ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/post-election-audits635926066.aspx
>States that require a post-election audit
"29 states and D.C. require post-election audits.
4 states have post-election audits under some circumstances.
17 states do not have post-election audits, but may conduct procedural audits as part of the post-election process."
>States That Don’t Have Mandatory Audits, But May Conduct Them Under Certain Circumstances
Idaho, Indiana, Nebraska, Virginia
>States That Don’t Provide in Statute for Audits
Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota and Wyoming.
------------
Key States "That Don’t Provide in Statute for Audits"
Georgia
Iowa
Michigan
-
freepress.org/article/why-can’t-nation-left-deal-election-theft
>Why Can’t the Nation & the Left Deal with Election Theft?
"There is no way to verify the official tally on the electronic machines on which the majority of Americans will vote this fall. Nearly all the machines are a decade old, most are controlled by a single company (ES&S, owned by Warren Buffett) and the courts have ruled that the software is proprietary, making the vote counts beyond public scrutiny. In fact, they are beyond all independent monitoring altogether. In many key swing states (including Ohio, Michigan, Iowa and Arizona) GOP governors and Secretaries of State will have a free hand to flip the vote count to whatever they want it to be without detection or accountability. This could turn control of our government come November, as it did in 2000 and 2004. "