Sandersfag here. I've been avoiding the election as much as possible the last few months but before I vote, I want to know - what's the most objectionable quote or two that's come out of Hillary's email scandals?
Can you guys help me out here? What's the worst actual content of what she's said?
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
archive.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
mostdamagingwikileaks.com
wikileaks.org
vaskal.ca
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
twitter.com
"As we all know the initiation rite to enter the establishment is to be filmed molesting a child so the jewish elders can blackmail you into promoting open borders but all we want is the money and power so we agreed"
seems legit
>worrying about what she SAID
I mean she basically turned the state department into her own little racketeering factory but sure worry about what she SAID, because who cares about what she actually did
ok, well then the worst email out there that shows she "did" stuff, whatever. I'm really just asking what the content around the scandal is
In my opinion it was the "We discovered Japan" and "We will ring China in the sea".
twitter.com
archive.org
Also, since you are a sandersfag I recommend looking at TYT Politics coverage of the e-mails. Jordan lays out very concrete examples of them shafting Sanders like moving the debates to bad times and trying to move primaries to favor Hillary.
>most objectionable quote
>>You Need Both A Public And A Private Position
Hillary Clinton practicing quantum politics
Just looking at her causes her to change positions
There is no "smoking gun". The collective evidence together points to only one reasonable conclusion: Hillary Clinton was at the center of a global crime ring specifically designed to make money off the corruption of American politics and the selling of American interests.
Literally anything you can think of. Hillary campaign asking to oversample polls in 2008, Obama emailing her with a fake name, bill Clinton memo on how to make profit with the foundation, how she wants open borders, how she hates everyday Americans.
Look at what Hillary thinks of you.
Pic related.
I don't want to wade through the two long-ass links, what in particular do you feel is bad in there. I don't like the hawkishness about China though.
can you elaborate more?
I'd rather make that judgment for myself based on direct evidence, thanks. What you got for me?
pro-tip, it's not a sanders guy.
This is a "show me some email shit, oh you can't? looks like I win' thread.
Too bad it's easy to just start posting shit.
But to answer your question, this.
They conspire to write a fraudulent job ad to frame Trump for sexual harassment.
Dude, we aren't here to spoonfeed you.
All this has been featured on the wikileaks twitter.
twitter.com
...
unaware and compliant citizenry is what got me the most furious.
OP, if you actually read the emails, much of it is boring, or stuff you'd expect any political candidate to take part in. Posters here have done their best to make a mountain of every anthill, but in reality, any politician who had their emails shared publicly would have their reputations damaged. Politics is a very nasty business.
this is actually kind of hilarious desu
can you get me those quotes?
hey man, what better place to easily find all the worst stuff than from people who are keeping track of it? I ain't got time to wade through all the bullshit.
>privilege checked
t-thanks
BAD GOY. YOU KNOW TOO MUCH AND ARE TOO REBELLIOUS.
She had special access programs (pieces of extremely classified information on a need to know basis) on her server that she didn't even have the authority to see herself. It's actual high treason.
I personally am a fan of the "I dream of the West without borders"
actually looking at this link, this is the most useful thing so far in the thread, thanks
now THAT is an interesting quote.
It says in a leaked email that she knew Saudi Arabia and Quatar are supporting ISIS, yet she still took money from them
Here's a couple good things to know as a Bernie supporter:
Donna Belize gave her questions to a debate ahead of time. When called out recently, she said it's absurd to have expected the DNC should be neutral.
Hillary's campaign also paid "mentally ill" homeless people, trained them in conflict escalation, and incited violence at Trump events, including a big one in Chicago leading to the injury of two police officers. Then she framed you for it
Do you work for CNN?
ha! no.
For someone of your persuasion (Socialist) it would probably be the speech she gave the finance heads that the transcript finally leaked for in which she told them she hates common americans and she has public and private positions on everything. AKA She sides with them in private and gets hundreds of millions from them, and in public she denounces them as corrupt.
having a public and private position? means i'll tell people one thing and do something completely different. if you want to speculate what influences her decisions look at the countries "donating" to her foundation. last time i checked saudis aren't too concerned with the welfare of the west. there is literally no reason to "donate" other than to have influence over her decisions.
...
it's a compilation of evidence and dot connecting that goes to show that she MAY have some corruption issues
I stress the "may" because she hasn't been charged with anything yet
Aside from the corruption allegations, the way she presents herself when asked about said allegations, along with the attempts by her own campaign managers to spin news stories shows how dishonest she really is.
Donna Brazile even fed her town hall questions to give Hillary an advantage over Bernie. The video of Brazile defending herself with Megyn Kelly is horrendously funny and I suggest watching it.
Also, the DNC actively propped up Hillary against other candidates in order for her to win the primaries.
