No paranormal claims, no hype, nothing fancy -- just plain common sense, political acumen, investigative talent, and various other skills.
The relevant prediction was this one:
>2. Hillary's deleted 33K emails won't resurface. KimDotCom and Mike Cernovich are lying or deluded. These emails may be in the hands of a foreign SIGINT (via either passive interception or active CNE against MTA endpoints), but in any event, there's no neat little parcel of 33K deleted emails that's going to drop before the election.
And what do you know? Not only was KimDotCom lying -- after leading the gullible Redditors and noobs on here around like headless chickens, he came out with a save concerning passive SIGINT interception (that wasn't intended as part of my prediction, so don't give me credit for that -- just a nice synchronicity).
Here are just some of the many action-packed hype threads that occurred on Sup Forums over the last 24 hours:
Look at all those gullible folks insulting those of us trying to instill reason.
Now, you may be wondering about KimDotCom's tweet from 1 Dec 2014 in which he claims to be Hillary's "worst nightmare" for 2016. What I didn't bother to mention in those hype threads -- wishing to save it for this autopsy -- is that the 2014 tweet was taken out of context. It was based on Kim's desire to launch the Internet Party in the US, and a whole series of tweets from Kim on the same day reference the Internet Party -- including, wait for it, this is going to show how dumb the Redditors here are, a news article with the headline "‘Hillary’s worst nightmare’: Kim Dotcom flags US Internet Party launch"
this. If they can't help themselves, they can't help anyone else.
Nathan Morales
I read your top 5. predictions. You are 100% right.
I have been here long enough to realize that we're right about everything but presidential elections.
I think it will be a good thing for us, we will still continue to be counter culture while recruiting the disenfranchised from Hillary's camp.
>inb4 ctr shill
kek is chaos, and you have been asking for chaos, so seek and ye shall find
William Allen
wrong, wait until next week
John Moore
What did he mean by this?
Parker Jenkins
Fuck me ffs. I posted in a couple of those breads, I'll admit it.
Nathan Peterson
Sage and shit in OP's shill mouth.
Landon Adams
Dubs of truth
Isaac Martinez
you must feel so special larping
Benjamin Jackson
The pic? After fooling the Redditors and noobs, he left them with blue balls by telling them to ask the NSA for the emails.
Actually, his technical details are off. X-KEYSCORE is used for tasking real-time filtering through the use of selectors, not for searching databases (neither partial nor full-take). As an analogy, it's the constraints that guide Google's crawler for indexing, not a Google search itself.
Carson Gray
...
Blake Sanchez
wow you're fucking stupid
sage goes in all fields
Noah Cook
>predicting the most likely thing >i'm a fucking prophet
I posted this in another Kim dotcom thread, but just to drive the point home and rule up some retards, I'll post it again:
It was so much fun watching you trump zombies freak out this morning, "oh shit guys it's really happening this time, this is the end for HRC". I had a good laugh when nothing happened. It'll be fun watching you idiots kill yourselves when Clinton becomes the nations president.
Justin Turner
>tfw neo-pol doesn't appreciate u
its alright lad...i do
Jonathan Bennett
THIS YOU GAY BOYS
CTR WORKS HARD
Brody Bennett
He was making a point that they used the tool on him during his investigation, but didn't use it on Hillary Clinton
Christopher Hill
RedProphet is a nofunallowed faggot.
He is not Australian
He is a faggot pls sage
Andrew Reed
I didn't really expect the 33k emails but it would have been a field day for Sup Forums if they were real.
Blake Jenkins
You'll notice that a lot of people insult me because I make the "most likely" predictions. That's not an insult at all! OF COURSE I'm making the most likely predictions! As I said, no paranormal claims, no hype, nothing fancy, just plain common sense. The hilarious thing is that many of the people insulting me for making the most likely predictions do so in those hype threads in which they're buying the hype. If you look at some of the user IDs insulting me in those hype threads for making the most likely predictions, you can see their other posts in which they're buying the hype. baka.
Josiah Peterson
...
Logan Cooper
Sure thing, bro!
Dylan Evans
didn't catch your first thread, pretty spot on I'd say.
