What would the right wing equivalent of Steven Universe even look like?

What would the right wing equivalent of Steven Universe even look like?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=D3vhpk7DhZM
laweekly.com/news/conservatives-are-more-likely-to-believe-lies-ucla-research-says-7896216
latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-conservative-believe-false-threats-20170202-story.html
researchgate.net/publication/235763966_Personality_correlates_of_party_preference_The_Big_Five_in_five_big_European_countries
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/31/business/la-fi-mh-conservatives-or-liberals-20140331
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Make it TV-PG or TV-14 please.

The same show. SU is subtle about it's right leaning tendancies. They hide it under a superficial lefty diversity shtick, but the themes of strength in war, the necessity of a stable mother/father family unit, and the importance of local community is very obvious once you see it.

wow really makes you think. the right seems like a whole bunch of degenerates.

>about it's right leaning tendancies.

*about its right leaning tendencies.

It's about a 13 year old memeboy who gets radicalised into switching off all capacity for empathy by a group of superpowered youtubers. Together they battle the reality-bending reptilian conspiracy.

>ke it TV-PG or TV-14 please.
look about the same, but characters suddenly have free will and are let to be unique and not devolve into bay sitting clones of a 8 year old retard

Instead of promoting love and peace, it promotes hate and war.

Finally a show that resonates with me

Dragonball

>warriors from the past who hold ancient values come to guard a fuccboi
youtube.com/watch?v=D3vhpk7DhZM

A Nazi, a randian, a hick, a Bible thumper and a CEO are drawn together by Goldman Sachs's trade supercomputer. They meet new people every week, and each time each of them presents a special lesson why accepting change of any sort is bad and that the only good thing about America is reruns of NCIS. When the villain appears, each one tries to defeat them- ashaved head lesbian Communist or community college transcript crybully with a black lawyer- alone before each of them realizes that only through their powers combined can they defeat them. As they all shout their battle cries, Jesus Christ- played by Tim Allen in his Santa Clause outfit- defeats them by yelling so angrily that his veins become tentacles that inject nanoscopic hot dogs into them, converting them into god fearing Christians from Idaho.

>ashaved

There won't be a SU of the right because the right would actually copy a good cartoon instead of stealing from a medicore show which can't even keep character sizes constant.

To continue, the show clearly has a right wing attitude towards weapons and their necessity for self defense. It shows business owners in a positive light, even showing the benefits of free competition, while politicians are shifty and ineffective.

The entire arc of Peridot is about an immigrant who learns to leave her old culture behind to integrate and assimilate to her new home.

>Each week George Soros transforms a Californian into a 300 ft tall welfare queen that can only be defeated by a giant Marlboro Man

A lot of right wingers are also pretty conservative so I'm pretty sure that wouldn't fly. The main girl would just stay at home and cook dinner in a full body denim dress for the men while they go out and save the day.

Alpha as fuck

It honestly wouldn't be *that* different. The relationships between the Gems would probably be more based off of Agape, Storge, and Philia instead of Eros but that is it.

Head, not crotch. Obviously.
Also I fucked up Transcript for Trans

This isn't even accurate. A good chunk of the GOP voter base is obese.

>A good chunk of the American voter base is obese

>"Lol this show has a genuinly nice main character and some gay characters. it also promotes love and peace. such a lefty show!"

"left wing" is now synonymous with being a nice person, and "right wing" is now synonymous with being an asshole.

>Jesus Christ- played by Tim Allen in his Santa Clause outfit

First laugh I've had on Sup Forums in awhile.

Well yeah, obviously, but red states in general contain the highest percentages.

>now

It's been that way since Nixon.

Good chunk? Try the whole fucking thing.
I mean, most Americans are fat, period. And while I hate to say "both sides" shit there isn't *really* all that much difference in being a fat piece of shit whining because "the government doesn't give me what I want" and being a fat piece of shit who delusionally claims "if it weren't fer the gubmint, I'd have what I want. Yessir, the gubmint is the only thing keeping me from being a millionaire like I deserve"

SU is actually pretty damn redpilled.

Steven Universe, but ironically and with everything cringeworthy or uncomfortable about the original dialed up to eleven. More Steven cross-dressing, or better, make him genderfluid and have him change his sex every episode depending on what he feels like that day. Have Stevonie date multiple people; ignore the implications. More rapey and sexually tense fusions. Lapidot. Have Greg reminisce about experimenting with guys. Make most townie couples same sex, and on top of that add polyamory and BDSM relationships. Portray Homeworld's human zoo as a lesson about how basic income will bring peace on Earth.

Once you start peeling away the upper layers, SU reads like a HFY thread on /tg/

SU is not conservative or right leaning. Just because you can talk yourself into delusion doesnt mean that was the creator's message.

