Mfw Shadman has single-handedly got me into watching Star Vs

>mfw Shadman has single-handedly got me into watching Star Vs

I'm so gay for Marco now.

Other urls found in this thread:

nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/question-unauthorized-use-of-photo-28285.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Is Shadman the patron saint of / co /?
Should we erect some statues?

>no bulge

God, Shadman is a hack.

...

More like a daedra

He's 14 years old you sick fuck.

>Is Shadman the patron saint of / co /?

No, that's Plague of Gripes.

He's a drawing

>Not posting the one with the bare nipples
Fag

...

>complaining about 14 year olds being sexualised
>on an image board that regularly sexualises lolis

Nigga get you're priorities straight

Bare nipples Marco woul actually be completely safe to post since Marco is a boy.

It would be hilarious if op got banned though.

...

I can complain about both.

Of a 14 year old boy.

Begone Moralfag. You have no Power here.

hips are too wide

Marco is a trap, not a tranny on hormones.

He's a shitty bandwagoner who'll suck any fandom's dick for exposure, to make up for his awful art. Objectively amongst the most insufferable yet popular porn artists around.

Small penis is a thing among trannies.

If you saw a drawing of a teen getting beat up would you also feel the same sense of moral outrage because after all my god it's a poor teenager getting abused

>He's a shitty bandwagoner who'll suck any fandom's dick for exposure
How is this any different from any other porn fanartist? Just admit you find him insufferable because he's popular.

but the character's not a tranny
he was just forced into drag in 2 different episodes

He's a cunt

I really hate his art style and I hate it more when he tries using it to draw these simplistic shows
it makes it look like he's rubbing grease over the screen while I'm watching it

but regardless, it doesn't help that, as an artist, he almost never does anything really original anymore

and lastly, i find him insufferable because he does fucking pinups of real life children

Reminder that it's literally canon that Marco is a trap for cash

>is shadman the patron saint of Sup Forums

The patron saint of pestilence and decay, maybe. His artstyle is like a 2D version of the fucking Polar Express CGI movie.

>pestilence and decay,

That sounds like Sup Forums

If he was nice (and popular), you would still hate him.

>and lastly, i find him insufferable because he does fucking pinups of real life children
Look at this bleeding heart. I'm sure your outrage makes all those irl kids feel much better. Oh wait, they don't care.

>and lastly, i find him insufferable because he does fucking pinups of real life children
I can agree with others but this is just dumb. Stop being such a little faggot.

Hi Shad! No, I dislike you because you're the Seth McFarlane of porn. You're a one-trick pony who relies too heavily on shock value and pre-existing, popular things for a quick buck, you terrible art looks like everything is soaked in rubbing oil, and the prime reason you're well-known is simply due to the sheer number of low effort drawings you constantly pump out. Oh, and your fetish for trashy-looking girls and fishnets is pathetically vanilla compared to the "depraved pedophile" act you put up.

Do you even enjoy what you do? Everything about your drawings just comes off as tryhard and hollow.

>too cool to object to IRL child pornography

wow so edgy

>a group of lines on a piece of paper are a child

...

...

o look, the shadman idf is here

Shad like every single artist ever started out with really shit drawings. The thing was that they were edgy and it got peoples attention, and his art quality did improve overtime and is acceptable for being free. A lot of Sup Forums are still being pissy little fags over a few totally spies snuff pieces he did years ago. After that is when the shadman is shit meme started, because Sup Forums loves totally spies.

Really I think he should go back into more variation. Everything became a bit stagnate when he cut back on the rape, racism, beastiality and snuff, and focused primarily on traps, loli, and futa.

Bullshit, My girlfriends dick is bigger than mine.

>(((girl)))friend

That's .... Pretty accurate actually

If they picture has no other context I would definitely think "What the fuck is wrong with the person who drew this?"

>Shadai, Daedric Lord of Lust
I'm down

Would you be comfortable finding out somebody has been drawing pornography depicting you or someone you know?

how did you edit the video?

user, I...

Beat me to it

>Making people uncomfortable is equivalent to rape
Maybe this isn't the place for you.

>He's never tried to get with a trap only to get sodomized by their enormous dick

You haven't lived life

it's a gif. use photoshop, and edit the frames

I thought they already had a daedra of rape and lust. And yes I know they're spirits and shit is just territory.