Dylan Perez
see
Jayden Bailey
>LARPing this hard I'd tell you to keep an eye on that faggotry, but it appears it's already consumed you
Kayden Clark
Cool story, bro! But not even /r/the_donald and Alex Jones are linking to it. What does that tell you?
Nicholas Thomas
>If you look at some of the user IDs insulting me in those hype threads for making the most likely predictions, you can see their other posts in which they're buying the hype
Being this autistic
Carson Morales
Also, nice 'drome. 28882 emails. Coooool.
Benjamin Taylor
Lots of butthurt over my correct prediction. I appreciate the compliments from those who miss the old /pol.
Luis Allen
We mock you because trying to get anons on this board to stop being sensationalist retards is a fools errand that we have all tried before.
You see there are trolls that purposely post sensationalist shit. Then some anons join in the game, and perhaps a few legitimate retards actually buy in the hype. Add in a few coincidences and it becomes a happening.
Christopher Evans
sorry but there is no reasonable explanation for his actions IF Hillary is rly this evil and corrupted. He was bought which i doubt very much, or all that evil crooked hillary meme is a total joke, which i start to believe.
Joseph Adams
The sun will come up tomorrow George soros is rich The news will say positive stuff about Hillary
Anyone have a good prophecy name for me I wanna reference back to this post tomorrow
Jordan Edwards
You forget Kim is a genius. He not only destroyed the Russia boogeyman, Hillary is shilling hardest. He will deliver when launching megaupload 2.0
Hudson Davis
OP is legit autistic.
"I am the red prophet, I will predict the most logical and obvious outcome of certain scenarios, worship me."
fucking kek.
Ryder Sanders
Incidentally, my name is RedProphet because I make redpilled predictions. I don't leave people with blue balls.
As for CTR, that's an error fueled by /r/the_donald. They think /r/politics is an arm of CTR, but this doesn't explain the following observations (copy-paste from one of my user posts):
1. During the primaries, anti-Hillary material completely dominated /r/politics. This was Berner activity. Why couldn't CTR operate then?
2. When Hillary collapsed on 9/11, that completely dominated /r/politics. Why? Because Berners had hope she could be replaced.
3. Recently, when Bernie spoke about the billion-dollar mergers (a la Trump), that dominated /r/politics.
4. A post on /r/the_donald that speaks fondly of Bernie in relation to Trump will get 4,000+ net upvotes and sit on /r/all. (If Trumpers were smart, they'd use this fact to dominate both /r/all and /r/politics.)
So I posit that it's not CTR fucking up the Internet but Berners who are following the shit-head geriatric down his myopic path of supporting Hillary.
Chase Carter
The point is your predictions are fucking worthless to us. All faggots make predictions but there are zero consequences when they're wrong, especially not here on an anonymous board.
Hope at least gets people motivated.
You're just an attention whore.
Elijah Bailey
Someone tweet this to kimdotcom so he takes it as a challenge and releases em haha
Charles Garcia
Boring
Angel Russell
>trying to get credit for saying something on an anonymous imageboard, or worse, thinking anybody cares about you
Juan James
>replying to a tripfag
Lucas Taylor
Can't wait til next cycle, when I can finish the destabilization of the Democrats.
I'll even use their prophet Alinsky's tactics against them.
Brayden Cruz
Canada tier tripfagging. Ignore, he's a sheepshagger with a proxy
Benjamin Adams
Weird rationalizations, bro.
If more people making predictions tripcoded, there'd be more accountability for wrong predictions.
For all I know, you could be in those hype threads saying "ANY DAY NOW!!!"
"Hope at least gets people motivated." Escapism is bluepilled.
"You're just an attention whore." I bet you're just the type who swoons over "GUYS, I'M AN INSIDER AT THE FBI (lol?) WHO KNOWS WHERE ALL THE BODIES ARE BURIED, AND I HAVE AN OMNISCIENT KNOWLEDGE CURRENT AND FUTURE EVENTS. ALSO, Sup Forums IS REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT TO THIS ELECTION."
Dominic Reyes
oldfriend here
Keep doing what you're doing, you're chemoing the reddit
Anthony Phillips
>"I am the red prophet, I will predict the most logical and obvious outcome"
tfw ppl think that's an insult
Jason Bailey
Good tripfag, if more anons had your skeptical attitude Sup Forums would be unstoppable
Oliver Harris
My problem with you, is that you aren't making predictions.