This is really amusing to me. Please continue if you can.

Blame blacks - they have the highest obesity rate (by far) of any demographic in the US, and the south has the highest concentration of blacks outside of inner city Detroit/Chicago/Milwaukee

>Good chunk? Try the whole fucking thing.
That's how you know you're about to read a sensible and unbiased post written by someone speaking from an objective worldview.

>being this butthurt that we're so rich we can eat anything we want

>this again
His interpretation is clever, but forced. Pretty typical of film criticism, really.

Would unironically watch.

Thank the spics and niggers for that.
We are also having to take in people from mexico, another country with a morbid obesity rate.

ducktales.

>America is fat because of blacks XD
You can't be this retarded. you are just pretending to be stupid, right?

Which one of the protagonists should be a cute girl?

He has a point tho.

Sounds like an [as] comedy series.
I'd watch it.

>high T
>swole as all fuck
Is this supposed to be bad?
What's wrong with being an asshole? It is fun and attractive.

I dont really buy the idea that if you have female villains you're secretly socking it to those feminists. It just seems like the logical extension of the CG's origins.

It's neither fun or attractive. it's repulsive.

But what really makes it bad is that you are harming the people around you. a society that is built by assholes is objectively worse than a society that is built by nice people

It'd be every tropey, socially accepted cartoon released prior to 2007-2010 I guess.

Death of the Author, bitch.

The main characters' wives who stay at home, obviously. Except the one who shuns women and believes in MGTOW.

Oh that.
I agree. Even if the CG's origins are concerning, to say the very least.

I don't think very much needs to change, Steven Universe isn't very leftwing, it's just really fucking gay and poorly written.
As far as the villains are concerned homeworld is the almost perfect enemy for a right wing group, Centralized authority and planning, collectivism, generally anti-meritocratic. However a few things about them don't really put them against the right, they're an incredibly moral and conscientious group, two characteristics that are heavily correlated with right-wing ideology. This could change but it wouldn't be necessary considering even in SU they have left tendencies and are still enemies of the crystal gems.

The Crystal Gems themselves aren't very left-wing, they just have an nontraditional family structure, which isn't inherently leftist. The town of Beach City isn't leftist either, people work on their own accord and trade good and services, Steven was even able to start his own business without government shutting him down. Dewey does almost nothing to intervene in these market relationships that we've seen, so market regulation is very lax and people get along just fine. No one is starving on the street so they clearly aren't commies.
I can't think of anything that needs to change for SU to be more right-wing.
But I can think of plenty of things that need to change for the show to not be complete garbage but that's for another thread.
I know this is bait but.
Why would a nazi be in a right wing SU? Why would they be brought together by goldmans sachs which is a bigger supporter of the left? Why would they be against change, surely you realize being a reactionary is not inherently right wing, nor does encompass a significant portion of the right?
There goes the tripfag, at it again.

Isn't Garnet also a toxic, codependent relationship of a rock with anger and violence issues and another rock with sociopathic apathy?

I dunno. I can see the stuff by the end of the post about the show's stance on fatherhood being forced, but otherwise he seems to have a valid interpretation of the the show. Obviously not the creators' intentions, but still a valid takeaway.

>Shifty and ineffective
I won't argue with it but at least Dewey has enough perception and insight to realize someone has to keep the crazy shit in Beach City under wraps.

Not toxic, they come together and become more stable overall, their relationship benefits everyone but the viewer, who has to deal with how annoying they are unfused.

I shouldn't be replying to a tripfag but, are you actually fucking retarded? I mean, I know you are but jesus christ this is ridiculous.

>incredibly moral and conscientious group, two characteristics that are heavily correlated with right-wing ideology.

LMAO.
Holy shit you are delusional

Assholes are usually charismatic and attractive to most people. When people can choose between a strong horse and a weak horse, the choice is obvious.

Nice people give away their approval freely like common sluts. You must earn respect from an asshole.
Assholes created Rome, the Han Dynasty, and the United States of America.

Nice people create shitholes like Sweden or the Song Dynasty or the Soviet Union.

>implying it's not a lefty show
Didnt they have episodes talking about gender roles, an episode alluding to trans people, and of course the "Don't say rock people!" thing? Sounds pretty lefty to me

>Nice people give away their approval freely like common sluts.
I love this.

>confusing confidence for being an asshole

America was created by both assholes and nice people. that's why you have a constitution that protects your liberties - if america was made purely by asshole it would have been a fascistic nightmare.

The soviet union was made by assholes too, btw.

