke it.
Moses, historically, was not actually a good person or a good christian.
Sahih Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes."
Seems like burning is alright.
... Considering he was a jew I realize how stupid that was. I'm sorry. I need to go to bed.
The basic idea is that it's wrong to burn muslims, which they have done. They burned the muslim pilot from Jordan alive. It was a big deal.
what is the Oklahoma city bombings.
It's not criminals, it's normal people who shoot firearms. Fuck's sake, here in the UK I can walk into a gun shop and just buy a .22 suppressor with no problems or license. If I want one for a firearm, I need it on the ticket, but they're easier to get than the guns they're for.
Only in the US are suppressors seen as 'Muh super dangerous assassin weapon tool!' Everywhere else, they're common as mud and even encouraged by police because they keep down noise pollution, are pretty much mandatory for pest control and small game shooting (how Americans do this without suppressors, I don't know) and are a safety device that reduce hearing damage.
Because no kid actually wants a trump cake, that's clearly his parents using the kid's birthday as a prop for their political beliefs.
Also, just to continue my last post, suppressors are already legal in the US, you just need the tax stamp and the ATF paperwork nonsense. Which is stupid. Just let people buy suppressors.
Not a shooting?
They're not Muslims if they are heretics who have sided with the Great Satan.
Thisthread sure does have a lot to do with a guy editing a dumb comic
And I'm sure faggots rolling up to a Christian Bakery and forcing them to get involved in a ceremony they want no part of has nothing to do with politics.
Americans don't need silencers, there no need because America is a fuckhuge place you silly little brit.
This is what happens when OP fails to deliver.
First of all yes plenty of kids would and all kids opinions at that age are based on what their parents taught them. I'm sure their was never a problem with an Obama cake. And second and much more importantly it doesn't matter who wanted the cake and for what reason. Either we are in the business of forcing people to bake cakes or we aren't (and we shouldn't be, if you have a problem with a company just boycott them).
Is this even an actual thing though user? Was there really a kid whobsaid mommy I wanted a trump cake for my birthday and they for some reason went to a bakery instead of making it at home and the bakery refused? Or is this purely hypotheticalsituation that you made up?
I tried to help but it was too late.
has nothing to do with politics
That's right, it's was never about politics. They just wanted a wedding cake.
Except even in the US, you get people complaining about the noise of firearm reports. Most of the US population lives in very concentrated areas of population in close proximity to one another. In addition, you're ignoring the two other very valid and useful reasons to use a suppressor; first for hearing purposes and second for hunting.
In addition, making suppressors harder to own hasn't impacted violent crime or gun violence, so their prohibition has no practical purpose. In fact, it would probably be a small benefit due to the increased taxation from sales and the boom of suppressor manufacture that would be sure to follow the relaxation of the law.
No, it was deliberately about politics. They did it to make a point.
So my takeaway from this thread is that all bakers are assholes.
first for hearing purposes
second for hunter
Here's an idea, bowhunting.
Google it dude. It's the top result.
Kids get obsessed with some strange things sometimes. Pic not trump , but related.
And the Christian Bakery was their only option? Don't be retarded user.
McVeigh was a self-avowed Agnostic and claimed his religion was Science.
Furthermore, the bombing had nothing (zero ) to do with Christian beliefs, it was a retaliation against the Feds for the Waco and Ruby Ridge incidents.
Ear protection is all well and good, but mistakes occur. And secondly, suppressors are used for hunting all manner of game by practically everyone outside of the US. If you're doing pest control on say, rabbits, a suppressor makes your life so much easier.
My 4-year-old nephew wants to dress up as David of David and Goliath fame. The actual biblical story. They're not even a hyper religious family, he just for whatever reason has an action figure of david and he's locked onto that.
Kids are dumb.
wearing ear plugs out innnawoods
Well I always wear hearing protection even when I'm using my CZ with a suppressor on it, but the point is that suppressors are perfectly normal things to have on a rifle and having them be unrestricted in the US makes sense.
Here's an idea, bowhunting.
Have you ever been bowhunting? I did once and I will never do it again. Much less human way to kill a deer than a 30-06
Okay, while we're having this discussion, can I ask in as reasonable a tone as I can why we weren't able to pass legislation to make it harder for people on a terrorism watch list to get a gun?
Depends on which list we're talking about. If it's the "No Fly List", then the fact that you can be put on it without due process or even being told you're being put on it would be a pretty good reason.
Because of the NRA
She forgot pride is Pepsi.
Because nobody could come with a reasonable explanation for how exactly someone's name ends up on a "terrorism" watch list.
Fucking Ted Kennedy's name ended up on a no-fly list IIRC.
Because that watch list requires no due process and is unconstitutional. Do you not believe in civil liberties?