I thought Shadman would a be a servant of Slaanesh, not Nurgle.

It's different when it's a fake character, user. But when it's an actual child? That's invading someones privacy and rights and isn't protected in any way or form.

Doesnt happen. Traps have tiny dicks due to hormones and shit. Unless you go for those disgusting big shemales.

>implying Sup Forums isn't a battalion of Khorne

Nobody derives pleasure from or desires Shadman's trash, and the ones that do should be hanged, drawn and quartered

>That's invading someones privacy
Incorrect, the person can live oblivious of it's existence and it wouldn't even matter. It's only an issue if you make it one, like the Striesand effect.

>>implying Sup Forums isn't a battalion of Khorne
That's Sup Forums.

>Traps
>Hormones
You stupid or something? Traps are literally just VERY convincing cross-dressers, that's why they're called traps. They don't use hormones because they aren't trans.

>daedra of rape and lust
Molag Bal and Sanguine respectively

more like daedric lord of triggering everyone everywhere somehow

You don't have to edit each individual frame since the scene itself doesn't seem to move, only jerry. Creating one frame anchored above the rest with the text should work.

>implying there can't be more than one board dedicated to Khorne

This board engages in flamewars and heated arguments by the day, it's about as devoted a battalion as you can get

Quit this nonsence
Post more Marco (female)

This is some gay shit.

JUST DRAW STAR ALREADY YOU FUCKING PIECE OF DOGSHIT

It is invading their privacy lmao. It isn't parody and is deemed as child pornography at that point anyway and is in the hands of the prosecutor on whether or not they see it as bothersome enough to take to court. Dafne Keen definitely didn't care about some shitfuck drawing porn of her, but when taken to court there is no way or form you are going to argue that it isn't invading ones privacy. You or others aren't ones to say whether or not these people feel that it invades their privacy, only the ones being drawn have a say in this.
And if a person sees the work as offensive/not a work of parody, and is used without their permission, they have the right to make a case of it, since they themselves are their own person and can control how they are being portrayed, if nowhere near truthful/or doesn't have a true purpose behind it. It would require cultural, artistic, or intrinsic value to fall under parody laws, and I don't think an actual underage child acting in sexually explicit ways, rubbing against microphones, has any of those attributes, even subjectively.

...

This

>That's invading someones privacy and rights

Privacy laws only work when you have a "reasonable expectation of privacy"; ie are in a residence or restroom. If the source is from a video or image uploaded via the individual they have voided their own rights to privacy.

Hell yeah, that my boy!

I wish Blargsnarf would draw vanilla, why is it every time there's a super talented on model western porn artist they have to have some sort of extreme fetish that inserts itself into all of their work?

Sup Forums's as Nurgle as you get. Decadent, constantly whinging about better days, both in regards to the board's media it consumes and the board itself, but never getting any shit done. Hell, our primary interests are capes and cartoons, some of the biggest slaves to status quo around.

Since when are we talking about fictional characters to an actual person? Also, that case didn't happen, they just took down the picture, that's all. No lawsuits of any kind.

There was a case where someone was suspect for murder, they checked his computer and they saw pics of anime lolis but since they are fictional they didn't arrest him.....so I don't know what you're trying to prove here but it shows how much of a moron you are.

People seem to have forgotten the original definition. I looked on r/traps once and found that a bunch of the posts were trannies.

You're confusing laws for real life images taken in public, where that would not apply, with laws that protect against defamation, invasion of privacy, etc.
>nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/question-unauthorized-use-of-photo-28285.html
>"You can stop a website's use of your image for three reasons: invasion of privacy, violation of right of publicity, or defamation.
Invasion of privacy can occur if you are portrayed falsely and in a highly offensive manner..."
and at this point it already is deemed as actual child porn, so that would be the main course of taking it to court anyway.

>"incorrect, the
>person..."
since you did that. i've already said the issue is drawing an actual child and not fake shit. no one gives a fuck and a case can't be made for it. and they had met at a legal agreement for no more copies, photos, images, kept up the image, or created or distributed by him or he would face criminal charges.

Is this a good prayer?

