I personally think it's a little out there for probabilities sake, but discuss
Was is Sup Forums s opinion on this Huffington Post election forecast?
> huffington post
> glorified blog
Huffington post isn't news. It's just a waste of bandwidth.
>private company
>private
>can say whatever it wants
I can only imagine what sort of shit they'll spew out when Trump is elected.
>Huffpost guide for niche knots.
>Huffpost: An expose on carbon monoxide.
>The Art of Cult Suicide
>She actually made gains since yesterday
Huffle Snuffle, everyone!
huffpo is a dem mouthpiece. Liberal version of Drudge
They're catering to their audience. Nothing to see here, move along.
>wrong.
All these simulations are relying on 2 historical things:
1. More Women voting than men
2. More people are Democrats than Republicans (by about 4 percent).
It's Huffington Post
Bob Creamer and Foval write for HuffPo
Zero credibility
Shyeeet thanks for the red pill on Huff Po.
I was curious why there was so much left-wing content on it.
>more of this shit
Don't suppose you have (((Nate Silver)))'s dozens of articles on why Trump will lose right?
Kek
>All these simulations are relying on 2 historical things:
>1. More Women voting than men
>2. More people are Democrats than Republicans (by about 4 percent).
She would not win like that even if ONLY Democratic women were voting.
Someone post the huffpost staff image
> Kek laughs at thier ignorance
Anybody save the Huff posts "WTF FBI?" headline. Shit was cash
here's BAIT (((silver)))
Appreciate it, my dude.
I sadly don't but I still have this one.
No problem. Everytime that kike lies about Donald Trump, more of it's hair falls out.
They said Brexit would be a landslide defeat.
They said Trump had a 1% chance of being nominated.
I'm not going to believe this kind of nonsense until I see it happen.
2/10 fun level ...