How did they get away with this?

How did they get away with this?

Other urls found in this thread:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12206/full
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Slade did nothing wrong

>turning down jailbait
>not wrong on every level

no way fag

you can do a lot of shit when no one's looking
just like the majority of DC's direct to video market

Get away with a semi-faithful adaption?

...

>How did they get away with this?
By having it in a shit low-budget movie they knew no one was going to watch

She looks terrible. Like Kid Flash took a week of hormones and put on too much blush.

>She looks terrible. Like Kid Flash took a week of hormones and put on too much blush.

That's the point.

No, user, I don't think that's the point.

I think that's just a failure of design.

How long would Kid Flash have to take hormones to look like a qt trap, considering is turbo metabolism?

But it IS the point. You're supposed to see that she's an unlikable tryhard who isn't truly beautiful like the good girls on the team (Donna, Starfire, etc).

Do little girls are really sexually attracted to older men or this is a 'only happens in comics' kind of deal?

...

Why would you think it's just boys who are aroused by adults? Yes girls have crushes on movie stars and shit too.

then how come is a crime to go after little girls if they want it?

Wolfman and Perez literally said they tried to make her as unlikable as possible down to the design. This is 30 years old, I don't know why you're denying it.

The same reason it's a crime to go after boys. Their brains aren't properly developed yet.

This is really not particularly deep.

>Nowayfag.jpg

user, Wolfman/Perez Terra looks nothing like this

She looks far more attractive, actually.

Disagree, her hair is just smoother. Same awful makeup and all though.

Honestly, she looks bad in this scene because she was supposed to be a young girl in a bad situation, who has no clue what she's doing but wants to make her 'savior' happy.
She clearly doesn't know how to apply makeup, and has never had anyone but Slade (on purpose). Terra in the movie isn't as good as Terra in the show, but still. The directors got the creepy feel they wanted.

user please don't rape your little sister

There is literally nothing wrong with having consensual sex with a teenage girl

No she has much more of a bowl cut in the comics
And I'm pretty sure she's thicker

because kids are stupid and dont know any better. you are assuming the same demographic that, if given the choice, would eat pizza, cake, and ice cream for every meal, is capable of making sound, well-informed, mature decisions that benefit their well-being.

they're not. hell, even some adults aren't.

>Honestly, she looks bad in this scene because she was supposed to be a young girl in a bad situation, who has no clue what she's doing but wants to make her 'savior' happy.
but she looks just as ugly in every other scene

>she's thicker
Not really.

They clearly failed.

>crooked teeth

The point is her poor application of makeup makes her look way worse.

>hell, even some adults aren't.

>Look at 90% of 4chin

You're the guy with the 15yo gf, aren't you?

they are not closeminded bigotts like you thats how

>There is literally nothing wrong with having consensual sex with a teenage girl
Apart from exploitation, power imbalances, unequal mental (and physical) development, and just about every other fucking thing under the sun.

Christ I hope you're trolling.

What's the exploitation? Social "power imbalance" is no reason since that is not specific to age. Unequal mental development is also not specific to age. Teen girls have undergone puberty and are physically developed for reproduction.

Christ I hope you're trolling

>Implying you aren't.

>Implying you aren't.

>Unequal mental development is also not specific to age.
Actually it is.

Studies demonstrate relationships with young women and older men (about a 10 year difference) end up lasting longer and are overall more stable.

>people calling that design ugly

(((Studies)))

>Citation needed

Nope. The brain doesn't finish developing until 25, afer that point everyone's brain has developed differently. There are disparities in IQs, hormones, experiences, and more. Mental development is absolutely never equal, thus it is not a valid point unless your argument is that no-one ever should have sex because of mental developmental disparities.

There needs to be more porn of this Terra.

japanese marriage statistics

>[Citation needed]

>The brain doesn't finish developing until 25
>Unequal mental development is also not specific to age
THESE ARE TWO CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS.

No, they're not, and you've just demonstrated that you literally have no idea what you're talking about and are unwilling to even read the information I'm giving you.

Two people who are 25 years of age have two completely differently developed brains. Two people born the exact same second, even once their initial brain development is "finalized" around twenty five, still have different stages of brain development. I literally explained this clearly in the rest of the post.

So, unless you're going to make the argument that no-one ever should fuck eachother legally until they both can provide documented and notarized evidence that they have exactly equal IQs, hormonal distributions, life experiences, chemical balances, and etc, then basically you can fuck off because you're not going to be intellectually honest.

Probably because

Despite feminism, women still desire to emotionally and financially depend on men. It takes closer to 30 for an adult to fully mentally develop, and only older men can get good positions for a variety of reasons.

For women, childbirth is safer closer to their prime than it is even waiting till 30.

This user is at least right about 25 being the age the brain finally matures. Your brain isn't truly done cooking till your mid twenties, and your late twenties/thirties is where you feel like you're no longer an emotional wreck of a person.

>no, they're not
Yeah, they are.

No, they're not, and you've just demonstrated that you literally have no idea what you're talking about and are unwilling to even read the information I'm giving you.

Two people who are 25 years of age have two completely differently developed brains. Two people born the exact same second, even once their initial brain development is "finalized" around twenty five, still have different stages of brain development. I literally explained this clearly in the rest of the post.

So, unless you're going to make the argument that no-one ever should fuck eachother legally until they both can provide documented and notarized evidence that they have exactly equal IQs, hormonal distributions, life experiences, chemical balances, and etc, then basically you can fuck off because you're not going to be intellectually honest.

>no, they're not
Yeah they are.