St. Shadman, glorious edgelord, faithful servant and intime friend of Slaanesh, the name of these fags on Sup Forums has caused you to be hated by many, but the true Sup Forumsmarde invokes you universally as the Patron of drepaved things, lolis with piercings, rimjobs and big futa dicks; pray for me, that finally I may receive the consolations and the succor of Heaven in all my necessities, tribulations, and sufferings, particularly do not to let the police and Chris Hansen find me. Bless Slaanesh. Futa aren't gay. Amen.

>Ode to an e-celeb
>A mediocre porn artist, to boot
Neck yourself, you pathetic faggot.

formerly chuck

...

>His artstyle is like a 2D version of the fucking Polar Express CGI movie.
kek

Sup Forums is more like Zuvassin

>Zuvassin is an enemy of all of Chaos, even including the other Renegade Gods, but it has been known for him to ally himself with another of the Gods of Chaos in order to thwart another's plans; for example, he might decide to aid the forces of Khorne in conflict with those of Slaanesh, (or vice-versa), if one of the Chaos Gods has a scheme which looks like it can't fail.

>Zuvassin is the patron of those who desire to use his powers to sabotage or undo something. All those who follow him find their plans going wrong in the process.

user, he's probably gonna hand that part over to his friend J-something or other and she'll get dicked by 2 foot long nigger dicks.

Nah, Sup Forums's hardcore Khorne: people on here wage verbal war about the stupidest shit here all the time. Nurgle-aligned Sup Forums would just have depression circlejerks about a range of stuff, which, in my experience, is fairly uncommon.

Traps ARE trans 99% of the time, user. It's the truth.

Sexual art portraying an irl minor is in fact considered child pornography you retards, loli/shota is different because the character doesn't exist and the age can be debated plus with artstyle it gets confusing, though it's still illegal in some places anyway. They're not the same thing at all. Not all people who like shota/loli are also disgusting pedos who like irl children. Shadman is.

Is that the one that /tg/ figured out to be just George Costanza or is that the atheist one

Yea but if he did his regular treatment aka foot armpit asshole and smell fetish stuff I'd probably never be able to have kids due to damage to my peen.

I couldn't hate him more.

tucking

This is one of the better things he has done lately. Would stick it in his butt for sure.

>portrayed falsely and in a highly offensive manner

The law works differently if you are in the public eye. This is why the New Yorker or Onion can make cartoons depicting someone as a racist or insulting them without their consent. Youtube celebs, movie celebs, and political figures all have pretty much lost the majority of their rights to privacy.

I haven't browsed /tg/ in years, but probably the atheist one. It'd make sense for him to sabotage his followers' beliefs.

>god of sabotaging plans
>his worshipers like sabotaging other people's plans
>he sabotages his worshipers plans

Doesn't that mean that his worshipers won't succeed in their sabotage? Chaos is so self-defeating.

The difference is that The Onion or other sites similar to it have an artistic value i.e. comedy, and falls under parody laws.
>shadman's
porn doesn't because it doesn't have that or any of the other three properties that allow it to apply for parody. His Jake Paul drawing can and should, because it has more of an artistic and cultural (youtube) value than his smut/porn. Take a step back and think; does his artwork of a child on youtube have any cultural, artistic, or intrinsic value? And the fact that it falls under child pornography laws immediately disallows the 1st Amendment and any laws that fall under it.

There is already a crossdressing thread, you didn't need to make a thread for this.

But Shadman is.

it's okay if she has a feminine penis

go be a gay somewhere else fag

I told you guys to ignore him and he will go away. Hes our monster now, we made him.

Yes, Shadman has drawn sexual pictures of irl minors, he's a pedophile.

Sick son of a bitch.

>artistic value
So entirely subjective based on personal preference.

>does his artwork of a child on youtube have any cultural, artistic, or intrinsic value?

Yes art is subjective so even a painting or video of a dog humping another dog while it takes a shit is still art.

>drawing are real crimes
why aren't all cape artists in prison for murder?

Artistic means any form of expression of creativity. I don't think that you or others should think that drawn child pornography even remotely has that attribute, nonetheless, in a court of law the defendant (shadman) would put forth whatever value it has and attempt to defend that point. From what he says, the judge and jury are going to judge him on it. Guess what the majority opinion is likely going to be?

See , this is a different situation. Don't use shitty strawmen either, user. Not good form.