You know a lot more than you let on, and you're trying to obfuscate that.
Luis Watson
Congrats, I guess. I was hyped for it, I admit. But what difference does it make to you if people were hyped about it? It's a big deal to many people that she be exposed. Many of us have seen undeniable corruption and were hoping, this time, that we'd see someone in power actually held to account.
You were right, but there's no need to be smug about. Unless smugness is your thing, in which case... carry on.
Austin Wood
Rationale for my activity:
I depend mostly on common sense and political acumen. My goal isn't to be impressive for the sake of being impressive. I don't regard my predictions as impressive.
I'm astounded by the paucity of political acumen, though. I still see people rallying for Bernie to replace Hillary. I see thousands of people doing pointless change.org petitions. I see people who honestly believe a candidate who got a free pass on 18 USC 793 (f) will get knocked out of the race a week or two before the election on FEC violations and technicalities. I see people who think Trump is Brexit 2.0 and who think their little Hillary gotchas are enough to counter the oppressive weight of the MSM machine. I see people cherry-picking polls. I see people who evidently don't know the ways of hype and buzz, the ways of the shyster.
Nathaniel Adams
>I see people who evidently don't know the ways of hype and buzz, the ways of the shyster.
You will get bored, frustrated and Sup Forums won't change. They can't even control themselves from replying to bait posts.
I can tell you're very new, as you haven't yet come to recognize the patterns that repeat on this board.
Dylan Martinez
What do you mean by knowing more than I let on? I'm flattered, but by my own admission, none of my predictions require any sort of occult or insider knowledge. I'd LOVE for my predictions to be wrong, but reality when it comes to the Clintons is actually pretty boring. Trust your cynical instincts on anything Clinton.
Joseph King
Who will win Trump or Hillary?
You're probably Nate Bronze from Aussie proxy.
Nolan Garcia
Whether autistic trolls or paid shills, the result is the same and Sup Forumsacks never learn.
Michael Cox
who are you? we, /pol\, will figure it out eventually. no way you know these things without having inside knowledge
Joshua Brown
You're probably right, but I don't recall Sup Forums ever being this gullible. I get called a CTR shill, but isn't it more likely that CTR would be spreading those stories that never pan out?
Aaron Diaz
>ever being this gullible It's been progressively getting worse since the primary started. However, the pivotal event was when various leftist media blogs started hard linking Sup Forums directly.
Furthermore, don't forget a big chunk of the userbase was banned for posting CTR's exec's name
Landon Edwards
>but isn't it more likely that CTR would be spreading those stories that never pan out?
I don't doubt it. Remember how prior to Assange having his internet cut out, there were much more Wikileaks threads? Anons would just look for stuff, but now those threads are gone and all we have are Kim Dotcom sensationalism and anons shitposting that Wikileaks may be compromised, i.e. that Assange is dead.
The common factor is that the crowdsourced through Wikileaks was hit hard.
Don't forget we have disinfo threads of "leaks" posted on Scribd. I do think there is a coordinated push on Sup Forums to spread disinfo so we get distracted from actually being productive: reading through all the leaks and posting on social media what we find.
Dylan Allen
The common factor is that the crowdsourced investigation of wikileaks leaks was hit hard.*
Ethan Ross
Hillary. It's prediction #4 in my original thread.
As an unfalsifiable counterfactual, I also offered my thoughts that Trump should've played the post-primary game a lot smarter. This ethics-reform thing should've been part of his 24/7 messaging from the start (who wouldn't want to drain the swamp, impose limits, etc.?). He should've done more to paint Hillary as the nuclear-war, dangerous candidate.
Also, people thought that just because Trump beat the Republican establishment in the primaries that he could take on the full weight of both establishments and the MSM machine. This was folly. The Clintons play a lot dirtier than effete Jeb! It was crazy talk to think people would ignore the MSM drum because muh anti-establishment candidate. If the MSM gave Clinton even a third of the negative attention they give Trump, she'd be behind 50 points -- that's the power of the MSM, and people were insane to doubt it.
Leo Richardson
Civil War or naw?