All of this combined tells me that the Democratic party, in its current state, cannot be trusted with anything, and should not be given any power in government until they come clean with everything, which will never ever happen.
he's talking about the phrase "everyday Americans"
I think the one we're they're criticizing the failed migrant policies in Germany and talking about how the Muslims turn to a life of crime as early as the age of seven.
It was pretty damning that they know the people won't integrate into western society and leech off the system and yet are still pushing to bring a million of them in to get a larger voting base.
wikileaks.org
this one is pretty damning, either you accept the information in the email as true, in which case the DNC is knowingly promoting a policy that will directly harm Americans. Or you ignore the facts, in which case this email becomes "very racist and highly problematic."
I'm already aware politicians are two-faced, thanks. It is interesting to me that she respects/fears an engaged public. That suggests that activism can still influence her, although I might be reading that in to her statements.
it does seem like a lot of the worst stuff presented so far is of the "no shit, she's a politician" variety. I'm still looking through stuff though.
have a blast
vaskal.ca
>can you elaborate more?
Pretty self explanatory.
In public you say what the focus groups tell you give the best results, in private you do what you are paid to do by Wall Street.
>no shit, she's a politician
why do you think we've stood behind a non-politician for the last year and a half?
She said Sandersfags are deplorable and should consider offing themselves for the good of mankind. I'm inclined to agree. What say you, OP?
Ultimately, there isn't anything amazingly damning in the emails if you're not a naive idiot.
A politican does politican shit, isn't always honest about what their real position is to the public, and has shady ties to people who have contrary objectives.
I'm not even pro-Hillary, but come on. If any of this shocked you, if any of this surprised you, I'm sorry but you're fucking stupid.
“But If Everybody's Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room
Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To
Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”*
CLINTON: You just have to sort of figure out how to -- getting back to that
word, "balance" -- how to balance the public and the private efforts that
are necessary to be successful, politically, and that's not just a comment
about today."
>(((undecided)))
Why should we spoonfeed you? You're obviously a pathetic numale cuckold. If you still haven't figured out why Hillary is the most corrupt person to run for office, you're out of your mind.
>In public you say what the focus groups tell you give the best results, in private you do what you are paid to do by Wall Street.
this
it's not like it's the difference between saying "hardworking Americans" and "hardworking citizens"
it's literally a complete 360 on her policies, and the fact that she KEEPS trying to do damage control is cowardly
>If any of this shocked you, if any of this surprised you
see
Every politician in the USA in the past 100 years did exactly that and only that.
see
>can you elaborate more
That's what the debate moderator asked her, she replied by saying she saw a film directed by her good friend (((Steven Spielberg))) and that Lincoln was a two-faced politician.
You are on pol, scroll down you lazy hipster douche
Taking money from and giving weapons to people you know are terrorists that want to destroy america isn't damning?
>can you elaborate more?
To put it shortly.
She will tell you about fighting with TTIP because you hate it but sign it without a glimpse of regret.
Same goes for many other issues.
regardless, she still actively opposes (given her speeches) the very things her party tries to stand for
I actually agree with her on some of her stances on issues from the leaked speeches. Doesn't change the fact that she's a liar.
The one where she admits she knows Saudi Arabia and Qatar are supporting ISIS and Al Qaeda
Generally speaking it's not a complete 180 turn for most politicians.
With her it's a loud "I HATE WALL STREET" while at the same time being funded by Wall Street at record breaking levels.
sounds sort of like you guys think this is the most damaging one? I'm sort of of the mind that this is a function of our current political system, not something specific to Hillary. Seems like trump does the same shit, anyways.
where was that one again?
Also, she knows who is funding ISIS, blatantly says so in her e-mails, and still takes money from those exact same people, and supplies arms to those exact same people.
When Trump said something along the lines of she started and supplies ISIS, it wasn't hyperbole.
You're talking about Ronald Reagan and Oliie North, right? Because they did just that. Let's make America great again!
No, they don't all do that.
Many politicians bend, sugar coat, their positions for the audience.
Hillary Clinton changes position for the audience.
Reading through Wikileaks emails there are several times it gave her staff conniption fits.
Clinton has public and private positions but also FBI positions, congressional investigation positions.....etc
Hell, Clinton even has different positions for her staff.
They were blindsided by the FBI investigation because she told them it was all taken care of.
Trump is better? He isn't working for Wallstreet, he IS Wallstreet.
she verified that she knew Saudi Arabia was providing arms and finances to Sunni terrorist groups at the time she approved a huge weapon's sale to them.
She's a war profiteer, her aspirations are to create large scale armed conflict. Don't elect her please.
>Hourglass
Why is there no Wikileaks-tan yet?
>where was that one again?
Qatar and Saudi arabia, she says in her emails she knows they are supplying and funding ISIS, but they give her foundation tens of millions of dollars and she authorizes arms shipments to both of them a few months later anyway.
wikileaks.org
Why is all of Wall Street against him then?
> flag
Don't bother replying
“I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake,” said Sen. Clinton. “And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.”