Oh, look, a study that disagrees with you:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12206/full

If the brain finishes developing at 25 then that means they are inqequal mental developments specific to age. A 16 or 15 year old's brain wouldn't be as developed as a 21 year old's brain.

Can someone just post the NoWayFag.jpg instead of arguing about human development like virgins?

What's was that he saying about intellectual dishonesty?

Should be easy for you to make an argument for that position then haha I'll wait.

Not with anything I've said.

No because it's not going to be the same across person to person. One 16 year old can be at the phase aas another 20 year old, etc. I's not uniform. 25 is the "ballpark".

Which is all irrelevant anyhow since the argument was that mental developmental differences should bar sexual relationships, and if that's the case then all sexual relationships would be illegal until proven mentally equal. If you're not going to make an argument for that right now then I'll just accept your concession.

Let's argue about whether or not the judas contract is sexist.
>it is

She's 17 though we've been together since she was 16

Hi tumblr

and you are how old exactly?

You can't trick me, satan.

Are you still a virgin, user?

...

>Like Kid Flash took a week of hormones and put on too much blush
Yum

>unless your argument is that no-one ever should have sex

Seems valid.

this

Terra's the best.

They knew that no one cared for this Terra and that it was going to be an inferior adaptation compared to the masterpiece of the early 2000 cartoon.

What I'm getting is that it's morally wrong to have sex with someone who is dumber than or of a lower social status to you.

Because ????

True

These amuse me

It promotes racemixing

>pig nose

No, they're not, and you've just demonstrated that you literally have no idea what you're talking about and are unwilling to even read the information I'm giving you.

Two people who are 25 years of age have two completely differently developed brains. Two people born the exact same second, even once their initial brain development is "finalized" around twenty five, still have different stages of brain development. I literally explained this clearly in the rest of the post.

So, unless you're going to make the argument that no-one ever should fuck eachother legally until they both can provide documented and notarized evidence that they have exactly equal IQs, hormonal distributions, life experiences, chemical balances, and etc, then basically you can fuck off because you're not going to be intellectually honest.

>being against pedos now makes me an SJW

OVERTON WINDOW

Don't worry, user. That just makes pedophiles on Sup Forums autistic.

Nothing wrong with teens having sex as long as it's responsibly and the older person isn't in a position of authority.

23

Feminists trying to paint everything as rape, also trying to shit on other people's fun, also jealous of younger girls being more attractive

>everything I disagree with is pedo
You've got the mentality down at least

She looks way past pubescent, so it's a pass. I'd say it's consent, unless he groomed her before this.

>everything I disagree with is pedo

Dude, you don't get to change definitions because of your bullshit social theory.

Pedophile is pedophilia. It's fucking wrong for a reason. Even the most savage cultures acknowledge the problems with adult child relations, what the fuck.

>science denying
>pseduo-moral busybodying
>wants the state to intervene in personal lives
>hates people having fun
>hates people being attracted to objectively attractive characteristics

Yeah that's SJW for you.

originally he drugged her to make her evil so there's still no consent

This is the same kind of retard that complains about the left normalizing pedophilia.

But Islam is all about child marriage.

What about the religion of peace user?

>Pedophile is pedophilia. It's fucking wrong for a reason. Even the most savage cultures acknowledge the problems with adult child relations, what the fuck.
In the distant past it was the norm for adult men to marry teenage girls. Freshly post-pubescent women are what they're naturally attracted to.

Pedophilia is pre-puberty, hence why it is wrong. It is sexual activity before sexual development.

A teenage girl is sexually developed. You literally could not tell the difference between a sexually developed 13 year old and 20 year old, because the difference biologically does not exist.

The problem is not sex with teenagers, it's sex without commitment. Slut culture pushed by media in the West along with the destruction of the family has caused this. Ideally the father is in the home to protect the chastity of the daughter until she is married to a man who is then committed to supporting her and their children not just a pump and dump, ruining her potential for another man.

Anyone genuinely bitching about a cartoon character, especially one past puberty, getting porked needs a damned hobby.

Didn't they have more to do with mortality rates than attraction? But also at that base line marriage in general was more of a business transaction than an emotional thing.

When you're a teenager you want to have sex with other teenagers. You only stop feeling attracted to teenagers because you're socialized to do so on account of the consequences.

More to do with marriage being family building. Your options were limited to the people in your town and so you just had to try to pic the best person you could to try to make some kids and a life. Sometimes that meant lolis marrying grown men and then raising a rock solid "we only have eachother and we're dirt fucking poor" famjam together.

Life of old eh

>Slut culture pushed by media in the West
Uhhh buddy. I would consider fucking in public parks pretty slutty. I would consider higher AIDS rates to be pretty damning. Let's not even discuss casual sex being so casual that in parts of SE Asia a blowjob under the table can literally be on the menu, or the fact that one town had to be quarantined for having an above 90% HIV infection.

Don't blame the west for having more media influence when even China still has massive brothels.

No, siding with pedos makes you a SJW.
Some fuck heads are saying that it's immoral to punish these people and parents should allow it if both parts consent about that fucking shit sinful relationship.

I lived enough to see the kikes masterplan, but probably will not live enough to see it fulfilled.

>whataboutery

*yawn*

What happened to America? Even the Puritans were okay with marrying off their 14-year-old daughters. But now, being attracted to teenagers is considered mental illness and criminal and fucking a dude in the ass in considered some wonderful thing? Is this some government agenda to slow population growth?

lol

>it's the media's fault i can't fuck 13 year olds
kek

Yawn all you want. Blaming other people for your problems is laughable though.

>Blaming other people for your problems is laughable
Ironic.