Something definitive and perfect to the point there would be no need for further attempts at finding a solution?
A bombing, not a shooting
A attack on American civilians in general, not the LBGT specifically
A secular politically motivated terrorist attack due to Ruby Ridge and Waco
Still lower than 9/11
Same reason why we don't ban people on the no fly list from voting, or just throw them all in jail. There's serious constitutional concerns about the No Fly List as it is..
Bakers are assholes
And you think this matters because....
It matters because it's less than some "private" colleges get on top of the fact that just because an organization receives funds from the government doesn't make it a government institution. If that were the case then it would mean that Hollywood studios and major league sports teams were government institutions.
If you can't see why America is a great comic, then you are whats rong with comics fans
The writer of America, everybody
What the fuck is a "POC party"
white girls are a dominant marjoriy and Gabby is trying to promote the latinx minority, thats why she doesnt repost white girl tweets! its a heroic stand you dumb shits its not racism
Gabby Rivera is bad. Alexis Sergio is a nazi.
How fucking ignorant are you?
thats cuz white men have made all the comcis since the fucking 1940s and no one else had gotten a chance. shes not saying white men cant ever write agan shes angry that only white men ever had the cnance
Alexis Sergio does not hate white men in comics. My ass.
Fair thing to be mad about, stupid way to go about being angry about it.
Especially since everyone takes the internet seriously these days.
She hates OLD white men. So fuck Xavier and Magneto. Those guys are assholes anyway.
I'm gonna get corrected either way
Pretty sure she means old white men MAKING comics.
Well shit, WE hate those guys too.
She with quote marks and a wink.
its not enough to have all teh power in life and the world you have to shit on every woman who criticises white mens shit! unfuckingbelieveable how fragile men ad the male ego are
"She's" just as bad.
OP is a piece of shit and his comic bastardization is not funny
When her dick is up your cuck ass, will you still say she? Or will you just thank your daddy like a sub is supposed to.
Your first part is irrelevant fluff. There are government agencies with negative government funding.
Your second part is also irrelevant. Berkeley is part of the state UC system. The rules under which it's run are decided by the state owned Regents, and the legislature directly. All the faculty and almost all the staff are covered by public sector unions.
In fact the governance of the system is literally specified in the state constitution. Where the hell is all this private stuff coming from?
It's still not clear where you're going with this argument anyways.
Basically private organization means discrimination is okay.
Took ya a half hour to Google that stuff huh?
Because you want some white dick, Gabby. Just be honest with yourself.
Because most respectable colleges require not being retarded to get in, and without retards, conservatives wouldn't get any votes
Well, the UC's are as much private organizations as your local public high school.
Don't kid yourself. Stupid /pol/ bullshit on an autosaging thread isn't worth a best effort. Not when there's a thread on mime traps active.
While Neocons autistically shove religion down everyone's throat with legislation that restricts reproductive rights in the name of "muh moral superiority"
Why do we need a comic to prove that America is a piece of shit when her own comics do it perfectly? This is just going to unite feminists against you fags, as always.
OP is once again a fag. The original edits to the Whor comic were funny because all they did was swap the gender pronouns more or less and made it sound fucking awful as a way of proving how bad the dialogue was. OP's just crams in epic memes.
telling corporations to go fuck themselves
Works for Marvel, which works for Disney
One of the most valuable and dominant corporations in existence
Also, words are violence.
Now, I'm a Puerto Rican raised in NC and I don't really ID as anything other than a PR because I'm the dark skinned variety, but holy fuck what the hell is wrong with her? I think the only time I'm ever afraid of a white guy is the redneck types at gas stations because I'm dark brown and have a bushy beard.
I have never been to college and am underage
This is what happens when you get all of your opinions from an echo chamber on Sup Forums.
I think the craziest pronoun I ever got in college was a "they", maybe a "xir" if you count that weird furry but who the fuck cares about furries?
Nothing stopping anyone with a computer and internet connection from publishing their own comic.
Were being raided again. Who posted this thread to reddit?
-Cite page numbers/year of publishing. Particularly since this seems to be a response to multiple publications by the same author.
-Don't use exclamation marks
-Don't start sentences with yet (or conjunctions in general)
-First four examples of perpetuating harm are not explained. Back up your points with evidence but then explain why the evidence supports your claim at all.
-'woman of color philosopher' is awkwardly worded as the natural tendency is to read 'color' as an adjective effecting 'philosopher' not 'woman'.
-Don't use abbreviations (HAR FUCKING HAR IRONY YES I'M AWARE)
-She actually isn't describing her work as critical. She's saying that her work takes place at a critical intersection.
Get the fuck back to high school and learn to write formally.