Who's to say she doesn't have a third, even more private opinion that aligns with a different agenda altogether? What if she's not only lying to the American people, but to the people who pull the stings as well?
>her plans may be even worse than her private speeches entail
you're being a retard
Trump wants to be president to make money for himself, that may at the end cost the Amerifat citizens less than Hitlary.
This.
Abandon thread. Look at OP's comment right above.
>I don't want to wade through the links you posted
Followed by
> please give me more information
Just another slide thread.
Abandon thread
He's literally the farthest thing from corrupt there is. He wouldn't even take money from the saudis if they sent it to his tower in cash with no return address
or maybe she has actual plans that are even better than the plans she told two different audiences?
the point is, I don't trust her
Now you're just making shit up jewboy.
Maybe he was before he turned against them, but the money loudly and clearly speaks for itself, and much louder than words.
Trump's name doesn't even show up on the lobbyist list because he doesn't get lobbyists.
www.opensecrets.org
>looks at a mountain of shit so high it shadows Mt.Everest
>Yeah but show me one quote that says she did something wrong
Hide sage report
C........T........R
I was implying they were even worse...
yeah but what if they are even better?
it doesn't matter, she can't be trusted
Let me reiterate just for the jewish and unskilled readers among us.
Trump has received NO Wall Street lobbyists.
I doubt any president since the establishment of Wall Street can claim that.
Nope she hates Americans. At least she does privately. Publicly she loves whoever will vote for her.
How did that Hitlary dudess got $88M?!
you're retarded if you think providing a huge amount of text and a 35 minute youtube video without context or citing a specific area is equal to providing information
quantity of information != quality
Ronald Reagan is running for president now?
Thanks ctr good insight, english major paying off
Just look at the best of wikileaks site posted above, it's summarized to a few sentences per leak, if you're unwilling to read that much you're a lost cause.
Kill yourself you ADD faggot
>just looking at her causes her to change positions
“But If Everybody's Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room
Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To
Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”
Also if you live in a state that allows write-ins for Bernie, do it.
already saw it and yes, that's a great source
>I'm a nigger with nothing else to do with my life
not all of us can be friendless shut in NEETs with endless time to wade through what is undoubtedly 90% bullshit filler to try and figure out what the hell some anonymous person on a chinese checkers board feels is upsetting about it
again, you're retarded if you think that sort of thing is anything other than shitposting
She rigged the election against Bernie Sanders, so she essentially STOLE the election.
Need anything more?
I honestly don't see any strong evidence that she did anything other than politically outmaneuver him. I knew bernie was going to lose pretty early on though so I had low expectations. Still, it's not like he's not campaigning for her now, and as a result of his candidacy he built something of a movement which had some real effects on Hillary's policies (well, supposedly).
Still wish he was VEEP, but majority leader would maybe be even better though.
Then you are incredibly naive.
Incredibly.
The evidence is out there, and it's contained in the Wikileaks.
Aside from that,
Actions corroborate it too.
You are so blinded by loyalty to the Two Party System, Republicans vs Democrats, that you can't see that.
Why don't you join us and become an INDEPENDENT, and things will become more clearer.
There is nothing that says you have to support either party.
Shills back?
I don't think I'm naive, exactly. Obviously the DNC preferred Hillary - but the thing is, the democratic party is a private organization, and obviously they have certain preferences and will act on them. They'll also act based on political expediency (like in 2008 when Obama beat out Hillary). If Bernie had done better, faster, they'd have fallen in line behind him, too. Didn't work out this time, bernie was outmaneuvered - or whatever you want to call it - but I'm not sure I saw enough evidence to say that the fundamental problem wasn't simply that he was outvoted by the public in the dem primaries.
I'm already past the two party system, intraparty politics is the real battlefield. The presidential election was already determined long ago (by demographics and current popular mood, I mean).
Every day there's something new.
It went under the radar, but yesterday a tape was released where she comments on interfering with elections in Palestine.
After all the accusations of Trump working with foreign entities to influence the election, she's the one on tape actually doing it.
I think you are getting confused on the word, Rigging.
When we say rigged, we actually mean manipulate.
The election was manipulated against Bernie.
And you just agreed that the DNC did manipulate the election against Bernie.
How is that fair again?
In a fair election, Bernie wouldn't have gotten "outmaneuvered".
Know why?
Because the media would have given him fair air time.
Except I saw how the Media almost never covered his speeches.
That's fair?
The fact that the DNC itself didn't want Bernie, instead they wanted Hillary to be elected....
How is that fair?
Believe it or not, there are people who are still sheeps and will listen to EVERYTHING that the media tells them, that the DNC party tells them.
That's why Bernie lost.
To someone that isn't biased, and who doesn't have an alliance to any party like me, it's pretty clear why Bernie lost.
Bernie was against the Establishment, and yet Hillary Clinton (the quintessential establishment candidate), had insider help from the media AND the DNC in her favor.