And also you are a delusional retard if you think Sweden is a "shithole" when they enjoy one of the highest quality of life in the world

>It's neither fun or attractive. it's repulsive.
Nah brah. You just don't get it cause you aren't a chick and only hang out with other betas. Try cutting loose some time.
>a society that is built by assholes is objectively worse than a society that is built by nice people
So go live around nice people. They won't mind you being an asshole so much and you'll look like a fucking Casanova next to their bland β selves.

It's true though.

Research has shown that conservatives give more to charity, lie less often, and have a weaker threshold for disgusting things. Liberals don't particularly believe in anything but generic feelgood empty words.

Nope.
There was just one epsiode where Steven dressed like a girl at end for a comedic effect, something that happened for comedy purposes for centuries user.

Also there wasn't an episode about "gender roles" and i don't get how saying they should be called Gems and not rock people is political in any way

...

>"Research has shown"
>Doesn't give any sources
Researches have also shown that people are lying in Sup Forums all the fucking time and making up fake researches that don't exist.

Aniway, Just go to Sup Forums for one hour, watch how right-wingers are casually advocating for genoicide, and come back.

Confident people are generally assholes, because they're unfettered by how others feel. This isn't a bad thing.
Soviet Union was founded by nice people who took their nice beliefs to the logical conclusion.

Sweden's social system was created by general pricks one generation removed from alliance with Nazis. It's a hellscape now with 3rd worlders terrorizing and destroying the place because everyone was too nice to say "fuck off".

Btw watch this articles, showing how conservatives are more likely to believe lies and falsehoods:

laweekly.com/news/conservatives-are-more-likely-to-believe-lies-ucla-research-says-7896216
latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-conservative-believe-false-threats-20170202-story.html

Megas XLR. Both feature obese nerdy protagonists who like professional wrestling, anime(Both even having blatant Harlock references), video games and food, and an ongoing conflict against an alien race. The difference is that quite a few problems in the show arise because Coop fucked up somewhere earlier in the episode, while Steven's problems are almost entirely based on either external threats acting purely on their own or another character(including his mother since even if Steven is just a reborn Rose with human DNA, he's an independent consciousness and personality).

Coop's solutions regularly involve using every bullet caliber, video game trick, and wrestling move known to mankind(and some known only to alienkind) in the most macho, tactically offensive and excessive fashions, while Steven uses racial superpowers and superhuman strength/agility powered purely by his emotions, and is geared towards a more defensive of supportive role in combat. Coop has also cried only for Comedic effect. All of the main characters have cried for drama at least once.(Except for Greg, he cries from his dick, that's why Steven was born). This probably isn't right wing Steven Universe, but it certainly is more "Steven Universe with more testosterone" or the other way around, since Megas came first.

What made the soviet union bad was corruption and abuse of power, which are inherently asshole qualities.

So fuck off, really. the soviet union was made by assholes, not by nice people

don't make shit up to make a point, they've never talked about gender roles on the show outside of one off jokes.

>implying the large groups of people that established these countries can easily be evaluated to be in one of two moral categories
>implying morality is not entirely subjective between perspective and time
>implying quality of life is both a statistic that is accurate for all citizens and not subjective to ideological or nationalistic bias of the population

>genuinly nice
Steven isn't nice, he's a naive retard. And the worl bow down to that shit instead of naturally evolving.

He is naive, but also genuinely nice.
The two terms are not contradictory.

there has literally *NEVER* been an episode about gender. The "don't say rock people" thing was very obviously a "nigga" joke (THAT'S OUR WORD), and I don't even know what you're talking about with trans people//

So they're moralfags who are ruining Sup Forums. Glad we can agree on something.

Morality is subjective philosophically, but practically you can treat morality as objective 99% of the time because generally speaking, most humans reason their morality behind what they think is better for human society

> homeworld is the almost perfect enemy for a right wing group, Centralized authority and planning, collectivism, generally anti-meritocratic.
But hierarchy is right-wing, too. The Homeworld is basically Fascist (no meme "fascist", but Mussolini Fascist). Whether you see them as right-wing should depend on whether you see the actual historical Fascists as right-wing, and opinions about that differ. On the right, Evola, von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, and basically every Catholic monarchist would call them left-wing, but Moldbug considers then right-wing, just mixed with lefty elements for that extra populist kick.

>i don't get how saying they should be called Gems and not rock people is political in any way
It's like how you shouldn't call blacks 'African Americans' anymore because it's insensitive.

Here's the part where you deny the validity of sociological research
"Conscientiousness
(OR = .37, p< .05) predicted a preference for center-right, whereas
Openness (OR = 2.42, p< .05) and Agreeableness (OR = 3.55,
p< .05) predicted a preference for center-left. "

Personality correlates of party preference: The Big Five in five big European countries
researchgate.net/publication/235763966_Personality_correlates_of_party_preference_The_Big_Five_in_five_big_European_countries

Other correlations like the one in [pic related] can be found here, correlating conservatism to a foundation based on purity, authority, achievement and low levels of hedonism
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042366

But honestly I shouldn't be doing your homework for you.

