Was is Sup Forums s opinion on this Huffington Post election forecast?

I personally think it's a little out there for probabilities sake, but discuss

> huffington post
> glorified blog

Huffington post isn't news. It's just a waste of bandwidth.

>private company
>private
>can say whatever it wants

I can only imagine what sort of shit they'll spew out when Trump is elected.
>Huffpost guide for niche knots.
>Huffpost: An expose on carbon monoxide.
>The Art of Cult Suicide

>She actually made gains since yesterday

Huffle Snuffle, everyone!

huffpo is a dem mouthpiece. Liberal version of Drudge

They're catering to their audience. Nothing to see here, move along.

>wrong.

All these simulations are relying on 2 historical things:

1. More Women voting than men

2. More people are Democrats than Republicans (by about 4 percent).

It's Huffington Post

Bob Creamer and Foval write for HuffPo

Zero credibility

Shyeeet thanks for the red pill on Huff Po.

I was curious why there was so much left-wing content on it.

>more of this shit

Don't suppose you have (((Nate Silver)))'s dozens of articles on why Trump will lose right?

Kek

>All these simulations are relying on 2 historical things:
>1. More Women voting than men
>2. More people are Democrats than Republicans (by about 4 percent).


She would not win like that even if ONLY Democratic women were voting.

Someone post the huffpost staff image

> Kek laughs at thier ignorance

Anybody save the Huff posts "WTF FBI?" headline. Shit was cash

here's BAIT (((silver)))

Appreciate it, my dude.

I sadly don't but I still have this one.

No problem. Everytime that kike lies about Donald Trump, more of it's hair falls out.

They said Brexit would be a landslide defeat.
They said Trump had a 1% chance of being nominated.
I'm not going to believe this kind of nonsense until I see it happen.

2/10 fun level ...