Samuel Morgan
Reminder: 2 more weeks and CTR will be gone
Matthew Campbell
What have I predicted that would require inside knowledge? Why do you think those who are insulting me call my predictions the most likely, most obvious outcomes? Because they are.
It's not as if I'm predicting stock prices or giving details on sensational events. There's nothing sensational about my predictions -- that's the point of them. A Hillary victory is the conventional wisdom, assured by talking heads, betting markets, and polling. My other predictions are simply based on many years of watching kooks, cranks, hype-mongers, and shysters -- and the patterns by which they operate. You can pretty much bet your life savings on them over-hyping and under-delivering. Dodgy marketers employ the same tricks during pre-launches of dud products.
I'd LOVE for my predictions to be wrong, but that's not how reality works with the Clintons.
Blake Hernandez
The reason why people don't like you is because your predictions are, exactly as you put it, cynical. They derive from the lowest common denominator.
What you're missing is that when something we'd generally want to happen ends up actually taking place, it happens against the odds, so your cynical approach is in essence tautology, and your success rate is basic beginner's luck. People sense that, and also sense that you see yourself as prophetic, and so it doesn't add up. Hence why you are disliked.
You are in essence a defeatist. No one likes a defeatist. Especially one who thinks he's profound.
Adam Gomez
If wikileaks is compromised they will release the emails except the bad ones, who knows if they will make fake ones like Hillary saving kitties, and people will believe it just because Kim said he sent it to wikileaks in twitter.
So it´s that the case, not only Kim didn´t do anything to Hillary in her birthday, but he said wikileaks are authentic making the work for Hillary. He was humiliated in his birthday and now he could be humiliated in her birthday.
I´m not attacking Kim but we can´t fight people like Hillary with ego.
Jordan Watson
Kim is just a big fat distraction. Literally just some tard who wants attention REALLY bad. Kim has nothing and never has had anything all he has is "HAPPENING" that leads to nothing.. attention.
Alexander Parker
>muh social cues of a retweet fuck off autist
The reason people don't like him is that he's autistic and hasn't actually predicted anything - if you make 1,000 claims and only one of them happens, you didn't make a prediction.
Aaron Jones
True that.
John Thompson
"kim dotcom genuinely believed wikileaks was going to release the emails because assange told him they would"
Kim's Twitter at the moment isn't that of a man who feels he's been let down. He's certainly not calling out Wikileaks or anything.
People were hyping Kim's 1 Dec 2014 "Hillary's worst nightmare" tweet, but it's a reference to the Internet Party, as other tweets on the same day show. He was going to start the Internet Party and give the duopoly a middle finger. It had nothing to do with emails.
sad but true. pol is very deluded these days, triggered by the slightest opposition. wake the fuck up.
Jackson Jenkins
For anyone who's not unaware, this Brit dude is an autist who's obsessed with me and follows me around, as autists are wont to do.
I called out James O'Keefe for riding the hype of a Hillary-is-a-racist video. On Sunday, O'Keefe sent out a retweet of Paul Joseph Watson asking about a Hillary-racist video dropping the next day. The retweet also included an article making the same point. In this O'Keefe cocksucker's mind, O'Keefe wasn't riding the hype and was just retweeting anything to do with him.
This British autist is also mad that he's not a high-functioning autist but a retard. Allow me to demonstrate: "The reason people don't like him is that he's autistic and hasn't actually predicted anything - if you make 1,000 claims and only one of them happens, you didn't make a prediction." As can be seen in my thread, I've made a mere 4 predictions and claimed ALL of them will be correct.
Nathan Martin
maybe you shouldn't use a trip then
Jaxson Robinson
Trip-bashing is passe. It's for newfags with low self-esteem who want to feel part of the cool crowd. Well-adjusted people don't give a fuck about tripcodes.
As some wise soul in my original thread said, making predictions is an ideal use case for tripcodes.
Nicholas Scott
The reason people got hyped up was because Kim had a very nice expensive bed he worked from, and is an obese man. The reference Trump made of a 400 lb hackers sitting on his bed was too coincidental so Sup Forums went crazy.
Owen Garcia
...
David White
>What you're missing is that when something we'd generally want to happen ends up actually taking place, it happens against the odds, so your cynical approach is in essence tautology
Reasoning of an escapist bluepilled faggot who can't handle reality and wants to live in fantasyland.