First of all i haven't seen anyone being against calling blacks "African Americans".

Second of all, the gems are objectively called "Gems" and not rock people. correcting a false terminology is not a political statement

Bismuth - Devoted Marxist with Stalinist sympathies
Steven - Social Democrat
Rose - Socialist
Pearl - Leninist
Garnet - Luxury Gay Space Communism
Amethyst - Trotskyist

forgot the pic
Fascist aren't right-wing, and considering hierarchy to be right wing makes the entire dichotomy of left vs. right non-descriptive considering that would make ideologies entrenched in hierarchy like stalinism right wing. The reason we conventionally include authoritarianism on a separate axis is because it's far more descriptive.

articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/31/business/la-fi-mh-conservatives-or-liberals-20140331
Liberals are more likely to donate charity to actual useful purposes, while conservatives mostly give charity to useless religious organizations.
Basically right-wingers are more likely to be brainwashed by religion. they aren't more moral, they are just more likely to believe falsehoods.

Watch the following studies, proving conservatives are more likely to believe propaganda and lies:
laweekly.com/news/conservatives-are-more-likely-to-believe-lies-ucla-research-says-7896216
latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-conservative-believe-false-threats-20170202-story.html

>correcting a false terminology is not a political statement
Y-yeah it kinda is under the right circumstances.

>tfw rightwing Trump voter who loves SU
what a fucking terrible idea for a thread, kys
and look at the rest of you, you don't even believe me because of your prejudices. Amazing.

>But honestly I shouldn't be doing your homework for you.
Okay, no. You're the one who brought up research without linking to anything. It's YOUR responsibility to back it up, not everyone else's.

There's a difference between being nice and naive. Leftists are naive but interpret it as kindness. More conservatives donate or volunteer to charities than leftists, who think wanting everyone to get taxed to give welfare means they're cheritiable.

I hope you are at least one of the people who realizes Trump is terrible but thought he is "not as bad as Clinton". i can respect you if that's the case.

Personally think Trump is even worse than Clinton though

I didn't say being naive and being nice are the same thing. Steven is both nice and naive.


Also, watch this:
articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/31/business/la-fi-mh-conservatives-or-liberals-20140331

Conservatives mostly donate to useless religious organizations while lefties donate money to actual useful purposes like scientific research

Objectively deciding morality based on whether it is intended to benefit the whole or the individual is still flawed on the basis that intentions do not equal results. Take for example virtually every attempt at communism, something that the majority intends to help the majority, and yet often leads to disaster. Are they morally better than those who act only for themselves but create beneficial results like a self centered employee? Would you feel they are the same morally both before and after the results of their actions? Would it not change depending on the sensibilities one was raised to uphold? Looking into it deeper may be considered "philosophical" but these details impact the practical decision on branding a person/group/country moral or immoral.

Morty. Steven is basically a Rickless Morty. As he never had Rick in his life, it allowed his empathy and naivette to run rampant turning Steven into the kid he is today.

Whereas Morty began as a loving person like Steven... he became a harsher and more practical person in later episodes.

>conservatives more likely to believe lies

>liberals believe in the gender wage gap, man made global warming, that taxing rich people will make you less poor, that all races are the same, that an education implies intelligence, that anything right wing is fascist when in actual fascism they would have been rounded up and shot ages ago.

Wew lad

He isn't even doing anything he said he would and is firing the people who believed in his campaign platform and elevating people whose beliefs are closer to Hilary's. Anyone who still supports him at this point is delusional. Trump's just yet another person who lied their way into office on a platform of change but is in fact maintaning the status quo. It's pretty funny he and his supporters hate Obama so much when he's proving to be the Republican Obama - Promising change but delivering none.

40k.

>Not just throwing your vote away by voting third party because it ultimately doesn't matter anyway.
I hear that red pill tastes like strawberry, you should go try it.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The only things I have issue with are his descriptions of the gems
Amethyst is closer to that cool sister than a mom and Garnet is less of a mother and more of a hermit guru up on a mountain

He's been in office in less than year and the the eo's he's tried to implement are blocked by leftist judges. Not to mention faggots like you in every corner trying to prevent him from doing anything because he hurts your fee fees and won't bring about the socialist utopia

Go back to Sup Forums, or least take off your trip before you shitpost.

Their intentions are moral, but the actual method they are using is not because it leads to a worse society.

What really should be done is a system of social democracy, which is a PROVEN system that is currently being implemented in many countries and it actually works.