>and your success rate is basic beginner's luck.
So bluepilled he calls it luck rather than common fucking sense.
>People sense that, and also sense that you see yourself as prophetic, and so it doesn't add up.
Yeah, I see myself as prophetic, which is why I wrote, in this thread, "No paranormal claims, no hype, nothing fancy." And in the original thread, "They aren't paranormal skills by any means."
>Hence why you are disliked.You are in essence a defeatist. No one likes a defeatist. Especially one who thinks he's profound.
Lol, escapist bluepilled faggot mad that not everyone wants to jerk off to Alex Jones, Sorcha Faal, and "insider" anons. Face reality, you weak piece of shit. Facing reality is the first step to being able to change it.
Jordan Fisher
Looks like I struck a nerve haha.
Carter Morgan
Post of a 12-year-old.
Alexander Gray
Is that how old you were when the bad man touched you?
Ryan Carter
And there it is, OP rages when called out. Every time, like pottery.
Adam Nelson
Trolls thrive on triggering high effort posts from low effort comments. The fact that you fell for the bait means you have much to learn.
Austin Richardson
1488 You have my attention user.
Oliver Ramirez
Is the context Kim's tweets over the past week and such? I said he was lying (or, most charitably, hoping Wikileaks had something).
He wasn't lying in the 1 Dec 2014 tweet, though. That was the Redditors misinterpreting it.
Jordan White
go roleplay somewhere else faggot
Jaxson Walker
Good point. Shills and trolls don't ragefag. I'm definitely a ragefag. The gullibility around here does indeed drive me up the wall. I feel nostalgia for a time when Sup Forums wasn't this fucking gullible. I'm working on my emotional responses to such stimuli. Stay tuned.
Austin Johnson
The length/effort of my response was proportionate.
I can't be baited into raging, because I've already been raging for the past week or two. I am legitimately angry about the gullibility. I am already replying to almost everything in a state of rage.
Lucas Garcia
>I don't have basic control over my emotions Last shred of credibility: gone
Nolan Cook
I have control over my reason but not my emotions. In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
Dylan Watson
Pls don't post on my and my wife's son's board again.
I'd rather have a blacked.com thread than have your shitty post take up a slot.
Be gone Aussie loser.
Cameron Murphy
>Aspergers
Hunter Brooks
>taking Sup Forums this seriously
Julian Garcia
>emphasize most obvious Either you dont understand the semantics or you believe stating the obvious ingratiates you with your non-existent audience of dullards.
Jason Wood
he's not larping. he's just pointing out the obvious that you paranoid dumb-asses from reddit can't seem to see (probably because you're low IQ troglodytes)
Noah Myers
10/10 for making me reply twice but dumb newfags taking this board seriously - dumb retards actually putting an emotional investment into shit posted here is the height of idiocy. The fact that you slap on a trip and post essays via smokesignals on a mexican claymation discussion forum forces me to ask you: what the fuck are you even trying to accomplish? A thinly veiled 'no fun allowed' post like yours is cancer, anyone can make 4 fucking obvious predictions like that, eg
1. The next meme right-nationalist candidate that Sup Forums hypes will lose their election
2. The next end of the world prediction is fake
3. The next meme twitter celebrity that Sup Forums "discovers" will be later found to be a leftist plant and/or a jew
4. Mods will do something that's actually justied by the board rules but Sup Forums will be assmad for days about it.
Fucking dumb fucks
Blake Ortiz
Exactly. I claim to do nothing more than point out the obvious. I don't deserve any awards for that, nor do I expect any.
Benjamin Watson
Lay off the vaccines.
Isaiah Moore
>what the fuck are you even trying to accomplish?
I get to taste the tears of all these Redditors, which I find enjoyable. Look at the fourth reply in this thread: "wrong, wait until next week."
I also have a bit of a grudge over the fact that I get called a CTR shill for criticizing the Wikileaks/O'Keefe drip-drip strategies as desensitizing exercises in acclimating people to the new normal, amid a confusing blur of convoluted facts. I'm told that I'm a CTR shill who'll be crying when I see these "brilliant" strategies leading to Hillary's downfall, with a final coup de grace coming in the next week or so.